Cumberland Presbyterian Church Metro Areas (2010) [ Counties | States ]
  QuickLists > U.S. Religious Groups > Cumberland Presbyterian Church
Search QuickLists:

The Cumberland Presbyterian Church began on the Western frontier in the early 19th century. In 1906 the main body of the church reunited with the Presbyterian Church in the U.S.A., now an integral part of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.). Those that did not participate in the merger reorganized themselves as the continuing Cumberland Presbyterian Church.

Using data from the 1980-2010 Religious Congregations and Membership Studies, this list ranks U.S. metro areas on the highest total number of adherents and the highest percent of the population in the Cumberland Presbyterian Church. You can sort the list by clicking on the column headings.

Congregational "Adherents" include all full members, their children, and others who regularly attend services. "Percent" is the percentage of the total population that belongs to that denomination. Note: Adherents are sometimes residents of a county different than the location of their congregation.

[ More information on the data source ]

Complete List

Ranking Metro Area   [Download CSV]AdherentsPercent
34 Ada, OK, Micropolitan Statistical Area
100
0.27
53 Albertville, AL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
32 Albuquerque, NM, Metropolitan Statistical Area
2,573
0.29
44 Anniston-Oxford-Jacksonville, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
90
0.08
53 Athens, TX, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
51 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
338
0.01
48 Austin-Round Rock, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
707
0.04
53 Bardstown, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
23 Batesville, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
178
0.49
39 Birmingham-Hoover, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,740
0.15
51 Bloomington, IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
27
0.01
52 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
35
0
31 Bowling Green, KY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
559
0.35
50 Branson, MO, Micropolitan Statistical Area
17
0.02
46 Burlington, IA-IL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
27
0.06
51 Calhoun, GA, Micropolitan Statistical Area
5
0.01
9 Camden, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
370
1.18
6 Campbellsville, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
373
1.52
53 Carbondale-Marion, IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
35 Charleston-Mattoon, IL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
150
0.23
32 Chattanooga, TN-GA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,552
0.29
52 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
60
0
30 Clarksville, TN-KY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
926
0.36
31 Cleveland, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
400
0.35
18 Columbus, MS, Micropolitan Statistical Area
403
0.67
15 Cookeville, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
835
0.79
44 Corinth, MS, Micropolitan Statistical Area
31
0.08
53 Corsicana, TX, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
11 Cullman, AL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
769
0.96
47 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
2,923
0.05
38 Dalton, GA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
228
0.16
41 Danville, IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
90
0.11
50 Decatur, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
37
0.02
52 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
47
0
36 Duncan, OK, Micropolitan Statistical Area
89
0.2
4 Dyersburg, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
779
2.03
53 Effingham, IL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
50 El Dorado, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
10
0.02
50 El Paso, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
161
0.02
38 Elizabethtown-Fort Knox, KY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
243
0.16
53 Escanaba, MI, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
40 Evansville, IN-KY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
444
0.14
50 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
70
0.02
19 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
957
0.65
28 Forrest City, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
117
0.41
45 Fort Smith, AR-OK, Metropolitan Statistical Area
189
0.07
53 Fresno, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
23 Gadsden, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
512
0.49
26 Glasgow, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
236
0.45
3 Greeneville, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
1,430
2.08
53 Harrison, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
43 Hot Springs, AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
91
0.09
51 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
419
0.01
38 Huntsville, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
675
0.16
52 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
11
0
53 Jackson, MS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
23 Jackson, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
641
0.49
36 Jacksonville, TX, Micropolitan Statistical Area
100
0.2
45 Jasper, IN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
36
0.07
48 Johnson City, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
78
0.04
53 Joplin, MO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
52 Kansas City, MO-KS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
54
0
53 Kennett, MO, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
53 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
29 Knoxville, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
3,247
0.39
24 Lawrenceburg, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
203
0.48
18 Lebanon, MO, Micropolitan Statistical Area
240
0.67
8 Lewisburg, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
363
1.19
52 Lexington-Fayette, KY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
10
0
33 Lincoln, IL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
84
0.28
48 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
307
0.04
37 Longview, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
418
0.19
