Indiana Mainline Churches, 1986
Data Archive > U.S. Surveys > General Population > National > Other National Surveys > Codebook
- All frequencies are raw numbers (no weights used).
-
- 1) Denomination code (DENOM)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Disciples of Christ | 279 | 20.1 |
3) Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod | 240 | 17.3 |
4) United Church of Christ | 201 | 14.5 |
5) Methodist | 366 | 26.4 |
6) Presbyterian | 302 | 21.8 |
TOTAL | 1388 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 2) Survey ID for churches returning survey (CHURCHID)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1388 | 628.086 | 1589 |
-
- 3) 5 digit zip code (ZIP)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1388 | 46949.104 | 601 |
-
- 4) Person completing survey (POSITION)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Pastor | 430 | 82.7 |
2) Lay official | 61 | 11.7 |
3) Other | 29 | 5.6 |
Missing | 868 | |
TOTAL | 520 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 5) Listed below are several alternatives touching upon important dimensions of a church's identity. Using the seven point scale between each set of alternatives, please circle the number which best describes where your congregation falls, "1" meaning most like the characteristic on the left, "7" meaning most like the characteristic on the right, "4" meaning an equal mix of both. Is your church -- More influenced by contemporary ideas and trends, or more influenced by its history and tradition? (HISTINF1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) More influenced by contemporary ideas and trends | 5 | 1.0 |
2) | 40 | 7.7 |
3) | 73 | 14.1 |
4) Equal mix of both | 123 | 23.7 |
5) | 122 | 23.6 |
6) | 113 | 21.8 |
7) More influenced by its history and tradition | 42 | 8.1 |
Missing | 870 | |
TOTAL | 518 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 6) Please reflect on whether your congregation has changed regarding being more influenced by contemporary ideas and trends, or more influenced by its history and tradition. Write in the number that best describes your congregation approximately 10 years ago. If there has been no change, write in the same number as you did in the question above. (HISTINF2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) More influenced by contemporary ideas and trends | 5 | 1.1 |
2) | 18 | 4.0 |
3) | 25 | 5.5 |
4) Equal mix of both | 62 | 13.7 |
5) | 102 | 22.6 |
6) | 172 | 38.1 |
7) More influenced by its history and tradition | 67 | 14.9 |
Missing | 937 | |
TOTAL | 451 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 7) Listed below are several alternatives touching upon important dimensions of a church's identity. Using the seven point scale between each set of alternatives, please circle the number which best describes where your congregation falls, "1" meaning most like the characteristic on the left, "7" meaning most like the characteristic on the right, "4" meaning an equal mix of both. Is your church -- Primarily oriented to serving the world beyond its membership, or primarily oriented to serving its own members? (WHOSERV1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Primarily oriented to serving the world beyond its membership | 5 | 1.0 |
2) | 34 | 6.6 |
3) | 69 | 13.3 |
4) Equal mix of both | 162 | 31.3 |
5) | 126 | 24.3 |
6) | 92 | 17.8 |
7) Primarily oriented to serving its own members | 30 | 5.8 |
Missing | 870 | |
TOTAL | 518 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 8) Please reflect on whether your congregation has changed regarding whether it is primarily oriented to serving the world beyond its membership, or primarily oriented to serving its own members. Write the number that best describes your congregation approximately 10 years ago. If there has been no change, write in the same number as you did for the question above. (WHOSERV2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Primarily oriented to serving the world beyond its membership | 5 | 1.1 |
2) | 15 | 3.3 |
3) | 29 | 6.4 |
4) Equal mix of both | 103 | 22.8 |
5) | 97 | 21.5 |
6) | 137 | 30.3 |
7) Primarily oriented to serving its own members | 66 | 14.6 |
Missing | 936 | |
TOTAL | 452 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 9) Listed below are several alternatives touching upon important dimensions of a church's identity. Using the seven point scale between each set of alternatives, please circle the number which best describes where your congregation falls, "1" meaning most like the characteristic on the left, "7" meaning most like the characteristic on the right, "4" meaning an equal mix of both. Does your congregation -- Feel like a loosely knit association of individuals and groups, or does it feel like one large family? (CONGFAM1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Loosely knit association of individuals and groups | 19 | 3.7 |
2) | 40 | 7.7 |
3) | 80 | 15.5 |
4) Equal mix of both | 87 | 16.8 |
5) | 90 | 17.4 |
6) | 126 | 24.4 |
7) One large family | 75 | 14.5 |
Missing | 871 | |
TOTAL | 517 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 10) Please reflect on whether your congregation has changed regarding feels like a loosely knit association of individuals and groups, or feels like one large family. Write in the number that best describes your congregation approximately 10 years ago. If there has been no change, write in the same number as you did for the question above. (CONGFAM2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Loosely knit association of individuals and groups | 16 | 3.5 |
2) | 40 | 8.9 |
3) | 58 | 12.9 |
4) Equal mix of both | 79 | 17.5 |
5) | 97 | 21.5 |
6) | 88 | 19.5 |
7) One large family | 73 | 16.2 |
Missing | 937 | |
TOTAL | 451 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 11) Listed below are several alternatives touching upon important dimensions of a church's identity. Using the seven point scale between each set of alternatives, please circle the number which best describes where your congregation falls, "1" meaning most like the characteristic on the left, "7" meaning most like the characteristic on the right, "4" meaning an equal mix of both. Is your church -- Strengths notwithstanding, considered one of the "status" churches in the area, or known as a prestigious church in the area? (PRESTGE1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Considered one of the "status" churches in the area | 71 | 13.7 |
2) | 95 | 18.4 |
3) | 61 | 11.8 |
4) Equal mix of both | 86 | 16.6 |
5) | 69 | 13.3 |
6) | 84 | 16.2 |
7) Known as a prestigious church in the area | 51 | 9.9 |
Missing | 871 | |
TOTAL | 517 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 12) Please reflect on whether your congregation has changed regarding whether it is considered one of the "status" churches in the area, or known as a prestigious church in the area. Write in the number that best describes your congregation approximately 10 years ago. If there has been no change, write in the same number as you did for the question above. (PRESTGE2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Considered one of the "status" churches in the area | 70 | 15.5 |
2) | 76 | 16.8 |
3) | 50 | 11.0 |
4) Equal mix of both | 68 | 15.0 |
5) | 56 | 12.4 |
6) | 73 | 16.1 |
7) Known as a prestigious church in the area | 60 | 13.2 |
Missing | 935 | |
TOTAL | 453 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 13) Listed below are several alternatives touching upon important dimensions of a church's identity. Using the seven point scale between each set of alternatives, please circle the number which best describes where your congregation falls, "1" meaning most like the characteristic on the left, "7" meaning most like the characteristic on the right, "4" meaning an equal mix of both. Is your congregation's approach to social issues -- Decidedly "activist." You have a proven history of taking a stand as a congregation, or basically educational, leaving any social action to individual conscience? (SOCACT1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Activist, with a proven history of taking a stand as a congregation | 1 | 0.2 |
2) | 10 | 1.9 |
3) | 39 | 7.6 |
4) Equal mix of both | 72 | 14.0 |
5) | 99 | 19.2 |
6) | 175 | 33.9 |
7) Educational, leaving any social action to individual conscience | 120 | 23.3 |
Missing | 872 | |
TOTAL | 516 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 14) Please reflect on whether your congregation has changed regarding whether your congregation's approach to social issues is decidedly "activist." You have a proven history of taking a stand as a congregation, or basically educational, leaving any social action to individual conscience. Write in the number that best describes your congregation approximately 10 years ago. If there has been no change, write in the same number as you did for the question above. (SOCACT2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Activist, with a proven history of taking a stand as a congregation | 3 | 0.7 |
2) | 7 | 1.5 |
3) | 17 | 3.8 |
4) Equal mix of both | 51 | 11.3 |
5) | 79 | 17.5 |
6) | 139 | 30.8 |
7) Educational, leaving any social action to individual conscience | 156 | 34.5 |
Missing | 936 | |
TOTAL | 452 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 15) Listed below are several alternatives touching upon important dimensions of a church's identity. Using the seven point scale between each set of alternatives, please circle the number which best describes where your congregation falls, "1" meaning most like the characteristic on the left, "7" meaning most like the characteristic on the right, "4" meaning an equal mix of both. Your congregation's approach to individual salvation -- is decidedly evangelistic, stressing a definite conversion experience, or emphasizes education, nurture and gradual growth in the faith? (INDSALV1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Evangelistic, stressing a definite conversion experience | 17 | 3.3 |
2) | 24 | 4.7 |
3) | 32 | 6.2 |
4) Equal mix of both | 71 | 13.8 |
5) | 92 | 17.9 |
6) | 139 | 27.1 |
7) Educational, nurture and gradual growth in the faith | 138 | 26.9 |
Missing | 875 | |
TOTAL | 513 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 16) Please reflect on whether your congregation has changed regarding your congregation's approach to individual salvation being decidedly evangelistic, stressing a definite conversion experience, or emphasizing education, nurture and gradual growth. Write in the number that best describes your congregation approximately 10 years ago. If there has been no change, write in the same number as you did for the question above. (INDSALV2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Evangelistic, stressing a definite conversion experience | 21 | 4.7 |
2) | 19 | 4.2 |
3) | 26 | 5.8 |
4) Equal mix of both | 56 | 12.5 |
5) | 75 | 16.7 |
6) | 122 | 27.2 |
7) Educational, nurture and gradual growth in the faith | 129 | 28.8 |
Missing | 940 | |
