Serbian Orthodox Church in North America Metro Areas (2010) [ Counties | States ]
  QuickLists > U.S. Religious Groups > Serbian Orthodox Church in North America
Search QuickLists:

Using data from the 1980-2010 Religious Congregations and Membership Studies, this list ranks U.S. metro areas on the highest total number of adherents and the highest percent of the population in the Serbian Orthodox Church in North America. You can sort the list by clicking on the column headings.

Congregational "Adherents" include all full members, their children, and others who regularly attend services. "Percent" is the percentage of the total population that belongs to that denomination. Note: Adherents are sometimes residents of a county different than the location of their congregation.

[ More information on the data source ]

Complete List

Ranking Metro Area   [Download CSV]AdherentsPercent
1 Butte-Silver Bow, MT, Micropolitan Statistical Area
200
0.58
2 Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
577
0.46
3 Hot Springs, AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
321
0.33
4 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
4,500
0.29
5 Duluth, MN-WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
797
0.28
6 Racine, WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
535
0.27
7 The Dalles, OR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
50
0.2
8 Akron, OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,360
0.19
9 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
7,625
0.18
10 Rockford, IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
600
0.17
11 Johnstown, PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
200
0.14
11 Pittsburgh, PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
3,207
0.14
11 South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
450
0.14
12 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
11,564
0.12
13 Monroe, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
140
0.09
14 Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
930
0.08
14 Cleveland-Elyria, OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,611
0.08
14 Safford, AZ, Micropolitan Statistical Area
30
0.08
15 Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,300
0.07
15 North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
500
0.07
15 Winston-Salem, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
420
0.07
15 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
401
0.07
16 Corpus Christi, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
275
0.06
16 Portland-South Portland, ME, Metropolitan Statistical Area
315
0.06
16 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,625
0.06
17 Canton-Massillon, OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
182
0.05
17 Harrisburg-Carlisle, PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
260
0.05
17 Lebanon, PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
68
0.05
17 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,000
0.05
17 Redding, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
86
0.05
18 Eugene, OR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
140
0.04
18 Fairmont, WV, Micropolitan Statistical Area
25
0.04
18 Fresno, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
400
0.04
18 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
5,490
0.04
18 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,500
0.04
18 Sierra Vista-Douglas, AZ, Metropolitan Statistical Area
50
0.04
18 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV, Metropolitan Statistical Area
2,000
0.04
19 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,600
0.03
19 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
640
0.03
19 Jacksonville, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
400
0.03
19 Kansas City, MO-KS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
680
0.03
19 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
223
0.03
19 Salt Lake City, UT, Metropolitan Statistical Area
300
0.03
19 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
860
0.03
20 Boise City, ID, Metropolitan Statistical Area
140
0.02
20 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,000
0.02
20 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
509
0.02
20 Colorado Springs, CO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
125
0.02
20 Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
140
0.02
20 Erie, PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
60
0.02
20 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
404
0.02
20 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1,000
0.02
20 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
3,700
0.02
20 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ, Metropolitan Statistical Area
700
0.02
20 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
500
0.02
20 Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
400
0.02
20 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
900
0.02
20 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
350
0.02
20 St. Louis, MO-IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
632
0.02
21 Anchorage, AK, Metropolitan Statistical Area
40
0.01
21 Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
180
0.01
21 Columbus, OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
250
0.01
21 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
820
0.01
21 Huntsville, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
60
0.01
21 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
340
0.01
21 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD, Metropolitan Statistical Area
350
0.01
21 Reno, NV, Metropolitan Statistical Area
55
0.01
21 Urban Honolulu, HI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
50
0.01
22 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
280
0
22 Madison, WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
25
0
22 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
70
0
23 Fitzgerald, GA, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
23 Ogden-Clearfield, UT, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
23 Raleigh, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--


* In an effort to better match the ASARB standards for adherents, a few religious bodies changed the way their adherents were reported in 2010, including Amish groups, Friends groups, Jewish groups, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Non-denominational Christian Churches, and the United Methodist Church. This change does not affect any of the data in the newly released 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study. In fact, the data for these groups are now more comparable to that of other bodies than it was in previous decadal reports.

However, the change in methodology can distort assessments on growth or decline between 2000 and 2010 for each of these groups. County-level 2000 data using the new methodology are not readily available. ASARB staff has adjusted some 2000 county-level adherent statistics to allow for a more accurate picture on growth or decline. The revised maps and charts are now available on-line at www.usreligioncensus.org for those who are interested in these trends.

Source

2010 data were collected by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB) and include statistics for 236 religious groups, providing information on the number of their congregations and adherents within each state and county in the United States. Clifford Grammich, Kirk Hadaway, Richard Houseal, Dale E. Jones, Alexei Krindatch, Richie Stanley and Richard H. Taylor supervised the collection. These data originally appeared in 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study, published by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB). [More information on the data collection]




Bookmark and Share