50 Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
276
0.02
45 Lubbock, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
204
0.07
13 Madisonville, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
397
0.85
46 Magnolia, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
15
0.06
14 Marshall, MO, Micropolitan Statistical Area
187
0.8
22 Marshall, TX, Micropolitan Statistical Area
336
0.51
10 Martin, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
394
1.13
16 Mayfield, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
272
0.73
12 McMinnville, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
356
0.89
35 Memphis, TN-MS-AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
2,991
0.23
52 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
78
0
53 Midland, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
41 Moberly, MO, Micropolitan Statistical Area
28
0.11
53 Monroe, LA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
47 Montgomery, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
169
0.05
36 Morristown, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
224
0.2
53 Mount Sterling, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
25 Mountain Home, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
196
0.47
17 Murray, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
259
0.7
53 Muskegon, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
53 Muskogee, OK, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
53 Nacogdoches, TX, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
26 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
7,476
0.45
46 Natchitoches, LA, Micropolitan Statistical Area
24
0.06
52 New Orleans-Metairie, LA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
38
0
52 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
207
0
39 Odessa, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
199
0.15
51 Oklahoma City, OK, Metropolitan Statistical Area
166
0.01
20 Owensboro, KY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
655
0.57
2 Paducah, KY-IL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
2,541
2.57
42 Paris, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
33
0.1
52 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD, Metropolitan Statistical Area
96
0
39 Pine Bluff, AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
148
0.15
53 Richmond-Berea, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
52 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
36
0
53 Rockford, IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
21 Russellville, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
462
0.55
53 Ruston, LA, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
52 Salisbury, MD-DE, Metropolitan Statistical Area
14
0
50 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
398
0.02
50 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
901
0.02
53 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
52 Santa Rosa, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
15
0
7 Scottsboro, AL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
657
1.23
43 Searcy, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
70
0.09
53 Sedalia, MO, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
46 Shelbyville, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
27
0.06
49 Sherman-Denison, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
40
0.03
53 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
45 Somerset, KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
43
0.07
53 Springfield, IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
45 Springfield, MO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
289
0.07
49 St. Joseph, MO-KS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
35
0.03
52 St. Louis, MO-IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
62
0
38 Sulphur Springs, TX, Micropolitan Statistical Area
55
0.16
51 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
381
0.01
48 Texarkana, TX-AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
54
0.04
52 Tucson, AZ, Metropolitan Statistical Area
24
0
5 Tullahoma-Manchester, TN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
1,659
1.66
51 Tulsa, OK, Metropolitan Statistical Area
72
0.01
42 Tuscaloosa, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
231
0.1
1 Union City, TN-KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
1,040
2.69
53 Vicksburg, MS, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
47 Vincennes, IN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
19
0.05
34 Warrensburg, MO, Micropolitan Statistical Area
140
0.27
42 Washington, IN, Micropolitan Statistical Area
33
0.1
27 Weatherford, OK, Micropolitan Statistical Area
115
0.42
47 West Plains, MO, Micropolitan Statistical Area
21
0.05


* In an effort to better match the ASARB standards for adherents, a few religious bodies changed the way their adherents were reported in 2010, including Amish groups, Friends groups, Jewish groups, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Non-denominational Christian Churches, and the United Methodist Church. This change does not affect any of the data in the newly released 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study. In fact, the data for these groups are now more comparable to that of other bodies than it was in previous decadal reports.

However, the change in methodology can distort assessments on growth or decline between 2000 and 2010 for each of these groups. County-level 2000 data using the new methodology are not readily available. ASARB staff has adjusted some 2000 county-level adherent statistics to allow for a more accurate picture on growth or decline. The revised maps and charts are now available on-line at www.usreligioncensus.org for those who are interested in these trends.

Source

2010 data were collected by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB) and include statistics for 236 religious groups, providing information on the number of their congregations and adherents within each state and county in the United States. Clifford Grammich, Kirk Hadaway, Richard Houseal, Dale E. Jones, Alexei Krindatch, Richie Stanley and Richard H. Taylor supervised the collection. These data originally appeared in 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study, published by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB). [More information on the data collection]