TOTAL | 448 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 17) Please assign a priority ranking to each type of activity according to its importance for your congregation. The activity to which your congregation gives greatest importance should be ranked "7", and so on to the activity given the least importance, which should be ranked "1". -- Priority of worship (PRINOW1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Lowest importance | 1 | 0.2 |
3) | 1 | 0.2 |
4) | 5 | 1.0 |
5) | 21 | 4.1 |
6) | 53 | 10.3 |
7) Highest importance | 432 | 84.2 |
Missing | 875 | |
TOTAL | 513 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 18) Please assign a priority ranking to each type of activity according to its importance for your congregation. The activity to which your congregation gives greatest importance should be ranked "7", and so on to the activity given least importance, which should be "1". -- Priority of education (PRINOW2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Lowest importance | 2 | 0.4 |
2) | 9 | 1.8 |
3) | 20 | 3.9 |
4) | 43 | 8.4 |
5) | 142 | 27.7 |
6) | 246 | 48.0 |
7) Highest importance | 51 | 9.9 |
Missing | 875 | |
TOTAL | 513 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 19) Please assign a priority ranking to each type of activity according to its importance for your congregation. The activity to which your congregation gives greatest importance should be ranked "7", and so on to the activity given least importance, which should be "1". -- Priority of fellowship and caring (PRINOW3)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
2) | 11 | 2.1 |
3) | 18 | 3.5 |
4) | 63 | 12.3 |
5) | 199 | 38.9 |
6) | 151 | 29.5 |
7) Highest importance | 70 | 13.7 |
Missing | 876 | |
TOTAL | 512 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 20) Please assign a priority ranking to each type of activity according to its importance for your congregation. The activity to which your congregation gives greatest importance should be ranked "7", and so on to the activity given least importance, which should be "1". -- Priority of local evangelism (PRINOW4)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Lowest importance | 57 | 11.1 |
2) | 138 | 27.0 |
3) | 117 | 22.9 |
4) | 117 | 22.9 |
5) | 44 | 8.6 |
6) | 21 | 4.1 |
7) Highest importance | 18 | 3.5 |
Missing | 876 | |
TOTAL | 512 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 21) Please assign a priority ranking to each type of activity according to its importance for your congregation. The activity to which your congregation gives greatest importance should be ranked "7", and so on to the activity given least importance, which should be "1". -- Priority of social service and outreach (PRINOW5)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Lowest importance | 18 | 3.5 |
2) | 133 | 26.0 |
3) | 129 | 25.2 |
4) | 141 | 27.6 |
5) | 48 | 9.4 |
6) | 33 | 6.5 |
7) Highest importance | 9 | 1.8 |
Missing | 877 | |
TOTAL | 511 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 22) Please assign a priority ranking to each type of activity according to its importance for your congregation. The activity to which your congregation gives greatest importance should be ranked "7", and so on to the activity given least importance, which should be "1". -- Priority of social action (PRINOW6)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Lowest importance | 339 | 66.6 |
2) | 82 | 16.1 |
3) | 46 | 9.0 |
4) | 24 | 4.7 |
5) | 9 | 1.8 |
6) | 5 | 1.0 |
7) Highest importance | 4 | 0.8 |
Missing | 879 | |
TOTAL | 509 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 23) Please assign a priority ranking to each type of activity according to its importance for your congregation. The activity to which your congregation gives greatest importance should be ranked "7", and so on to the activity given least importance, which should be "1". -- Priority of world mission (PRINOW7)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Lowest importance | 52 | 10.2 |
2) | 99 | 19.3 |
3) | 147 | 28.7 |
4) | 116 | 22.7 |
5) | 49 | 9.6 |
6) | 31 | 6.1 |
7) Highest importance | 18 | 3.5 |
Missing | 876 | |
TOTAL | 512 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 24) Please indicate your assessment of how effectively the congregation has carried out its programs in relation to the priority rating you gave this area in the previous set of questions. If the congregation has performed satisfactorily, circle an "S"; if the performance has been unsatisfactory, circle a "U". Remember, a program area which receives low priority may be satisfactorily addressed with little or no activity. Thus it would be rated "S" in the same way that a high priority area that is satisfactorily addressed would receive an "S". In other words, the performance level has been satisfactory to match the priority it is given. -- Effectiveness of worship (PRIEFF1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Unsatisfactory | 20 | 3.9 |
2) Satisfactory | 493 | 96.1 |
Missing | 875 | |
TOTAL | 513 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 25) Please indicate your assessment of how effectively the congregation has carried out its programs in relation to the priority rating you gave this area in the previous set of questions. If the congregation has performed satisfactorily, circle an "S"; if the performance has been unsatisfactory, circle a "U". Remember, a program area which receives low priority may be satisfactorily addressed with little or no activity. Thus it would be rated "S" in the same way that a high priority area that is satisfactorily addressed would receive an "S". In other words, the performance level has been satisfactory to match the priority it is given. -- Effectiveness of education (PRIEFF2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Unsatisfactory | 162 | 31.8 |
2) Satisfactory | 348 | 68.2 |
Missing | 878 | |
TOTAL | 510 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 26) Please indicate your assessment of how effectively the congregation has carried out its programs in relation to the priority rating you gave this area in the previous set of questions. If the congregation has performed satisfactorily, circle an "S"; if the performance has been unsatisfactory, circle a "U". Remember, a program area which receives low priority may be satisfactorily addressed with little or no activity. Thus it would be rated "S" in the same way that a high priority area that is satisfactorily addressed would receive an "S". In other words, the performance level has been satisfactory to match the priority it is given. -- Effectiveness of fellowship and caring (PRIEFF3)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Unsatisfactory | 79 | 15.5 |
2) Satisfactory | 432 | 84.5 |
Missing | 877 | |
TOTAL | 511 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 27) Please indicate your assessment of how effectively the congregation has carried out its programs in relation to the priority rating you gave this area in the previous set of questions. If the congregation has performed satisfactorily, circle an "S"; if the performance has been unsatisfactory, circle a "U". Remember, a program area which receives low priority may be satisfactorily addressed with little or no activity. Thus it would be rated "S" in the same way that a high priority area that is satisfactorily addressed would receive an "S". In other words, the performance level has been satisfactory to match the priority it is given. -- Effectiveness of local evangelism (PRIEFF4)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Unsatisfactory | 282 | 55.2 |
2) Satisfactory | 229 | 44.8 |
Missing | 877 | |
TOTAL | 511 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 28) Please indicate your assessment of how effectively the congregation has carried out its programs in relation to the priority rating you gave this area in the previous set of questions. If the congregation has performed satisfactorily, circle an "S"; if the performance has been unsatisfactory, circle a "U". Remember, a program area which receives low priority may be satisfactorily addressed with little or no activity. Thus it would be rated "S" in the same way that a high priority area that is satisfactorily addressed would receive an "S". In other words, the performance level has been satisfactory to match the priority it is given. -- Effectiveness of social services and outreach (PRIEFF5)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Unsatisfactory | 108 | 21.3 |
2) Satisfactory | 400 | 78.7 |
Missing | 880 | |
TOTAL | 508 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 29) Please indicate your assessment of how effectively the congregation has carried out its programs in relation to the priority rating you gave this area in the previous set of questions. If the congregation has performed satisfactorily, circle an "S"; if the performance has been unsatisfactory, circle a "U". Remember, a program area which receives low priority may be satisfactorily addressed with little or no activity. Thus it would be rated "S" in the same way that a high priority area that is satisfactorily addressed would receive an "S". In other words, the performance level has been satisfactory to match the priority it is given. -- Effectiveness of social action (PRIEFF6)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Unsatisfactory | 224 | 44.2 |
2) Satisfactory | 283 | 55.8 |
Missing | 881 | |
TOTAL | 507 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 30) Please indicate your assessment of how effectively the congregation has carried out its programs in relation to the priority rating you gave this area in the previous set of questions. If the congregation has performed satisfactorily, circle an "S"; if the performance has been unsatisfactory, circle a "U". Remember, a program area which receives low priority may be satisfactorily addressed with little or no activity. Thus it would be rated "S" in the same way that a high priority area that is satisfactorily addressed would receive an "S". In other words, the performance level has been satisfactory to match the priority it is given. -- Effectiveness of world mission (PRIEFF7)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Unsatisfactory | 130 | 25.5 |
2) Satisfactory | 379 | 74.5 |
Missing | 879 | |
TOTAL | 509 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 31) Please indicate whether any significant changes have occurred in your congregation's priorities. Please rank the activities as you believe they were 10 or so years ago. The activity to which your congregation gave greatest importance should be ranked "7", and so on to the activity given least importance, which should be ranked "1". -- Priority of worship 10 years ago (PRI10YR1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Lowest importance | 1 | 0.2 |
2) | 3 | 0.6 |
3) | 2 | 0.4 |
4) | 11 | 2.2 |
5) | 27 | 5.5 |
6) | 56 | 11.4 |
7) Highest importance | 393 | 79.7 |
Missing | 895 | |
TOTAL | 493 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 32) Please indicate whether any significant changes have occurred in your congregation's priorities. Please rank the activities as you believe they were 10 or so years ago. The activity to which your congregation gave greatest importance should be ranked "7", and so on to the activity given least importance, which should be ranked "1". -- Priority of education 10 years ago (PRI10YR2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Lowest importance | 3 | 0.6 |
