- All frequencies are raw numbers (no weights used).
- 1) Version number (VERSION)
-
TOTAL % 1) 1807 100.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 2) NES dataset number (DSETNO)
-
- 3) ICPSR archive number 3131 (ICPSRNO)
-
TOTAL % 3131) 1807 100.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 4) NES 2000 Case ID (CASEID)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 905.667 523 - 5) Post ID: There are gaps in the numbering. 0001-1557 Post interviews 2001-2254 Post non-interviews (POSTID)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 966.531 627 - 6) 2000 Sample weight: This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and 4 actual decimal places. A post stratification adjustment using the 2000 CPS March supplement estimates as the standard was done for the combined RDD and area samples. The cells were formed by crossing 6 age groups by 4 levels of education. The age groups were: 18-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70+. The education levels were: less than high school graduation, high school graduate, some college, and 4 years of college or more (SWEIGHT)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 1 0 - 7) Sample weight for post variables. This is a 6-digit variable with a coded decimal point and 4 actual decimal places (0 = No post election interview) (PWEIGHT)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 .861 1 - 8) Pre only or pre-and-post (PREPOST)
-
TOTAL % 0) Pre-election and post-election interviews 1555 86.1 1) Pre-election interview only 252 13.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 9) Pre: Mode of pre interview (MODE)
-
TOTAL % 1) Personal (FTF) 1006 55.7 5) Telephone 801 44.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 10) Pre: Form - E section administered questions about R's personal financial situation were randomly selected to be administered either in pre section e or post section H (FORM_E)
-
TOTAL % 0) Section E not administered in pre 880 48.7 1) Section E administered in pre 927 51.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 11) Pre: Form - half sample. The series of questions concerning 'most important problem' was administered to a randomly selected half sample in the pre. (FORM_F)
-
TOTAL % 0) R not selected 902 49.9 1) R selected 905 50.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 12) Pre: Form - Clinton retrospective or Clinton affects/traits. RS were randomly selected to be administered either the Clinton retrospective or the Clinton traits and affects questions in the pre. The questions for which R was not selected for pre administration were administered in the post (FORM_Q)
-
TOTAL % 1) Asked in pre [Clinton retrospective] 891 49.3 2) Asked in pre [Clinton affects and traits] 916 50.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 13) Pre: Form - lib/con format. Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard 7-point scale format for liberal/conservative placements, or to an experimental branching format. Self placement (LOBCONF)
-
TOTAL % 1) Standard format (FTF/phone) 868 48.0 2) Experimental format (FTF and phone) 939 52.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 14) Pre: Form - economy retrospective format (ECONF)
-
TOTAL % 1) Standard format 908 50.2 2) Experimental format 899 49.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 15) Pre: Form - employment retrospective format (EMPRETF)
-
TOTAL % 1) Standard format 901 49.9 2) Experimental format 906 50.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 16) Pre: Form - economy prospective format (ECONPF)
-
TOTAL % 1) Standard format 911 50.4 2) Experimental format 896 49.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 17) Pre: Form - imports format (IMPORTF)
-
TOTAL % 1) Standard format 910 50.4 2) Experimental format 897 49.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 18) Pre: Form - isolationism format (ISOLATF)
-
TOTAL % 1) Standard format 891 49.3 2) Experimental format 916 50.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 19) Pre: Form - medical insurance format. FTF (7-point scale): Respondents were randomly assigned to either the standard format for gov't/private health insurance self-placement, or to an experimental format. Phone (branching): Respondents were randomly assigned to either version 1 or version 2 (MEDINSF)
-
TOTAL % 1) FTF standard/phone version 891 49.3 2) FTF experimental/phone version 916 50.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 20) Pre: Form - affirmative action format (AFFACTF)
-
TOTAL % 1) Standard format 880 48.7 2) Experimental format 927 51.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 21) Pre: Form - environment vs. jobs format (ENVJOBF)
-
TOTAL % 1) FTF standard 875 48.4 2) FTF experimental 932 51.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 22) Pre: Form - school voucher format (SCHVCHF)
-
TOTAL % 1) Standard format 882 48.8 2) Experimental format 925 51.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 23) Pre: Form - women equal role format (WOMROLEF)
-
TOTAL % 1) FTF standard 902 49.9 2) FTF experimental 905 50.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 24) Pre: Month of interview (MONTHINT)
-
TOTAL % 9) September 831 46.0 10) October 714 39.5 11) November 262 14.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 25) Pre: Day of interview (DAYINT)
-
TOTAL % 1) 64 3.5 2) 72 4.0 3) 61 3.4 4) 74 4.1 5) 97 5.4 6) 113 6.3 7) 87 4.8 8) 38 2.1 9) 52 2.9 10) 43 2.4 11) 66 3.7 12) 55 3.0 13) 43 2.4 14) 49 2.7 15) 41 2.3 16) 66 3.7 17) 52 2.9 18) 60 3.3 19) 57 3.2 20) 70 3.9 21) 67 3.7 22) 43 2.4 23) 60 3.3 24) 38 2.1 25) 50 2.8 26) 56 3.1 27) 43 2.4 28) 44 2.4 29) 48 2.7 30) 71 3.9 31) 27 1.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 26) Pre: Month and day (MMDD) of interview (MMDDINT)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 983.184 68 - 27) Pre: Number of days before election (Election Day was November 7, 2000) (NDPELECT)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 32.629 19 - 28) Pre: Interview length. Number of minutes (2 decimal places) is coded, except: 999.99 NA; INAP, Partial IW (IWLENGTH)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 72.474 66 - 29) Pre: Interview number (IWNUMBER)
-
TOTAL % 1) 99 5.5 2) 105 5.8 3) 99 5.5 4) 98 5.4 5) 94 5.2 6) 93 5.1 7) 90 5.0 8) 86 4.8 9) 84 4.6 10) 80 4.4 11) 75 4.2 12) 74 4.1 13) 65 3.6 14) 61 3.4 15) 57 3.2 16) 55 3.0 17) 52 2.9 18) 45 2.5 19) 42 2.3 20) 40 2.2 21) 34 1.9 22) 30 1.7 23) 26 1.4 24) 30 1.7 25) 27 1.5 26) 21 1.2 27) 20 1.1 28) 15 0.8 29) 14 0.8 30) 12 0.7 31) 14 0.8 32) 10 0.6 33) 10 0.6 34) 9 0.5 35) 7 0.4 36) 4 0.2 37) 5 0.3 38) 2 0.1 39) 3 0.2 40) 3 0.2 41) 3 0.2 42) 2 0.1 43) 3 0.2 44) 2 0.1 45) 1 0.1 46) 2 0.1 47) 1 0.1 50) 1 0.1 52) 1 0.1 53) 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 30) Pre: Date of beginning VQ file (VQBEGIN)
-
TOTAL % 0) VQ dated 8/15 6 0.3 1) VQ dated 8/30 45 2.5 2) VQ dated 9/5 41 2.3 3) VQ dated 9/6 183 10.1 4) VQ dated 9/8 430 23.8 5) VQ dated 9/25 103 5.7 6) VQ dated 9/28 26 1.4 7) VQ dated 9/29 191 10.6 8) VQ dated 10/5 338 18.7 9) VQ dated 10/19 444 24.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 31) Pre: Date of ending VQ file (VQEND)
-
TOTAL % 0) VQ dated 8/15 5 0.3 1) VQ dated 8/30 31 1.7 2) VQ dated 9/5 34 1.9 3) VQ dated 9/6 171 9.5 4) VQ dated 9/8 426 23.6 5) VQ dated 9/25 101 5.6 6) VQ dated 9/28 24 1.3 7) VQ dated 9/29 196 10.8 8) VQ dated 10/5 342 18.9 9) VQ dated 10/19 471 26.1 99) INAP 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 32) Pre: Flag- change in VQ (VQFLAG)
-
TOTAL % 0) No change 1694 93.7 1) Change in VQ 107 5.9 9) NA 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 33) Pre: Advance letter sent? (ADVLETTR)
-
TOTAL % 0) No advance letter sent 335 18.5 1) Advance letter sent 1467 81.2 9) NA 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 34) Pre: Payment amount (PAYAMNT)
-
TOTAL % 0) R requested no payment 8 0.4 20) Twenty dollars 1396 77.3 40) Forty dollars 389 21.5 99) NA 14 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 35) Pre: Payment mode (PAYMODE)
-
TOTAL % 0) R requested no payment 8 0.4 1) Check 1615 89.4 2) Cash 169 9.4 9) NA 15 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 36) Pre: Payment date (MMDD) [9999. NA; R requested no payment] (PAYDATE)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 1118.615 989 - 37) Pre: Tape recorded? (RECORDED)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 161 8.9 5) No 1646 91.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 38) Pre: Verification (VERIFY)
-
TOTAL % 0) Counted for Ann Arbor office, not selected for verification 1509 83.5 1) Flagged for verification 15 0.8 2) Verified OK 246 13.6 3) Verified with some discrepancies 22 1.2 4) Not verified - attempts to verify halted 3 0.2 5) Unable to verify 10 0.6 6) Verification limit met 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 39) Pre: Evaluation (EVALUATE)
-
TOTAL % 0) Not evaluated 1694 93.7 1) Flagged 1 0.1 2) Evaluated 102 5.6 4) Cannot evaluate 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 40) Pre: Refusal conversion indicator (CONVINDC)
-
TOTAL % 0) Not a refusal conversion situation 1534 84.9 1) Refusal conversion situation indicated 273 15.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 41) Pre: Persuasion letter - flag (PERSLTTR)
-
TOTAL % 0) No persuasion letter sent 1716 95.0 1) Persuasion letter sent 90 5.0 9) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 42) Pre: Date persuasion letter requested (MMDD) [9999. No persuasion letter requested] (DPLREQST)
-
TOTAL % 911) 1 0.1 917) 1 0.1 918) 1 0.1 925) 1 0.1 927) 1 0.1 929) 2 0.1 1001) 3 0.2 1002) 3 0.2 1004) 1 0.1 1005) 9 0.5 1006) 5 0.3 1009) 11 0.6 1010) 7 0.4 1011) 1 0.1 1012) 2 0.1 1013) 3 0.2 1014) 1 0.1 1015) 3 0.2 1016) 4 0.2 1017) 4 0.2 1018) 3 0.2 1019) 4 0.2 1020) 3 0.2 1021) 1 0.1 1022) 1 0.1 1023) 12 0.7 1024) 2 0.1 1030) 1 0.1 9999) 1716 95.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 43) Pre: Date persuasion letter sent (MMDD) [9999. NA; INAP, No persuasion letter requested (9999 In pre-admin] (DPSENT)
-
TOTAL % 918) 1 0.1 922) 1 0.1 927) 1 0.1 929) 2 0.1 1002) 2 0.1 1004) 2 0.1 1005) 1 0.1 1006) 4 0.2 1007) 4 0.2 1010) 26 1.4 1012) 4 0.2 1015) 1 0.1 1016) 7 0.4 1017) 7 0.4 1018) 1 0.1 1019) 2 0.1 1020) 3 0.2 1022) 3 0.2 1023) 6 0.3 1024) 1 0.1 1025) 6 0.3 1026) 4 0.2 1101) 1 0.1 9999) 1717 95.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 44) Pre: Type of persuasion letter (PLTYPE)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1717 95.0 1) Too busy 33 1.8 2) Too personal 4 0.2 3) Not interested 23 1.3 4) Too old 4 0.2 6) Gatekeeper 3 0.2 7) Not at home 23 1.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 45) Pre: Number of telephone calls (TELCALLS)
-
TOTAL % 0) 778 43.1 1) 174 9.6 2) 147 8.1 3) 99 5.5 4) 93 5.1 5) 82 4.5 6) 74 4.1 7) 57 3.2 8) 43 2.4 9) 35 1.9 10) 39 2.2 11) 33 1.8 12) 22 1.2 13) 22 1.2 14) 13 0.7 15) 18 1.0 16) 13 0.7 17) 9 0.5 18) 6 0.3 19) 10 0.6 20) 10 0.6 21) 2 0.1 22) 3 0.2 23) 3 0.2 24) 4 0.2 25) 2 0.1 27) 2 0.1 28) 1 0.1 30) 3 0.2 31) 1 0.1 32) 1 0.1 33) 1 0.1 34) 1 0.1 35) 2 0.1 36) 1 0.1 37) 1 0.1 38) 1 0.1 42) 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 46) Pre: Number of face-to-face (FTF) calls (FTFCALLS)
-
TOTAL % 0) 785 43.4 1) 144 8.0 2) 202 11.2 3) 186 10.3 4) 162 9.0 5) 103 5.7 6) 61 3.4 7) 43 2.4 8) 37 2.0 9) 30 1.7 10) 14 0.8 11) 9 0.5 12) 8 0.4 13) 7 0.4 14) 6 0.3 15) 1 0.1 16) 2 0.1 17) 2 0.1 18) 1 0.1 19) 1 0.1 20) 1 0.1 21) 1 0.1 22) 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 47) Pre: Final result (FINRESLT)
-
TOTAL % 1) Interview, complete 1801 99.7 5) Interview, partial 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 48) Sample release (all 1). All cases coded 1 there was a single release of the entire sample. (SMPLREL)
-
TOTAL % 1) 1807 100.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 49) Pre: Language of interview (all English) all interviews conducted entirely in English (code 1) (LANGUAGE)
-
TOTAL % 1) 1807 100.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 50) Pre - coversheet: Flag - missing coversheet (FLAGMCS)
-
TOTAL % 0) Coversheet not missing 1783 98.7 1) Missing coversheet 24 1.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 51) Pre - coversheet: Color of coversheet (CVSCOLOR)
-
TOTAL % 1) Blue 984 54.5 2) Yellow 794 43.9 4) Green - FTF type II updating 5 0.3 9) Missing coversheet 24 1.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 52) If telephone RDD: Since the phone number I dialed is produced by a computer, I do not know whether I'm calling a business, a home, a dormitory, or some other type of residence. (Which is it?) (PHONTYPE)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP, assigned FTF mode 1006 55.7 1) Business 2 0.1 2) Home 735 40.7 3) Both 4 0.2 5) Cell phone 44 2.4 9) NA; phone mode and coversheet missing 16 0.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 53) If telephone RDD: If business phone number: Does anyone live there on the premises? (PHBUSRES)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1805 99.9 1) Yes 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 54) If telephone RDD: If business phone number: If someone lives on the premises: Do (they/you) have a different phone number inside (their/your) residence that is for personal use? (PHBUSRSP)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1805 99.9 2) Use this 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 55) If face-to-face mode: Household listing obtained from: (HHLIST)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP, assigned phone mode 801 44.3 1) HU member 980 54.2 2) Neighbor 3 0.2 3) Apt. manager 1 0.1 4) Landlord 1 0.1 7) Other (specify) 4 0.2 9) NA; FTF and coversheet missing 17 0.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 56) Household listing: Selection table (HHTABLE)
-
TOTAL % 1) Selection table A 274 15.2 2) Table B1 152 8.4 3) Table B2 135 7.5 4) Table C 304 16.8 5) Table D 299 16.5 6) Table E1 161 8.9 7) Table E2 149 8.2 8) Table F 309 17.1 9) Missing coversheet 24 1.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 57) Household listing: Number of eligible adults (9 NA) (NELIGADL)
-
TOTAL % 1) 607 33.6 2) 989 54.7 3) 161 8.9 4) 44 2.4 5) 3 0.2 6) 2 0.1 7) 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 58) Household listing: Number ineligible adults (9 NA) (NINELADL)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1743 96.5 1) 51 2.8 2) 1 0.1 3) 1 0.1 4) 2 0.1 9) 9 0.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 59) Household listing: Household composition (HHCOMPOS)
-
TOTAL % 10) 1 Adult male HHR 216 12.0 11) 1 Adult male HHR plus 1 other non-relative 25 1.4 12) 1 Adult male HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives 7 0.4 20) 1 Adult female HHR 347 19.2 21) 1 Adult female HHR plus 1 other non-relative 15 0.8 22) 1 Adult female HHR plus 2 or more non-relatives 3 0.2 30) 1 Married couple: No children/or children at home under 18 879 48.6 40) 1 Married couple plus 1 other relative 135 7.5 50) 1 Married couple plus 2 or more other relatives 44 2.4 51) 1 Married couple plus 1 other non-relative 6 0.3 55) 1 Married couple plus relatives and non-relatives 2 0.1 60) 1 Male HHR plus 1 other relative 32 1.8 65) 1 Male HHR plus relatives and nonrelatives 1 0.1 70) 1 Male HHR plus 2 or more other relatives 7 0.4 80) 1 Female HHR plus 1 other relative 50 2.8 85) 1 Female HHR plus relatives and non-relatives 1 0.1 90) 1 Female HHR plus 2 or more other relatives 19 1.1 95) Relatives of opposite sex, unclear who is HHR 6 0.3 99) NA 12 0.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 60) Household listing: R person number (9 NA) (RESPNMBR)
-
