Survey of Religion and Community Life in Indianapolis, 1999

• Summary
• Codebook
• Search
• Download
• Custom Table
• Results

LILLY2A ASKED ONLY OF THOSE WHO RESPONDED THAT THEY WERE SOMEWHAT OR VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE LILLY ENDOWMENT: How important do you think the Lilly Endowment is to community development in Indianapolis?   1) Very important   2) Somewhat important   3) Not too important   4) Not at all important

Pie Chart Bar Chart Cumulative Bar Chart

Category	Frequency	Percentage	Cumulative Percentage	Z-Score
Very important	396	72.5%	72.5%	-.59
Somewhat important	141	25.8%	98.4%	1.42
Not too important	8	1.5%	99.8%	3.43
Not at all important	1	.2%	100%	5.44

Variable Comparisons

Gender Education Religious preference Age Race Marital status Political party Household income

Gender (I-GENDER)

	Male	Female	TOTAL
Very important	69.7% 161	74.8% 235	72.7% 396
Somewhat important	28.1% 65	23.9% 75	25.7% 140
Not too important	2.2% 5	1.0% 3	1.5% 8
Not at all important	0.0% 0	0.3% 1	0.2% 1
TOTAL	100.0% 231	100.0% 314	545

Education (I-EDUC)

	Zero to 11 years	12 years	Some college	College degree or higher	Don't know	TOTAL
Very important	55.2% 16	69.5% 98	74.1% 100	76.1% 181	50.0% 1	72.7% 396
Somewhat important	41.4% 12	28.4% 40	24.4% 33	22.7% 54	50.0% 1	25.7% 140
Not too important	0.0% 0	2.1% 3	1.5% 2	1.3% 3	0.0% 0	1.5% 8
Not at all important	3.4% 1	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	0.2% 1
TOTAL	100.0% 29	100.0% 141	100.0% 135	100.0% 238	100.0% 2	545

Religious preference (I-REL)

	Catholic	Protestant	Oth Chrstn	Oth Rel	No pref	TOTAL
Very important	79.6% 90	75.9% 142	69.0% 87	66.7% 42	62.3% 33	72.7% 394
Somewhat important	18.6% 21	23.5% 44	29.4% 37	28.6% 18	35.8% 19	25.6% 139
Not too important	1.8% 2	0.5% 1	1.6% 2	3.2% 2	1.9% 1	1.5% 8
Not at all important	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	1.6% 1	0.0% 0	0.2% 1
TOTAL	100.0% 113	100.0% 187	100.0% 126	100.0% 63	100.0% 53	542

Age (I-AGE)

	18-29	30-44	45-65	65 and up	Refused	TOTAL
Very important	53.6% 45	70.0% 126	82.1% 147	76.8% 76	66.7% 2	72.7% 396
Somewhat important	40.5% 34	28.9% 52	17.3% 31	22.2% 22	33.3% 1	25.7% 140
Not too important	6.0% 5	1.1% 2	0.6% 1	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	1.5% 8
Not at all important	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	1.0% 1	0.0% 0	0.2% 1
TOTAL	100.0% 84	100.0% 180	100.0% 179	100.0% 99	100.0% 3	545

Race (I-RACE)

	White	Black	Wh and Ind	Other	Dk/ ref	TOTAL
Very important	72.4% 268	71.6% 68	64.0% 16	78.0% 39	100.0% 5	72.7% 396
Somewhat important	25.9% 96	25.3% 24	36.0% 9	22.0% 11	0.0% 0	25.7% 140
Not too important	1.4% 5	3.2% 3	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	1.5% 8
Not at all important	0.3% 1	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	0.2% 1
TOTAL	100.0% 370	100.0% 95	100.0% 25	100.0% 50	100.0% 5	545

Marital status (I-MARITAL)

	Married	Cohabiting	Widowed	Sep/ Div	Nvr marry	TOTAL
Very important	75.6% 201	63.6% 14	84.4% 27	64.6% 73	72.1% 80	72.6% 395
Somewhat important	23.3% 62	31.8% 7	15.6% 5	34.5% 39	24.3% 27	25.7% 140
Not too important	1.1% 3	4.5% 1	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	3.6% 4	1.5% 8
Not at all important	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	0.9% 1	0.0% 0	0.2% 1
TOTAL	100.0% 266	100.0% 22	100.0% 32	100.0% 113	100.0% 111	544

Political party (I-PARTY)

	Republican	Democrat	Independnt	Other	Dk/ ref	TOTAL
Very important	72.0% 121	70.2% 139	78.4% 109	65.6% 21	75.0% 6	72.7% 396
Somewhat important	28.0% 47	28.3% 56	18.0% 25	31.3% 10	25.0% 2	25.7% 140
Not too important	0.0% 0	1.5% 3	2.9% 4	3.1% 1	0.0% 0	1.5% 8
Not at all important	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	0.7% 1	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	0.2% 1
TOTAL	100.0% 168	100.0% 198	100.0% 139	100.0% 32	100.0% 8	545

Household income (I-INCOME)

	$0-19999	$20-29999	$30-39999	$40-49999	$60000+	TOTAL
Very important	59.0% 36	73.8% 59	64.7% 55	74.4% 96	79.7% 137	72.7% 383
Somewhat important	39.3% 24	26.3% 21	31.8% 27	23.3% 30	19.2% 33	25.6% 135
Not too important	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	3.5% 3	2.3% 3	1.2% 2	1.5% 8
Not at all important	1.6% 1	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	0.2% 1
TOTAL	100.0% 61	100.0% 80	100.0% 85	100.0% 129	100.0% 172	527