2) | 8 | 1.6 |
3) | 12 | 2.4 |
4) | 41 | 8.3 |
5) | 116 | 23.6 |
6) | 250 | 50.8 |
7) Highest importance | 62 | 12.6 |
Missing | 896 | |
TOTAL | 492 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 33) Please indicate whether any significant changes have occurred in your congregation's priorities. Please rank the activities as you believe they were 10 or so years ago. The activity to which your congregation gave greatest importance should be ranked "7", and so on to the activity given least importance, which should be ranked "1". -- Priority of fellowship and caring 10 years ago (PRI10YR3)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Lowest importance | 3 | 0.6 |
2) | 15 | 3.1 |
3) | 35 | 7.1 |
4) | 84 | 17.1 |
5) | 191 | 38.9 |
6) | 112 | 22.8 |
7) Highest importance | 51 | 10.4 |
Missing | 897 | |
TOTAL | 491 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 34) Please indicate whether any significant changes have occurred in your congregation's priorities. Please rank the activities as you believe they were 10 or so years ago. The activity to which your congregation gave greatest importance should be ranked "7", and so on to the activity given least importance, which should be ranked "1". -- Priority of local evangelism 10 years ago (PRI10YR4)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Lowest importance | 55 | 11.2 |
2) | 104 | 21.2 |
3) | 105 | 21.4 |
4) | 134 | 27.3 |
5) | 54 | 11.0 |
6) | 28 | 5.7 |
7) Highest importance | 11 | 2.2 |
Missing | 897 | |
TOTAL | 491 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 35) Please indicate whether any significant changes have occurred in your congregation's priorities. Please rank the activities as you believe they were 10 or so years ago. The activity to which your congregation gave greatest importance should be ranked "7", and so on to the activity given least importance, which should be ranked "1". -- Priority of social service and outreach 10 years ago (PRI10YR5)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Lowest importance | 29 | 5.9 |
2) | 152 | 31.0 |
3) | 155 | 31.6 |
4) | 96 | 19.6 |
5) | 30 | 6.1 |
6) | 23 | 4.7 |
7) Highest importance | 5 | 1.0 |
Missing | 898 | |
TOTAL | 490 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 36) Please indicate whether any significant changes have occurred in your congregation's priorities. Please rank the activities as you believe they were 10 or so years ago. The activity to which your congregation gave greatest importance should be ranked "7", and so on to the activity given least importance, which should be ranked "1". -- Priority of social action 10 years ago (PRI10YR6)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Lowest importance | 326 | 66.8 |
2) | 86 | 17.6 |
3) | 37 | 7.6 |
4) | 19 | 3.9 |
5) | 7 | 1.4 |
6) | 9 | 1.8 |
7) Highest importance | 4 | 0.8 |
Missing | 900 | |
TOTAL | 488 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 37) Please indicate whether any significant changes have occurred in your congregation's priorities. Please rank the activities as you believe they were 10 or so years ago. The activity to which your congregation gave greatest importance should be ranked "7", and so on to the activity given least importance, which should be ranked "1". -- Priority of world mission 10 years ago (PRI10YR7)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Lowest importance | 61 | 12.4 |
2) | 108 | 22.0 |
3) | 122 | 24.9 |
4) | 103 | 21.0 |
5) | 52 | 10.6 |
6) | 27 | 5.5 |
7) Highest importance | 17 | 3.5 |
Missing | 898 | |
TOTAL | 490 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 38) Please estimate below how important you think the congregation's performance in each program area has been in attracting new members to the congregation in recent years. -- Worship effect on membership (ATTR1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) Has had a negative effect | 22 | 4.3 |
1) Of no importance | 190 | 36.8 |
2) Important | 295 | 57.1 |
3) Very important | 10 | 1.9 |
Missing | 871 | |
TOTAL | 517 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 39) Please estimate below how important you think the congregation's performance in each program area has been in attracting new members to the congregation in recent years. -- Education effect on membership (ATTR2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) Has had a negative effect | 62 | 12.0 |
1) Of no importance | 262 | 50.8 |
2) Important | 153 | 29.7 |
3) Very important | 39 | 7.6 |
Missing | 872 | |
TOTAL | 516 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 40) Please estimate below how important you think the congregation's performance in each program area has been in attracting new members to the congregation in recent years. -- Fellowship/caring effect on membership (ATTR3)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) Has had a negative effect | 34 | 6.6 |
1) Of no importance | 220 | 42.9 |
2) Important | 251 | 48.9 |
3) Very important | 8 | 1.6 |
Missing | 875 | |
TOTAL | 513 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 41) Please estimate below how important you think the congregation's performance in each program area has been in attracting new members to the congregation in recent years. -- Local evangelism effect on membership (ATTR4)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) Has had a negative effect | 208 | 40.4 |
1) Of no importance | 214 | 41.6 |
2) Important | 57 | 11.1 |
3) Very important | 36 | 7.0 |
Missing | 873 | |
TOTAL | 515 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 42) Please estimate below how important you think the congregation's performance in each program area has been in attracting new members to the congregation in recent years. -- Social service and outreach effect on membership (ATTR5)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) Has had a negative effect | 273 | 53.1 |
1) Of no importance | 179 | 34.8 |
2) Important | 38 | 7.4 |
3) Very important | 24 | 4.7 |
Missing | 874 | |
TOTAL | 514 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 43) Please estimate below how important you think the congregation's performance in each program area has been in attracting new members to the congregation in recent years. -- Social action effect on membership (ATTR6)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) Has had a negative effect | 367 | 71.4 |
1) Of no importance | 65 | 12.6 |
2) Important | 10 | 1.9 |
3) Very important | 72 | 14.0 |
Missing | 874 | |
TOTAL | 514 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 44) Please estimate below how important you think the congregation's performance in each program area has been in attracting new members to the congregation in recent years. -- World mission effect on membership (ATTR7)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) Has had a negative effect | 294 | 57.1 |
1) Of no importance | 146 | 28.3 |
2) Important | 39 | 7.6 |
3) Very important | 36 | 7.0 |
Missing | 873 | |
TOTAL | 515 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 45) Please estimate how important the congregation's performance in each program area has been in affecting how much money people have contributed to the church in recent years. -- Worship effect on contributions (ATTRCT1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) Has had a negative effect | 32 | 6.3 |
1) Of no importance | 180 | 35.2 |
2) Important | 294 | 57.4 |
3) Very important | 6 | 1.2 |
Missing | 876 | |
TOTAL | 512 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 46) Please estimate how important the congregation's performance in each program area has been in affecting how much money people have contributed to the church in recent years. -- Education effect on contributions (ATTRCT2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) Has had a negative effect | 96 | 18.8 |
1) Of no importance | 237 | 46.3 |
2) Important | 164 | 32.0 |
3) Very important | 15 | 2.9 |
Missing | 876 | |
TOTAL | 512 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 47) Please estimate how important the congregation's performance in each program area has been in affecting how much money people have contributed to the church in recent years. -- Fellowship and caring effect on contribution (ATTRCT3)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) Has had a negative effect | 63 | 12.4 |
1) Of no importance | 214 | 42.1 |
2) Important | 227 | 44.7 |
3) Very important | 4 | 0.8 |
Missing | 880 | |
TOTAL | 508 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 48) Please estimate how important the congregation's performance in each program area has been in affecting how much money people have contributed to the church in recent years. -- Local evangelism effect on contributions (ATTRCT4)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) Has had a negative effect | 288 | 56.5 |
1) Of no importance | 171 | 33.5 |
2) Important | 31 | 6.1 |
3) Very important | 20 | 3.9 |
Missing | 878 | |
TOTAL | 510 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 49) Please estimate how important the congregation's performance in each program area has been in affecting how much money people have contributed to the church in recent years. -- Social service and outreach effect on contributions (ATTRCT5)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) Has had a negative effect | 216 | 42.4 |
1) Of no importance | 205 | 40.2 |
2) Important | 77 | 15.1 |
3) Very important | 12 | 2.4 |
Missing | 878 | |
TOTAL | 510 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 50) Please estimate how important the congregation's performance in each program area has been in affecting how much money people have contributed to the church in recent years. -- Social action effect on contributions (ATTRCT6)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) Has had a negative effect | 332 | 65.2 |
1) Of no importance | 84 | 16.5 |
2) Important | 7 | 1.4 |
3) Very important | 86 | 16.9 |
Missing | 879 | |
TOTAL | 509 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 51) Please estimate how important the congregation's performance in each program area has been in affecting how much money people have contributed to the church in recent years. -- World mission effect on contributions (ATTRCT7)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) Has had a negative effect | 141 | 27.6 |
1) Of no importance | 225 | 44.0 |
2) Important | 108 | 21.1 |
3) Very important | 37 | 7.2 |
Missing | 877 | |
TOTAL | 511 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 52) Not used but in original codebook (ID1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) | 141 | 27.2 |
3) | 270 | 52.1 |
4) | 107 | 20.7 |
Missing | 870 | |
TOTAL | 518 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 53) Think about the emphasis on stewardship and giving in your congregation, indicating the emphasis on particular forms of stewardship. -- Overall stewardship and giving emphasis (STEWEMP1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Weak or none | 277 | 53.4 |
