Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America Metro Areas [ Counties | States ]
  QuickLists > U.S. Religious Groups > Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America
Search QuickLists:

The Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America began with the Orthodox mission among Arab-Americans by the Russian Orthodox Church in 1892. The mission became independent in 1925. The Patriarchate of Antioch is one of the four ancient Christian centers in the Eastern Mediterranean.

Using data from the 1980-2010 Religious Congregations and Membership Studies, this list ranks U.S. metro areas on the highest total number of adherents and the highest percent of the population in the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America. You can sort the list by clicking on the column headings.

Complete List

Rank
2010
Rank
2000
Metro Area   [Download CSV]
Percent
2010
Percent
2000
20 30 Abilene, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0.02
19 24 Akron, OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
0.08
21 29 Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.03
24 31 Albuquerque, NM, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
0.01
5 16 Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.21
0.16
14 13 Altoona, PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.09
0.23
12 14 Anchorage, AK, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.12
0.21
21 33 Ann Arbor, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
--
22 30 Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.02
23 30 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
0.02
18 27 Austin-Round Rock, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.05
0.05
24 32 Bakersfield, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
0
21 30 Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.02
14 29 Barnstable Town, MA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.09
0.03
14 19 Beaumont-Port Arthur, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.09
0.13
18 28 Beckley, WV, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.05
0.04
17 27 Bellingham, WA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.06
0.05
22 33 Birmingham-Hoover, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
--
10 17 Bloomington, IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.14
0.15
22 31 Boise City, ID, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.01
18 26 Boone, NC, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.05
0.06
14 17 Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.09
0.15
8 21 Boulder, CO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.16
0.11
20 33 Bowling Green, KY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
--
12 18 Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.12
0.14
19 25 Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
0.07
16 19 Canton-Massillon, OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.07
0.13
22 33 Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
--
20 33 Cape Girardeau, MO-IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
--
9 12 Cedar Rapids, IA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.15
0.24
15 24 Chambersburg-Waynesboro, PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.08
0.08
18 30 Champaign-Urbana, IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.05
0.02
2 1 Charleston, WV, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.45
0.71
24 31 Charleston-North Charleston, SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
0.01
18 30 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN-WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.05
0.02
22 31 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.01
15 25 Cleveland-Elyria, OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.08
0.07
12 16 Coeur d'Alene, ID, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.12
0.16
21 33 College Station-Bryan, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
--
23 32 Columbia, SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
0
22 33 Columbus, OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
--
24 31 Corpus Christi, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
0.01
22 30 Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.02
20 28 Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0.04
20 30 Denver-Aurora-Lakewood, CO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0.02
14 24 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.09
0.08
20 32 Dothan, AL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0
17 22 El Paso, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.06
0.1
24 28 Elkhart-Goshen, IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
0.04
24 31 Fargo, ND-MN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
--
0.01
17 33 Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.06
--
7 33 Flint, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.17
--
19 30 Fort Collins, CO, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
0.02
19 27 Fort Wayne, IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
0.05
13 33 Fredericksburg, TX, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.1
--
14 33 Garden City, KS, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.09
--
14 8 Gillette, WY, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.09
0.3
14 16 Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.09
0.16
22 32 Greenville-Anderson-Mauldin, SC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0
19 33 Holland, MI, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
--
19 33 Hot Springs, AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
--
19 29 Houston-The Woodlands-Sugar Land, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
0.03
19 26 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
0.06
19 26 Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson, IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
0.06
15 33 Iowa City, IA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.08
--
3 9 Iron Mountain, MI-WI, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.37
0.29
21 29 Jackson, MS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.03
17 29 Jacksonville, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.06
0.03
19 33 Jacksonville, TX, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
--
21 29 Johnson City, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.03
5 5 Johnstown, PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.21
0.38
22 33 Kansas City, MO-KS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
--
7 4 Kearney, NE, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.17
0.47
16 25 La Crosse-Onalaska, WI-MN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.07
0.07
20 30 Lafayette, LA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0.02
21 29 Lake Charles, LA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.03
22 30 Lansing-East Lansing, MI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.02
22 30 Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.02
18 28 Lexington-Fayette, KY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.05
0.04
22 31 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.01
19 27 Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