TOTAL % 1) 1107 61.3 2) 617 34.1 3) 64 3.5 4) 12 0.7 5) 1 0.1 9) 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 61) Contact description: Describe the type of structure in which the respondent lives (STRUCTYP)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP, assigned phone mode 801 44.3 1) Mobile home 38 2.1 2) Detached single family 658 36.4 3) Multi-family 47 2.6 4) Apartment house 166 9.2 5) Condo complex 35 1.9 7) Other (specify) 32 1.8 9) NA; missing coversheet 30 1.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 62) If face-to-face mode: Is there a building manager, security guard or other gatekeeper whose cooperation you need in order to gain access to the R's housing unit? (FTFGTKEE)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP, assigned phone mode 801 44.3 1) Yes 36 2.0 2) No, but building is locked/subdivision is gated and locked 33 1.8 5) No 876 48.5 9) NA; missing coversheet 61 3.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 63) If face-to-face mode: If gatekeeper/guard/manager/locked access: Check the box below which best describes the situation [1 Building manager or other gatekeeper must let you in the building (on the grounds, into the mobile home park) but then you are free to attempt contact with R's HU; 2 Building manager/other gatekeeper must get permission from someone in R's HU before you are allowed to make contact with the household; 7 Other (specify); 9 NA; 0 INAP] (FTFTGKEE)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1738 96.2 1) 15 0.8 2) 2 0.1 7) 47 2.6 9) 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 64) Contact description: Was there resistance from any contact person? (CNTCTRS1)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 458 25.3 5) No 1322 73.2 9) NA 27 1.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 65) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - surveys waste of time; previous bad experience (CNTCTRS2)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1349 74.7 1) Marked 10 0.6 5) Not marked 342 18.9 9) NA 106 5.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 66) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - content too personal (CNTCTRS3)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1349 74.7 1) Marked 20 1.1 5) Not marked 332 18.4 9) NA 106 5.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 67) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - confidentiality (CNTCTRS4)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1349 74.7 1) Marked 40 2.2 5) Not marked 312 17.3 9) NA 106 5.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 68) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - not interested in politics (CNTCTRS5)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1349 74.7 1) Marked 81 4.5 5) Not marked 271 15.0 9) NA 106 5.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 69) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - too busy (CNTCTRS6)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1349 74.7 1) Marked 125 6.9 5) Not marked 227 12.6 9) NA 106 5.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 70) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - poor health (CNTCTRS7)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1349 74.7 1) Marked 15 0.8 5) Not marked 337 18.6 9) NA 106 5.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 71) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - other (specify) (CNTCTRS8)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1349 74.7 1) Marked 163 9.0 5) Not marked 189 10.5 9) NA 106 5.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 72) Contact description: Did R refuse initially? (RREFUSED)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 222 12.3 5) No 1530 84.7 9) NA 55 3.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 73) Contact description: Did respondent break any appointments (RBRKAPP)
-
TOTAL % 0) None 1522 84.2 1) One 200 11.1 2) Two or more 67 3.7 9) NA 18 1.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 74) Contact description: If contact persons resisted, was the respondent the contact person who gave resistance? (RCNTCRES)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1349 74.7 1) Yes 281 15.6 5) No 97 5.4 9) NA 80 4.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 75) Summary: Resistance (RRESIST1)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes, some resistance identified 330 18.3 5) No resistance identified 1450 80.2 9) NA 27 1.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 76) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - surveys waste of time; previous bad experience (RRESIST2)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1630 90.2 1) Marked 1 0.1 5) Not marked 176 9.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 77) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - content too personal (RRESIST3)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1630 90.2 1) Marked 7 0.4 5) Not marked 170 9.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 78) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - confidentiality (RRESIST4)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1630 90.2 1) Marked 9 0.5 5) Not marked 168 9.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 79) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - not interested in politics (RRESIST5)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1630 90.2 1) Marked 12 0.7 5) Not marked 165 9.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 80) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - too busy (RRESIST6)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1630 90.2 1) Marked 21 1.2 5) Not marked 156 8.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 81) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - poor health (RRESIST7)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1630 90.2 1) Marked 3 0.2 5) Not marked 174 9.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 82) If R was not the contact person who resisted: Resistance from R - other (specify) (RRESIST8)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1630 90.2 1) Marked 15 0.8 5) Not marked 162 9.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 83) If face-to-face mode: CSMS interviewer evaluation: What is the estimated income of R's household? (ESTINCOM)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 801 44.3 1) Under $10,000 98 5.4 2) $10,000-25,000 202 11.2 3) $25,000-50,000 264 14.6 4) $50,000-105,000 249 13.8 5) $105,000 and above 72 4.0 8) DK 49 2.7 9) NA 72 4.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 84) If face-to-face mode: CSMS interviewer evaluation: What is the race of R's household? (ESTRACE)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 801 44.3 1) White 764 42.3 2) Black 131 7.2 3) American Indian 4 0.2 4) Asian 17 0.9 7) Other 36 2.0 8) DK 2 0.1 9) NA 52 2.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 85) If face-to-face mode: If interviewer has identified race of household: Is this definite or probable? (CERTRACE)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 855 47.3 1) Definite 915 50.6 5) Probable 31 1.7 9) NA 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 86) If face-to-face mode: CSMS interviewer evaluation: Is R or R's household of Hispanic origin? (HISPHH)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 801 44.3 1) Yes 84 4.6 5) No 863 47.8 8) DK 7 0.4 9) NA 52 2.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 87) If face-to-face mode: If interviewer has identified Hispanic status of R/R's household: CSMS interviewer evaluation: Is this definite or probable? (CERTHISP)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 860 47.6 1) Definite 911 50.4 5) Probable 33 1.8 9) NA 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 88) Pre: Interviewer of record ID (4-digit ID) (INTVREC)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 5115.753 2426 - 89) Pre: Supervisor ID (4-digit ID) (SPVSR)
-
TOTAL % 3548) 414 22.9 4529) 199 11.0 6840) 801 44.3 7356) 393 21.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 90) Pre: Interviewer gender (INTVGEND)
-
TOTAL % 1) Male 226 12.5 2) Female 1581 87.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 91) Pre: Interviewer education (INTVEDUC)
-
TOTAL % 3) High school graduate 333 18.4 4) Some college 574 31.8 5) College degree 572 31.7 6) Master's degree 294 16.3 9) NA 34 1.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 92) Pre: Interviewer race (INTVRACE)
-
TOTAL % 1) White 1684 93.2 2) Black 100 5.5 7) Other 23 1.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 93) Pre: Interviewer ethnicity (INTVETHN)
-
TOTAL % 0) No ethnic identity coded 1561 86.4 1) Hispanic 61 3.4 7) Other 185 10.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 94) Pre: Interviewer languages--this variable is not available in 2000. (INTVLANG)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1807 100.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 95) Pre: Years interviewer experience (99 NA) (INTEXPNC)
-
TOTAL % 0) 449 24.8 1) 385 21.3 2) 148 8.2 3) 214 11.8 4) 22 1.2 5) 133 7.4 6) 60 3.3 7) 64 3.5 8) 78 4.3 9) 82 4.5 10) 38 2.1 11) 15 0.8 12) 38 2.1 13) 13 0.7 14) 4 0.2 15) 29 1.6 16) 12 0.7 17) 23 1.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 96) Pre: Interviewer age (INTAGE)
-
TOTAL % 1) 18-34 Years 113 6.3 2) 35-40 Years 179 9.9 3) 41-45 Years 273 15.1 4) 46-50 Years 314 17.4 5) 51-55 Years 255 14.1 6) 56-60 Years 287 15.9 7) 51-64 Years 133 7.4 8) 65-79 Years 253 14.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 97) ICPSR state code (STATECOD)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 39.77 21 - 98) FIPS state code - interview location [NOTE: 3 Cases were misidentified in the preload as PA but should have been NJ. These cases are coded 96] (FIPS)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 28.909 17 - 99) 2000 State abbreviation and congressional district number - interview location (STATE)
-
- 100) 2000 FIPS state code and congressional district number -interview location FIPS state code resides in first 2 digits, CD number in last 2 digits. [9996 Misidentified location 9999. NA 0000. Washington D.C.] (VAR00082)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 2897.744 1706 - 101) Congressional district number - interview location [96 Misidentified location 99. NA 00. Washington D.C.] (CDISTNO)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 8.812 10 - 102) ICPSR state code and congressional district - interview location ICPSR state code resides in first 2 digits, CD number in last 2 digits. [9996 Misidentified location 9999. NA 0000. Washington D.C.] (STATECD)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 3974.114 2085 - 103) Did R vote in state and CD of interview? (VOTEOUTC)
-
TOTAL % 0) R voted in state and CD of interview 1131 62.6 1) R did not vote in state and CD of interview 22 1.2 8) NA 28 1.5 9) INAP 626 34.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 104) State and CD of vote cast outside CD of interview [9999. NA if voted outside CD of interview 0000. INAP, 0,9 in Pre-sample.] (WHVOTED)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1757 97.2 620) 1 0.1 699) 1 0.1 1203) 1 0.1 1299) 1 0.1 1799) 2 0.1 1899) 1 0.1 2201) 1 0.1 2605) 1 0.1 2608) 1 0.1 2708) 1 0.1 2903) 1 0.1 3412) 1 0.1 3712) 1 0.1 4105) 1 0.1 4199) 1 0.1 4704) 1 0.1 4706) 1 0.1 5101) 2 0.1 5399) 2 0.1 9999) 28 1.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 105) Primary area name (PSU Interview location) (INTLOCAT)
-
- 106) Primary area code - Interview location - 110. Boston, MA 230. Milwaukee, WI 120. New York, NY 239. Wheelng-Steubenvl OH 121 Philadelphia, PA-NJ 240. Des Moines, IA 122 Nassau-Suffolk, NY 250. Richmond-Ptrsbrg, VA 130. Chicago, IL 255 Columbus, GA-AL 131 Detroit, MI 257 Jacksonville, FL 132 Cleveland, OH 258 Lakeld-Wntr Haven FL 141 St Louis, MO-IL 260. Knoxville, TN 150. Washington, DC-MD-VA 262 Birmingham, AL 152 Baltimore, MD 273 Waco, TX 154 Miami-Hialeh, FL 274 McAllen, TX 170. Houston, TX 280. Salt Lake C-Ogden UT 171 Dallas-FT Worth, TX 292 Fresno, CA 181 Denver, CO 293 Eugene-Springfld, OR 190. Los Angeles, CA 434 Saginaw, MI 191 Seattle-Tacoma, WA 464 Gardner, MA 194 Anaheim, CA 466 Decatur CO., IN 196 San Francisco, CA 470. Mower CO., MN 211 New Haven, CT 474 DeSoto Parish, LA 213 Manchester-Nashua NH 477 Chicot CO., AR 220. Buffalo, NY 480. Montgomery CO., VA 226 Atlantic City, NJ 482 EL Dorado CO., CA 000. Telephone Sample (RDD) (AREACODE)
-
TOTAL % 0) 801 44.3 110) 11 0.6 120) 22 1.2 121) 16 0.9 122) 18 1.0 130) 23 1.3 131) 21 1.2 132) 18 1.0 141) 12 0.7 150) 19 1.1 152) 13 0.7 154) 2 0.1 170) 28 1.5 171) 13 0.7 181) 20 1.1 190) 24 1.3 191) 27 1.5 194) 17 0.9 196) 15 0.8 211) 9 0.5 213) 17 0.9 220) 40 2.2 226) 24 1.3 230) 45 2.5 239) 14 0.8 240) 20 1.1 250) 21 1.2 255) 17 0.9 257) 23 1.3 258) 15 0.8 260) 14 0.8 262) 48 2.7 273) 18 1.0 274) 14 0.8 280) 34 1.9 292) 20 1.1 293) 20 1.1 434) 23 1.3 464) 32 1.8 466) 26 1.4 470) 43 2.4 474) 40 2.2 477) 26 1.4 480) 39 2.2 482) 45 2.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 107) Number of household unit [Codes 1-5 and: 9 NA, 0. Phone IW] (NUMHHUNI)
-
TOTAL % 0) 801 44.3 1) 983 54.4 2) 2 0.1 3) 3 0.2 5) 1 0.1 9) 17 0.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 108) Census region - interview location: 1 Northeast (CT, ME, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT; 2 North Central (IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND, OH, SD, WI; 3 South (AL, AR, DE, DC, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV; 4 WEST (AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, NV, OR, UT, WA, WY (CENSUSRE)
-
TOTAL % 1) Northeast 316 17.5 2) North Central 450 24.9 3) South 657 36.4 4) West 384 21.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 109) Belt code - interview location: [1 Central Cities of the six largest (population over 4,500,000) consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Areas; 2 Central Cities of CMSAS and MSAS with fewer than 2,000,000 population (exclusive of those in the 21); 3 Suburbs of the six largest CMSA/MSAS; 4 Suburb of all other CMSA/MSAS; 5 Adjacent areas: Includes all territory beyond the outer boundary of the suburban belt, but within 50; 6 Outlying area: includes all territory more than 50 miles from the central business district of a central city 0. Telephone sample (RDD)] (BELTCODE)
-
TOTAL % 0) Telephone sample 801 44.3 1) Central City 99 5.5 2) City less than 2 Million 185 10.2 3) Large Suburbs 168 9.3 4) Suburbs 241 13.3 5) Adjacent 264 14.6 6) Outlying 49 2.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 110) Population in 1000S - interview location. (POPULATI)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 4593.992 4889 - 111) Census size of place - interview location (SIZE)
-
TOTAL % 0) Telephone sample (RDD) 801 44.3 11) Central Cities 87 4.8 20) Rural incl. LT 2500 places 45 2.5 21) 2,500-9,999 37 2.0 22) 10,000-29,999 62 3.4 23) 30,000-49,999 35 1.9 24) 50,000-99,999 29 1.6 25) 100,000-149,999 2 0.1 26) 150,000-349,999 10 0.6 27) 350,000 4 0.2 30) Under 50,000 14 0.8 31) 50,000-99,999 13 0.7 32) 100,000-149,999 19 1.1 33) 150,000-349,999 90 5.0 34) 350,000 and over 49 2.7 40) Rural 100 5.5 41) 2,500-9,999 116 6.4 42) 10,000-29,999 64 3.5 43) 30,000-49,999 5 0.3 44) 50,000-99,999 33 1.8 45) 100,000-149,999 3 0.2 50) Rural (including rural places with less than 2,000,000 population) 100 5.5 51) 2,500-9,999 28 1.5 52) 10,000-29,999 36 2.0 53) 30,000-49,999 25 1.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 112) Census tract/ed indicator - interview location (blanked) (TRACT)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1807 100.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 113) 2000 Sampling error code (SECODE)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 299.488 176 - 114) 2000 Census NECMA/SMSA - interview location [See note 9 in summary] (NECMASMS)
-