3) Strong | 172 | 33.1 |
4) Very strong | 70 | 13.5 |
Missing | 869 | |
TOTAL | 519 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Tithing, Congregational Attitude]
- 54) Think about the emphasis on stewardship and giving in your congregation, indicating the emphasis on particular forms of stewardship. -- Emphasis on pledging (STEWEMP2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Weak or none | 393 | 75.7 |
3) Strong | 93 | 17.9 |
4) Very strong | 33 | 6.4 |
Missing | 869 | |
TOTAL | 519 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Tithing, Congregational Attitude]
- 55) Think about the emphasis on stewardship and giving in your congregation, indicating the emphasis on particular forms of stewardship. -- Emphasis on member canvass or visitation (STEWEMP3)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Weak or none | 282 | 54.2 |
3) Strong | 192 | 36.9 |
4) Very strong | 46 | 8.8 |
Missing | 868 | |
TOTAL | 520 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Tithing, Congregational Attitude]
- 56) Think about the emphasis on stewardship and giving in your congregation, indicating the emphasis on particular forms of stewardship. -- Emphasis on tithing or proportionate giving (STEWEMP4)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Weak or none | 309 | 59.9 |
3) Strong | 169 | 32.8 |
4) Very strong | 38 | 7.4 |
Missing | 872 | |
TOTAL | 516 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Behavioral Rules, Presence of]
- 57) Think about the emphasis on stewardship and giving in your congregation, indicating the emphasis on particular forms of stewardship. -- Emphasis on stewardship education program (STEWEMP5)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Weak or none | 154 | 29.7 |
3) Strong | 291 | 56.2 |
4) Very strong | 73 | 14.1 |
Missing | 870 | |
TOTAL | 518 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Tithing, Congregational Attitude]
- 58) Think about the emphasis on stewardship and giving in your congregation, indicating the emphasis on particular forms of stewardship. -- Emphasis by pastor (preaching and other direct emphasis) (STEWEMP6)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Weak or none | 279 | 55.6 |
3) Strong | 194 | 38.6 |
4) Very strong | 29 | 5.8 |
Missing | 886 | |
TOTAL | 502 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Tithing, Congregational Attitude]
- 59) Think about the emphasis on stewardship and giving in your congregation, indicating the emphasis on particular forms of stewardship. -- Overall stewardship and giving emphasis 10 years ago (STEWEMP7)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) 0 | 306 | 58.7 |
1) Weak or none | 46 | 8.8 |
2) 2 | 27 | 5.2 |
3) Strong | 22 | 4.2 |
4) Very strong | 8 | 1.5 |
5) 5 | 41 | 7.9 |
6) 6 | 4 | 0.8 |
7) 7 | 7 | 1.3 |
8) 8 | 6 | 1.2 |
10) 10 | 20 | 3.8 |
11) 11 | 2 | 0.4 |
12) 12 | 3 | 0.6 |
15) 15 | 5 | 1.0 |
17) 17 | 2 | 0.4 |
20) 20 | 6 | 1.2 |
24) 24 | 1 | 0.2 |
25) 25 | 3 | 0.6 |
28) 28 | 1 | 0.2 |
30) 30 | 2 | 0.4 |
33) 33 | 2 | 0.4 |
40) 40 | 2 | 0.4 |
45) 45 | 1 | 0.2 |
50) 50 | 2 | 0.4 |
60) 60 | 1 | 0.2 |
81) 81 | 1 | 0.2 |
Missing | 867 | |
TOTAL | 521 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Tithing, Congregational Attitude]
- 60) Using percentages, please indicate approximately what percentage of the church's annual income comes from: -- Endowment (INC1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) | 12 | 2.3 |
3) | 1 | 0.2 |
8) | 1 | 0.2 |
15) | 1 | 0.2 |
25) | 3 | 0.6 |
40) | 2 | 0.4 |
45) | 1 | 0.2 |
47) | 1 | 0.2 |
50) | 8 | 1.5 |
51) | 1 | 0.2 |
52) | 1 | 0.2 |
55) | 1 | 0.2 |
57) | 2 | 0.4 |
60) | 5 | 1.0 |
61) | 1 | 0.2 |
62) | 1 | 0.2 |
65) | 5 | 1.0 |
66) | 1 | 0.2 |
67) | 2 | 0.4 |
68) | 2 | 0.4 |
69) | 1 | 0.2 |
70) | 22 | 4.2 |
73) | 1 | 0.2 |
74) | 1 | 0.2 |
75) | 33 | 6.3 |
76) | 4 | 0.8 |
77) | 2 | 0.4 |
78) | 6 | 1.1 |
79) | 3 | 0.6 |
80) | 55 | 10.5 |
81) | 3 | 0.6 |
82) | 1 | 0.2 |
83) | 5 | 1.0 |
84) | 3 | 0.6 |
85) | 48 | 9.2 |
86) | 10 | 1.9 |
87) | 5 | 1.0 |
88) | 6 | 1.1 |
89) | 5 | 1.0 |
90) | 104 | 19.9 |
91) | 14 | 2.7 |
92) | 10 | 1.9 |
93) | 10 | 1.9 |
94) | 19 | 3.6 |
95) | 48 | 9.2 |
96) | 5 | 1.0 |
97) | 8 | 1.5 |
98) | 14 | 2.7 |
99) | 25 | 4.8 |
Missing | 865 | |
TOTAL | 523 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 61) Using percentages, please indicate approximately what percentage of the church's annual income comes from: -- Pledges/regular offering (INC2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) | 72 | 13.8 |
1) | 40 | 7.7 |
2) | 51 | 9.8 |
3) | 26 | 5.0 |
4) | 26 | 5.0 |
5) | 126 | 24.2 |
6) | 14 | 2.7 |
7) | 11 | 2.1 |
8) | 17 | 3.3 |
10) | 83 | 16.0 |
12) | 7 | 1.3 |
14) | 1 | 0.2 |
15) | 11 | 2.1 |
16) | 1 | 0.2 |
17) | 2 | 0.4 |
18) | 3 | 0.6 |
19) | 1 | 0.2 |
20) | 13 | 2.5 |
23) | 1 | 0.2 |
25) | 7 | 1.3 |
29) | 1 | 0.2 |
30) | 3 | 0.6 |
35) | 1 | 0.2 |
50) | 2 | 0.4 |
Missing | 868 | |
TOTAL | 520 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 62) Using percentages, please indicate approximately what percentage of the church's annual income comes from: -- Special offerings (INC3)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) | 240 | 46.2 |
1) | 59 | 11.3 |
2) | 46 | 8.8 |
3) | 27 | 5.2 |
4) | 14 | 2.7 |
5) | 68 | 13.1 |
6) | 5 | 1.0 |
7) | 1 | 0.2 |
8) | 5 | 1.0 |
10) | 27 | 5.2 |
11) | 1 | 0.2 |
12) | 2 | 0.4 |
15) | 11 | 2.1 |
17) | 1 | 0.2 |
18) | 2 | 0.4 |
20) | 4 | 0.8 |
25) | 3 | 0.6 |
26) | 1 | 0.2 |
28) | 1 | 0.2 |
40) | 1 | 0.2 |
55) | 1 | 0.2 |
Missing | 868 | |
TOTAL | 520 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 63) Using percentages, please indicate approximately what percentage of the church's annual income comes from: -- Special events (fairs, suppers, etc.) (INC4)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) | 232 | 44.6 |
1) | 93 | 17.9 |
2) | 48 | 9.2 |
3) | 18 | 3.5 |
4) | 11 | 2.1 |
5) | 52 | 10.0 |
6) | 5 | 1.0 |
7) | 6 | 1.2 |
8) | 3 | 0.6 |
10) | 28 | 5.4 |
11) | 4 | 0.8 |
12) | 1 | 0.2 |
13) | 1 | 0.2 |
14) | 1 | 0.2 |
15) | 4 | 0.8 |
16) | 2 | 0.4 |
18) | 1 | 0.2 |
20) | 2 | 0.4 |
23) | 1 | 0.2 |
25) | 1 | 0.2 |
27) | 1 | 0.2 |
38) | 1 | 0.2 |
39) | 1 | 0.2 |
45) | 1 | 0.2 |
50) | 1 | 0.2 |
83) | 1 | 0.2 |
Missing | 868 | |
TOTAL | 520 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 64) Using percentages, please indicate approximately what percentage of the church's annual income comes from: -- Miscellaneous (building rental, etc.) (INC5)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) | 327 | 63.2 |
3) | 165 | 31.9 |
4) | 25 | 4.8 |
Missing | 871 | |
TOTAL | 517 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 65) Think about the emphasis on growth in membership in your congregation and the methods used in church growth. -- Overall membership recruitment emphasis (GROW1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Weak or none | 260 | 50.4 |
3) Strong | 205 | 39.7 |
4) Very strong | 51 | 9.9 |
Missing | 872 | |
TOTAL | 516 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 66) Think about the emphasis on growth in membership in your congregation and the methods used in church growth. -- Visitation of prospective members (GROW2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Weak or none | 353 | 68.4 |
3) Strong | 145 | 28.1 |
4) Very strong | 18 | 3.5 |
Missing | 872 | |
TOTAL | 516 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 67) Think about the emphasis on growth in membership in your congregation and the methods used in church growth. -- Programs for targeted groups (e.g. singles, elderly, young families) (GROW3)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Weak or none | 398 | 77.3 |
3) Strong | 105 | 20.4 |
4) Very strong | 12 | 2.3 |
Missing | 873 | |
TOTAL | 515 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 68) Think about the emphasis on growth in membership in your congregation and the methods used in church growth. -- Advertisements in newspapers and other media (GROW4)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Weak or none | 208 | 40.3 |
3) Strong | 185 | 35.9 |
4) Very strong | 123 | 23.8 |
Missing | 872 | |
TOTAL | 516 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 69) Think about the emphasis on growth in membership in your congregation and the methods used in church growth. -- Letters of welcome to newcomers or prospective members (GROW5)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Weak or none | 92 | 17.8 |
3) Strong | 295 | 57.2 |
4) Very strong | 129 | 25.0 |
Missing | 872 | |
TOTAL | 516 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 70) Think about the emphasis on growth in membership in your congregation and the methods used in church growth. -- Preaching and personal involvement of the pastor in membership recruitment (GROW6)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Weak or none | 332 | 66.0 |
3) Strong | 153 | 30.4 |
4) Very strong | 18 | 3.6 |
Missing | 885 | |
TOTAL | 503 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 71) Think about the emphasis on growth in membership in your congregation and the methods used in church growth. -- Overall emphasis on membership recruitment 10 years ago (GROW7)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) 0 | 122 | 23.6 |
1) Weak or none | 395 | 76.4 |
Missing | 871 | |
TOTAL | 517 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 72) Will you now reflect on any serious conflicts which have taken place in your congregation within the last 10 years or so, and whether they have affected membership or giving. The conflicts could be over theological, social, financial, administrative, interpersonal, or other issues. -- Have you had one or more such conflicts in the last 10 years? (CONFLICT)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Yes | 145 | 36.1 |
3) 3 | 128 | 31.8 |
4) 4 | 129 | 32.1 |
Missing | 986 | |
TOTAL | 402 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 73) Will you now reflect on any serious conflicts which have taken place in your congregation within the last 10 years or so, and whether they have affected membership or giving. The conflicts could be over theological, social, financial, administrative, interpersonal, or other issues. -- Have conflicts hurt membership? (NEGAFF1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) A little or not at all | 175 | 43.5 |
3) Some | 148 | 36.8 |
4) Very much | 79 | 19.7 |
Missing | 986 | |
TOTAL | 402 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 74) Will you now reflect on any serious conflicts which have taken place in your congregation within the last 10 years or so, and whether they have affected membership or giving. The conflicts could be over theological, social, financial, administrative, interpersonal, or other issues. -- Have conflicts hurt giving? (NEGAFF2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) A little or not at all | 244 | 62.9 |
3) Some | 97 | 25.0 |
4) Very much | 47 | 12.1 |
Missing | 1000 | |
