Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church Metro Areas [ Counties | States ]
  QuickLists > U.S. Religious Groups > Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church
Search QuickLists:

The Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church (General Synod) grew out of the Seceder Movement that broke with the Church of Scotland in the 1740s. It was organized in the United States in 1790. In 1822, the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church split into northern and southern branches. The southern branch continues today as the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church (General Synod). The church is a member of the International Conference of Reformed Churches.

Using data from the 1980-2010 Religious Congregations and Membership Studies, this list ranks U.S. metro areas on the highest total number of adherents and the highest percent of the population in the Associate Reformed Presbyterian Church. You can sort the list by clicking on the column headings.

Complete List

Rank
2010
Rank
2000
Rank
1990
Rank
1980
Metro Area    [Download CSV]
Percent
2010
Percent
2000
Percent
1990
Percent
1980
1 1 1 3 Sebring, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
1.14
1.37
1.69
1.16
3 2 2 4 Greenwood, SC, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.5
1.02
1.15
1.01
2 3 4 1 Newberry, SC, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.54
0.9
0.99
1.27
5 4 3 2 Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.43
0.74
1
1.18
4 4 5 12 Columbia, SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.49
0.74
0.79
0.24
6 5 7 6 Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.25
0.47
0.42
0.54
8 6 6 5 Staunton-Waynesboro, VA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.2
0.41
0.5
0.68
15 7 13 24 Greensboro-High Point, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.08
0.29
0.15
0
12 8 11 25 Seneca, SC, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.11
0.27
0.24
--
10 8 10 13 Sumter, SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.18
0.27
0.31
0.19
7 9 6 7 Shelby, NC, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.22
0.23
0.5
0.46
11 10 9 11 Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.14
0.22
0.32
0.28
12 11 14 19 Asheville, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.11
0.2
0.13
0.07
9 11 8 9 Burlington, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.19
0.2
0.33
0.32
14 12 9 8 Russellville, AR, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.09
0.17
0.32
0.4
13 13 12 10 Gaffney, SC, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.1
0.15
0.18
0.3
16 13 16 16 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.07
0.15
0.1
0.14
14 14 20 13 Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.09
0.14
0.04
0.19
13 15 25 25 Albemarle, NC, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.1
0.12
--
--
15 15 25 25 Sebastian-Vero Beach, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.08
0.12
--
--
16 16 25 25 The Villages, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.07
0.11
--
--
16 17 15 25 Florence, SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.07
0.1
0.11
--
14 17 18 16 Spartanburg, SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.09
0.1
0.08
0.14
18 18 14 17 Memphis, TN-MS-AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.05
0.09
0.13
0.13
20 19 20 20 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0.08
0.04
0.05
18 20 24 25 Boone, NC, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.05
0.07
0
--
24 20 25 25 Pinehurst-Southern Pines, NC, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
0.07
--
--
22 20 18 18 Selma, AL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.07
0.08
0.09
20 21 25 25 North Port-Sarasota-Bradenton, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0.06
--
--
24 22 17 16 Gloversville, NY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
0.05
0.09
0.14
21 23 19 19 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.03
0.05
0.07
21 23 23 24 Charleston-North Charleston, SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.03
0.01
0
23 23 22 25 Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Beaufort, SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
0.03
0.02
--
16 23 22 14 Tupelo, MS, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.07
0.03
0.02
0.17
21 24 21 22 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.02
24 24 22 25 Florence-Muscle Shoals, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
0.02
0.02
--
22 24 25 25 Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, MS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.02
--
--
24 24 25 25 Jackson, MS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
0.02
--
--
24 24 21 20 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
0.02
0.03
0.05
22 24 20 25 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC-NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.02
0.04
--
23 24 23 24 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
0.02
0.01
0
21 24 24 25 Raleigh, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.02
0
--
22 25 23 25 Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.01
0.01
--
22 25 25 25 Durham-Chapel Hill, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.01
--
--
21 25 23 25 Huntsville, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.01
0.01
--
23 25 23 23 Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
0.01
0.01
0.01
22 25 25 25 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.01
--
--
23 25 24 24 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
0.01
0
0
22 25 23 25 Pittsburgh, PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.01
0.01
--
17 25 22 21 Roanoke, VA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.06
0.01
0.02
0.03
23 25 23 24 St. Louis, MO-IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
0.01
0.01
0
21 25 23 21 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.03
22 25 22 25 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.01
0.02
--
22 25 25 25 Wilmington, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.01
--
--
23 26 24 25 Birmingham-Hoover, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
0
0
--
24 26 25 25 Corpus Christi, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
0
--
--
23 26 25 25 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
0
--
--
24 26 25 25 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
0
--
--
23 26 25 25 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
0
--
--
23 26 25 25 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
0
--
--
22 26 25 25 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0
--
--
23 26 25 25 Rochester, NY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
0
--
--
23 26 25 25 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
0
--
--
24 26 25 25 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
0
--
--
24 26 25 25 Toledo, OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
0
--
--
22 26 25 23 Winston-Salem, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0
--
0.01
17 27 25 25 Blacksburg-Christiansburg-Radford, VA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.06
--
--
--
24 27 21 25 Columbus, GA-AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
0.03
--
23 27 25 25 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
--
--
--
21 27 25 25 Fayetteville, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
--
--
--
23 27 25 25 Jacksonville, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
--
--
--
18 27 25 25 Jacksonville, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.05
--
--
--
23 27 25 25 Johnson City, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
--
--
--
3 27 25 25 Laurinburg, NC, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.5
--
--
--
19 27 25 25 Monroe, LA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
--
--
--
23 27 25 25 Montgomery, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
--
--
--
23 27 25 25 North Wilkesboro, NC, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0
--
--
--
14 27 25 25 Opelousas, LA, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.09
--
--
--
19 27 25 25 Paducah, KY-IL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
--
--
--
23 27 25 25 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
--
--
--
24 27 22 22 Pine Bluff, AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
0.02
0.02
22 27 25 25 Scranton--Wilkes-Barre--Hazleton, PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
--
--
--
23 27 25 25 Springfield, MO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
--
--
--
24 27 18 15 Union City, TN-KY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
--
--
0.08
0.15
23 27 25 25 Weirton-Steubenville, WV-OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
--
--
--
20 27 25 25 Wilson, NC, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
--
--
--
22 27 25 25 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
--
--
--


* In an effort to better match the ASARB standards for adherents, a few religious bodies changed the way their adherents were reported in 2010, including Amish groups, Friends groups, Jewish groups, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Non-denominational Christian Churches, and the United Methodist Church. This change does not affect any of the data in the newly released 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study. In fact, the data for these groups are now more comparable to that of other bodies than it was in previous decadal reports.

However, the change in methodology can distort assessments on growth or decline between 2000 and 2010 for each of these groups. County-level 2000 data using the new methodology are not readily available. ASARB staff has adjusted some 2000 county-level adherent statistics to allow for a more accurate picture on growth or decline. The revised maps and charts are now available on-line at www.usreligioncensus.org for those who are interested in these trends.

Source

2010 data were collected by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB) and include statistics for 236 religious groups, providing information on the number of their congregations and adherents within each state and county in the United States. Clifford Grammich, Kirk Hadaway, Richard Houseal, Dale E. Jones, Alexei Krindatch, Richie Stanley and Richard H. Taylor supervised the collection. These data originally appeared in 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study, published by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB). [More information on the data collection]