TOTAL % 0) 219 12.1 360) 17 0.9 560) 24 1.3 720) 13 0.7 1000) 48 2.7 1123) 11 0.6 1280) 40 2.2 1600) 23 1.3 1680) 18 1.0 1800) 17 0.9 1920) 9 0.5 2080) 20 1.1 2120) 20 1.1 2160) 21 1.2 2400) 20 1.1 2800) 4 0.2 2840) 20 1.1 3360) 28 1.5 3600) 23 1.3 3840) 14 0.8 3980) 15 0.8 4480) 24 1.3 4763) 17 0.9 4880) 14 0.8 5000) 2 0.1 5080) 45 2.5 5380) 18 1.0 5483) 9 0.5 5600) 22 1.2 6160) 16 0.9 6760) 21 1.2 6960) 23 1.3 7040) 12 0.7 7160) 34 1.9 7360) 15 0.8 7600) 20 1.1 8080) 14 0.8 8200) 7 0.4 8800) 18 1.0 8840) 19 1.1 9243) 32 1.8 9996) 801 44.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 115) 2000 CMSA - interview location [07 Boston-Lawrence-Salem MA-NH 10. Buffalo-Niagara Falls NY 14 Chicago-Gary-Lake County IL-IN-WI** 28 Cleveland-Akron-Lorain OH 31 Dallas-FT Worth TX (since Dallas and Ft Worth were made separate PMSAS in 1990, this new CMSA was added 34 Denver-Boulder CO) (since Denver and Boulder were made separate PMSAS in 1990, this new CMSA was added in) 35 Detroit-Ann Arbor MI** 42 Houston-Galveston-Brazoria TX 49 Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside CA** 56 Miami-Fort Lauderdale FL 63 Milwaukee-Racine WI 70. New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island NY-NJ-CT** 77 Philadelphia-Wilmington-Trenton PA-NJ-DE-MD** 78 Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley PA 84 San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose CA** 91 Seattle-Tacoma WA 96 Telephone Sample (RDD 00. INAP, location not in CMSA.) This includes old code 32 (Dayton Springfield, OH) which is no longer consolidated in 1990 since Dayton and Springfield are combined in a single MSA in 1990] (CMSA)
-
TOTAL % 0) 646 35.7 7) 11 0.6 10) 40 2.2 14) 23 1.3 28) 18 1.0 31) 13 0.7 34) 20 1.1 35) 21 1.2 42) 28 1.5 49) 41 2.3 56) 2 0.1 63) 45 2.5 70) 40 2.2 77) 16 0.9 84) 15 0.8 91) 27 1.5 96) 801 44.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 116) Pre section timing - Section A (SECTATIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 9.779 57 - 117) Pre section timing - Section B (SECTBTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 4.626 57 - 118) Pre section timing - section C (SECTCTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 6.546 57 - 119) Pre section timing - section D (SECTDTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 6.765 57 - 120) Pre section timing - section E (SECTETIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 3.801 58 - 121) Pre section timing - section F (SECTFTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 7.117 57 - 122) Pre section timing - section G (SECTGTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 5.503 57 - 123) Pre section timing - section H (SECTHTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 7.557 57 - 124) Pre section timing - section K (SECTKTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 6.884 57 - 125) Pre section timing - section L (SECTLTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 14.776 57 - 126) Pre section timing - section M (SECTMTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 8.454 57 - 127) Pre section timing - section N (SECTNTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 5.381 57 - 128) Pre section timing - section P (SECTPTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 7.682 57 - 129) Pre section timing - section Q (SECTQTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 5.987 57 - 130) Pre section timing - section R (SECTRTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 4.709 57 - 131) Pre section timing - section S (SECTSTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 4.706 57 - 132) Pre section timing - section X (SECTXTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 4.608 57 - 133) Pre section timing - section Y (SECTYTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 10.476 57 - 134) Pre section timing - section Z (SECTZTIM)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 8.484 78 - 135) Post: mode of interview (PAINTMOD)
-
TOTAL % 0) No post IW 252 13.9 1) Personal 693 38.4 5) Telephone 857 47.4 7) Administered wrong mode: FTF re-assigned to telephone but administered as personal interview 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 136) Post - mode switch (PAFLAGS)
-
TOTAL % 1) Assigned FTF, not switched to phone mode 805 44.5 2) Assigned phone 802 44.4 3) Assigned FTF, switched to phone mode 200 11.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 137) Post: Form - section H administered in post (PAFORMDS)
-
TOTAL % 0) Section H not administered in post 790 43.7 1) Section H administered in post 765 42.3 9) No post IW 252 13.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 138) Post: Form - K2 format (PAFDSCFM)
-
TOTAL % 0) Administered without probes 1025 56.7 1) Administered with probes 530 29.3 9) No post IW 252 13.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 139) Post: Month of interview (PAIWMNTH)
-
TOTAL % 0) No post IW 252 13.9 11) November 1147 63.5 12) December 408 22.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 140) Post: Day of interview - coded 1-31 and 0 No post interview (PAIWDAY)
-
TOTAL % 0) 252 13.9 1) 33 1.8 2) 27 1.5 3) 21 1.2 4) 37 2.0 5) 38 2.1 6) 28 1.5 7) 30 1.7 8) 44 2.4 9) 62 3.4 10) 56 3.1 11) 81 4.5 12) 42 2.3 13) 85 4.7 14) 84 4.6 15) 83 4.6 16) 86 4.8 17) 77 4.3 18) 61 3.4 19) 56 3.1 20) 87 4.8 21) 68 3.8 22) 39 2.2 23) 2 0.1 24) 16 0.9 25) 25 1.4 26) 22 1.2 27) 70 3.9 28) 56 3.1 29) 83 4.6 30) 56 3.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 141) Post: Month and day (MMDD) (PAMNTHDA)
-
TOTAL % 0) 252 13.9 1108) 14 0.8 1109) 46 2.5 1110) 46 2.5 1111) 52 2.9 1112) 26 1.4 1113) 69 3.8 1114) 73 4.0 1115) 76 4.2 1116) 75 4.2 1117) 68 3.8 1118) 55 3.0 1119) 40 2.2 1120) 78 4.3 1121) 61 3.4 1122) 38 2.1 1123) 2 0.1 1124) 16 0.9 1125) 25 1.4 1126) 22 1.2 1127) 70 3.9 1128) 56 3.1 1129) 83 4.6 1130) 56 3.1 1201) 33 1.8 1202) 27 1.5 1203) 21 1.2 1204) 37 2.0 1205) 38 2.1 1206) 28 1.5 1207) 30 1.7 1208) 30 1.7 1209) 16 0.9 1210) 10 0.6 1211) 29 1.6 1212) 16 0.9 1213) 16 0.9 1214) 11 0.6 1215) 7 0.4 1216) 11 0.6 1217) 9 0.5 1218) 6 0.3 1219) 16 0.9 1220) 9 0.5 1221) 7 0.4 1222) 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 142) Post: Number of days after election (96 INAP, No post IW; 99 NA) (DAYSPELE)
-
TOTAL % 1) 14 0.8 2) 46 2.5 3) 46 2.5 4) 52 2.9 5) 26 1.4 6) 69 3.8 7) 73 4.0 8) 76 4.2 9) 75 4.2 10) 68 3.8 11) 55 3.0 12) 40 2.2 13) 78 4.3 14) 61 3.4 15) 38 2.1 16) 2 0.1 17) 16 0.9 18) 25 1.4 19) 22 1.2 20) 70 3.9 21) 56 3.1 22) 83 4.6 23) 56 3.1 24) 33 1.8 25) 27 1.5 26) 21 1.2 27) 37 2.0 28) 38 2.1 29) 28 1.5 30) 30 1.7 31) 30 1.7 32) 16 0.9 33) 10 0.6 34) 29 1.6 35) 16 0.9 36) 16 0.9 37) 11 0.6 38) 7 0.4 39) 11 0.6 40) 9 0.5 41) 6 0.3 42) 16 0.9 43) 9 0.5 44) 7 0.4 45) 1 0.1 96) 252 13.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 143) Post: Interview taken before or after Gore concession: December 13, 2000 (IWGORECN)
-
TOTAL % 0) Before 1462 80.9 1) Day of concession (Dec. 13) 16 0.9 2) After 77 4.3 9) NA; INAP, no post IW 252 13.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 144) Post: Interview length (999.99 NA; partial IW 000.00 No post IW) (PAIWLNGT)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 57.974 61 - 145) Post: Interview number (99. NA; 00. INAP; no post interview) (PAIWNO)
-
TOTAL % 0) 252 13.9 1) 90 5.0 2) 88 4.9 3) 87 4.8 4) 86 4.8 5) 85 4.7 6) 85 4.7 7) 85 4.7 8) 80 4.4 9) 77 4.3 10) 73 4.0 11) 70 3.9 12) 66 3.7 13) 62 3.4 14) 56 3.1 15) 51 2.8 16) 48 2.7 17) 46 2.5 18) 41 2.3 19) 37 2.0 20) 34 1.9 21) 26 1.4 22) 24 1.3 23) 18 1.0 24) 18 1.0 25) 14 0.8 26) 13 0.7 27) 13 0.7 28) 11 0.6 29) 10 0.6 30) 8 0.4 31) 8 0.4 32) 7 0.4 33) 6 0.3 34) 6 0.3 35) 5 0.3 36) 5 0.3 37) 3 0.2 38) 3 0.2 39) 2 0.1 40) 2 0.1 41) 2 0.1 42) 2 0.1 43) 1 0.1 44) 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 146) Post: Date of beginning VQ file (PAVQBEGN)
-
TOTAL % 0) No post IW 252 13.9 1) 11/7 140 7.7 2) 11/10 351 19.4 3) 11/16 (1) 13 0.7 4) 11/16 (2) 201 11.1 5) 11/18 282 15.6 6) 11/27 568 31.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 147) Post: Date of ending VQ file (PAVQEND)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP, partial IW; no post IW 256 14.2 1) 11/7 105 5.8 2) 11/10 352 19.5 3) 11/16 13 0.7 4) 11/16 158 8.7 5) 11/18 318 17.6 6) 11/27 605 33.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 148) Post: Flag - change in VQ (PAFLGVQ)
-
TOTAL % 0) No change 1429 79.1 1) Change in VQ 122 6.8 9) INAP, partial IW; no post IW 256 14.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 149) POST: RELEASE (PARELEAS)
-
TOTAL % 1) Release 1 - November 7 1147 63.5 2) Release 2 - November 15 319 17.7 3) Release 3 - November 21 340 18.8 9) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 150) Post: Payment to R - amount (PAPAYAMN)
-
TOTAL % 0) R requested no payment 4 0.2 20) Twenty dollars 1525 84.4 96) INAP, no post IW 252 13.9 99) NA 26 1.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 151) Interviewer incentive - beginning October 26, 2000, interviewers were paid $10 for each completed interview. (PAINTVIN)
-
TOTAL % 0) Post interview date not in incentive period 1236 68.4 1) Post interview date in incentive period. 319 17.7 9) INAP, no post IW 252 13.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 152) Post: Payment to R - mode (PAPAYMOD)
-
TOTAL % 0) R Requested no payment 4 0.2 1) Check 1511 83.6 2) Cash 14 0.8 9) NA; INAP, no post IW 278 15.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 153) Post: Payment to R - date (MMDD - '0000' is used for cases with no post IW or 0 in Post-Admin.14/Post-Admin.15; '9999' indicates NA.) (PAPAYDAY)
-
TOTAL % 0) 256 14.2 102) 12 0.7 110) 1 0.1 123) 1 0.1 1031) 579 32.0 1109) 94 5.2 1113) 1 0.1 1116) 172 9.5 1117) 1 0.1 1121) 119 6.6 1122) 1 0.1 1125) 2 0.1 1128) 2 0.1 1130) 334 18.5 1201) 1 0.1 1202) 1 0.1 1206) 99 5.5 1213) 73 4.0 1220) 31 1.7 9999) 27 1.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 154) Post: Tape recorded? (PARECORD)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP, no post IW 252 13.9 1) Yes 78 4.3 5) No 1477 81.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 155) Post: Verification (PAVERIFY)
-
TOTAL % 0) Counted for Ann Arbor office, not selected for verification 1332 73.7 1) Flagged for verification 55 3.0 2) Verified OK 142 7.9 3) Verified with some discrepancies 18 1.0 5) Unable to verify 4 0.2 6) Verification limit met 2 0.1 9) NA; INAP, no post IW 254 14.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 156) Post: Evaluation (PAEVALU)
-
TOTAL % 0) Not evaluated 1477 81.7 1) Flagged 1 0.1 2) Evaluated 77 4.3 9) INAP, no post IW 252 13.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 157) Post: Refusal conversion indicator (PACONIND)
-
TOTAL % 0) Not a refusal conversion situation 1529 84.6 1) Refusal conversion situation indicated 26 1.4 9) NA; INAP, no post IW 252 13.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 158) Post: Persuasion letter - flag (PAPERSLT)
-
TOTAL % 0) No persuasion letter sent 1517 84.0 1) Persuasion letter sent 95 5.3 9) NA; INAP, no post IW 195 10.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 159) Post: Date persuasion letter requested (MMDD - '0000' is used for cases with no post IW or no letter requested;'9999' indicates NA.) (PADATERE)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1712 94.7 1109) 1 0.1 1112) 1 0.1 1113) 1 0.1 1115) 1 0.1 1116) 2 0.1 1120) 4 0.2 1121) 2 0.1 1125) 1 0.1 1128) 2 0.1 1129) 2 0.1 1130) 2 0.1 1202) 1 0.1 1204) 3 0.2 1205) 6 0.3 1207) 5 0.3 1209) 2 0.1 1212) 1 0.1 1213) 1 0.1 9999) 57 3.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 160) Post: Date persuasion letter sent - '0000' is used for cases with no post IW or no letter requested;'9999' indicates NA. (PADATSN)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1712 94.7 1109) 1 0.1 1112) 1 0.1 1113) 1 0.1 1116) 1 0.1 1117) 1 0.1 1120) 5 0.3 1121) 2 0.1 1127) 1 0.1 1129) 2 0.1 1130) 2 0.1 1202) 2 0.1 1204) 3 0.2 1205) 4 0.2 1206) 3 0.2 1207) 5 0.3 1209) 2 0.1 1212) 1 0.1 1214) 1 0.1 9999) 57 3.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 161) Post: Type of persuasion letter (PALTRTYP)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP, no post IW 1712 94.7 1) Too busy 9 0.5 3) Not interested 28 1.5 5) Evasive 51 2.8 9) NA 7 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 162) Post: Number of telephone calls (99 NA; INAP, no post IW) (PATELCAL)
-
TOTAL % 0) 90 5.0 1) 239 13.2 2) 303 16.8 3) 223 12.3 4) 172 9.5 5) 120 6.6 6) 103 5.7 7) 69 3.8 8) 57 3.2 9) 24 1.3 10) 32 1.8 11) 20 1.1 12) 18 1.0 13) 16 0.9 14) 13 0.7 15) 8 0.4 16) 6 0.3 17) 9 0.5 18) 7 0.4 19) 6 0.3 20) 3 0.2 21) 2 0.1 22) 1 0.1 23) 1 0.1 24) 4 0.2 25) 3 0.2 26) 2 0.1 27) 1 0.1 29) 1 0.1 30) 1 0.1 31) 1 0.1 99) 252 13.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 163) Post: Number of face-to-face calls (99 NA; INAP, no post IW) (PAFTFCAL)
-
TOTAL % 0) 851 47.1 1) 468 25.9 2) 130 7.2 3) 66 3.7 4) 27 1.5 5) 7 0.4 6) 3 0.2 7) 1 0.1 10) 1 0.1 12) 1 0.1 99) 252 13.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 164) Post: Final result code (PAFINRES)
-
TOTAL % 1) IW complete 1551 85.8 5) IW partial 4 0.2 51) Refusal by R 99 5.5 52) Refusal by person other than R 5 0.3 54) Initial refusal, not reached for conversion 20 1.1 61) No contact 23 1.3 63) Noninterview, permanent reason 5 0.3 66) Interview begun then terminated, insufficiently complete 1 0.1 67) Noninterview, other reason 79 4.4 68) Could not locate R 20 1.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 165) Post: Result date (post non-interviews '0000' is used for cases with post IW; '9999' indicates NA.) (PARESDAT)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1555 86.1 1115) 1 0.1 1117) 1 0.1 1126) 2 0.1 1127) 1 0.1 1128) 1 0.1 1130) 2 0.1 1201) 1 0.1 1202) 3 0.2 1203) 3 0.2 1204) 1 0.1 1205) 5 0.3 1206) 1 0.1 1207) 4 0.2 1208) 2 0.1 1209) 1 0.1 1210) 2 0.1 1211) 7 0.4 1212) 4 0.2 1213) 7 0.4 1214) 7 0.4 1215) 1 0.1 1216) 9 0.5 1217) 6 0.3 1218) 13 0.7 1219) 48 2.7 1220) 37 2.0 1221) 51 2.8 1222) 10 0.6 1223) 10 0.6 1226) 5 0.3 1227) 4 0.2 1228) 1 0.1 9999) 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 166) Post: Flag - pre/post mode switch (PAFLGMS)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP, no post IW 252 13.9 1) Pre FTF and post FTF 698 38.6 2) Pre phone and post phone 693 38.4 3) Pre FTF and post phone 164 9.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 167) Post: Language of interview (All interviews were conducted entirely in English) (PAINTLAN)
-
TOTAL % 1) English 1807 100.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 168) Flag- missing CS (POFLAGMC)
-