TOTAL | 388 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 75) Will you now reflect on any serious conflicts which have taken place in your congregation within the last 10 years or so, and whether they have affected membership or giving. The conflicts could be over theological, social, financial, administrative, interpersonal, or other issues. -- Have conflict resolutions helped members? (POSAFF1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) A little or not at all | 251 | 64.9 |
3) Some | 88 | 22.7 |
4) Very much | 48 | 12.4 |
Missing | 1001 | |
TOTAL | 387 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 76) Will you now reflect on any serious conflicts which have taken place in your congregation within the last 10 years or so, and whether they have affected membership or giving. The conflicts could be over theological, social, financial, administrative, interpersonal, or other issues. -- Have conflict resolutions helped giving? (POSAFF2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) A little or not at all | 26 | 5.0 |
2) 2 | 128 | 24.7 |
3) Some | 365 | 70.3 |
Missing | 869 | |
TOTAL | 519 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 77) Please reflect on how similar or dissimilar the members of your congregation generally are to residents in your congregation's immediate geographical area. For each factor below, indicate whether your congregation is similar, somewhat different, or very different from its immediate social context. If other important community characteristics are relevant, please list them. -- Age (CONGSIM1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Very different | 15 | 2.9 |
2) Somewhat different | 36 | 7.0 |
3) Similar | 466 | 90.1 |
Missing | 871 | |
TOTAL | 517 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 78) Please reflect on how similar or dissimilar the members of your congregation generally are to residents in your congregation's immediate geographical area. For each factor below, indicate whether your congregation is similar, somewhat different, or very different from its immediate social context. If other important community characteristics are relevant, please list them. -- Race (CONGSIM2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Very different | 16 | 3.1 |
2) Somewhat different | 54 | 10.5 |
3) Similar | 445 | 86.4 |
Missing | 873 | |
TOTAL | 515 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Racial Diversity, Extent of]
- 79) Please reflect on how similar or dissimilar the members of your congregation generally are to residents in your congregation's immediate geographical area. For each factor below, indicate whether your congregation is similar, somewhat different, or very different from its immediate social context. If other important community characteristics are relevant, please list them. -- Ethnic background (CONGSIM3)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Very different | 24 | 4.7 |
2) Somewhat different | 94 | 18.2 |
3) Similar | 398 | 77.1 |
Missing | 872 | |
TOTAL | 516 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Racial Diversity, Extent of]
- 80) Please reflect on how similar or dissimilar the members of your congregation generally are to residents in your congregation's immediate geographical area. For each factor below, indicate whether your congregation is similar, somewhat different, or very different from its immediate social context. If other important community characteristics are relevant, please list them. -- Marital status (CONGSIM4)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Very different | 49 | 9.5 |
2) Somewhat different | 153 | 29.5 |
3) Similar | 316 | 61.0 |
Missing | 870 | |
TOTAL | 518 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 81) Please reflect on how similar or dissimilar the members of your congregation generally are to residents in your congregation's immediate geographical area. For each factor below, indicate whether your congregation is similar, somewhat different, or very different from its immediate social context. If other important community characteristics are relevant, please list them. -- Economic status (CONGSIM5)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Very different | 45 | 8.7 |
2) Somewhat different | 160 | 30.9 |
3) Similar | 313 | 60.4 |
Missing | 870 | |
TOTAL | 518 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 82) Please reflect on how similar or dissimilar the members of your congregation generally are to residents in your congregation's immediate geographical area. For each factor below, indicate whether your congregation is similar, somewhat different, or very different from its immediate social context. If other important community characteristics are relevant, please list them. -- Education (CONGSIM6)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
3) Similar | 46 | 100.0 |
Missing | 1342 | |
TOTAL | 46 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 83) Please reflect on how similar or dissimilar the members of your congregation generally are to residents in your congregation's immediate geographical area. For each factor below, indicate whether your congregation is similar, somewhat different, or very different from its immediate social context. If other important community characteristics are relevant, please list them. -- Other (CONGSIM7)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) 1 | 47 | 9.3 |
2) 2 | 48 | 9.5 |
3) Similar | 412 | 81.3 |
Missing | 881 | |
TOTAL | 507 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 84) In order to understand whether and how the situation has changed, please provide estimates of similarities or differences between your congregation's members and persons in the immediate geographical area approximately 10 years ago. -- Age (CONG10S1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Very different | 17 | 3.3 |
2) Different | 15 | 2.9 |
3) Somewhat similar | 477 | 93.7 |
Missing | 879 | |
TOTAL | 509 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 85) In order to understand whether and how the situation has changed, please provide estimates of similarities or differences between your congregation's members and persons in the immediate geographical area approximately 10 years ago. -- Race (CONG10S2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Very different | 21 | 4.1 |
2) Different | 31 | 6.1 |
3) Somewhat similar | 455 | 89.7 |
Missing | 881 | |
TOTAL | 507 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Racial Diversity, Extent of]
- 86) In order to understand whether and how the situation has changed, please provide estimates of similarities or differences between your congregation's members and persons in the immediate geographical area approximately 10 years ago. -- Ethnic background (CONG10S3)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Very different | 39 | 7.7 |
2) Different | 38 | 7.5 |
3) Somewhat similar | 430 | 84.8 |
Missing | 881 | |
TOTAL | 507 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Racial Diversity, Extent of]
- 87) In order to understand whether and how the situation has changed, please provide estimates of similarities or differences between your congregation's members and persons in the immediate geographical area approximately 10 years ago. -- Marital status (CONG10S4)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Very different | 74 | 14.5 |
2) Different | 81 | 15.9 |
3) Somewhat similar | 354 | 69.5 |
Missing | 879 | |
TOTAL | 509 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 88) In order to understand whether and how the situation has changed, please provide estimates of similarities or differences between your congregation's members and persons in the immediate geographical area approximately 10 years ago. -- Economic status (CONG10S5)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Very different | 67 | 13.6 |
2) Different | 67 | 13.6 |
3) Somewhat similar | 357 | 72.7 |
Missing | 897 | |
TOTAL | 491 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 89) In order to understand whether and how the situation has changed, please provide estimates of similarities or differences between your congregation's members and persons in the immediate geographical area approximately 10 years ago. -- Education (CONG10S6)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
3) Somewhat similar | 30 | 100.0 |
Missing | 1358 | |
TOTAL | 30 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 90) In order to understand whether and how the situation has changed, please provide estimates of similarities or differences between your congregation's members and persons in the immediate geographical area approximately 10 years ago. -- Other (CONG10S7)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) 1 | 16 | 3.1 |
2) 2 | 439 | 85.4 |
3) Somewhat similar | 59 | 11.5 |
Missing | 874 | |
TOTAL | 514 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 91) Are there environmental factors in your immediate community which may have had an effect on your congregation in the last 10 years? For each indicate whether the effect has been positive, negative, or no effect. If the factor is not present, check "NA", not applicable. -- Effect of shopping malls (COMFAC1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Negative effect | 13 | 2.5 |
2) No effect or not applicable | 399 | 77.3 |
3) Positive effect | 104 | 20.2 |
Missing | 872 | |
TOTAL | 516 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 92) Are there environmental factors in your immediate community which may have had an effect on your congregation in the last 10 years? For each indicate whether the effect has been positive, negative, or no effect. If the factor is not present, check "NA", not applicable. -- Effect of new apartments (COMFAC2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Negative effect | 3 | 0.6 |
2) No effect or not applicable | 399 | 77.3 |
3) Positive effect | 114 | 22.1 |
Missing | 872 | |
TOTAL | 516 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 93) Are there environmental factors in your immediate community which may have had an effect on your congregation in the last 10 years? For each indicate whether the effect has been positive, negative, or no effect. If the factor is not present, check "NA", not applicable. -- Effect of new houses (COMFAC3)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Negative effect | 62 | 12.0 |
2) No effect or not applicable | 352 | 68.1 |
3) Positive effect | 103 | 19.9 |
Missing | 871 | |
TOTAL | 517 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 94) Are there environmental factors in your immediate community which may have had an effect on your congregation in the last 10 years? For each indicate whether the effect has been positive, negative, or no effect. If the factor is not present, check "NA", not applicable. -- Effect of business development (COMFAC4)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Negative effect | 23 | 4.5 |
2) No effect or not applicable | 394 | 76.5 |
3) Positive effect | 98 | 19.0 |
Missing | 873 | |
