Seventh Day Baptist General Conference, USA and Canada Metro Areas (2010) [ Counties | States ]
  QuickLists > U.S. Religious Groups > Seventh Day Baptist General Conference, USA and Canada
Search QuickLists:

The Seventh Day Baptist General Conference was organized in 1801 and continues the practice of sabbatarianism among English-speaking Baptists.

Using data from the 1980-2010 Religious Congregations and Membership Studies, this list ranks U.S. metro areas on the highest total number of adherents and the highest percent of the population in the Seventh Day Baptist General Conference, USA and Canada. You can sort the list by clicking on the column headings.

Congregational "Adherents" include all full members, their children, and others who regularly attend services. "Percent" is the percentage of the total population that belongs to that denomination. Note: Adherents are sometimes residents of a county different than the location of their congregation.

[ More information on the data source ]

Complete List

Ranking Metro Area   [Download CSV]AdherentsPercent
8 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
157
0.02
10 Albuquerque, NM, Metropolitan Statistical Area
10
0
11 Anchorage, AK, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
11 Anniston-Oxford-Jacksonville, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
10 Appleton, WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
10
0
10 Asheville, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
15
0
10 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
105
0
11 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
11 Austin-Round Rock, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
3 Battle Creek, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
113
0.08
8 Boulder, CO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
59
0.02
11 Centralia, WA, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
11 Charleston-North Charleston, SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
1 Clarksburg, WV, Micropolitan Statistical Area
285
0.3
9 Colorado Springs, CO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
56
0.01
10 Columbus, OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
65
0
11 Cumberland, MD-WV, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
11 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
8 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
145
0.02
10 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
78
0
7 Eau Claire, WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
65
0.04
11 Florence, SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
10 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
20
0
10 Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT, Metropolitan Statistical Area
42
0
10 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
67
0
10 Huntsville, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
13
0
2 Janesville-Beloit, WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
226
0.14
11 Jefferson City, MO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
9 Johnson City, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
12
0.01
11 Junction City, KS, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
11 Kansas City, MO-KS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
11 Kingsport-Bristol-Bristol, TN-VA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
10 Lincoln, NE, Metropolitan Statistical Area
15
0
9 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
53
0.01
10 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
67
0
10 Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
27
0
11 Lubbock, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
9 Madison, WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
73
0.01
11 McComb, MS, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
11 Memphis, TN-MS-AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
10 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
189
0
11 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
11 Muskogee, OK, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
10 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
21
0
10 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
298
0
10 North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
26
0
9 Norwich-New London, CT, Metropolitan Statistical Area
16
0.01
11 Oklahoma City, OK, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
11 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
9 Palatka, FL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
11
0.01
10 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD, Metropolitan Statistical Area
64
0
10 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
33
0
8 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
289
0.02
11 Rapid City, SD, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
9 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
316
0.01
5 Rochester, MN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
116
0.06
11 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
10 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
73
0
11 Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
2 Scottsboro, AL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
72
0.14
10 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
65
0
11 Springfield, MO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
11 St. Louis, MO-IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
9 Syracuse, NY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
45
0.01
11 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
4 Texarkana, TX-AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
109
0.07
6 Topeka, KS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
108
0.05
11 Tulsa, OK, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
5 Utica-Rome, NY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
178
0.06
1 Vineland-Bridgeton, NJ, Metropolitan Statistical Area
471
0.3
10 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV, Metropolitan Statistical Area
194
0
10 Watertown-Fort Drum, NY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
3
0
11 Whitewater-Elkhorn, WI, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
11 Wichita Falls, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
8 Yakima, WA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
38
0.02


* In an effort to better match the ASARB standards for adherents, a few religious bodies changed the way their adherents were reported in 2010, including Amish groups, Friends groups, Jewish groups, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Non-denominational Christian Churches, and the United Methodist Church. This change does not affect any of the data in the newly released 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study. In fact, the data for these groups are now more comparable to that of other bodies than it was in previous decadal reports.

However, the change in methodology can distort assessments on growth or decline between 2000 and 2010 for each of these groups. County-level 2000 data using the new methodology are not readily available. ASARB staff has adjusted some 2000 county-level adherent statistics to allow for a more accurate picture on growth or decline. The revised maps and charts are now available on-line at www.usreligioncensus.org for those who are interested in these trends.

Source

2010 data were collected by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB) and include statistics for 236 religious groups, providing information on the number of their congregations and adherents within each state and county in the United States. Clifford Grammich, Kirk Hadaway, Richard Houseal, Dale E. Jones, Alexei Krindatch, Richie Stanley and Richard H. Taylor supervised the collection. These data originally appeared in 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study, published by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB). [More information on the data collection]