0.05
15 19 Louisville/Jefferson County, KY-IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.08
0.13
21 33 Lynchburg, VA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
--
20 30 Madison, WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0.02
20 32 Manhattan, KS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0
21 28 Memphis, TN-MS-AR, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.04
19 29 Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
0.03
21 30 Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.02
22 30 Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.02
22 33 Modesto, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
--
20 29 Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC-NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0.03
15 29 Naples-Immokalee-Marco Island, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.08
0.03
20 28 Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0.04
1 3 New Castle, PA, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.48
0.68
20 30 New Orleans-Metairie, LA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0.02
21 29 New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.03
22 30 Ocala, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.02
21 33 Odessa, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
--
14 20 Oklahoma City, OK, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.09
0.12
19 33 Olympia-Tumwater, WA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
--
19 23 Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
0.09
21 29 Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.03
18 21 Ottawa-Peru, IL, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.05
0.11
22 33 Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
--
20 33 Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
--
20 33 Peoria, IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
--
22 31 Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.01
20 28 Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0.04
12 15 Pittsburgh, PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.12
0.17
21 30 Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.02
20 32 Providence-Warwick, RI-MA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0
19 27 Raleigh, NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
0.05
19 33 Rapid City, SD, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
--
21 29 Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.03
20 28 Rochester, NY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0.04
21 30 Sacramento--Roseville--Arden-Arcade, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.02
11 7 Salina, KS, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.13
0.31
20 33 Salisbury, MD-DE, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
--
21 27 Salt Lake City, UT, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.05
22 33 San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
--
21 30 San Diego-Carlsbad, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.02
20 28 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0.04
19 27 San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
0.05
15 18 Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.08
0.14
15 26 Santa Fe, NM, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.08
0.06
15 15 Santa Maria-Santa Barbara, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.08
0.17
22 31 Santa Rosa, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.01
19 16 Scranton--Wilkes-Barre--Hazleton, PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
0.16
22 30 Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.02
21 30 Shreveport-Bossier City, LA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.02
12 11 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.12
0.25
17 27 Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.06
0.05
22 33 Springfield, MA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
--
23 33 St. Louis, MO-IL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0
--
17 23 Syracuse, NY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.06
0.09
22 31 Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0.01
9 9 Terre Haute, IN, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.15
0.29
8 7 Toledo, OH, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.16
0.31
20 25 Topeka, KS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0.07
21 28 Tucson, AZ, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.04
20 28 Tulsa, OK, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.03
0.04
18 33 Twin Falls, ID, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.05
--
21 33 Tyler, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
--
19 29 Utica-Rome, NY, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
0.03
19 24 Vallejo-Fairfield, CA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.04
0.08
4 2 Vicksburg, MS, Micropolitan Statistical Area
0.32
0.69
22 32 Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.01
0
21 28 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.04
18 20 Wichita Falls, TX, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.05
0.12
6 6 Wichita, KS, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.2
0.32
8 10 Worcester, MA-CT, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.16
0.27
13 15 Yakima, WA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.1
0.17
17 24 York-Hanover, PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.06
0.08
21 26 Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA, Metropolitan Statistical Area
0.02
0.06


* In an effort to better match the ASARB standards for adherents, a few religious bodies changed the way their adherents were reported in 2010, including Amish groups, Friends groups, Jewish groups, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Non-denominational Christian Churches, and the United Methodist Church. This change does not affect any of the data in the newly released 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study. In fact, the data for these groups are now more comparable to that of other bodies than it was in previous decadal reports.

However, the change in methodology can distort assessments on growth or decline between 2000 and 2010 for each of these groups. County-level 2000 data using the new methodology are not readily available. ASARB staff has adjusted some 2000 county-level adherent statistics to allow for a more accurate picture on growth or decline. The revised maps and charts are now available on-line at www.usreligioncensus.org for those who are interested in these trends.

Source

2010 data were collected by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB) and include statistics for 236 religious groups, providing information on the number of their congregations and adherents within each state and county in the United States. Clifford Grammich, Kirk Hadaway, Richard Houseal, Dale E. Jones, Alexei Krindatch, Richie Stanley and Richard H. Taylor supervised the collection. These data originally appeared in 2010 U.S. Religion Census: Religious Congregations & Membership Study, published by the Association of Statisticians of American Religious Bodies (ASARB). [More information on the data collection]