TOTAL | 515 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 95) Are there environmental factors in your immediate community which may have had an effect on your congregation in the last 10 years? For each indicate whether the effect has been positive, negative, or no effect. If the factor is not present, check "NA", not applicable. -- Effect of community renewal (COMFAC5)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Negative effect | 28 | 5.5 |
2) No effect or not applicable | 415 | 80.9 |
3) Positive effect | 70 | 13.6 |
Missing | 875 | |
TOTAL | 513 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 96) Are there environmental factors in your immediate community which may have had an effect on your congregation in the last 10 years? For each indicate whether the effect has been positive, negative, or no effect. If the factor is not present, check "NA", not applicable. -- Effect of new schools (COMFAC6)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Negative effect | 218 | 42.2 |
2) No effect or not applicable | 280 | 54.3 |
3) Positive effect | 18 | 3.5 |
Missing | 872 | |
TOTAL | 516 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 97) Are there environmental factors in your immediate community which may have had an effect on your congregation in the last 10 years? For each indicate whether the effect has been positive, negative, or no effect. If the factor is not present, check "NA", not applicable. -- Effect of community decline (COMFAC7)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Negative effect | 224 | 43.5 |
2) No effect or not applicable | 277 | 53.8 |
3) Positive effect | 14 | 2.7 |
Missing | 873 | |
TOTAL | 515 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 98) Are there environmental factors in your immediate community which may have had an effect on your congregation in the last 10 years? For each indicate whether the effect has been positive, negative, or no effect. If the factor is not present, check "NA", not applicable. -- Effect of job losses (COMFAC8)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Negative effect | 255 | 49.3 |
2) No effect or not applicable | 245 | 47.4 |
3) Positive effect | 17 | 3.3 |
Missing | 871 | |
TOTAL | 517 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 99) Are there environmental factors in your immediate community which may have had an effect on your congregation in the last 10 years? For each indicate whether the effect has been positive, negative, or no effect. If the factor is not present, check "NA", not applicable. -- Effect of economic decline (COMFAC9)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Negative effect | 72 | 14.0 |
2) No effect or not applicable | 436 | 84.5 |
3) Positive effect | 8 | 1.6 |
Missing | 872 | |
TOTAL | 516 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 100) Are there environmental factors in your immediate community which may have had an effect on your congregation in the last 10 years? For each indicate whether the effect has been positive, negative, or no effect. If the factor is not present, check "NA", not applicable. -- Effect of school closings (COMFAC10)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Negative effect | 183 | 35.5 |
2) No effect or not applicable | 320 | 62.0 |
3) Positive effect | 13 | 2.5 |
Missing | 872 | |
TOTAL | 516 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 101) Are there environmental factors in your immediate community which may have had an effect on your congregation in the last 10 years? For each indicate whether the effect has been positive, negative, or no effect. If the factor is not present, check "NA", not applicable. -- Effect of population decline (COMFAC11)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) Negative effect | 17 | 3.4 |
2) No effect or not applicable | 449 | 88.7 |
3) Positive effect | 40 | 7.9 |
Missing | 882 | |
TOTAL | 506 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 102) Are there environmental factors in your immediate community which may have had an effect on your congregation in the last 10 years? For each indicate whether the effect has been positive, negative, or no effect. If the factor is not present, check "NA", not applicable. -- Effect of new highways (COMFAC12)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
3) Positive effect | 28 | 100.0 |
Missing | 1360 | |
TOTAL | 28 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 103) Are there environmental factors in your immediate community which may have had an effect on your congregation in the last 10 years? For each indicate whether the effect has been positive, negative, or no effect. If the factor is not present, check "NA", not applicable. -- Effect of other (COMFAC13)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 17365.647 | 18078 |
-
- 104) Not Used. In original data (ID2)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 18046.879 | 18343 |
-
- 105) Population 1970 (POP70)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 17879.979 | 18170 |
-
- 106) Population 1980 (POP80)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 17675.849 | 18080 |
-
- 107) Estimated population 1984 (POP84)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 681.232 | 3626 |
-
- 108) Projected population 1989 (POP89)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 9.864 | 19 |
-
- 109) Change in population 1970 to 1980 (NPOP7080)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | -166.901 | 1377 |
-
- 110) Percent change in population 1970 to 1980 (PPOP7080)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
-36) | 3 | 0.2 |
-25) | 2 | 0.1 |
-21) | 4 | 0.3 |
-16) | 2 | 0.1 |
-15) | 4 | 0.3 |
-14) | 5 | 0.4 |
-11) | 31 | 2.3 |
-10) | 25 | 1.8 |
-9) | 20 | 1.5 |
-8) | 28 | 2.0 |
-7) | 19 | 1.4 |
-6) | 13 | 1.0 |
-5) | 47 | 3.4 |
-4) | 46 | 3.4 |
-3) | 114 | 8.3 |
-2) | 119 | 8.7 |
-1) | 121 | 8.8 |
0) | 126 | 9.2 |
1) | 116 | 8.5 |
2) | 136 | 9.9 |
3) | 68 | 5.0 |
4) | 84 | 6.1 |
5) | 59 | 4.3 |
6) | 35 | 2.6 |
7) | 35 | 2.6 |
8) | 17 | 1.2 |
9) | 15 | 1.1 |
10) | 25 | 1.8 |
11) | 6 | 0.4 |
12) | 7 | 0.5 |
13) | 5 | 0.4 |
14) | 9 | 0.7 |
15) | 9 | 0.7 |
16) | 3 | 0.2 |
17) | 7 | 0.5 |
19) | 3 | 0.2 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 111) Change in population 1980 to 1984 (NPOP8084)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | -204.13 | 1629 |
-
- 112) Percent change in population 1980 to 1984 (PPOP8084)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
-38) | 3 | 0.2 |
-34) | 1 | 0.1 |
-29) | 1 | 0.1 |
-26) | 4 | 0.3 |
-23) | 2 | 0.1 |
-20) | 5 | 0.4 |
-19) | 4 | 0.3 |
-16) | 13 | 1.0 |
-15) | 3 | 0.2 |
-14) | 17 | 1.2 |
-13) | 23 | 1.7 |
-12) | 16 | 1.2 |
-11) | 6 | 0.4 |
-10) | 42 | 3.1 |
-9) | 3 | 0.2 |
-8) | 9 | 0.7 |
-7) | 41 | 3.0 |
-6) | 15 | 1.1 |
-5) | 44 | 3.2 |
-4) | 61 | 4.5 |
-3) | 101 | 7.4 |
-2) | 100 | 7.3 |
-1) | 103 | 7.5 |
0) | 87 | 6.4 |
1) | 95 | 6.9 |
2) | 156 | 11.4 |
3) | 65 | 4.8 |
4) | 60 | 4.4 |
5) | 74 | 5.4 |
6) | 41 | 3.0 |
7) | 42 | 3.1 |
8) | 26 | 1.9 |
9) | 21 | 1.5 |
10) | 12 | 0.9 |
11) | 24 | 1.8 |
12) | 5 | 0.4 |
13) | 5 | 0.4 |
14) | 15 | 1.1 |
15) | 9 | 0.7 |
16) | 5 | 0.4 |
17) | 2 | 0.1 |
18) | 6 | 0.4 |
20) | 1 | 0.1 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 113) Change in population 1984 to 1989 (NPOP8489)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 5423.829 | 5651 |
-
- 114) Percent change in population 1984 to 1989 (PPOP8489)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 6423.347 | 6582 |
-
- 115) Number of households 1970 (HSH70)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 6413.718 | 6560 |
-
- 116) Number of households 1980 (HSH80)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 6398.011 | 6573 |
-
- 117) Estimated number of households 1984 (HSH84)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 999.518 | 1597 |
-
- 118) Projected number of households 1989 (HSH89)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 23.658 | 24 |
-
- 119) Change in number of households 1970 to 1980 (NHSH7080)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | -9.629 | 495 |
-
- 120) Percent change in number of households 1970 to 1980 (PHSH7080)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
-38) | 3 | 0.2 |
-25) | 2 | 0.1 |
-23) | 4 | 0.3 |
-17) | 2 | 0.1 |
-15) | 4 | 0.3 |
-14) | 1 | 0.1 |
-13) | 4 | 0.3 |
-10) | 38 | 2.8 |
-9) | 27 | 2.0 |
-8) | 14 | 1.0 |
-7) | 24 | 1.8 |
-6) | 25 | 1.8 |
-5) | 23 | 1.7 |
-4) | 45 | 3.3 |
-3) | 42 | 3.1 |
-2) | 101 | 7.4 |
-1) | 120 | 8.8 |
0) | 121 | 8.8 |
1) | 122 | 8.9 |
2) | 129 | 9.4 |
3) | 117 | 8.6 |
4) | 82 | 6.0 |
5) | 66 | 4.8 |
6) | 63 | 4.6 |
7) | 39 | 2.9 |
8) | 41 | 3.0 |
9) | 12 | 0.9 |
10) | 26 | 1.9 |
11) | 11 | 0.8 |
12) | 9 | 0.7 |
13) | 10 | 0.7 |
14) | 8 | 0.6 |
15) | 6 | 0.4 |
16) | 14 | 1.0 |
18) | 10 | 0.7 |
20) | 2 | 0.1 |
22) | 1 | 0.1 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 121) Change in number of households 1980 to 1984 (NHSH8084)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | -15.707 | 592 |
-
- 122) Percent change in number of households 1980 to 1984 (PHSH8084)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
-45) | 3 | 0.2 |
-35) | 1 | 0.1 |
-34) | 1 | 0.1 |
-27) | 4 | 0.3 |
-24) | 2 | 0.1 |
-21) | 4 | 0.3 |
-20) | 1 | 0.1 |
-18) | 4 | 0.3 |
-15) | 13 | 1.0 |
-14) | 3 | 0.2 |
-13) | 16 | 1.2 |
-12) | 36 | 2.6 |
-11) | 6 | 0.4 |
-10) | 9 | 0.7 |
-9) | 29 | 2.1 |
-8) | 13 | 1.0 |
-7) | 10 | 0.7 |
-6) | 38 | 2.8 |
-5) | 24 | 1.8 |
-4) | 37 | 2.7 |
-3) | 61 | 4.5 |
-2) | 97 | 7.1 |
-1) | 84 | 6.1 |
0) | 119 | 8.7 |
1) | 84 | 6.1 |
2) | 97 | 7.1 |
3) | 134 | 9.8 |
4) | 66 | 4.8 |
5) | 75 | 5.5 |
6) | 45 | 3.3 |
7) | 68 | 5.0 |
8) | 43 | 3.1 |
9) | 19 | 1.4 |
10) | 32 | 2.3 |
11) | 12 | 0.9 |
12) | 18 | 1.3 |
13) | 12 | 0.9 |
14) | 9 | 0.7 |
15) | 7 | 0.5 |
16) | 12 | 0.9 |
17) | 7 | 0.5 |
18) | 4 | 0.3 |
19) | 2 | 0.1 |
20) | 6 | 0.4 |
21) | 1 | 0.1 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 123) Change in number of households 1984 to 1989 (NHSH8489)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 2940.915 | 488 |
-
- 124) Percent change in number of households 1984 to 1989 (PHSH8489)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 6903.83 | 1127 |
-
- 125) Per capita income 1969 (PCI69)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 8543.99 | 1510 |
-
- 126) Per capita income 1979 (PCI79)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 9897.247 | 1919 |
-
- 127) Estimated per capita income 1984 (PCI84)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 9385.262 | 1831 |
-
- 128) Projected per capita income 1989 (PCI89)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 19583.503 | 3461 |
-
- 129) Average household income 1969 (AHI69)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 24020.496 | 4406 |
-
- 130) Average household income 1979 (AHI79)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 27528.716 | 5402 |
-
- 131) Estimated average household income 1984 (AHI84)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 110.368 | 23 |
-
- 132) Projected average household income 1989 (AHI89)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
8) | 1 | 0.1 |
9) | 1 | 0.1 |
10) | 8 | 0.6 |
11) | 13 | 1.0 |
12) | 19 | 1.4 |
13) | 13 | 1.0 |
14) | 52 | 3.8 |