TOTAL % 0) Coversheet not missing 1780 98.5 1) Coversheet missing 27 1.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 169) Color of coversheet (POCCSHEE)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 27 1.5 1) Blue 936 51.8 2) Yellow 831 46.0 3) Pink 13 0.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 170) Does (name still live here? - R still live at sample address) (RESATADD)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 27 1.5 1) Yes 1512 83.7 5) No 41 2.3 9) NA 227 12.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 171) If phone mode: If R does not still live at sample address: New phone number available (NEWPHONE)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1793 99.2 1) Available 8 0.4 2) Not available 2 0.1 9) NA 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 172) If face-to-face mode: If R does not still live at sample address: Address is: Status of new address (ADDRSTAT)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1780 98.5 1) Out of range 1 0.1 3) Within range 17 0.9 5) Can't find 7 0.4 9) NA 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 173) If face-to-face mode: Describe the type of structure in which the respondent lives (PSTRUCTY)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 926 51.2 1) Mobile home 26 1.4 2) Detached single family 501 27.7 3) Multi-family 31 1.7 4) Apartment house 106 5.9 5) Condo complex 35 1.9 7) Other (specify) 24 1.3 9) NA 158 8.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 174) If face-to-face mode: Is there a building manager, security guard or other gatekeeper whose cooperation you need in order to gain access to the R's housing unit? (PFTFGTKE)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 898 49.7 1) Yes 58 3.2 2) No, but building is locked/ subdivision is gated and locked 21 1.2 5) No 637 35.3 9) NA 193 10.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 175) If face-to-face mode: If gatekeeper/guard/manager/locked access: Check the box below which best describes the situation [1 Building manager or other gatekeeper must let you in the building (on the grounds, into the mobile home park) but then you are free to attempt contact with R's HU 2 Building manager/other gatekeeper must get permission from someone in R's HU before you are allowed to make contact with the household 7 Other (specify 9 NA 0. INAP,] (PFTFTGKE)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1728 95.6 1) 10 0.6 2) 2 0.1 7) 35 1.9 9) 32 1.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 176) Contact description was there resistance from any contact person? (PCNTCTR1)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 27 1.5 1) Yes 222 12.3 5) No 1454 80.5 9) NA 104 5.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 177) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - surveys waste of time; previous bad experience (PCNTCTR2)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1585 87.7 1) Marked 10 0.6 5) Not marked 202 11.2 9) NA 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 178) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - content too personal (PCNTCTR3)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1585 87.7 1) Marked 2 0.1 5) Not marked 210 11.6 9) NA 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 179) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - confidentiality (PCNTCTR4)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1585 87.7 1) Marked 1 0.1 5) Not marked 211 11.7 9) NA 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 180) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - not interested in politics (PCNTCTR5)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1585 87.7 1) Marked 20 1.1 5) Not marked 192 10.6 9) NA 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 181) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - too busy (PCNTCTR6)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1585 87.7 1) Marked 91 5.0 5) Not marked 122 6.8 9) NA 9 0.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 182) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - poor health (PCNTCTR7)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1585 87.7 1) Marked 16 0.9 5) Not marked 196 10.8 9) NA 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 183) If resistance from any contact person: Resistance from contact person - other (specify) (PCNTCTR8)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1585 87.7 1) Marked 111 6.1 5) Not marked 107 5.9 9) NA 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 184) Post - coversheet did R refuse initially? (PRREFUSD)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 27 1.5 1) Yes 98 5.4 5) No 1573 87.1 9) NA 109 6.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 185) Post - coversheet did respondent break any appointments (PRBRKAPP)
-
TOTAL % 0) None 1444 79.9 1) One 273 15.1 2) Two or more 90 5.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 186) Post - coversheet if contact persons resisted, was the respondent the contact person who gave resistance? (PRCNTCR)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1585 87.7 1) Yes 152 8.4 5) No 15 0.8 9) NA 55 3.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 187) Summary: Did R resist (PRRESIS1)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 131 7.2 1) Yes, some resistance identified 152 8.4 5) No resistance identified 1454 80.5 9) NA 70 3.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 188) If R was not the contact person resistance from R - surveys waste of time; previous bad experience (PRRESIS2)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1792 99.2 9) NA 15 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 189) If R was not the contact person post-coversheet contact description item resistance from R - too personal (PRRESIS3)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1792 99.2 9) NA 15 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 190) If R was not the contact person post-coversheet contact description item resistance from R - confidentiality (PRRESIS4)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1792 99.2 9) NA 15 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 191) If R was not the contact person post-coversheet contact description resistance from R - not interested in politics (PRRESIS5)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1792 99.2 9) NA 15 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 192) If R was not the contact person resistance from R - too busy (PRRESIS6)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1792 99.2 9) NA 15 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 193) If R was not the contact person resistance from R - poor health (PRRESIS7)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1792 99.2 9) NA 15 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 194) If R was not the contact person contact description item: Resistance from R - other (PRRESIS8)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1792 99.2 9) NA 15 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 195) Were you ever able to make contact with someone at this housing unit? (PEVCNTCT)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 12 0.7 1) Yes 1760 97.4 5) No 35 1.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 196) Did you ever have any contact with the respondent? (PEVCNTC)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 12 0.7 1) Yes 1722 95.3 5) No 70 3.9 9) NA 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 197) What was the reason for no contact? [1 Nobody home at any call; no info about household could be obtained; 2 All occupants away during entire study period (i.e., long vacation, illness); info obtained from neighbor, manager etc.; 3 Nobody answered door but think someone in household unit [FTF: When visits made]; 4 Could not obtain access to HU; 7 Other (specify; 9 NA; 0. INAP) (NCREASON)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1770 98.0 1) 14 0.8 2) 1 0.1 3) 1 0.1 4) 1 0.1 7) 15 0.8 9) 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 198) If FTF mode: CSMS interviewer evaluation what is the estimated income of R's household? (PESTINC)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP, phone mode 801 44.3 1) Under $10,000 98 5.4 2) $10,000-25,000 201 11.1 3) $25,000-50,000 263 14.6 4) $50,000-105,000 247 13.7 5) $105,000 and above 72 4.0 8) DK 49 2.7 9) NA 76 4.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 199) If FTF mode: CSMS Interviewer evaluation what is the race of R's household? (PESTRACE)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP, phone mode 801 44.3 1) White 759 42.0 2) Black 133 7.4 3) American Indian 4 0.2 4) Asian 17 0.9 7) Other 36 2.0 8) DK 2 0.1 9) NA 55 3.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 200) If face-to-face mode: If interviewer has identified race of household: CSMS interviewer evaluation is this definite or probable? (PCRTRACE)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 858 47.5 1) Definite 912 50.5 5) Probable 31 1.7 9) NA 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 201) If face-to-face mode: CSMS interviewer evaluation: is R or R's household of Hispanic origin? (PHISPHH)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP, phone mode 801 44.3 1) Yes 85 4.7 5) No 860 47.6 8) DK 6 0.3 9) NA 55 3.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 202) If face-to-face mode: If interviewer has identified Hispanic status of R/R's household: CSMS interviewer evaluation: Is this definite or probable? (PCERTHHH)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 862 47.7 1) Definite 908 50.2 5) Probable 33 1.8 9) NA 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 203) Post: Interviewer of record ID 9999 NA (PINTVREC)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 5209.407 2219 - 204) Post: Supervisor ID 9999. NA (PSPVSR)
-
TOTAL % 3548) 414 22.9 4529) 199 11.0 6840) 801 44.3 7356) 392 21.7 9999) 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 205) Post: Interviewer gender (PINTGEND)
-
TOTAL % 1) Male 200 11.1 2) Female 1606 88.9 9) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 206) Post: Interviewer education (PINTVEDU)
-
TOTAL % 3) High school graduate 385 21.3 4) Some college 596 33.0 5) College degree 533 29.5 6) Master's degree 254 14.1 9) NA 39 2.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 207) Post: Interviewer race (PINTVRAC)
-
TOTAL % 1) White 1733 95.9 2) Black 46 2.5 7) Other 28 1.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 208) Post: Interviewer ethnicity (PINTVETH)
-
TOTAL % 0) No ethnic identity coded 1577 87.3 1) Hispanic 67 3.7 7) Other 163 9.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 209) Post: Interviewer languages this variable is not available in 2000. (PINTVLAN)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1807 100.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 210) Post: Years interviewer experience interviewer's years of experience and: 99. NA; INAP, no post IW (PINTEXPN)
-
TOTAL % 0) 445 24.6 1) 391 21.6 2) 161 8.9 3) 205 11.3 4) 20 1.1 5) 176 9.7 6) 66 3.7 7) 68 3.8 8) 36 2.0 9) 68 3.8 10) 37 2.0 11) 28 1.5 12) 42 2.3 13) 19 1.1 14) 3 0.2 15) 29 1.6 17) 12 0.7 99) 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 211) Post: Interviewer age (PINTAGE)
-
TOTAL % 1) 18-34 Years 114 6.3 2) 35-40 Years 187 10.3 3) 41-45 Years 260 14.4 4) 46-50 Years 297 16.4 5) 51-55 Years 255 14.1 6) 56-60 Years 311 17.2 7) 51-64 Years 142 7.9 8) 65-79 Years 240 13.3 9) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 212) House race type: [Democratic incumbent running 12 Dem incumbent running -- Republican challenger 13 Dem incumbent running -- other challenger 14 Dem incumbent running - unopposed 19 Dem incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers Republican incumbent running 21 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic challenger 23 Rep incumbent running -- other challenger 24 Rep incumbent running - unopposed 29 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers other incumbent running 31 Other incumbent running -- Democratic challenger 32 Other incumbent running -- Republican challenger 34 Other incumbent running - unopposed 35 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and Republican challengers 36 Other incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers 37 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers 39 Other incumbent running -- Democratic, Republican, other challs no incumbent running 51 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed 52 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed 53 Dem incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed 55 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands 56 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands 57 DEM incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands 59 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands 61 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed 62 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed 63 Rep incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed 65 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands 66 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands 67 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands 69 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands 96 1 in post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases 99 NA; 00 Washington DC) (PCHRTYPE)
-
TOTAL % 0) 4 0.2 12) 632 35.0 13) 3 0.2 14) 111 6.1 19) 12 0.7 21) 717 39.7 23) 9 0.5 24) 126 7.0 29) 8 0.4 31) 3 0.2 32) 1 0.1 55) 25 1.4 65) 152 8.4 96) 3 0.2 99) 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 213) Retiring House representative name (RETRNAME)
-
- 214) Retiring House representative code [41 Democratic representative--retiring (district with open race; 42 Republican representative--retiring (district with open race; 96 1 in post-summary.22 (error in CD identification; 3 cases); 99. NA; 00. No retiring House representative; Washington DC] (RETRCODE)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1626 90.0 41) 25 1.4 42) 152 8.4 96) 3 0.2 99) 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 215) Retiring House representative gender (RETRGNDR)
-
TOTAL % 0) No retiring House representative; Washington DC 1626 90.0 1) Male 141 7.8 2) Female 36 2.0 8) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 3 0.2 9) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 216) Winner of 2000 House election in R's district of interview (HEWINNER)
-
TOTAL % 0) Washington, D.C. 4 0.2 31) Democratic candidate in open race 42 2.3 32) Republican candidate in open race 135 7.5 33) Democratic incumbent 753 41.7 34) Republican incumbent 823 45.5 35) Democratic challenger 37 2.0 36) Republican challenger 5 0.3 39) Independent/3rd party nonincumbent candidate 4 0.2 99) NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-sample. 1) 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 217) Winner of 2000 Senate election in R's state of interview - [09 Third party or Independent Senate candidate -incumbent; 10 Third party or Independent Senate candidate - nonincumbent; 08 Third party or Independent Senate candidate -- 2nd nonincumbent; 11 Democratic candidate in open Senate race; 12 Republican candidate in open Senate race; 13 Democratic Senate incumbent; 14 Republican Senate incumbent; 15 Democratic Senate challenger; 16 Republican Senate challenger; 99. NA (R's correct district not determined, 96 or 99 in Pre-sample); 00. No race in state; Washington CD] (SENWINN)
-
TOTAL % 0) 417 23.1 11) 251 13.9 12) 5 0.3 13) 420 23.2 14) 411 22.7 15) 159 8.8 16) 91 5.0 31) 2 0.1 33) 36 2.0 35) 11 0.6 99) 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 218) Competitiveness of House race in 1998 in respondent's district 1998 districts were stratified for competitiveness by the winning margin of the elected candidate. (CDCOMPET)
-
TOTAL % 1) Least competitive 375 20.8 2) 300 16.6 3) 361 20.0 4) 362 20.0 5) Most competitive 401 22.2 9) NA 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 219) Open seat in R's district in 1998? (SEATOP98)
-
TOTAL % 0) No 1697 93.9 1) Yes 102 5.6 9) NA 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 220) House Democratic candidate name (HDCANNAM)
-
- 221) House Democratic candidate code (HDCANCOD)
-
TOTAL % 0) No Democratic candidate; Washington DC 140 7.7 31) Democratic candidate in open House race 180 10.0 33) Democratic House incumbent 758 41.9 35) Democratic House challenger 725 40.1 96) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 3 0.2 99) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 222) House Democratic candidate gender (HDCANGN)
-
TOTAL % 0) No Democratic House candidate; Washington DC 140 7.7 1) Male 1367 75.7 2) Female 296 16.4 8) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 3 0.2 9) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 223) House Republican candidate name (HRCANNAM)
-
- 224) House Republican candidate code (HRCANCO)
-
TOTAL % 0) No Republican House candidate; Washington DC 121 6.7 32) Republican candidate in open House race 178 9.9 34) Republican House incumbent 860 47.6 36) Republican House challenger 644 35.6 96) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 3 0.2 99) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 225) House Republican candidate gender (HRCANGND)
-
TOTAL % 0) No Republican House candidate; Washington DC 121 6.7 1) Male 1574 87.1 2) Female 108 6.0 8) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 3 0.2 9) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 226) House Independent/third party candidate name (HICANNA)
-
- 227) House Independent/third party candidate code (HICANCO)
-
TOTAL % 0) No Independent/third party House candidate; Washington DC 1767 97.8 30) Third party or Independent House candidate--nonincumbent 32 1.8 39) Third party or Independent House candidate--incumbent 4 0.2 96) Error in CD identification 3 0.2 99) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 228) House Independent/third party candidate party (HICANPR)
-
- 229) House Independent/third party candidate gender (HICANGND)
-
