Cumberland Presbyterian Church Metro Areas (2010) [ Counties | States ]

• All Years
• 2010
• 2000
• 1990
• 1980

The Cumberland Presbyterian Church began on the Western frontier in the early 19th century. In 1906 the main body of the church reunited with the Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A., now an integral part of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). Those that did not participate in the merger reorganized themselves as the continuing Cumberland Presbyterian Church.

Using data from the 1980-2010 Religious Congregations and Membership Studies, this list ranks U.S. metro areas on the highest total number of adherents and the highest percent of the population in the Cumberland Presbyterian Church. You can sort the list by clicking on the column headings.

Congregational "Adherents" include all full members, their children, and others who regularly attend services. "Percent" is the percentage of the total population that belongs to that denomination. Note: Adherents are sometimes residents of a county different than the location of their congregation.

[ More information on the data source ]

Complete List

Ranking	Metro Area   [Download CSV]	Adherents	Percent
9	Albuquerque, NM Metropolitan Statistical Area	2,573	0.29
19	Anniston-Oxford, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area	90	0.08
25	Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA Metropolitan Statistical Area	338	0.01
22	Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area	707	0.04
15	Birmingham-Hoover, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area	1,740	0.15
26	Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH Metropolitan Statistical Area	35	0
6	Bowling Green, KY Metropolitan Statistical Area	517	0.41
9	Chattanooga, TN-GA Metropolitan Statistical Area	1,552	0.29
26	Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI Metropolitan Statistical Area	60	0
7	Clarksville, TN-KY Metropolitan Statistical Area	987	0.36
8	Cleveland, TN Metropolitan Statistical Area	400	0.35
21	Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area	2,923	0.05
14	Dalton, GA Metropolitan Statistical Area	228	0.16
16	Danville, IL Metropolitan Statistical Area	90	0.11
24	Decatur, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area	37	0.02
26	Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI Metropolitan Statistical Area	47	0
24	El Paso, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area	161	0.02
11	Elizabethtown, KY Metropolitan Statistical Area	243	0.2
13	Evansville, IN-KY Metropolitan Statistical Area	639	0.18
24	Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO Metropolitan Statistical Area	70	0.02
1	Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area	957	0.65
19	Fort Smith, AR-OK Metropolitan Statistical Area	239	0.08
27	Fresno, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area	--	--
4	Gadsden, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area	512	0.49
18	Hot Springs, AR Metropolitan Statistical Area	91	0.09
25	Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area	419	0.01
14	Huntsville, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area	675	0.16
26	Indianapolis-Carmel, IN Metropolitan Statistical Area	11	0
27	Jackson, MS Metropolitan Statistical Area	--	--
3	Jackson, TN Metropolitan Statistical Area	605	0.52
22	Johnson City, TN Metropolitan Statistical Area	78	0.04
27	Joplin, MO Metropolitan Statistical Area	--	--
26	Kansas City, MO-KS Metropolitan Statistical Area	54	0
27	Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA Metropolitan Statistical Area	--	--
5	Knoxville, TN Metropolitan Statistical Area	2,959	0.42
26	Lexington-Fayette, KY Metropolitan Statistical Area	10	0
22	Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR Metropolitan Statistical Area	307	0.04
12	Longview, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area	418	0.19
24	Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN Metropolitan Statistical Area	276	0.02
20	Lubbock, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area	204	0.07
10	Memphis, TN-MS-AR Metropolitan Statistical Area	2,954	0.22
26	Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL Metropolitan Statistical Area	78	0
27	Midland, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area	--	--
27	Monroe, LA Metropolitan Statistical Area	--	--
21	Montgomery, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area	169	0.05
14	Morristown, TN Metropolitan Statistical Area	224	0.16
27	Muskegon-Norton Shores, MI Metropolitan Statistical Area	--	--
6	Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN Metropolitan Statistical Area	6,526	0.41
26	New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA Metropolitan Statistical Area	38	0
26	New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA Metropolitan Statistical Area	207	0
15	Odessa, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area	199	0.15
25	Oklahoma City, OK Metropolitan Statistical Area	166	0.01
2	Owensboro, KY Metropolitan Statistical Area	655	0.57
26	Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD Metropolitan Statistical Area	96	0
15	Pine Bluff, AR Metropolitan Statistical Area	148	0.15
26	Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area	36	0
27	Rockford, IL Metropolitan Statistical Area	--	--
25	Salisbury, MD Metropolitan Statistical Area	14	0.01
24	San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area	398	0.02
24	San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area	901	0.02
27	San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area	--	--
26	Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA Metropolitan Statistical Area	15	0
23	Sherman-Denison, TX Metropolitan Statistical Area	40	0.03
27	Shreveport-Bossier City, LA Metropolitan Statistical Area	--	--
27	Springfield, IL Metropolitan Statistical Area	--	--
20	Springfield, MO Metropolitan Statistical Area	289	0.07
23	St. Joseph, MO-KS Metropolitan Statistical Area	35	0.03
26	St. Louis, MO-IL Metropolitan Statistical Area	62	0
25	Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL Metropolitan Statistical Area	381	0.01
27	Texarkana, TX-Texarkana, AR Metropolitan Statistical Area	--	--
26	Tucson, AZ Metropolitan Statistical Area	24	0
25	Tulsa, OK Metropolitan Statistical Area	72	0.01
17	Tuscaloosa, AL Metropolitan Statistical Area	228	0.1

^* In an effort to better match the ASARB standards for adherents, a few religious bodies changed the way their adherents were reported in 2010, including Amish groups, Friends groups, Jewish groups, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Non-denominational Christian Churches, and the United Methodist Church. This change does not affect any of the data in the newly released 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study. In fact, the data for these groups are now more comparable to that of other bodies than it was in previous decadal reports.

However, the change in methodology can distort assessments on growth or decline between 2000 and 2010 for each of these groups. County-level 2000 data using the new methodology are not readily available. ASARB staff has adjusted some 2000 county-level adherent statistics to allow for a more accurate picture on growth or decline. The revised maps and charts are now available on-line at www.usreligioncensus.org for those who are interested in these trends.

Source

2010 data were collected by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB) and include statistics for 236 religious groups, providing information on the number of their congregations and adherents within each state and county in the United States. Clifford Grammich, Kirk Hadaway, Richard Houseal, Dale E. Jones, Alexei Krindatch, Richie Stanley and Richard H. Taylor supervised the collection. These data originally appeared in 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study, published by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB). [More information on the data collection]