15) | 89 | 6.5 |
16) | 85 | 6.2 |
17) | 78 | 5.7 |
18) | 74 | 5.4 |
19) | 81 | 5.9 |
20) | 67 | 4.9 |
21) | 60 | 4.4 |
22) | 59 | 4.3 |
23) | 49 | 3.6 |
24) | 52 | 3.8 |
25) | 90 | 6.6 |
26) | 94 | 6.9 |
27) | 55 | 4.0 |
28) | 60 | 4.4 |
29) | 50 | 3.7 |
30) | 33 | 2.4 |
31) | 44 | 3.2 |
32) | 9 | 0.7 |
33) | 53 | 3.9 |
34) | 12 | 0.9 |
35) | 38 | 2.8 |
36) | 19 | 1.4 |
37) | 3 | 0.2 |
38) | 3 | 0.2 |
40) | 3 | 0.2 |
41) | 1 | 0.1 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 133) Percent change in average household income 1969 to 1979 (PAHI6979)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
5) | 4 | 0.3 |
6) | 20 | 1.5 |
7) | 5 | 0.4 |
8) | 54 | 3.9 |
9) | 102 | 7.5 |
10) | 119 | 8.7 |
11) | 117 | 8.6 |
12) | 104 | 7.6 |
13) | 97 | 7.1 |
14) | 90 | 6.6 |
15) | 109 | 8.0 |
16) | 89 | 6.5 |
17) | 120 | 8.8 |
18) | 89 | 6.5 |
19) | 63 | 4.6 |
20) | 43 | 3.1 |
21) | 50 | 3.7 |
22) | 28 | 2.0 |
23) | 30 | 2.2 |
24) | 29 | 2.1 |
25) | 2 | 0.1 |
26) | 2 | 0.1 |
27) | 1 | 0.1 |
28) | 1 | 0.1 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 134) Percent change in average household income 1979 to 1984 (PAHI7984)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 8809.461 | 1640 |
-
- 135) Percent change in average household income 1984 to 1989 (PAHI8489)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 17481.506 | 3375 |
-
- 136) Median household income 1969 (MHI69)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 21515.219 | 4106 |
-
- 137) Median household income 1979 (MHI79)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 24665.274 | 4956 |
-
- 138) Estimated median household income 1984 (MHI84)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
19) | 1 | 0.1 |
20) | 1 | 0.1 |
22) | 18 | 1.3 |
23) | 40 | 2.9 |
24) | 68 | 5.0 |
25) | 71 | 5.2 |
26) | 147 | 10.7 |
27) | 187 | 13.7 |
28) | 189 | 13.8 |
29) | 179 | 13.1 |
30) | 204 | 14.9 |
31) | 85 | 6.2 |
32) | 49 | 3.6 |
33) | 42 | 3.1 |
34) | 26 | 1.9 |
35) | 28 | 2.0 |
36) | 13 | 1.0 |
37) | 7 | 0.5 |
38) | 5 | 0.4 |
39) | 5 | 0.4 |
40) | 1 | 0.1 |
45) | 1 | 0.1 |
52) | 1 | 0.1 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 139) Projected median household income 1989 (MHI89)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
23) | 15 | 1.1 |
24) | 7 | 0.5 |
25) | 26 | 1.9 |
26) | 25 | 1.8 |
27) | 56 | 4.1 |
28) | 118 | 8.6 |
29) | 248 | 18.1 |
30) | 315 | 23.0 |
31) | 248 | 18.1 |
32) | 158 | 11.5 |
33) | 66 | 4.8 |
34) | 49 | 3.6 |
35) | 15 | 1.1 |
36) | 13 | 1.0 |
37) | 5 | 0.4 |
39) | 2 | 0.1 |
46) | 1 | 0.1 |
50) | 1 | 0.1 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 140) Median age 1969 (MAGE70)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
24) | 8 | 0.6 |
25) | 16 | 1.2 |
26) | 9 | 0.7 |
27) | 51 | 3.7 |
28) | 73 | 5.3 |
29) | 145 | 10.6 |
30) | 219 | 16.0 |
31) | 309 | 22.6 |
32) | 244 | 17.8 |
33) | 160 | 11.7 |
34) | 70 | 5.1 |
35) | 26 | 1.9 |
36) | 18 | 1.3 |
37) | 13 | 1.0 |
38) | 3 | 0.2 |
39) | 2 | 0.1 |
47) | 1 | 0.1 |
50) | 1 | 0.1 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 141) Median age 1979 (MAGE80)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
25) | 2 | 0.1 |
26) | 11 | 0.8 |
27) | 10 | 0.7 |
28) | 19 | 1.4 |
29) | 38 | 2.8 |
30) | 96 | 7.0 |
31) | 177 | 12.9 |
32) | 295 | 21.6 |
33) | 314 | 23.0 |
34) | 223 | 16.3 |
35) | 95 | 6.9 |
36) | 42 | 3.1 |
37) | 26 | 1.9 |
38) | 7 | 0.5 |
39) | 8 | 0.6 |
42) | 3 | 0.2 |
48) | 2 | 0.1 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 142) Estimated median age 1984 (MAGE84)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 18046.89 | 18343 |
-
- 143) Projected median age 1989 (MAGE89)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
100) | 1368 | 100.0 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 144) Total 1980 population (NPOPALL)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 16432.805 | 16889 |
-
- 145) 100% for every case (PPOPALL)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
1) | 1 | 0.1 |
5) | 3 | 0.2 |
13) | 4 | 0.3 |
30) | 13 | 1.0 |
32) | 3 | 0.2 |
35) | 8 | 0.6 |
37) | 4 | 0.3 |
46) | 2 | 0.1 |
48) | 5 | 0.4 |
49) | 1 | 0.1 |
59) | 1 | 0.1 |
61) | 1 | 0.1 |
66) | 7 | 0.5 |
69) | 7 | 0.5 |
72) | 6 | 0.4 |
73) | 2 | 0.1 |
74) | 11 | 0.8 |
76) | 3 | 0.2 |
77) | 3 | 0.2 |
79) | 2 | 0.1 |
80) | 3 | 0.2 |
82) | 4 | 0.3 |
84) | 14 | 1.0 |
86) | 8 | 0.6 |
88) | 16 | 1.2 |
89) | 1 | 0.1 |
90) | 2 | 0.1 |
91) | 8 | 0.6 |
92) | 28 | 2.0 |
93) | 30 | 2.2 |
94) | 42 | 3.1 |
95) | 39 | 2.9 |
96) | 54 | 3.9 |
97) | 58 | 4.2 |
98) | 190 | 13.9 |
99) | 424 | 31.0 |
100) | 360 | 26.3 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 146) Number of Whites 1980 (NPOPWHIT)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 1372.077 | 4322 |
-
- 147) Percent Whites 1980 (PPOPWHIT)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) | 741 | 54.2 |
1) | 226 | 16.5 |
2) | 83 | 6.1 |
3) | 79 | 5.8 |
4) | 14 | 1.0 |
5) | 33 | 2.4 |
6) | 11 | 0.8 |
7) | 37 | 2.7 |
8) | 8 | 0.6 |
9) | 3 | 0.2 |
10) | 10 | 0.7 |
11) | 7 | 0.5 |
13) | 8 | 0.6 |
14) | 9 | 0.7 |
15) | 5 | 0.4 |
17) | 7 | 0.5 |
19) | 2 | 0.1 |
20) | 2 | 0.1 |
22) | 4 | 0.3 |
24) | 8 | 0.6 |
25) | 8 | 0.6 |
26) | 6 | 0.4 |
28) | 4 | 0.3 |
30) | 8 | 0.6 |
32) | 4 | 0.3 |
37) | 1 | 0.1 |
39) | 1 | 0.1 |
46) | 1 | 0.1 |
47) | 2 | 0.1 |
59) | 4 | 0.3 |
60) | 1 | 0.1 |
64) | 7 | 0.5 |
66) | 3 | 0.2 |
69) | 6 | 0.4 |
70) | 7 | 0.5 |
79) | 4 | 0.3 |
94) | 3 | 0.2 |
99) | 1 | 0.1 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 148) Number of Blacks 1980 (NPOPBLCK)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 26.689 | 37 |
-
- 149) Percent Blacks 1980 (PPOPBLCK)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) | 1340 | 98.0 |
1) | 28 | 2.0 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 150) Number of Native Americans 1980 (NPOPAMIN)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 75.183 | 157 |
-
- 151) Percent Native Americans 1980 (PPOPAMIN)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) | 1191 | 87.1 |
1) | 167 | 12.2 |
2) | 3 | 0.2 |
3) | 7 | 0.5 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 152) Number of Asian/Pacific Islanders 1980 (NPOPASPC)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 140.135 | 567 |
-
- 153) Percent Asian/Pacific Islanders 1980 (PPOPASPC)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) | 1062 | 77.6 |
1) | 206 | 15.1 |
2) | 67 | 4.9 |
3) | 11 | 0.8 |
4) | 6 | 0.4 |
5) | 2 | 0.1 |
6) | 5 | 0.4 |
8) | 4 | 0.3 |
22) | 5 | 0.4 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 154) Number of Others 1980 (NPOPOTHR)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 271.203 | 1063 |
-
- 155) Percent Others 1980 (PPOPOTHR)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) | 599 | 43.8 |
1) | 604 | 44.2 |
2) | 72 | 5.3 |
3) | 23 | 1.7 |
4) | 31 | 2.3 |
5) | 6 | 0.4 |
6) | 8 | 0.6 |
7) | 3 | 0.2 |
8) | 3 | 0.2 |
9) | 1 | 0.1 |
10) | 4 | 0.3 |
12) | 1 | 0.1 |
13) | 8 | 0.6 |
42) | 5 | 0.4 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 156) Number of Hispanics 1980 (NPOPHISP)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 1683.686 | 1744 |
-
- 157) Percent Hispanics 1980 (PPOPHISP)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 1757.949 | 1853 |
-
- 158) Number with education less than or equal to 8 years, 1980 (NED0008)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 4240.343 | 4144 |
-
- 159) Number with education 9 to 11 years, 1980 (NED0911)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 1275.137 | 1413 |
-
- 160) Number with education equal to 12 years, 1980 (NED1212)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 1357.444 | 1936 |
-
- 161) Number with education between 13-15 years, 1980 (NED1315)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
2) | 7 | 0.5 |
3) | 1 | 0.1 |
5) | 11 | 0.8 |
6) | 20 | 1.5 |
7) | 9 | 0.7 |
8) | 23 | 1.7 |
9) | 21 | 1.5 |
10) | 53 | 3.9 |
11) | 51 | 3.7 |
12) | 109 | 8.0 |
13) | 70 | 5.1 |
14) | 82 | 6.0 |
15) | 90 | 6.6 |
16) | 72 | 5.3 |
17) | 117 | 8.6 |
18) | 89 | 6.5 |
19) | 95 | 6.9 |
20) | 93 | 6.8 |
21) | 61 | 4.5 |
22) | 55 | 4.0 |
23) | 60 | 4.4 |
24) | 27 | 2.0 |
25) | 24 | 1.8 |
26) | 35 | 2.6 |
27) | 38 | 2.8 |
28) | 10 | 0.7 |
29) | 18 | 1.3 |
30) | 6 | 0.4 |
32) | 5 | 0.4 |
33) | 2 | 0.1 |
34) | 6 | 0.4 |
36) | 2 | 0.1 |
37) | 1 | 0.1 |
39) | 1 | 0.1 |
40) | 3 | 0.2 |
44) | 1 | 0.1 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 162) Number with education greater than or equal to 16 years, 1980 (NED16P)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
3) | 3 | 0.2 |
5) | 4 | 0.3 |
6) | 10 | 0.7 |
7) | 6 | 0.4 |
8) | 13 | 1.0 |
9) | 5 | 0.4 |
10) | 8 | 0.6 |
11) | 24 | 1.8 |
12) | 23 | 1.7 |
13) | 74 | 5.4 |
14) | 101 | 7.4 |
15) | 116 | 8.5 |
16) | 170 | 12.4 |
17) | 203 | 14.8 |
18) | 188 | 13.7 |
19) | 125 | 9.1 |
20) | 103 | 7.5 |
21) | 83 | 6.1 |
22) | 23 | 1.7 |
23) | 29 | 2.1 |
24) | 15 | 1.1 |
25) | 6 | 0.4 |
26) | 12 | 0.9 |
27) | 17 | 1.2 |
29) | 7 | 0.5 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 163) Percent with education less than or equal to 8 years, 1980 (PED0008)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
23) | 7 | 0.5 |
25) | 4 | 0.3 |
26) | 2 | 0.1 |
27) | 3 | 0.2 |
28) | 11 | 0.8 |
29) | 14 | 1.0 |
30) | 15 | 1.1 |
31) | 15 | 1.1 |
32) | 13 | 1.0 |
33) | 11 | 0.8 |
34) | 23 | 1.7 |
35) | 12 | 0.9 |
36) | 21 | 1.5 |
37) | 19 | 1.4 |
38) | 39 | 2.9 |
39) | 61 | 4.5 |
40) | 92 | 6.7 |
41) | 101 | 7.4 |
42) | 83 | 6.1 |
43) | 82 | 6.0 |
44) | 101 | 7.4 |
45) | 117 | 8.6 |
46) | 102 | 7.5 |
47) | 88 | 6.4 |
48) | 56 | 4.1 |
49) | 65 | 4.8 |
50) | 63 | 4.6 |
51) | 41 | 3.0 |
52) | 21 | 1.5 |
53) | 39 | 2.9 |
54) | 22 | 1.6 |
55) | 11 | 0.8 |
56) | 6 | 0.4 |
57) | 6 | 0.4 |
59) | 1 | 0.1 |
61) | 1 | 0.1 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 164) Percent with education 9 to 11 years, 1980 (PED0911)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
3) | 1 | 0.1 |
4) | 1 | 0.1 |
5) | 13 | 1.0 |
6) | 27 | 2.0 |
7) | 61 | 4.5 |
8) | 126 | 9.2 |
9) | 181 | 13.2 |
10) | 232 | 17.0 |
11) | 180 | 13.2 |
12) | 172 | 12.6 |
13) | 91 | 6.7 |
14) | 93 | 6.8 |
15) | 70 | 5.1 |
16) | 23 | 1.7 |
17) | 16 | 1.2 |
18) | 22 | 1.6 |
19) | 12 | 0.9 |
20) | 21 | 1.5 |
21) | 11 | 0.8 |
22) | 10 | 0.7 |
23) | 5 | 0.4 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 165) Percent with education equal to 12 years, 1980 (PED1212)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
2) | 3 | 0.2 |
3) | 14 | 1.0 |
4) | 36 | 2.6 |
5) | 76 | 5.6 |
6) | 91 | 6.7 |
7) | 143 | 10.5 |
8) | 200 | 14.6 |
9) | 154 | 11.3 |
10) | 159 | 11.6 |
11) | 113 | 8.3 |
12) | 62 | 4.5 |
13) | 41 | 3.0 |
14) | 45 | 3.3 |
15) | 33 | 2.4 |
16) | 47 | 3.4 |
17) | 8 | 0.6 |
18) | 17 | 1.2 |
19) | 29 | 2.1 |
20) | 18 | 1.3 |
21) | 8 | 0.6 |
22) | 16 | 1.2 |
23) | 4 | 0.3 |
25) | 7 | 0.5 |
27) | 3 | 0.2 |
28) | 2 | 0.1 |
29) | 1 | 0.1 |
30) | 5 | 0.4 |
32) | 1 | 0.1 |
33) | 10 | 0.7 |
36) | 3 | 0.2 |
39) | 5 | 0.4 |
40) | 4 | 0.3 |
45) | 1 | 0.1 |
48) | 2 | 0.1 |
50) | 7 | 0.5 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 166) Percent with education between 13-15 years, 1980 (PED1315)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