TOTAL % 0) No Independent/third party House candidate; Washington DC 1767 97.8 1) Male 36 2.0 8) Error in CD identification 3 0.2 9) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 230) Senate race type: [12 Dem incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 13 Dem incumbent running -- other challenger; 14 Dem incumbent running - unopposed; 19 Dem incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 21 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 23 Rep incumbent running -- other challenger; 24 Rep incumbent running - unopposed; 29 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers; 31 Other incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 32 Other incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 34 Other incumbent running - unopposed; 35 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and Republican challengers; 36 Other incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 37 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers; 39 Other incumbent running -- Democratic, Republican, other challs no incumbent running; 51 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 52 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed; 53 Dem incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed; 55 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands; 56 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 57 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 59 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands; 61 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 62 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed; 63 Rep incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed; 65 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican CANDS; 66 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 67 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 69 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands no race in state; 81 Democratic incumbents, no race in state; 82 Republican incumbents, no race in state; 85 Democratic and Republican incumbents, no race in state; 96 code 1 in post-summary; 99 NA; 00 Washington DC (SENRACT)
-
TOTAL % 0) 4 0.2 12) 256 14.2 19) 255 14.1 21) 584 32.3 23) 13 0.7 24) 22 1.2 55) 164 9.1 69) 92 5.1 81) 58 3.2 82) 165 9.1 85) 190 10.5 96) 3 0.2 99) 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 231) Senate Democratic candidate name (SDCANNAM)
-
- 232) Senate Democratic candidate code (SDCANCO)
-
TOTAL % 0) No race in state; no Democratic Senate candidate; Washington 452 25.0 11) Democratic candidate in open Senate race 256 14.2 13) Democratic Senate incumbent 511 28.3 15) Democratic Senate challenger 584 32.3 96) Error in CD identification 3 0.2 99) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 233) Senate Democratic candidate gender (SDCANGD)
-
TOTAL % 0) No race in state; no Democratic Senate candidate; Washington 452 25.0 1) Male 924 51.1 2) Female 427 23.6 8) Error in CD identification 3 0.2 9) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 234) Senate Republican candidate name (SRCANNAM)
-
- 235) Senate Republican candidate code (SRCANCOD)
-
TOTAL % 0) No race in state; no Republican Senate candidate; Washington 417 23.1 12) Republican candidate in open Senate race 256 14.2 14) Republican Senate incumbent 619 34.3 16) Republican Senate challenger 511 28.3 96) Error in CD identification 3 0.2 99) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 236) Senate Republican candidate gender (SRCANGN)
-
TOTAL % 0) No race in state; no Republican Senate candidate; Washington 417 23.1 1) Male 1245 68.9 2) Female 141 7.8 8) Error in CD identification 3 0.2 9) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 237) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate name (SICANNAM)
-
- 238) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate code (SICANCOD)
-
TOTAL % 0) No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate 1443 79.9 10) Third party or Independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent 360 19.9 96) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 3 0.2 99) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 239) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate party (SICANPRT)
-
- 240) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate gender (SICANGN)
-
TOTAL % 0) No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate 1443 79.9 1) Male 109 6.0 2) Female 251 13.9 8) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases 3 0.2 9) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 241) Senate Independent/third party 2 - candidate name (SI2CANN)
-
- 242) Senate Independent/third party 2 - candidate code (SI2CANCO)
-
TOTAL % 0) No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate 1612 89.2 8) Third party or Independent Senate candidate --2nd nonincumbent 191 10.6 96) 1 In post-summary 3 0.2 99) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 243) Senate Independent/third party 2 - candidate party (SI2CANPR)
-
- 244) Senate Independent/third party 2 - candidate gender (SI2CANGN)
-
TOTAL % 0) No race in state; no Independent/third party Senate candidate 1612 89.2 2) Female 191 10.6 8) 1 In post-summary (error in CD identification; 3 cases) 3 0.2 9) NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 245) House Democratic candidate name - vote outside CD of IW (OHDEMNAM)
-
- 246) House Democratic candidate code - vote outside CD of IW (OHDEMCOD)
-
TOTAL % 0) 0,8,9 In presample (VOTEOUTC) 1785 98.8 31) Democratic candidate in open House race 3 0.2 33) Democratic House incumbent 9 0.5 35) Democratic House challenger 2 0.1 99) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state) 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 247) House Democratic candidate gender - vote outside CD of IW (OHDEMGND)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1785 98.8 1) Male 11 0.6 2) Female 3 0.2 9) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state) 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 248) House Republican candidate name - vote outside CD of IW (OHREPNAM)
-
- 249) House Republican candidate code - vote outside CD of IW (OHREPCO)
-
TOTAL % 0) 0,8,9 In presample 7.(VOTEOUTC) 1785 98.8 32) Republican candidate in open House race 3 0.2 34) Republican House incumbent 2 0.1 36) Republican House challenger 9 0.5 99) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state) 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 250) House Republican candidate gender - vote outside CD of IW (OHRPGNDR)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1785 98.8 1) Male 11 0.6 2) Female 3 0.2 9) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state) 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 251) House Independent/third party candidate code - vote outside CD of IW (OHINDCD)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1785 98.8 96) NO Independent/3rd party candidate in 'outside' CD 14 0.8 99) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state) 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 252) House Independent/third party candidate gender - vote outside CD of IW (OHINDGN)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1785 98.8 8) No Independent/3rd party candidate in 'outside' CD 14 0.8 9) Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state) 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 253) House race type - vote outside state of IW [12 Dem incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 13 Dem incumbent running -- other challenger; 14 Dem incumbent running - unopposed; 19 Dem incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 21 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 23 Rep incumbent running -- other challenger; 24 Rep incumbent running - unopposed; 29 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers; 31 Other incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 32 other incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 34 Other incumbent running - unopposed; 35 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and Republican challengers; 36 Other incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 37 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers; 39 Other incumbent running -- Democratic, Republican, other challs no incumbent running; 51 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 52 Dem incumbent not RUNNING -- Republican candidate unopposed; 53 Dem incumbent not running -- other candidate unopposed; 55 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands; 56 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 57 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 59 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands; 61 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 62 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed; 63 Rep incumbent not running -- Other candidate unopposed; 65 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands; 66 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 67 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 69 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands; 96 Washington DC; 99. Does not have the exact CD of outside vote identified (outside state. 00. INAP)] (OHRACET)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1785 98.8 12) 9 0.5 21) 2 0.1 55) 1 0.1 65) 2 0.1 99) 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 254) Senate race type - vote outside state of IW [12 Dem incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 13 Dem incumbent running -- other challenger; 14 Dem incumbent running - unopposed; 19 Dem incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 21 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 23 Rep incumbent running -- Other challenger; 24 Rep incumbent running - unopposed; 29 Rep incumbent running -- Democratic and other challengers; 31 Other incumbent running -- Democratic challenger; 32 Other incumbent running -- Republican challenger; 34 Other incumbent running - unopposed; 35 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and Republican challengers; 36 Other incumbent running -- Republican and other challengers; 37 Other incumbent running -- Democratic and other Challengers; 39 Other incumbent running -- Democratic, Republican, other challs; 51 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 52 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed; 53 Dem incumbent not running -- Other candidate unopposed; 55 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands; 56 Dem incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 57 Dem incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 59 Dem Incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, other cands; 61 Rep incumbent not RUNNING -- Democratic candidate unopposed; 62 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican candidate unopposed; 63 Rep incumbent not running -- Other candidate unopposed; 65 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and Republican cands; 66 Rep incumbent not running -- Republican and other cands; 67 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic and other cands; 69 Rep incumbent not running -- Democratic, Republican, Other cands; 81 Democratic incumbents, no race in state; 82 Republican incumbents, no race in state; 85 Democratic and Republican incumbents, no race in state; 96 Washington DC; 99. R vote in another district but not another state; 00. INAP] (OSRACET)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1785 98.8 12) 2 0.1 19) 1 0.1 21) 3 0.2 69) 1 0.1 85) 3 0.2 99) 12 0.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 255) Senate Democratic candidate name - vote outside state of IW (OSSDNME)
-
- 256) Senate Democratic candidate code - vote outside state of IW (OSDEMCD)
-
TOTAL % 0) R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC 1785 98.8 11) Democratic candidate in open Senate race 1 0.1 13) Democratic Senate incumbent 3 0.2 15) Democratic Senate challenger 3 0.2 96) No race in state; no Democratic candidate 3 0.2 99) R voted in another district but not another state 12 0.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 257) Senate Democratic candidate gender - vote outside state of IW (OSDEMGR)
-
TOTAL % 0) R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district 1797 99.4 1) Male 4 0.2 2) Female 3 0.2 9) No race in state; no Democratic candidate 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 258) Senate Republican candidate name - vote outside state of IW (OSREPNM)
-
- 259) Senate Republican candidate code - vote outside state of IW (OSREPCD)
-
TOTAL % 0) R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC 1785 98.8 12) Republican candidate in open Senate race 1 0.1 14) Republican Senate incumbent 3 0.2 16) Republican Senate challenger 3 0.2 96) No race in state; no Republican candidate 3 0.2 99) R voted in another district but not another state 12 0.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 260) Senate Republican candidate gender - vote outside state of IW (OSREPGN)
-
TOTAL % 0) R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district 1797 99.4 1) Male 7 0.4 9) No race in state; no Democratic candidate 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 261) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate name - vote outside state of IW (OSSINM1)
-
- 262) Senate Independent/third party 1 - candidate code - vote outside state of IW (OSINDCD1)
-
TOTAL % 0) R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC 1785 98.8 10) Third party or Independent Senate candidate --nonincumbent 2 0.1 96) No race in state; no Independent/3rd party candidate 8 0.4 99) R voted in another district but not another state 12 0.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 263) Senate independent/third party 1 - candidate gender - vote outside state of IW [9 - No race in state; no Independent/3rd party candidate. 0 - R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC] (OSINDGD1)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1797 99.4 1) Male 1 0.1 2) Female 1 0.1 9) No race in state; no Independent/3rd party candidate 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 264) Senate Independent/third party 2 -candidate name - vote outside state of IW (OSSINM2)
-
- 265) Senate Independent/third party 2 - Candidate code - vote outside state of IW - 08 Third party or Independent Senate candidate -- 2nd nonincumbent; 96 No race in state; no Independent/3rd party candidate; no second Independent/3rd party candidate; 99. R voted in another district but not another state; 00. R did not vote outside state of IW; Washington DC (OSINDCD2)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1785 98.8 8) 1 0.1 96) 9 0.5 99) 12 0.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 266) Senate Independent/third party 2 - candidate gender - vote outside state of IW [9 - No race in state; no Independent/3rd party candidate; no second Independent/3rd party candidate. 0 - R did not vote outside state of IW; R voted in another district but not another state; Washington DC] (OSINDG2)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1797 99.4 2) Female 1 0.1 9) 9 0.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 267) Post section timing - section A - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSATIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 3.446 47 - 268) Post section timing - section B - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSBTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 4.594 47 - 269) Post section timing - section C - 999.99 NA - 000.00 No post IW (PSCTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 4.81 47 - 270) Post section timing - section D - 999.99 NA - 000.00 No post IW (PSDTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 7.769 47 - 271) Post section timing - section E - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSETIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 3.829 47 - 272) Post section timing - section F - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSFTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 3.47 47 - 273) Post section timing - section G - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSGTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 6.146 47 - 274) Post section timing - section H - 999.99 NA; 000.00 Administered in pre; no post IW (PSHTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 2.707 47 - 275) Post section timing - section J - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSJTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 6.613 47 - 276) Post section timing - section K - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSKTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 10.508 47 - 277) Post section timing - section L - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSLTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 3.832 47 - 278) Post section timing - section M - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSMTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 3.439 47 - 279) Post section timing - section N - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSNTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 3.771 47 - 280) Post section timing - section P - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSPTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 3.481 47 - 281) Post section timing - section Q - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSQTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 5.05 47 - 282) Post section timing - section R - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSRTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 6.449 47 - 283) Post section timing - section S - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSSTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 4.326 47 - 284) Post section timing - section T - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSTTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 3.592 47 - 285) Post section timing - section V - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSVTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 4.031 47 - 286) Post section timing - section Y - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSYTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 3.492 47 - 287) Post section timing - section Z - 999.99 NA; 000.00 No post IW (PSZTIME)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 7.033 57 - 288) Post: Wrong CD administered (preloaded) (PSWRNGCD)
