Cumberland Presbyterian Church Metro Areas (1980) [ Counties | States ]
  QuickLists > U.S. Religious Groups > Cumberland Presbyterian Church
Search QuickLists:

The Cumberland Presbyterian Church began on the Western frontier in the early 19th century. In 1906 the main body of the church reunited with the Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A., now an integral part of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). Those that did not participate in the merger reorganized themselves as the continuing Cumberland Presbyterian Church.

Using data from the 1980-2010 Religious Congregations and Membership Studies, this list ranks U.S. metro areas on the highest total number of adherents and the highest percent of the population in the Cumberland Presbyterian Church. You can sort the list by clicking on the column headings.

Congregational "Adherents" include all full members, their children, and others who regularly attend services. "Percent" is the percentage of the total population that belongs to that denomination. Note: Adherents are sometimes residents of a county different than the location of their congregation.

[ More information on the data source ]

Complete List

Ranking Metro Area   [Download CSV]AdherentsPercent
34 Ada, OK, Micropolitan Statistical Area
178
0.55
72 Albertville, AL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
14
0.02
54 Albuquerque, NM, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,033
0.21
61 Anniston-Oxford-Jacksonville, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
166
0.14
69 Athens, TX, Micropolitan Statistical Area
22
0.05
73 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
312
0.01
51 Austin-Round Rock, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,448
0.25
33 Bardstown, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
155
0.56
31 Batesville, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
177
0.59
48 Birmingham-Hoover, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
2,559
0.28
69 Bloomington, IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
64
0.05
75 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
36 Bowling Green, KY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
497
0.46
75 Branson, MO, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
75 Burlington, IA-IL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
67 Calhoun, GA, Micropolitan Statistical Area
22
0.07
13 Camden, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
535
1.46
5 Campbellsville, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
527
2.49
72 Carbondale-Marion, IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
18
0.02
60 Charleston-Mattoon, IL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
98
0.15
29 Chattanooga, TN-GA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
2,928
0.69
74 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
7
0
19 Clarksville, TN-KY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,723
1.08
57 Cleveland, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
148
0.18
28 Columbus, MS, Micropolitan Statistical Area
437
0.76
26 Cookeville, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
600
0.8
75 Corinth, MS, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
69 Corsicana, TX, Micropolitan Statistical Area
17
0.05
24 Cullman, AL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
527
0.85
67 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
2,267
0.07
53 Dalton, GA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
192
0.22
66 Danville, IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
80
0.08
75 Decatur, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
74 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
112
0
32 Duncan, OK, Micropolitan Statistical Area
253
0.58
3 Dyersburg, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
998
2.88
65 Effingham, IL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
28
0.09
50 El Dorado, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
125
0.26
75 El Paso, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
52 Elizabethtown-Fort Knox, KY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
301
0.24
39 Escanaba, MI, Micropolitan Statistical Area
169
0.43
40 Evansville, IN-KY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,160
0.42
71 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
64
0.03
15 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,714
1.27
40 Forrest City, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
130
0.42
62 Fort Smith, AR-OK, Metropolitan Statistical Area
263
0.13
73 Fresno, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
35
0.01
27 Gadsden, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
818
0.79
6 Glasgow, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
1,073
2.47
2 Greeneville, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
1,658
3.05
58 Harrison, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
58
0.17
75 Hot Springs, AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
73 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
318
0.01
37 Huntsville, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,099
0.45
73 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
154
0.01
69 Jackson, MS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
204
0.05
23 Jackson, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
889
0.87
64 Jacksonville, TX, Micropolitan Statistical Area
38
0.1
60 Jasper, IN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
71
0.15
58 Johnson City, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
261
0.17
55 Joplin, MO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
259
0.2
72 Kansas City, MO-KS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
356
0.02
74 Kennett, MO, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0
0
72 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
45
0.02
37 Knoxville, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
2,783
0.45
4 Lawrenceburg, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
864
2.53
12 Lebanon, MO, Micropolitan Statistical Area
381
1.57
18 Lewisburg, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
220
1.12
68 Lexington-Fayette, KY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
185
0.06
17 Lincoln, IL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
389
1.22
65 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
460
0.09
26 Longview, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,361
