International Churches of Christ Metro Areas (2010) [ Counties | States ]
  QuickLists > U.S. Religious Groups > International Churches of Christ
Search QuickLists:

Using data from the 1980-2010 Religious Congregations and Membership Studies, this list ranks U.S. metro areas on the highest total number of adherents and the highest percent of the population in the International Churches of Christ. You can sort the list by clicking on the column headings.

Congregational "Adherents" include all full members, their children, and others who regularly attend services. "Percent" is the percentage of the total population that belongs to that denomination. Note: Adherents are sometimes residents of a county different than the location of their congregation.

[ More information on the data source ]

Complete List

Ranking Metro Area   [Download CSV]AdherentsPercent
13 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
34
0
11 Albuquerque, NM, Metropolitan Statistical Area
135
0.02
13 Amarillo, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
10
0
10 Anchorage, AK, Metropolitan Statistical Area
132
0.03
11 Appleton, WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
45
0.02
1 Athens-Clarke County, GA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
398
0.21
10 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,831
0.03
11 Auburn-Opelika, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
24
0.02
11 Austin-Round Rock, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
267
0.02
12 Bakersfield, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
55
0.01
11 Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD, Metropolitan Statistical Area
416
0.02
12 Bellingham, WA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
25
0.01
12 Birmingham-Hoover, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
78
0.01
7 Bloomington, IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
106
0.06
12 Boise City, ID, Metropolitan Statistical Area
90
0.01
10 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,518
0.03
6 Boulder, CO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
192
0.07
12 Bozeman, MT, Micropolitan Statistical Area
13
0.01
11 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT, Metropolitan Statistical Area
143
0.02
14 Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
12 Burlington-South Burlington, VT, Metropolitan Statistical Area
25
0.01
12 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
53
0.01
5 Champaign-Urbana, IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
217
0.09
14 Charleston-North Charleston, SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
14 Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
9 Charlottesville, VA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
91
0.04
12 Chattanooga, TN-GA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
55
0.01
14 Cheyenne, WY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
11 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
2,271
0.02
11 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
385
0.02
12 Cleveland-Elyria, OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
257
0.01
14 College Station-Bryan, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
11 Colorado Springs, CO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
156
0.02
7 Columbia, MO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
100
0.06
7 Columbia, SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
461
0.06
12 Columbus, OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
142
0.01
11 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,130
0.02
12 Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
38
0.01
12 Dayton, OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
62
0.01
12 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
33
0.01
11 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
588
0.02
14 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
12 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
277
0.01
6 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
339
0.07
11 Eau Claire, WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
39
0.02
11 El Paso, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
122
0.02
9 Fayetteville, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
152
0.04
14 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
10 Fort Collins, CO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
75
0.03
12 Fort Wayne, IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
37
0.01
12 Fresno, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
92
0.01
3 Gainesville, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
313
0.12
12 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
50
0.01
11 Great Falls, MT, Metropolitan Statistical Area
17
0.02
11 Greensboro-High Point, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
122
0.02
13 Greenville, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
5
0
12 Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
101
0.01
12 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
35
0.01
14 Harrisonburg, VA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
10 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT, Metropolitan Statistical Area
341
0.03
10 Hilo, HI, Micropolitan Statistical Area
57
0.03
12 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
683
0.01
11 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
410
0.02
13 Jackson, MS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
9
0
11 Jacksonville, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
312
0.02
11 Kahului-Wailuku-Lahaina, HI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
30
0.02
11 Kansas City, MO-KS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
418
0.02
12 Killeen-Temple, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
54
0.01
12 Knoxville, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
123
0.01
12 Lansing-East Lansing, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
50
0.01
14 Las Cruces, NM, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
12 Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV, Metropolitan Statistical Area
254
0.01
7 Lawrence, KS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
71
0.06
12 Lexington-Fayette, KY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
60
0.01
12 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
41
0.01
8 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
6,560
0.05
12 Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
183
0.01
12 Lubbock, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
16
0.01
11 Macon, GA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
46
0.02
11 Madison, WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
142
0.02
7 Manchester-Nashua, NH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
231
0.06
14 Manhattan, KS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
12 McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
93
0.01
12 Memphis, TN-MS-AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
96
0.01
10 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,511
0.03
11 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
276
0.02
12 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
249
0.01
6 Missoula, MT, Metropolitan Statistical Area
76
0.07
14 Morgantown, WV, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
14 Naples-Immokalee-Marco Island, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
10 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
490
0.03
12 New Orleans-Metairie, LA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
127
0.01
11 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
3,693
0.02
8 Norwich-New London, CT, Metropolitan Statistical Area
137
0.05
12 Oklahoma City, OK, Metropolitan Statistical Area
73
0.01
12 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
111
0.01
10 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
544
0.03
8 Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
396
0.05
11 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
131
0.02
12 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD, Metropolitan Statistical Area
858
0.01
11 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ, Metropolitan Statistical Area
701
0.02
12 Pittsburgh, PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
293
0.01
14 Portland-South Portland, ME, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
14 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
12 Reno, NV, Metropolitan Statistical Area
60
0.01
11 Richmond, VA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
245
0.02
12 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
531
0.01
9 Roanoke, VA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
137
0.04
12 Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
131
0.01
13 Salt Lake City, UT, Metropolitan Statistical Area
39
0
11 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
482
0.02
9 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,195
0.04
14 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
11 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
821
0.02
14 Sioux Falls, SD, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
10 Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
152
0.03
10 Springfield, IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
54
0.03
2 Springfield, MA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,146
0.18
12 Springfield, MO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
40
0.01
12 St. Louis, MO-IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
381
0.01
11 State College, PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
32
0.02
13 Syracuse, NY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
29
0
4 Tallahassee, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
350
0.1
12 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
346
0.01
12 Toledo, OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
75
0.01
14 Tucson, AZ, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
12 Tulsa, OK, Metropolitan Statistical Area
59
0.01
10 Urban Honolulu, HI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
320
0.03
8 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
795
0.05
11 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,036
0.02
10 Wichita, KS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
165
0.03
11 Worcester, MA-CT, Metropolitan Statistical Area
187
0.02


* In an effort to better match the ASARB standards for adherents, a few religious bodies changed the way their adherents were reported in 2010, including Amish groups, Friends groups, Jewish groups, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Non-denominational Christian Churches, and the United Methodist Church. This change does not affect any of the data in the newly released 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study. In fact, the data for these groups are now more comparable to that of other bodies than it was in previous decadal reports.

However, the change in methodology can distort assessments on growth or decline between 2000 and 2010 for each of these groups. County-level 2000 data using the new methodology are not readily available. ASARB staff has adjusted some 2000 county-level adherent statistics to allow for a more accurate picture on growth or decline. The revised maps and charts are now available on-line at www.usreligioncensus.org for those who are interested in these trends.

Source

2010 data were collected by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB) and include statistics for 236 religious groups, providing information on the number of their congregations and adherents within each state and county in the United States. Clifford Grammich, Kirk Hadaway, Richard Houseal, Dale E. Jones, Alexei Krindatch, Richie Stanley and Richard H. Taylor supervised the collection. These data originally appeared in 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study, published by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB). [More information on the data collection]