-
TOTAL % 0) No misidentification of CD 1553 85.9 1) Wrong CD identified 3 0.2 9) No post IW 251 13.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 289) Post: Type of error in preload (TEPRLOAD)
-
TOTAL % 0) No error in preload 1550 85.8 1) Wrong Senate type race preloaded (WV, 3 cases) 3 0.2 2) Wrong CD 3 0.2 9) No post IW 251 13.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 290) Post: Flag - randomization failure in post admin (FPRNFAIL)
-
TOTAL % 0) No post randomization failure 1051 58.2 1) Post randomization failure in at least a portion of the interview 504 27.9 9) No post IW 252 13.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 291) Some people don't pay much attention to political campaigns. How about you? Would you say that you have been very much interested, somewhat interested or not much interested in the political campaigns so far this year? (ATTNCAMP)
-
TOTAL % 1) Very much interested 525 29.1 3) Somewhat interested 886 49.0 5) Not much interested 396 21.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 292) Generally speaking, would you say that you personally care a good deal who wins the presidential election this fall, or that you don't care very much who wins? (CAREPLEC)
-
TOTAL % 1) Care a good deal 1402 77.6 3) Don't care very much 397 22.0 8) Don't know 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 293) In 1996 Bill Clinton ran on the Democratic ticket against Bob Dole for the Republicans, and Ross Perot as an Independent candidate. Do you remember for sure whether or not you voted in that election? (VOTEN96)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes, voted 1264 70.0 5) No, didn't vote 530 29.3 8) Don't know 12 0.7 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 294) (If voted in 1996) Which one did you vote for? (WHOIN96)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 543 30.0 1) Bill Clinton 665 36.8 3) Bob Dole 408 22.6 5) Ross Perot 138 7.6 7) Other (specify) 27 1.5 8) Don't know 9 0.5 9) Refused 17 0.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 295) Is there anything in particular about Vice President Al Gore that might make you want to vote for him? (LIKEGORE)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 912 50.5 5) No 878 48.6 8) Don't know 13 0.7 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 296) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Gore: Mention 1 - Gore 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREP1)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 384.524 842 - 297) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Gore: Mention 2- Gore 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREP2)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 228.144 369 - 298) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Gore: Mention 3- Gore 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREP3)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 152.339 324 - 299) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Gore: Mention 4- Gore 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREP4)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 84.65 253 - 300) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Gore: Mention 5- Gore 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREP5)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 47.395 195 - 301) Is there anything in particular about Al Gore that might make you want to vote against him? (DLIKGORE)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 860 47.6 5) No 934 51.7 8) Don't know 10 0.6 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 302) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Gore: Mention 1 - Gore 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREN1)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 367.893 989 - 303) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Gore: Mention 2- Gore 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREN2)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 183.584 322 - 304) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Gore: Mention 3- Gore 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREN3)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 101.3 260 - 305) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Gore: Mention 4- Gore 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREN4)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 53.063 201 - 306) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Gore: Mention 5- Gore 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (GOREN5)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1742 96.4 201) 1 0.1 223) 1 0.1 313) 2 0.1 402) 2 0.1 404) 1 0.1 414) 1 0.1 424) 1 0.1 431) 1 0.1 441) 1 0.1 446) 2 0.1 462) 1 0.1 500) 1 0.1 505) 2 0.1 508) 4 0.2 513) 1 0.1 542) 1 0.1 555) 1 0.1 604) 1 0.1 606) 1 0.1 610) 1 0.1 614) 4 0.2 702) 3 0.2 735) 3 0.2 801) 7 0.4 805) 2 0.1 836) 1 0.1 842) 1 0.1 901) 1 0.1 903) 1 0.1 906) 1 0.1 923) 1 0.1 931) 1 0.1 933) 1 0.1 962) 1 0.1 964) 1 0.1 981) 1 0.1 985) 1 0.1 1026) 1 0.1 1042) 1 0.1 1056) 1 0.1 1107) 1 0.1 1112) 1 0.1 1206) 1 0.1 1209) 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 307) Is there anything in particular about Texas Governor George W. Bush that might make you want to vote for him? (LIKEBUSH)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 822 45.5 5) No 970 53.7 8) Don't know 13 0.7 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 308) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about GW Bush: Mention 1 - Bush 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHP1)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 342.142 790 - 309) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about GW Bush: Mention 2- Bush 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHP2)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 198.857 343 - 310) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about GW Bush: Mention 3- Bush 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHP3)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 116.286 285 - 311) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about GW Bush: Mention 4- Bush 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHP4)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 65.37 221 - 312) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about GW Bush: Mention 5- Bush 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHP5)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 38.414 175 - 313) Is there anything in particular about George W. Bush that might make you want to vote against him? (DLIKBUSH)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 885 49.0 5) No 899 49.8 8) Don't know 20 1.1 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 314) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about GW Bush: Mention 1 - Bush 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHN1)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 354.861 783 - 315) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about GW Bush: Mention 2 - Bush 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHN2)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 209.678 365 - 316) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about GW Bush: Mention 3 - Bush 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHN3)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 125.928 306 - 317) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about GW Bush: Mention 4 - Bush 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHN4)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 67.534 236 - 318) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about GW Bush: Mention 5 - Bush 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] (BUSHN5)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 33.972 166 - 319) How many days in the past week did you watch the national network news on TV? (DAYSNEWS)
-
TOTAL % 0) None 483 26.7 1) One day 165 9.1 2) Two days 201 11.1 3) Three days 179 9.9 4) Four days 99 5.5 5) Five days 135 7.5 6) Six days 27 1.5 7) Every day 515 28.5 8) Don't know 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 320) How much attention do you pay to news on national news shows about the campaign for President - a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? (ATTNNEWS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 486 26.9 1) A great deal 235 13.0 2) Quite a bit 364 20.1 3) Some 513 28.4 4) Very little 190 10.5 5) None 19 1.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 321) How many days in the past week did you watch the local TV news shows such as Eyewitness News or Action News in the late afternoon or early-evening? (EARLNEWS)
-
TOTAL % 0) None 562 31.1 1) One day 110 6.1 2) Two days 176 9.7 3) Three days 140 7.7 4) Four days 115 6.4 5) Five days 163 9.0 6) Six days 22 1.2 7) Every day 519 28.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 322) How many days in the past week did you watch the local TV news shows in the late evening? (LATENEWS)
-
TOTAL % 0) None 727 40.2 1) One day 130 7.2 2) Two days 182 10.1 3) Three days 157 8.7 4) Four days 106 5.9 5) Five days 127 7.0 6) Six days 39 2.2 7) Every day 338 18.7 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 323) How much attention do you pay to news on local news shows about the campaign for President -- a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? (ATTLNEWS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 327 18.1 1) A great deal 192 10.6 2) Quite a bit 316 17.5 3) Some 558 30.9 4) Very little 347 19.2 5) None 67 3.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 324) Do you have either cable or satellite television? (CABSATLL)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 1418 78.5 5) No 389 21.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 325) How many days in the past week did you read a daily newspaper? (READPAPR)
-
TOTAL % 0) None 468 25.9 1) One day 216 12.0 2) Two days 181 10.0 3) Three days 130 7.2 4) Four days 74 4.1 5) Five days 92 5.1 6) Six days 36 2.0 7) Every day 610 33.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 326) Did you read about the campaign in any newspaper? (READCAMP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 468 25.9 1) Yes 790 43.7 5) No 548 30.3 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 327) How much attention do you pay to newspaper articles about the campaign for President - a great deal, quite a bit, some, very little, or none? (ATTNEWSP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1017 56.3 1) A great deal 121 6.7 2) Quite a bit 202 11.2 3) Some 352 19.5 4) Very little 107 5.9 5) None 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 328) Do you recall seeing any ads for political candidates on television this fall? (TVADS)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 1377 76.2 5) No 427 23.6 8) Don't know 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 329) Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling his job as President? (CLINAP)
-
TOTAL % 1) Approve 1177 65.1 5) Disapprove 565 31.3 8) Don't know 55 3.0 9) Refused 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 330) Strength of R's approval/disapproval for the way Bill Clinton is handling his job as President (CLINTST)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 65 3.6 1) Strongly 1145 63.4 5) Not strongly 587 32.5 8) Don't know 8 0.4 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 331) Summary approval/disapproval for the way Bill Clinton is handling his job (CLINTSD)
-
TOTAL % 1) Approve strongly 745 41.2 2) Approve not strongly 425 23.5 4) Disapprove not strongly 162 9.0 5) Disapprove strongly 400 22.1 8) Don't know 63 3.5 9) Refused 12 0.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 332) As you know, representatives to Congress in Washington are being chosen in this election from congressional districts all around the country. How much would you say that you personally care about the way the election to the U.S. House of Representatives comes out: do you care very much, pretty much, not very much or not at all? (HSECARE)
-