0.8
67 Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
668
0.07
46 Lubbock, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
729
0.32
22 Madisonville, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
419
0.91
45 Magnolia, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
89
0.33
21 Marshall, MO, Micropolitan Statistical Area
229
0.92
25 Marshall, TX, Micropolitan Statistical Area
434
0.83
7 Martin, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
760
2.31
10 Mayfield, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
706
2.07
14 McMinnville, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
441
1.35
43 Memphis, TN-MS-AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
3,489
0.35
75 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
75 Midland, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
38 Moberly, MO, Micropolitan Statistical Area
111
0.44
68 Monroe, LA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
98
0.06
75 Montgomery, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
49 Morristown, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
220
0.27
75 Mount Sterling, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
33 Mountain Home, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
154
0.56
35 Murray, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
152
0.51
59 Muskegon, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
246
0.16
69 Muskogee, OK, Micropolitan Statistical Area
34
0.05
75 Nacogdoches, TX, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
20 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
9,535
0.99
75 Natchitoches, LA, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
70 New Orleans-Metairie, LA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
463
0.04
75 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
41 Odessa, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
477
0.41
72 Oklahoma City, OK, Metropolitan Statistical Area
172
0.02
19 Owensboro, KY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,119
1.08
8 Paducah, KY-IL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
2,064
2.19
44 Paris, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
98
0.34
75 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
42 Pine Bluff, AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
432
0.39
62 Richmond-Berea, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
88
0.13
73 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
92
0.01
67 Rockford, IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
185
0.07
11 Russellville, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
996
1.78
71 Ruston, LA, Micropolitan Statistical Area
12
0.03
75 Salisbury, MD-DE, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
71 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
352
0.03
71 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
900
0.03
75 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
75 Santa Rosa, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
16 Scottsboro, AL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
632
1.23
47 Searcy, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
156
0.31
72 Sedalia, MO, Micropolitan Statistical Area
7
0.02
48 Shelbyville, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
79
0.28
64 Sherman-Denison, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
94
0.1
74 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
10
0
75 Somerset, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
73 Springfield, IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
22
0.01
64 Springfield, MO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
267
0.1
56 St. Joseph, MO-KS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
227
0.19
74 St. Louis, MO-IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
111
0
69 Sulphur Springs, TX, Micropolitan Statistical Area
13
0.05
67 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,152
0.07
63 Texarkana, TX-AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
146
0.11
75 Tucson, AZ, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
9 Tullahoma-Manchester, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
1,586
2.12
70 Tulsa, OK, Metropolitan Statistical Area
283
0.04
59 Tuscaloosa, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
276
0.16
1 Union City, TN-KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
1,694
4.06
75 Vicksburg, MS, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
47 Vincennes, IN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
129
0.31
26 Warrensburg, MO, Micropolitan Statistical Area
313
0.8
59 Washington, IN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
44
0.16
30 Weatherford, OK, Micropolitan Statistical Area
171
0.66
46 West Plains, MO, Micropolitan Statistical Area
93
0.32


* In an effort to better match the ASARB standards for adherents, a few religious bodies changed the way their adherents were reported in 2010, including Amish groups, Friends groups, Jewish groups, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Non-denominational Christian Churches, and the United Methodist Church. This change does not affect any of the data in the newly released 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study. In fact, the data for these groups are now more comparable to that of other bodies than it was in previous decadal reports.

However, the change in methodology can distort assessments on growth or decline between 2000 and 2010 for each of these groups. County-level 2000 data using the new methodology are not readily available. ASARB staff has adjusted some 2000 county-level adherent statistics to allow for a more accurate picture on growth or decline. The revised maps and charts are now available on-line at www.usreligioncensus.org for those who are interested in these trends.

Source

2010 data were collected by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB) and include statistics for 236 religious groups, providing information on the number of their congregations and adherents within each state and county in the United States. Clifford Grammich, Kirk Hadaway, Richard Houseal, Dale E. Jones, Alexei Krindatch, Richie Stanley and Richard H. Taylor supervised the collection. These data originally appeared in 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study, published by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB). [More information on the data collection]