10) | 3 | 0.2 |
11) | 29 | 2.1 |
12) | 1122 | 82.0 |
13) | 191 | 14.0 |
14) | 9 | 0.7 |
15) | 5 | 0.4 |
16) | 9 | 0.7 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 167) Percent with education greater than or equal to 16 years, 1980 (PED16P)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) | 23 | 1.7 |
10) | 5 | 0.4 |
11) | 21 | 1.5 |
12) | 1074 | 78.5 |
13) | 215 | 15.7 |
14) | 4 | 0.3 |
15) | 16 | 1.2 |
16) | 10 | 0.7 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 168) Median years of education, 1980 (MEDTOT)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) | 704 | 51.5 |
5) | 9 | 0.7 |
7) | 3 | 0.2 |
9) | 11 | 0.8 |
10) | 45 | 3.3 |
11) | 84 | 6.1 |
12) | 323 | 23.6 |
13) | 138 | 10.1 |
14) | 15 | 1.1 |
15) | 14 | 1.0 |
16) | 20 | 1.5 |
17) | 2 | 0.1 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 169) Median years education for Whites, 1980 (MEDWHIT)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) | 18 | 1.3 |
5) | 4 | 0.3 |
6) | 1 | 0.1 |
7) | 2 | 0.1 |
8) | 1 | 0.1 |
9) | 24 | 1.8 |
10) | 15 | 1.1 |
11) | 41 | 3.0 |
12) | 934 | 68.3 |
13) | 298 | 21.8 |
14) | 2 | 0.1 |
15) | 13 | 1.0 |
16) | 15 | 1.1 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 170) Median years education for Blacks, 1980 (MEDBLCK)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) | 533 | 39.0 |
5) | 49 | 3.6 |
6) | 11 | 0.8 |
7) | 26 | 1.9 |
8) | 35 | 2.6 |
9) | 72 | 5.3 |
10) | 61 | 4.5 |
11) | 47 | 3.4 |
12) | 257 | 18.8 |
13) | 181 | 13.2 |
14) | 26 | 1.9 |
15) | 5 | 0.4 |
16) | 65 | 4.8 |
Missing | 20 | |
TOTAL | 1368 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 171) Median years education for Others, 1980 (MEDOTHR)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1175 | 106852.058 | 146496 |
-
- 172) Median years education for Hispanics, 1980 (MEDHISP)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
-4) | 1 | 0.2 |
-3) | 1 | 0.2 |
-2) | 7 | 1.4 |
-1) | 26 | 5.3 |
0) | 393 | 79.7 |
1) | 38 | 7.7 |
2) | 18 | 3.7 |
3) | 7 | 1.4 |
4) | 1 | 0.2 |
5) | 1 | 0.2 |
Missing | 895 | |
TOTAL | 493 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 173) Total giving 1986 from Yearbook (GIVE86)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
-4) | 4 | 0.8 |
-3) | 5 | 1.0 |
-2) | 27 | 5.5 |
-1) | 92 | 18.7 |
0) | 276 | 56.1 |
1) | 61 | 12.4 |
2) | 17 | 3.5 |
3) | 6 | 1.2 |
4) | 3 | 0.6 |
5) | 1 | 0.2 |
Missing | 896 | |
TOTAL | 492 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 174) Difference between current priority and priority 10 years ago -- Worship (PRINOW1-PRI10YR1) (PRICH1)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
-4) | 1 | 0.2 |
-3) | 5 | 1.0 |
-2) | 16 | 3.3 |
-1) | 53 | 10.8 |
0) | 264 | 53.8 |
1) | 89 | 18.1 |
2) | 43 | 8.8 |
3) | 12 | 2.4 |
4) | 3 | 0.6 |
5) | 3 | 0.6 |
6) | 2 | 0.4 |
Missing | 897 | |
TOTAL | 491 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 175) Difference between current priority and priority 10 years ago -- Education (PRINOW2-PRI10YR2) (PRICH2)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
-5) | 3 | 0.6 |
-4) | 9 | 1.8 |
-3) | 18 | 3.7 |
-2) | 49 | 10.0 |
-1) | 83 | 16.9 |
0) | 231 | 47.0 |
1) | 47 | 9.6 |
2) | 24 | 4.9 |
3) | 13 | 2.6 |
4) | 9 | 1.8 |
5) | 1 | 0.2 |
6) | 4 | 0.8 |
Missing | 897 | |
TOTAL | 491 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 176) Difference between current priority and priority 10 years ago -- Fellowship and caring (PRINOW3-PRI10YR3) (PRICH3)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
-4) | 1 | 0.2 |
-3) | 8 | 1.6 |
-2) | 15 | 3.1 |
-1) | 46 | 9.4 |
0) | 264 | 53.9 |
1) | 85 | 17.3 |
2) | 46 | 9.4 |
3) | 15 | 3.1 |
4) | 7 | 1.4 |
5) | 3 | 0.6 |
Missing | 898 | |
TOTAL | 490 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 177) Difference between current priority and priority 10 years ago -- Local evangelism (PRINOW4-PRI10YR4) (PRICH4)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
-5) | 2 | 0.4 |
-3) | 5 | 1.0 |
-2) | 15 | 3.1 |
-1) | 38 | 7.8 |
0) | 364 | 74.6 |
1) | 46 | 9.4 |
2) | 11 | 2.3 |
3) | 6 | 1.2 |
4) | 1 | 0.2 |
Missing | 900 | |
TOTAL | 488 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 178) Difference between current priority and priority 10 years ago -- Social service and outreach (PRINOW5-PRI10YR5) (PRICH5)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
-5) | 1 | 0.2 |
-4) | 3 | 0.6 |
-3) | 9 | 1.8 |
-2) | 27 | 5.5 |
-1) | 53 | 10.8 |
0) | 271 | 55.3 |
1) | 81 | 16.5 |
2) | 28 | 5.7 |
3) | 14 | 2.9 |
4) | 2 | 0.4 |
6) | 1 | 0.2 |
Missing | 898 | |
TOTAL | 490 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 179) Difference between current priority and priority 10 years ago -- Social action (PRINOW6-PRI10YR6) (PRICH6)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | -371.031 | 3000 |
-
- 180) Difference between current priority and priority 10 years ago -- World mission (PRINOW7-PRI10YR7) (PRICH7)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | .341 | 12 |
-
- 181) Change in population 1980 to 1989 (NPOP8089)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | -25.336 | 1083 |
-
- 182) Percent Change in population 1980 to 1989 (PPOP8089)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 2.504 | 13 |
-
- 183) Change in number of households 1980 to 1989 (NHSH8089)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 7945.213 | 2864 |
-
- 184) Percent change in number of households 1980 to 1989 (PHSH8089)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1368 | 40.668 | 13 |
-
- 185) Change in average household income 1980 to 1989 (NAHI8089)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1141 | 114.558 | 87 |
-
- 186) Percent change in average household income 1980 to 1989 (PAHI8089)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1085 | 244.436 | 161 |
-
- 187) Per capita (member) giving 1970 (PCGIVE70)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1170 | 336.542 | 302 |
-
- 188) Per capita (member) giving 1980 (PCGIVE80)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1151 | 379.597 | 238 |
-
- 189) Per capita (member) giving 1986 (PCGIVE86)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 978 | 1.761 | 6 |
-
- 190) Per capita (member) giving 1988 (PCGIVE88)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1047 | 1.529 | 13 |
-
- 191) Proportion change in total giving 1970 to 1980 (RGIV8070)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1121 | 1.247 | 6 |
-
- 192) Proportion change in total giving 1980 to 1986 (RGIV8680)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1020 | 1.363 | 13 |
-
- 193) Proportion change in total giving 1986 to 1988 (RGIV8886)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 958 | 2.113 | 15 |
-
- 194) Proportion change in total giving 1980 to 1988 (RGIV8880)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1041 | 1.767 | 15 |
-
- 195) Proportion change in per capita giving 1970 to 1980 (RPCG8070)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1118 | 1.593 | 7 |
-
- 196) Proportion change in per capita giving 1980 to 1986 (RPCG8680)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1017 | 1.669 | 14 |
-
- 197) Proportion change in per capita giving 1986 to 1988 (RPCG8886)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
-.9) | 4 | 0.4 |
-.8) | 9 | 0.9 |
-.7) | 14 | 1.4 |
-.6) | 22 | 2.2 |
-.5) | 38 | 3.8 |
-.4) | 66 | 6.7 |
-.3) | 121 | 12.2 |
-.2) | 135 | 13.7 |
-.1) | 148 | 15.0 |
0) | 131 | 13.3 |
.1) | 93 | 9.4 |
.2) | 57 | 5.8 |
.3) | 49 | 5.0 |
.4) | 26 | 2.6 |
.5) | 16 | 1.6 |
.6) | 7 | 0.7 |
.7) | 11 | 1.1 |
.8) | 8 | 0.8 |
.9) | 4 | 0.4 |
1) | 5 | 0.5 |
1.1) | 2 | 0.2 |
1.3) | 3 | 0.3 |
1.4) | 2 | 0.2 |
1.5) | 1 | 0.1 |
1.7) | 3 | 0.3 |
1.9) | 1 | 0.1 |
2.1) | 1 | 0.1 |
2.6) | 3 | 0.3 |
2.9) | 1 | 0.1 |
3.2) | 1 | 0.1 |
3.3) | 1 | 0.1 |
3.4) | 1 | 0.1 |
3.8) | 1 | 0.1 |
3.9) | 1 | 0.1 |
5.5) | 1 | 0.1 |
10.7) | 1 | 0.1 |
Missing | 400 | |
TOTAL | 988 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 198) Proportion change in per capita giving 1980 to 1988 (RPCG8880)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
-1.9) | 1 | 0.1 |
-1.6) | 1 | 0.1 |
-1.5) | 3 | 0.3 |
-1.4) | 2 | 0.2 |
-1.3) | 2 | 0.2 |
-1.2) | 2 | 0.2 |
-1.1) | 11 | 1.0 |
-1) | 11 | 1.0 |
-.9) | 9 | 0.8 |
-.8) | 30 | 2.8 |
-.7) | 19 | 1.8 |
-.6) | 34 | 3.2 |
-.5) | 45 | 4.2 |
-.4) | 75 | 7.0 |
-.3) | 96 | 8.9 |
-.2) | 116 | 10.8 |
-.1) | 158 | 14.7 |
0) | 145 | 13.5 |
.1) | 118 | 10.9 |
.2) | 68 | 6.3 |
.3) | 35 | 3.2 |
.4) | 24 | 2.2 |
.5) | 14 | 1.3 |
.6) | 12 | 1.1 |
.7) | 5 | 0.5 |
.8) | 9 | 0.8 |
.9) | 4 | 0.4 |
1) | 7 | 0.6 |
1.1) | 1 | 0.1 |
1.2) | 1 | 0.1 |
1.3) | 2 | 0.2 |
1.4) | 1 | 0.1 |
1.5) | 2 | 0.2 |
2) | 1 | 0.1 |
2.1) | 1 | 0.1 |
2.3) | 1 | 0.1 |
2.5) | 1 | 0.1 |
2.9) | 1 | 0.1 |
3) | 2 | 0.2 |
4) | 1 | 0.1 |
4.6) | 1 | 0.1 |
4.8) | 1 | 0.1 |
6) | 1 | 0.1 |
9.1) | 1 | 0.1 |
15.1) | 1 | 0.1 |
21) | 1 | 0.1 |
22.2) | 1 | 0.1 |
Missing | 310 | |
TOTAL | 1078 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 199) Proportion change in membership 1970 to 1980 (RMEM8070)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1149 | -.101 | 1 |
-
- 200) Proportion change in membership 1980 to 1986 (RMEM8680)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
-1.2) | 2 | 0.2 |
-1) | 3 | 0.3 |
-.9) | 4 | 0.4 |
-.8) | 9 | 0.8 |
-.7) | 15 | 1.4 |
-.6) | 34 | 3.2 |
-.5) | 56 | 5.3 |
-.4) | 75 | 7.1 |
-.3) | 113 | 10.7 |
-.2) | 148 | 14.0 |
-.1) | 192 | 18.1 |
0) | 156 | 14.7 |
.1) | 101 | 9.5 |
.2) | 64 | 6.0 |
.3) | 30 | 2.8 |
.4) | 12 | 1.1 |
.5) | 15 | 1.4 |
.6) | 7 | 0.7 |
.7) | 2 | 0.2 |
.8) | 4 | 0.4 |
.9) | 6 | 0.6 |
1) | 1 | 0.1 |
1.3) | 2 | 0.2 |
1.4) | 1 | 0.1 |
1.8) | 1 | 0.1 |
2.4) | 1 | 0.1 |
3.5) | 1 | 0.1 |
3.8) | 1 | 0.1 |
3.9) | 1 | 0.1 |
4.9) | 1 | 0.1 |
12.6) | 1 | 0.1 |
Missing | 329 | |
TOTAL | 1059 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Growth/Decline, Amount Of]
- 201) Proportion change in membership 1986 to 1988 (RMEM8886)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1249 | 352.407 | 398 |
-
- 202) Proportion change in membership 1980 to 1988 (RMEM8880)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1171 | 337.868 | 379 |
-
- 203) Membership 1970 (MEM70)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1337 | 288.126 | 352 |
-
- 204) Membership 1980 (MEM80)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1356 | 274.861 | 353 |
-
- 205) Membership 1986 (MEM86)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1210 | 42337.141 | 71957 |
-
- 206) Membership 1988 (MEM88)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1121 | 83522.11 | 113250 |
-
- 207) Total giving 1970 (GIVE70)
-
| N | Mean | Std.Deviation |
TOTAL | 1182 | 118274.497 | 181904 |
-
- 208) Total giving 1980 (GIVE80)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) | 279 | 20.1 |
1) | 240 | 17.3 |
2) | 201 | 14.5 |
3) | 366 | 26.4 |
4) | 302 | 21.8 |
TOTAL | 1388 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 209) Total giving 1986 (GIVE88)
-
| TOTAL | % |
---|
0) | 269 | 20.1 |
1) | 306 | 22.9 |
2) | 267 | 20.0 |
3) | 276 | 20.6 |
4) | 219 | 16.4 |
Missing | 51 | |
TOTAL | 1337 | 100.0 |
- [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
|