TOTAL % 1) Very much 501 27.7 2) Pretty much 669 37.0 3) Not very much 475 26.3 4) Not at all 155 8.6 8) Don't know 7 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 333) Do you happen to remember the names of the candidates for Congress -- that is, for the House of Representatives in Washington -- who are running in the November election from this district? (HSECAN)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 526 29.1 5) No 1277 70.7 8) Don't know 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 334) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who are they? 1st Recalled House candidate name [31. Democratic candidate in open race; 32. Republican candidate in open race; 33. Democratic incumbent; 34 Republican incumbent; 35 Democratic challenger; 36 Republican challenger; 97 Name not on candidate list.] (HCNAME)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1281 70.9 31) 6 0.3 32) 15 0.8 33) 104 5.8 34) 133 7.4 35) 8 0.4 36) 11 0.6 97) 234 12.9 98) 15 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 335) If R recalls names of House candidates: What is [NAME'S] party? Recalled party of first recalled candidate (HCPARTY)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1281 70.9 1) Democrat 245 13.6 2) Republican 238 13.2 7) Other party 20 1.1 8) Don't know 23 1.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 336) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who were they? Actual party - 1st recalled candidate (HCPARTYA)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1281 70.9 1) Democrat 118 6.5 2) Republican 159 8.8 7) Other party 234 12.9 8) Don't know 15 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 337) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who were they? What is [NAME'S] party? 1st recall accuracy; [0 INAP; 1 Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name; 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name; 3. Valid candidate name given, Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name; 5. Invalid candidate name given with Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 6. No candidate name given (Don't know or NA) -- any party mention; 7. No candidate name given (Don't know) -- Don't know or NA for party; 9 No answer] (HCPARAC)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1281 70.9 1) +NM, +PTY 241 13.3 2) +NM, -PTY 25 1.4 3) +NM, Don't know PT 11 0.6 4) -NM, PTY 222 12.3 5) -NM, Don't know PT 12 0.7 6) No candidate 15 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 338) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who are they? 2nd Recalled House candidate name [31. Democratic candidate in open race; 32. Republican candidate in open race; 33. Democratic incumbent; 34. Republican incumbent; 35. Democratic challenger; 36. Republican challenger; 97. Name not on candidate list.] (HSECAN2)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1520 84.1 31) 6 0.3 32) 4 0.2 33) 16 0.9 34) 14 0.8 35) 23 1.3 36) 16 0.9 97) 141 7.8 98) 67 3.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 339) If R recalls names of House candidates: What is [NAME'S] party? Recalled party of second recalled candidate (HCPARTY2)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1521 84.2 1) Democrat 121 6.7 2) Republican 120 6.6 7) Other party 35 1.9 8) Don't know 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 340) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who were they? Actual party - 2nd recalled candidate (HCPARR2)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1520 84.1 1) Democrat 45 2.5 2) Republican 34 1.9 7) Other party 141 7.8 8) Don't know 67 3.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 341) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who were they? What is [NAME'S] party? 2nd Recall accuracy; [0. INAP; 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name; 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name; 3. Valid candidate name given, Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 4. Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name; 5. Invalid candidate name given with Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 6. No candidate name given (Don't know or NA) -- any party mention; 7. No candidate name given (Don't know) -- Don't know or NA for party; 9. No answer] (HCPARAC2)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1520 84.1 1) +NM, +PTY 68 3.8 2) +NM, -PTY 9 0.5 3) +NM, Don't know PT 2 0.1 4) -NM, PTY 132 7.3 5) -NM, Don't know PT 9 0.5 6) No candidate 67 3.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 342) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who are they? 3rd Recalled House candidate name [31. Democratic candidate in open race; 32. Republican candidate in open race; 33. Democratic incumbent; 34. Republican incumbent; 35. Democratic challenger; 36. Republican challenger; 97. Name not on candidate list.] (HSECAN3)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1728 95.6 32) 1 0.1 33) 1 0.1 34) 5 0.3 35) 1 0.1 97) 38 2.1 98) 33 1.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 343) If R recalls names of House candidates: What is [NAME'S] party? Recalled party of third recalled candidate (HCPART3)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1732 95.8 1) Democrat 28 1.5 2) Republican 14 0.8 7) Other party 31 1.7 8) Don't know 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 344) IF R recalls names of House candidates: who were they? Actual party - 3rd recalled candidate (HCPARTR3)
-
TOTAL % 0) Know name and DK/NA party; NA/RF 1728 95.6 1) Democratic candidate 2 0.1 2) Republican candidate 6 0.3 7) Name given not on candidate list 38 2.1 8) Don't know name but know party 33 1.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 345) If R recalls names of House candidates: Who were they? What is [NAME'S] party? 3rd Recall accuracy; [0. INAP; 1. Valid candidate name given and correct party associated with name; 2. Valid candidate name given but incorrect party associated with name; 3. Valid candidate name given, Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 4 Invalid candidate name given with any mention of party associated with name; 5 Invalid candidate name given with Don't know or NA for party associated with name; 6 No candidate name given (Don't know or NA) -- any party mention; 7 No candidate name given (Don't know) -- Don't know or NA for party; 9 No answer] (HCPARTC3)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1728 95.6 1) +NM, +PTY 7 0.4 2) +NM, -PTY 1 0.1 4) -NM, PTY 32 1.8 5) -NM, Don't know PT 6 0.3 6) No candidate 33 1.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 346) Do you approve or disapprove of the way the U.S. Congress has been handling its job? (CONGJAPP)
-
TOTAL % 1) Approve 933 51.6 5) Disapprove 617 34.1 8) Don't know 246 13.6 9) Refused 11 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 347) R's strength of approval/disapproval of the way Congress has been handling its job (CONGJSAP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 257 14.2 1) Strongly 603 33.4 5) Not strongly 947 52.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 348) Summary of R's approval/disapproval of the way Congress has been handling its job (CONGAPSU)
-
TOTAL % 1) Approve strongly 285 15.8 2) Approve not strongly 648 35.9 4) Disapprove not strongly 299 16.5 5) Disapprove not strongly 318 17.6 8) Don't know 246 13.6 9) Refused 11 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 349) Thermometer rating: Bill Clinton [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (CLINTHER)
-
TOTAL % 0) 171 9.5 1) 3 0.2 2) 3 0.2 3) 4 0.2 5) 8 0.4 7) 1 0.1 9) 1 0.1 10) 27 1.5 12) 1 0.1 15) 69 3.8 20) 21 1.2 25) 42 2.3 28) 1 0.1 30) 104 5.8 31) 1 0.1 32) 1 0.1 33) 1 0.1 35) 4 0.2 40) 111 6.1 42) 1 0.1 45) 6 0.3 46) 1 0.1 47) 1 0.1 48) 2 0.1 49) 6 0.3 50) 195 10.8 51) 2 0.1 52) 1 0.1 55) 9 0.5 58) 1 0.1 60) 164 9.1 65) 17 0.9 66) 1 0.1 68) 1 0.1 70) 233 12.9 75) 93 5.1 78) 1 0.1 79) 1 0.1 80) 71 3.9 85) 221 12.2 86) 1 0.1 87) 1 0.1 89) 1 0.1 90) 50 2.8 93) 1 0.1 95) 10 0.6 100) 128 7.1 998) 11 0.6 999) 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 350) Thermometer rating: Al Gore [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (GORETHER)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 74.744 128 - 351) Thermometer rating: George W. Bush [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (BUSHTHER)
-
TOTAL % 0) 77 4.3 1) 3 0.2 2) 5 0.3 4) 1 0.1 5) 4 0.2 6) 1 0.1 7) 1 0.1 10) 19 1.1 15) 48 2.7 16) 1 0.1 20) 20 1.1 25) 30 1.7 30) 111 6.1 35) 12 0.7 40) 175 9.7 45) 7 0.4 48) 1 0.1 49) 1 0.1 50) 308 17.0 51) 1 0.1 52) 5 0.3 55) 12 0.7 60) 220 12.2 62) 1 0.1 65) 23 1.3 66) 1 0.1 67) 1 0.1 68) 1 0.1 69) 1 0.1 70) 231 12.8 75) 66 3.7 77) 1 0.1 78) 2 0.1 79) 1 0.1 80) 53 2.9 85) 168 9.3 90) 49 2.7 92) 1 0.1 95) 13 0.7 96) 1 0.1 98) 1 0.1 99) 1 0.1 100) 82 4.5 997) 2 0.1 998) 41 2.3 999) 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 352) Thermometer rating: Pat Buchanan [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (BUCHTHER)
-
TOTAL % 0) 178 9.9 1) 3 0.2 2) 6 0.3 4) 2 0.1 5) 11 0.6 8) 1 0.1 10) 56 3.1 11) 1 0.1 12) 1 0.1 15) 85 4.7 20) 36 2.0 25) 24 1.3 28) 1 0.1 30) 129 7.1 33) 1 0.1 35) 13 0.7 40) 146 8.1 42) 1 0.1 44) 1 0.1 45) 14 0.8 48) 1 0.1 49) 3 0.2 50) 457 25.3 52) 1 0.1 55) 6 0.3 57) 1 0.1 58) 1 0.1 59) 2 0.1 60) 152 8.4 65) 7 0.4 70) 74 4.1 73) 1 0.1 75) 19 1.1 80) 13 0.7 85) 23 1.3 86) 1 0.1 90) 3 0.2 99) 1 0.1 100) 10 0.6 997) 124 6.9 998) 194 10.7 999) 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 353) Thermometer rating: Ralph Nader [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (NADRTHER)
-
TOTAL % 0) 65 3.6 1) 5 0.3 2) 1 0.1 3) 1 0.1 5) 3 0.2 6) 1 0.1 10) 19 1.1 15) 33 1.8 20) 20 1.1 22) 1 0.1 25) 19 1.1 26) 1 0.1 30) 74 4.1 35) 8 0.4 37) 1 0.1 38) 1 0.1 40) 94 5.2 41) 1 0.1 45) 10 0.6 46) 1 0.1 49) 2 0.1 50) 394 21.8 51) 2 0.1 52) 2 0.1 53) 2 0.1 54) 1 0.1 55) 13 0.7 59) 1 0.1 60) 177 9.8 62) 2 0.1 65) 23 1.3 70) 104 5.8 72) 1 0.1 75) 47 2.6 76) 1 0.1 80) 35 1.9 83) 2 0.1 85) 74 4.1 90) 24 1.3 95) 8 0.4 99) 2 0.1 100) 45 2.5 997) 251 13.9 998) 233 12.9 999) 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 354) Thermometer rating: John McCain [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (MCCNTHER)
-
TOTAL % 0) 26 1.4 1) 1 0.1 3) 1 0.1 4) 2 0.1 5) 5 0.3 10) 9 0.5 15) 20 1.1 20) 6 0.3 25) 15 0.8 26) 1 0.1 30) 44 2.4 35) 4 0.2 39) 1 0.1 40) 78 4.3 45) 13 0.7 48) 1 0.1 49) 1 0.1 50) 362 20.0 51) 2 0.1 52) 4 0.2 54) 1 0.1 55) 22 1.2 58) 1 0.1 59) 1 0.1 60) 246 13.6 65) 25 1.4 70) 237 13.1 72) 1 0.1 75) 55 3.0 80) 53 2.9 85) 97 5.4 90) 27 1.5 92) 1 0.1 95) 11 0.6 98) 2 0.1 99) 1 0.1 100) 50 2.8 997) 193 10.7 998) 185 10.2 999) 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 355) Thermometer rating: Bill Bradley [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (BRDLTHER)
-
TOTAL % 0) 35 1.9 1) 1 0.1 4) 1 0.1 5) 3 0.2 7) 1 0.1 8) 1 0.1 10) 8 0.4 15) 10 0.6 20) 13 0.7 25) 17 0.9 30) 47 2.6 35) 10 0.6 40) 91 5.0 42) 1 0.1 44) 1 0.1 45) 9 0.5 50) 438 24.2 51) 1 0.1 52) 1 0.1 55) 22 1.2 59) 1 0.1 60) 218 12.1 65) 17 0.9 70) 157 8.7 72) 1 0.1 75) 36 2.0 76) 1 0.1 78) 1 0.1 80) 30 1.7 85) 81 4.5 90) 21 1.2 93) 1 0.1 95) 5 0.3 97) 1 0.1 100) 21 1.2 997) 248 13.7 998) 253 14.0 999) 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 356) Thermometer rating: Joseph Lieberman [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't Know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (LBRMTHER)
-
TOTAL % 0) 33 1.8 5) 2 0.1 8) 2 0.1 10) 17 0.9 11) 1 0.1 15) 26 1.4 20) 16 0.9 25) 9 0.5 27) 1 0.1 30) 59 3.3 35) 2 0.1 37) 1 0.1 40) 79 4.4 44) 1 0.1 45) 19 1.1 47) 1 0.1 48) 1 0.1 49) 1 0.1 50) 368 20.4 51) 1 0.1 52) 2 0.1 55) 17 0.9 60) 157 8.7 61) 1 0.1 65) 22 1.2 68) 2 0.1 70) 169 9.4 72) 1 0.1 75) 58 3.2 77) 1 0.1 78) 1 0.1 80) 51 2.8 82) 1 0.1 85) 121 6.7 86) 1 0.1 90) 22 1.2 95) 10 0.6 97) 1 0.1 99) 2 0.1 100) 37 2.0 997) 237 13.1 998) 250 13.8 999) 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 357) Thermometer rating: Dick Cheney [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (CHNYTHER)
-
TOTAL % 0) 52 2.9 2) 2 0.1 3) 1 0.1 4) 1 0.1 5) 5 0.3 10) 8 0.4 12) 1 0.1 15) 27 1.5 20) 15 0.8 25) 17 0.9 30) 53 2.9 35) 6 0.3 40) 85 4.7 43) 1 0.1 44) 1 0.1 45) 16 0.9 48) 1 0.1 49) 2 0.1 50) 387 21.4 52) 2 0.1 54) 1 0.1 55) 14 0.8 56) 1 0.1 59) 1 0.1 60) 191 10.6 63) 1 0.1 65) 26 1.4 70) 166 9.2 72) 1 0.1 75) 51 2.8 78) 1 0.1 80) 43 2.4 83) 1 0.1 85) 100 5.5 86) 1 0.1 90) 33 1.8 92) 1 0.1 95) 6 0.3 97) 1 0.1 99) 2 0.1 100) 48 2.7 997) 215 11.9 998) 216 12.0 999) 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 358) Thermometer rating: Hillary Clinton [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (HLRYTHER)
-
TOTAL % 0) 212 11.7 1) 7 0.4 2) 5 0.3 3) 2 0.1 4) 1 0.1 5) 12 0.7 10) 29 1.6 15) 83 4.6 17) 1 0.1 20) 43 2.4 25) 22 1.2 28) 1 0.1 30) 108 6.0 32) 1 0.1 35) 8 0.4 40) 131 7.2 45) 11 0.6 49) 2 0.1 50) 220 12.2 51) 2 0.1 52) 1 0.1 55) 12 0.7 60) 164 9.1 63) 1 0.1 65) 28 1.5 70) 181 10.0 71) 1 0.1 72) 1 0.1 75) 67 3.7 80) 57 3.2 84) 1 0.1 85) 163 9.0 87) 1 0.1 90) 49 2.7 93) 1 0.1 95) 19 1.1 97) 1 0.1 99) 2 0.1 100) 127 7.0 995) 5 0.3 997) 4 0.2 998) 18 1.0 999) 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 359) Thermometer rating: Democratic Party [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (DEMSTHRM)
-
TOTAL % 0) 62 3.4 1) 2 0.1 2) 2 0.1 4) 1 0.1 5) 3 0.2 7) 1 0.1 10) 14 0.8 15) 46 2.5 20) 22 1.2 22) 1 0.1 25) 30 1.7 30) 88 4.9 35) 13 0.7 40) 144 8.0 42) 1 0.1 45) 15 0.8 48) 3 0.2 49) 2 0.1 50) 319 17.7 51) 1 0.1 52) 3 0.2 54) 1 0.1 55) 19 1.1 59) 1 0.1 60) 210 11.6 62) 2 0.1 65) 25 1.4 67) 1 0.1 70) 197 10.9 74) 1 0.1 75) 82 4.5 78) 1 0.1 80) 53 2.9 85) 180 10.0 86) 1 0.1 90) 34 1.9 95) 18 1.0 98) 2 0.1 100) 147 8.1 997) 2 0.1 998) 55 3.0 999) 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 360) Thermometer rating: Republican Party[997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (REPTHER)
-
TOTAL % 0) 96 5.3 1) 2 0.1 2) 2 0.1 5) 6 0.3 10) 20 1.1 15) 38 2.1 20) 12 0.7 25) 19 1.1 30) 106 5.9 32) 1 0.1 35) 20 1.1 40) 192 10.6 45) 22 1.2 48) 1 0.1 49) 2 0.1 50) 354 19.6 51) 1 0.1 52) 4 0.2 55) 12 0.7 59) 1 0.1 60) 257 14.2 65) 32 1.8 68) 2 0.1 70) 201 11.1 75) 77 4.3 78) 1 0.1 80) 55 3.0 82) 1 0.1 85) 107 5.9 90) 29 1.6 95) 8 0.4 99) 1 0.1 100) 59 3.3 997) 2 0.1 998) 62 3.4 999) 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 361) Thermometer rating: Reform Party[997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (REFTHER)
-
TOTAL % 0) 115 6.4 3) 1 0.1 5) 4 0.2 10) 26 1.4 14) 1 0.1 15) 62 3.4 18) 1 0.1 20) 30 1.7 25) 25 1.4 30) 119 6.6 32) 1 0.1 35) 7 0.4 40) 107 5.9 45) 8 0.4 48) 1 0.1 49) 2 0.1 50) 544 30.1 51) 1 0.1 52) 1 0.1 54) 1 0.1 55) 14 0.8 60) 135 7.5 63) 1 0.1 65) 12 0.7 70) 67 3.7 71) 1 0.1 75) 14 0.8 80) 10 0.6 85) 15 0.8 90) 2 0.1 95) 2 0.1 100) 12 0.7 997) 110 6.1 998) 352 19.5 999) 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 362) Thermometer rating: Political parties in general [997 R doesn't recognize name; 998 Don't know where to rate; can't judge; 999 No answer, refused] (PRTYTHER)
-
TOTAL % 0) 55 3.0 1) 2 0.1 5) 2 0.1 10) 11 0.6 15) 29 1.6 20) 17 0.9 25) 16 0.9 30) 77 4.3 32) 1 0.1 35) 7 0.4 38) 1 0.1 40) 159 8.8 43) 1 0.1 45) 19 1.1 48) 2 0.1 49) 1 0.1 50) 562 31.1 51) 2 0.1 52) 1 0.1 55) 21 1.2 59) 1 0.1 60) 319 17.7 65) 16 0.9 70) 190 10.5 75) 52 2.9 80) 27 1.5 85) 67 3.7 87) 1 0.1 90) 16 0.9 99) 1 0.1 100) 26 1.4 997) 4 0.2 998) 97 5.4 999) 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 363) Is there anything in particular that you like about the Democratic Party? (DEMLIKE)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 1018 56.3 5) No 766 42.4 8) Don't know 20 1.1 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 364) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Democratic Party: Mention 1 - Democrat 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM_1)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 505.552 717 - 365) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Democratic Party: Mention 2 - Democrat 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM_2)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 309.468 468 - 366) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Democratic Party: Mention 3 - Democrat 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM_3)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 166.412 368 - 367) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Democratic Party: Mention 4 - Democrat 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM_4)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 85.897 279 - 368) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Democratic Party: Mention 5 - Democrat 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM_5)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1730 95.7 5) 1 0.1 17) 1 0.1 121) 1 0.1 133) 4 0.2 171) 1 0.1 609) 2 0.1 610) 1 0.1 801) 5 0.3 805) 2 0.1 807) 1 0.1 829) 1 0.1 849) 1 0.1 900) 1 0.1 901) 2 0.1 905) 1 0.1 906) 3 0.2 907) 2 0.1 909) 3 0.2 915) 4 0.2 924) 3 0.2 930) 1 0.1 938) 1 0.1 962) 1 0.1 986) 5 0.3 1002) 1 0.1 1008) 1 0.1 1025) 2 0.1 1026) 3 0.2 1039) 1 0.1 1057) 1 0.1 1102) 1 0.1 1107) 1 0.1 1144) 1 0.1 1155) 1 0.1 1164) 1 0.1 1165) 1 0.1 1203) 2 0.1 1205) 2 0.1 1213) 4 0.2 1221) 1 0.1 1229) 2 0.1 1233) 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 369) Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Democratic Party? (DEMDLIKE)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 782 43.3 5) No 996 55.1 8) Don't know 25 1.4 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 370) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Democratic Party: Mention 1 - Democrat 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM1)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 330.164 694 - 371) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Democratic Party: Mention 2 - Democrat 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM2)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 195.67 376 - 372) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Democratic Party: Mention 3 - Democrat 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM3)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 97.339 287 - 373) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Democratic Party: Mention 4 - Democrat 