American Congregational Giving Study, Congregational Profiles, 1993

• Summary
• Codebook
• Search
• Download
• Results

CSLKEY2 (Weighted by WEIGHT) Did your congregation sponsor a before- or after-school "latchkey" program? If YES: Was the latchkey program self-supporting, or did it require a subsidy?   1) It was self-supporting.   2) It provided a surplus to the congregation. Amount:   3) It required a subsidy.

Pie Chart Bar Chart Cumulative Bar Chart

Category	Frequency	Percentage	Cumulative Percentage
It was self-supporting.	37	71.2%	71.2%
It provided a surplus to the congregation. Amount:	4	7.7%	78.9%
It required a subsidy.	11	21.2%	100.1%
Missing	573	%	%

Variable Comparisons

Religious preference Region Year founded Church membership Place of residence

Religious preference (I-DENOM)

	Assemblies of God	Southern Baptist	Catholic	ELCA	Presbyterian (U.S.A.)	TOTAL
It was self-supporting.	83.3% 5	75.0% 3	80.0% 20	42.9% 3	54.5% 6	69.8% 37
It provided a surplus to the congregation. Amount:	16.7% 1	0.0% 0	12.0% 3	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	7.5% 4
It required a subsidy.	0.0% 0	25.0% 1	8.0% 2	57.1% 4	45.5% 5	22.6% 12
Missing	119	121	101	118	114	573
TOTAL	100.0% 6	100.0% 4	100.0% 25	100.0% 7	100.0% 11	53

Region (I-REGION)

	Northeast	Midwest	South	West	TOTAL
It was self-supporting.	58.3% 7	50.0% 5	86.7% 13	78.6% 11	70.6% 36
It provided a surplus to the congregation. Amount:	0.0% 0	20.0% 2	0.0% 0	14.3% 2	7.8% 4
It required a subsidy.	41.7% 5	30.0% 3	13.3% 2	7.1% 1	21.6% 11
Missing	92	177	233	69	571
TOTAL	100.0% 12	100.0% 10	100.0% 15	100.0% 14	51

Year founded (I-YEAREST)

	1770-1865	1866-1918	1919-1945	1946-1965	1966 & later	TOTAL
It was self-supporting.	33.3% 3	75.0% 15	87.5% 7	78.6% 11	100.0% 2	71.7% 38
It provided a surplus to the congregation. Amount:	0.0% 0	5.0% 1	12.5% 1	14.3% 2	0.0% 0	7.5% 4
It required a subsidy.	66.7% 6	20.0% 4	0.0% 0	7.1% 1	0.0% 0	20.8% 11
Missing	101	146	82	122	120	571
TOTAL	100.0% 9	100.0% 20	100.0% 8	100.0% 14	100.0% 2	53

Church membership (I-#MEMBERS)

	100 & less	101-200	201-500	501-1000	Over 1000	TOTAL
It was self-supporting.	100.0% 1	33.3% 3	50.0% 4	83.3% 5	82.8% 24	69.8% 37
It provided a surplus to the congregation. Amount:	0.0% 0	11.1% 1	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	10.3% 3	7.5% 4
It required a subsidy.	0.0% 0	55.6% 5	50.0% 4	16.7% 1	6.9% 2	22.6% 12
Missing	116	145	164	64	77	566
TOTAL	100.0% 1	100.0% 9	100.0% 8	100.0% 6	100.0% 29	53

(I-#ATTEND)

	100 & less	101-200	201-350	Over 350	Missing	TOTAL
It was self-supporting.	33.3% 3	57.1% 4	83.3% 5	80.0% 24	2	69.2% 36
It provided a surplus to the congregation. Amount:	0.0% 0	14.3% 1	0.0% 0	10.0% 3	0	7.7% 4
It required a subsidy.	66.7% 6	28.6% 2	16.7% 1	10.0% 3	0	23.1% 12
Missing	249	138	68	106	0	561
TOTAL	100.0% 9	100.0% 7	100.0% 6	100.0% 30	2	52

Place of residence (I-LOCATION)

	LgCty/Sub	MdCty/Sub	Small city	Town	Rural	Missing	TOTAL
It was self-supporting.	77.8% 21	100.0% 10	42.9% 3	42.9% 3	0.0% 0	0	72.5% 37
It provided a surplus to the congregation. Amount:	7.4% 2	0.0% 0	14.3% 1	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	1	5.9% 3
It required a subsidy.	14.8% 4	0.0% 0	42.9% 3	57.1% 4	0.0% 0	0	21.6% 11
Missing	155	80	94	154	90	0	573
TOTAL	100.0% 27	100.0% 10	100.0% 7	100.0% 7	100.0% 0	1	51