Presbyterian Panel Survey, August 1999 -- Public Role of Presbyterians, Member

• Summary
• Codebook
• Search
• Download
• Custom Table
• Results

ENVMISSN Here is a possible way that the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) can be involved in environmental issues. Please indicate how important you think it is for the PC(USA) to be involved in this way.- focusing on environmental concerns in foreign mission work   1) Extremely important   2) Very important   3) Somewhat important   4) Not very important   5) Don't know

Pie Chart Bar Chart Cumulative Bar Chart

Category	Frequency	Percentage	Cumulative Percentage	Z-Score
Extremely important	29	6.5%	6.5%	-2.06
Very important	90	20.3%	26.8%	-1.07
Somewhat important	175	39.4%	66.2%	-.08
Not very important	118	26.6%	92.8%	.92
Don't know	32	7.2%	100%	1.91

Variable Comparisons

Gender Marital status Region Political party Age Family income Race

Gender (I-GENDER)

	Female	Male	TOTAL
Extremely important	8.1% 22	4.0% 7	6.5% 29
Very important	21.9% 59	17.9% 31	20.3% 90
Somewhat important	40.7% 110	37.0% 64	39.3% 174
Not very important	21.9% 59	34.1% 59	26.6% 118
Don't know	7.4% 20	6.9% 12	7.2% 32
TOTAL	100.0% 270	100.0% 173	443

Marital status (I-MARITAL)

	Married	Not married	TOTAL
Extremely important	5.8% 20	8.7% 8	6.4% 28
Very important	20.3% 70	21.7% 20	20.6% 90
Somewhat important	39.8% 137	35.9% 33	39.0% 170
Not very important	27.6% 95	23.9% 22	26.8% 117
Don't know	6.4% 22	9.8% 9	7.1% 31
TOTAL	100.0% 344	100.0% 92	436

Region (I-REGION)

	Northeast	Midwest	South	West	TOTAL
Extremely important	3.4% 2	7.7% 12	7.2% 11	5.2% 4	6.5% 29
Very important	24.1% 14	21.2% 33	18.3% 28	19.5% 15	20.3% 90
Somewhat important	32.8% 19	41.7% 65	36.6% 56	45.5% 35	39.4% 175
Not very important	32.8% 19	23.1% 36	28.8% 44	24.7% 19	26.6% 118
Don't know	6.9% 4	6.4% 10	9.2% 14	5.2% 4	7.2% 32
TOTAL	100.0% 58	100.0% 156	100.0% 153	100.0% 77	444

Political party (I-POLITAFF)

	Democrat	Independent	Republican	Other	TOTAL
Extremely important	7.8% 8	13.9% 11	3.7% 9	0.0% 0	6.4% 28
Very important	26.2% 27	20.3% 16	17.8% 43	13.3% 2	20.1% 88
Somewhat important	39.8% 41	39.2% 31	39.0% 94	46.7% 7	39.5% 173
Not very important	18.4% 19	20.3% 16	32.8% 79	26.7% 4	26.9% 118
Don't know	7.8% 8	6.3% 5	6.6% 16	13.3% 2	7.1% 31
TOTAL	100.0% 103	100.0% 79	100.0% 241	100.0% 15	438

Age (I-AGE)

	<39	40-49	50-64	65+	TOTAL
Extremely important	6.8% 5	6.6% 5	6.9% 9	6.3% 10	6.6% 29
Very important	28.4% 21	15.8% 12	15.3% 20	22.2% 35	20.0% 88
Somewhat important	29.7% 22	52.6% 40	42.7% 56	35.4% 56	39.6% 174
Not very important	25.7% 19	23.7% 18	31.3% 41	24.1% 38	26.4% 116
Don't know	9.5% 7	1.3% 1	3.8% 5	12.0% 19	7.3% 32
TOTAL	100.0% 74	100.0% 76	100.0% 131	100.0% 158	439

Family income (I-FAMINCOM)

	<20K	20K-49,999	50K-99,999	100K+	TOTAL
Extremely important	6.7% 2	7.9% 11	5.1% 9	6.5% 5	6.4% 27
Very important	23.3% 7	20.7% 29	21.1% 37	18.2% 14	20.6% 87
Somewhat important	30.0% 9	36.4% 51	44.0% 77	41.6% 32	40.0% 169
Not very important	20.0% 6	28.6% 40	22.9% 40	27.3% 21	25.4% 107
Don't know	20.0% 6	6.4% 9	6.9% 12	6.5% 5	7.6% 32
TOTAL	100.0% 30	100.0% 140	100.0% 175	100.0% 77	422

Race (I-RACE1)

	White	Other	TOTAL
Extremely important	6.4% 26	0.0% 0	6.3% 26
Very important	19.2% 78	33.3% 1	19.3% 79
Somewhat important	39.8% 162	33.3% 1	39.8% 163
Not very important	27.0% 110	33.3% 1	27.1% 111
Don't know	7.6% 31	0.0% 0	7.6% 31
TOTAL	100.0% 407	100.0% 3	410