Phase III of the National Study on the Permanent Diaconate: A Survey of Catholic Deacons' Supervisors, 1995

• Summary
• Codebook
• Search
• Download
• Custom Table
• Results

EFTVDCN2 How would you rate the overall effectiveness of most deacons you direct and council in other areas not previously listed -- Answer Two?   1) Very effective   2) Somewhat effective   3) Ineffective

Pie Chart Bar Chart Cumulative Bar Chart

Category	Frequency	Percentage	Cumulative Percentage	Z-Score
Very effective	33	63.5%	63.5%	-.71
Somewhat effective	17	32.7%	96.2%	1.05
Ineffective	2	3.8%	100%	2.8

Variable Comparisons

Age Race Education

Age (I-AGE)

	<50	50-59	60-69	70&over	TOTAL
Very effective	43.8% 7	66.7% 10	76.5% 13	75.0% 3	63.5% 33
Somewhat effective	50.0% 8	26.7% 4	23.5% 4	25.0% 1	32.7% 17
Ineffective	6.3% 1	6.7% 1	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	3.8% 2
TOTAL	100.0% 16	100.0% 15	100.0% 17	100.0% 4	52

Race (I-RACE)

	Caucasian	Hispanic	Native Am.	African-Am	Other	TOTAL
Very effective	63.0% 29	100.0% 2	0.00% 0	100.0% 1	33.3% 1	63.5% 33
Somewhat effective	32.6% 15	0.0% 0	0.00% 0	0.0% 0	66.7% 2	32.7% 17
Ineffective	4.3% 2	0.0% 0	0.00% 0	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	3.8% 2
TOTAL	100.0% 46	100.0% 2	100.0% 0	100.0% 1	100.0% 3	52

Education (I-EDUCATN)

	Less than college degree	B.A., STB, or other bachelor's	M.A. STL, M. DIV., M.S., or other master's	Doctorate	TOTAL
Very effective	100.0% 1	88.9% 8	61.8% 21	28.6% 2	62.7% 32
Somewhat effective	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	38.2% 13	57.1% 4	33.3% 17
Ineffective	0.0% 0	11.1% 1	0.0% 0	14.3% 1	3.9% 2
TOTAL	100.0% 1	100.0% 9	100.0% 34	100.0% 7	51