Presbyterian Panel Survey, November 1997 - Older Adult Ministries, Elders

• Summary
• Codebook
• Search
• Download
• Custom Table
• Results

IMPINTGN In your opinion, how important is it for congregations to: regularly design and lead intentionally-intergenerational programs in the congregation?   1) Very important   2) Important   3) Not very important   4) Not at all important

Pie Chart Bar Chart Cumulative Bar Chart

Category	Frequency	Percentage	Cumulative Percentage	Z-Score
Very important	192	23.9%	23.9%	-1.42
Important	430	53.4%	77.3%	0
Not very important	175	21.7%	99%	1.42
Not at all important	8	1%	100%	2.84

Variable Comparisons

Gender Marital status Region Political party Family income Age Race

Gender (I-GENDER)

	Female	Male	TOTAL
Very important	32.4% 129	15.3% 62	23.8% 191
Important	51.8% 206	55.1% 223	53.4% 429
Not very important	15.3% 61	28.1% 114	21.8% 175
Not at all important	0.5% 2	1.5% 6	1.0% 8
TOTAL	100.0% 398	100.0% 405	803

Marital status (I-MARITAL)

	Married	Not married	TOTAL
Very important	24.4% 169	20.2% 21	23.8% 190
Important	53.4% 370	55.8% 58	53.7% 428
Not very important	21.5% 149	21.2% 22	21.5% 171
Not at all important	0.7% 5	2.9% 3	1.0% 8
TOTAL	100.0% 693	100.0% 104	797

Region (I-REGION)

	Northeast	Midwest	South	West	TOTAL
Very important	14.9% 21	18.6% 46	29.5% 88	31.4% 37	23.9% 192
Important	55.3% 78	60.7% 150	46.6% 139	52.5% 62	53.4% 429
Not very important	28.4% 40	19.0% 47	23.2% 69	16.1% 19	21.8% 175
Not at all important	1.4% 2	1.6% 4	0.7% 2	0.0% 0	1.0% 8
TOTAL	100.0% 141	100.0% 247	100.0% 298	100.0% 118	804

Political party (I-POLITAFF)

	Democrat	Independent	Republican	Other	TOTAL
Very important	31.4% 61	21.1% 28	21.1% 96	26.7% 4	23.7% 189
Important	49.5% 96	59.4% 79	54.3% 247	33.3% 5	53.6% 427
Not very important	18.0% 35	18.8% 25	24.0% 109	26.7% 4	21.7% 173
Not at all important	1.0% 2	0.8% 1	0.7% 3	13.3% 2	1.0% 8
TOTAL	100.0% 194	100.0% 133	100.0% 455	100.0% 15	797

Family income (I-FAMINCOM)

	<20K	20K-49,999	50K-99,999	100K+	TOTAL
Very important	22.9% 8	21.6% 50	22.5% 71	29.1% 55	23.9% 184
Important	40.0% 14	58.2% 135	53.7% 169	50.3% 95	53.6% 413
Not very important	31.4% 11	19.4% 45	22.9% 72	20.1% 38	21.5% 166
Not at all important	5.7% 2	0.9% 2	1.0% 3	0.5% 1	1.0% 8
TOTAL	100.0% 35	100.0% 232	100.0% 315	100.0% 189	771

Age (I-AGE)

	<40	40-49	50-64	65+	TOTAL
Very important	23.8% 19	34.3% 59	24.8% 72	15.7% 40	23.8% 190
Important	50.0% 40	51.7% 89	53.8% 156	54.5% 139	53.2% 424
Not very important	23.8% 19	14.0% 24	21.0% 61	27.8% 71	22.0% 175
Not at all important	2.5% 2	0.0% 0	0.3% 1	2.0% 5	1.0% 8
TOTAL	100.0% 80	100.0% 172	100.0% 290	100.0% 255	797

Race (I-RACE1)

	White	Black	Other	TOTAL
Very important	24.0% 189	33.3% 1	0.0% 0	23.8% 190
Important	53.6% 422	33.3% 1	77.8% 7	53.8% 430
Not very important	21.4% 169	33.3% 1	22.2% 2	21.5% 172
Not at all important	1.0% 8	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	1.0% 8
TOTAL	100.0% 788	100.0% 3	100.0% 9	800