Presbyterian Panel Survey, November 1997 - Older Adult Ministries, Elders

• Summary
• Codebook
• Search
• Download
• Custom Table
• Results

LVPASTOR (ASKED ONLY OF RESPONDENTS WHO ANSWERED THAT THEY ARE "NOT VERY" OR "NOT AT ALL LIKELY" TO BE A PART OF THEIR CURRENT CONGREGATION FIVE YEARS FROM NOW) Rate the importance of the following factor in your likelihood of leaving: I don't appreciate the pastor(s).   1) Very important   2) Important   3) Not very important   4) Not at all important

Pie Chart Bar Chart Cumulative Bar Chart

Category	Frequency	Percentage	Cumulative Percentage	Z-Score
Very important	6	15.8%	15.8%	-1.8
Important	6	15.8%	31.6%	-.97
Not very important	2	5.3%	36.8%	-.13
Not at all important	24	63.2%	100%	.7

Variable Comparisons

Gender Marital status Region Political party Family income Age Race

Gender (I-GENDER)

	Female	Male	TOTAL
Very important	22.2% 4	10.0% 2	15.8% 6
Important	22.2% 4	10.0% 2	15.8% 6
Not very important	11.1% 2	0.0% 0	5.3% 2
Not at all important	44.4% 8	80.0% 16	63.2% 24
TOTAL	100.0% 18	100.0% 20	38

Marital status (I-MARITAL)

	Married	Not married	TOTAL
Very important	14.7% 5	25.0% 1	15.8% 6
Important	14.7% 5	25.0% 1	15.8% 6
Not very important	5.9% 2	0.0% 0	5.3% 2
Not at all important	64.7% 22	50.0% 2	63.2% 24
TOTAL	100.0% 34	100.0% 4	38

Region (I-REGION)

	Northeast	Midwest	South	West	TOTAL
Very important	0.0% 0	21.4% 3	25.0% 3	0.0% 0	15.8% 6
Important	28.6% 2	14.3% 2	8.3% 1	20.0% 1	15.8% 6
Not very important	14.3% 1	7.1% 1	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	5.3% 2
Not at all important	57.1% 4	57.1% 8	66.7% 8	80.0% 4	63.2% 24
TOTAL	100.0% 7	100.0% 14	100.0% 12	100.0% 5	38

Political party (I-POLITAFF)

	Democrat	Independent	Republican	Other	TOTAL
Very important	15.4% 2	16.7% 1	15.8% 3	0.00% 0	15.8% 6
Important	15.4% 2	0.0% 0	21.1% 4	0.00% 0	15.8% 6
Not very important	7.7% 1	0.0% 0	5.3% 1	0.00% 0	5.3% 2
Not at all important	61.5% 8	83.3% 5	57.9% 11	0.00% 0	63.2% 24
TOTAL	100.0% 13	100.0% 6	100.0% 19	100.0% 0	38

Family income (I-FAMINCOM)

	<20K	20K-49,999	50K-99,999	100K+	TOTAL
Very important	0.0% 0	42.9% 3	5.9% 1	18.2% 2	16.7% 6
Important	0.0% 0	14.3% 1	23.5% 4	0.0% 0	13.9% 5
Not very important	0.0% 0	0.0% 0	11.8% 2	0.0% 0	5.6% 2
Not at all important	100.0% 1	42.9% 3	58.8% 10	81.8% 9	63.9% 23
TOTAL	100.0% 1	100.0% 7	100.0% 17	100.0% 11	36

Age (I-AGE)

	<40	40-49	50-64	65+	TOTAL
Very important	16.7% 1	10.0% 1	7.7% 1	37.5% 3	16.2% 6
Important	16.7% 1	30.0% 3	0.0% 0	12.5% 1	13.5% 5
Not very important	0.0% 0	10.0% 1	7.7% 1	0.0% 0	5.4% 2
Not at all important	66.7% 4	50.0% 5	84.6% 11	50.0% 4	64.9% 24
TOTAL	100.0% 6	100.0% 10	100.0% 13	100.0% 8	37

Race (I-RACE1)

	White	Black	Other	TOTAL
Very important	16.2% 6	0.00% 0	0.0% 0	15.8% 6
Important	16.2% 6	0.00% 0	0.0% 0	15.8% 6
Not very important	5.4% 2	0.00% 0	0.0% 0	5.3% 2
Not at all important	62.2% 23	0.00% 0	100.0% 1	63.2% 24
TOTAL	100.0% 37	100.0% 0	100.0% 1	38