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM4)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 40.439 185 - 374) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Democratic Party: Mention 5 - Democrat 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (DEM5)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1758 97.3 18) 1 0.1 19) 2 0.1 602) 2 0.1 604) 2 0.1 606) 2 0.1 710) 1 0.1 719) 1 0.1 731) 1 0.1 796) 1 0.1 801) 1 0.1 803) 1 0.1 805) 2 0.1 809) 1 0.1 828) 2 0.1 832) 1 0.1 838) 1 0.1 905) 1 0.1 907) 2 0.1 908) 1 0.1 923) 1 0.1 931) 1 0.1 933) 1 0.1 963) 2 0.1 981) 3 0.2 986) 1 0.1 1025) 1 0.1 1047) 1 0.1 1056) 1 0.1 1101) 1 0.1 1103) 1 0.1 1107) 1 0.1 1165) 1 0.1 1201) 2 0.1 1209) 1 0.1 1210) 1 0.1 1214) 1 0.1 1217) 1 0.1 1301) 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 375) Is there anything in particular that you like about the Republican Party? (REPLIKE)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 808 44.7 5) No 975 54.0 8) Don't know 20 1.1 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 376) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Republican Party: Mention 1 - Republican 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP_1)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 393.02 808 - 377) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Republican Party: Mention 2 - Republican 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP_2)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 235.137 450 - 378) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Republican Party: Mention 3 - Republican 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP_3)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 127.92 320 - 379) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R likes about Republican Party: Mention 4 - Republican 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP_4)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 67.214 329 - 380) (What is that?) if R says there is anything R likes about Republican Party: Mention 5 - Republican 'likes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP_5)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1748 96.7 42) 1 0.1 46) 1 0.1 52) 1 0.1 111) 1 0.1 173) 1 0.1 601) 1 0.1 603) 1 0.1 605) 1 0.1 607) 1 0.1 701) 1 0.1 702) 1 0.1 801) 3 0.2 806) 3 0.2 816) 1 0.1 827) 2 0.1 835) 4 0.2 904) 2 0.1 907) 2 0.1 909) 1 0.1 914) 4 0.2 915) 1 0.1 923) 1 0.1 924) 1 0.1 929) 1 0.1 930) 2 0.1 980) 1 0.1 987) 1 0.1 1005) 1 0.1 1024) 1 0.1 1025) 2 0.1 1048) 1 0.1 1050) 1 0.1 1054) 1 0.1 1060) 1 0.1 1106) 3 0.2 1123) 1 0.1 1164) 1 0.1 1184) 1 0.1 1194) 1 0.1 1209) 1 0.1 1211) 1 0.1 1213) 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 381) Is there anything in particular that you don't like about the Republican Party? (REPDLIKE)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 915 50.6 5) No 867 48.0 8) Don't know 21 1.2 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 382) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Republican Party: Mention 1 - Republican 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP1)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 454.469 775 - 383) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Republican Party: Mention 2 - Republican 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP2)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 270.599 452 - 384) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Republican Party: Mention 3 - Republican 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP3)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 135.862 346 - 385) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Republican Party: Mention 4 - Republican 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP4)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 69.832 259 - 386) (What is that?) If R says there is anything R dislikes about Republican Party: Mention 5 - Republican 'dislikes' [See note 1 in summary] 0 INAP; 8999 Other Misc; 9001 R has been influenced by spouse; 9002 R has been influenced by someone else; 9995 NA; 9998 Don't know; 9999 Refused (REP5)
-
TOTAL % 0) 1744 96.5 45) 1 0.1 51) 1 0.1 112) 1 0.1 122) 2 0.1 134) 1 0.1 141) 1 0.1 166) 2 0.1 602) 2 0.1 606) 1 0.1 614) 1 0.1 801) 2 0.1 806) 3 0.2 819) 1 0.1 836) 1 0.1 848) 1 0.1 910) 1 0.1 916) 2 0.1 933) 3 0.2 939) 2 0.1 964) 2 0.1 980) 1 0.1 984) 1 0.1 985) 1 0.1 987) 3 0.2 1015) 1 0.1 1019) 1 0.1 1020) 1 0.1 1025) 1 0.1 1027) 3 0.2 1056) 1 0.1 1058) 2 0.1 1103) 1 0.1 1106) 3 0.2 1115) 1 0.1 1206) 3 0.2 1209) 4 0.2 1218) 1 0.1 1222) 1 0.1 1230) 1 0.1 1243) 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 387) Do you think it is better when one party controls both the presidency and Congress, better when control is split between the Democrats and Republicans, or doesn't it matter? (DIVGOVPR)
-
TOTAL % 1) Better when one party controls both 420 23.2 3) Better when control is split 926 51.2 5) It doesn't matter 420 23.2 8) Don't know 38 2.1 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 388) We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? (LYRHOW)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 880 48.7 1) Better 312 17.3 3) Worse 130 7.2 5) The same 482 26.7 8) Don't know 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 389) (Much better or somewhat better?) If R says R is better off financially now than a year ago (LYRBTTR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1495 82.7 1) Much better 117 6.5 5) Somewhat better 194 10.7 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 390) (Much worse or somewhat worse?) If R says R is worse off financially now than a year ago (LYRWRSE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1677 92.8 1) Much worse 41 2.3 5) Somewhat worse 89 4.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 391) We are interested in how people are getting along financially these days. Would you say that you (and your family) are better off, worse off, or just about the same financially as you were a year ago? (ECONSUMM)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 880 48.7 1) Much better 117 6.5 2) Somewhat better 194 10.7 3) Same 482 26.7 4) Somewhat worse 89 4.9 5) Much worse 41 2.3 8) Don't know 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 392) In the past year did you (or anyone in your family) put off medical or dental treatment because you didn't have the money? (MEDDELAY)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 880 48.7 1) Yes 278 15.4 5) No 649 35.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 393) Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? (EXPECT1)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 880 48.7 1) Better 369 20.4 3) Worse 53 2.9 5) The same 479 26.5 8) Don't know 26 1.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 394) (Much better or somewhat better?) If R says R expects to be better off financially one year from now (HOWBTTR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1438 79.6 1) Much better 117 6.5 5) Somewhat better 251 13.9 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 395) (Much worse or somewhat worse?) If R says R expects to be worse off financially one year FROM NOW (HOWWORSE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1754 97.1 1) Much worse 18 1.0 5) Somewhat worse 33 1.8 8) Don't know 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 396) Now looking ahead, do you think that a year from now you (and your family) will be better off financially, worse off, or just about the same as now? (ECONNYR)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 906 50.1 1) Much better 117 6.5 2) Somewhat better 251 13.9 3) Same 479 26.5 4) Somewhat worse 33 1.8 5) Much worse 18 1.0 8) Don't know 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 397) (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Angry? (GOREANG)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 524 29.0 5) No 1272 70.4 8) Don't know 9 0.5 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 398) (If yes, Gore has made R angry) How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (GOREANG2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1283 71.0 1) Very often 94 5.2 2) Fairly often 102 5.6 3) Occasionally 221 12.2 4) Rarely 107 5.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 399) (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Hopeful? (GOREHOPE)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 853 47.2 5) No 934 51.7 8) Don't know 18 1.0 9) REFUSED 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 400) (If yes, Gore has made R hopeful) How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (GOREHOP2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 954 52.8 1) Very often 141 7.8 2) Fairly often 254 14.1 3) Occasionally 379 21.0 4) Rarely 77 4.3 8) Don't know 1 0.1 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 401) (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Afraid? (GOREAFR)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 333 18.4 5) No 1462 80.9 8) Don't know 10 0.6 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 402) (If yes, Gore has made R afraid) How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (GOREAFR2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1474 81.6 1) Very often 73 4.0 2) Fairly often 74 4.1 3) Occasionally 134 7.4 4) Rarely 52 2.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 403) (Think about Al Gore.) Has Al Gore (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Proud? (GOREPRD)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 608 33.6 5) No 1174 65.0 8) Don't know 23 1.3 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 404) (If yes, Gore has made R proud) How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (GOREPRD2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1199 66.4 1) Very often 111 6.1 2) Fairly often 198 11.0 3) Occasionally 250 13.8 4) Rarely 48 2.7 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 405) (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Angry? (BUSHANG)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 487 27.0 5) No 1303 72.1 8) Don't know 14 0.8 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 406) (If yes, George W. Bush has made R angry) How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUSHANG2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1320 73.0 1) Very often 79 4.4 2) Fairly often 97 5.4 3) Occasionally 209 11.6 4) Rarely 101 5.6 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 407) (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Hopeful? (BUSHHOPE)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 774 42.8 5) No 1014 56.1 8) Don't know 17 0.9 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 408) (If yes, George W. Bush has made R hopeful) How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUSHHOP2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1033 57.2 1) Very often 124 6.9 2) Fairly often 227 12.6 3) Occasionally 348 19.3 4) Rarely 74 4.1 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 409) (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Afraid? (BUSHAFR)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 418 23.1 5) No 1374 76.0 8) Don't know 13 0.7 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 410) (If yes, George W. Bush has made R afraid) How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUSHAFR2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1389 76.9 1) Very often 73 4.0 2) Fairly often 93 5.1 3) Occasionally 176 9.7 4) Rarely 75 4.2 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 411) (Think about George W. Bush.) Has George W. Bush (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Proud? (BUSHPRD)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 542 30.0 5) No 1239 68.6 8) Don't know 24 1.3 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 412) (If yes, George W. Bush has made R proud) How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUSHPRD2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1265 70.0 1) Very often 96 5.3 2) Fairly often 148 8.2 3) Occasionally 250 13.8 4) Rarely 46 2.5 8) Don't know 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 413) (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Angry? (BUCHANG)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1037 57.4 1) Yes 197 10.9 5) No 505 27.9 8) Don't know 67 3.7 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 414) (If yes, Buchanan has made R angry) How often would you say you've felt angry -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUCHANG2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1610 89.1 1) Very often 53 2.9 2) Fairly often 40 2.2 3) Occasionally 82 4.5 4) Rarely 22 1.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 415) (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Hopeful? (BUCHHOPE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1037 57.4 1) Yes 114 6.3 5) No 588 32.5 8) Don't know 67 3.7 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 416) (If yes, Buchanan has made R hopeful) How often would you say you've felt hopeful -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUCHHPE2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1693 93.7 1) Very often 10 0.6 2) Fairly often 17 0.9 3) Occasionally 61 3.4 4) Rarely 26 1.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 417) (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Afraid? (BUCHAFR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1037 57.4 1) Yes 153 8.5 5) No 551 30.5 8) Don't know 65 3.6 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 418) (If yes, Buchanan has made R afraid) How often would you say you've felt afraid -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUCHAFR2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1654 91.5 1) Very often 46 2.5 2) Fairly often 34 1.9 3) Occasionally 51 2.8 4) Rarely 22 1.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 419) (Think about Pat Buchanan.) Has Pat Buchanan (because of the kind of person he is, or because of something he has done) -- ever made you feel: Proud? (BUCHPRD)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1037 57.4 1) Yes 78 4.3 5) No 623 34.5 8) Don't know 68 3.8 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 420) (If yes, Buchanan has made R proud) How often would you say you've felt proud -- very often, fairly often, occasionally, or rarely? (BUCHPRD2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1729 95.7 1) Very often 8 0.4 2) Fairly often 23 1.3 3) Occasionally 33 1.8 4) Rarely 14 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 421) What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? Mention 1 - most important problem [See note 2 in summary] 0 INAP; 991 No issues; 992 No campaign in district; 995 NA; 998 Don't know, 999 Refused (IMPPROB1)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 146.767 244 - 422) What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? Mention 2 - most important problem [See note 2 in summary] 0 INAP; 991 No issues; 992 No campaign in district; 995 NA; 998 Don't know, 999 Refused (IMPPROB2)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 106.26 203 - 423) What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? Mention 3 - most important problem [See note 2 in summary] 0 INAP; 991 No issues; 992 No campaign in district; 995 NA; 998 Don't know, 999 Refused (IMPPROB3)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 83.474 191 - 424) What do you think are the most important problems facing this country? Mention 4 - most important problem [See note 2 in summary ] 0 INAP; 991 No issues; 992 No campaign in district; 995 NA; 998 Don't know, 999 Refused (IMPPROB4)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 54.484 158 - 425) Interviewer checkpoint: Number of important problems mentioned by R [if unsure whether one problem or more than one problem code more than 1] (MNTCHECK)
-
TOTAL % 0) R has not mentioned any problems 31 1.7 1) R has mentioned only one problem 167 9.2 2) R has mentioned 2or more problems 707 39.1 9) Refused 902 49.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 426) (If R has mentioned 2 or more problems) Of those you've mentioned, what would you say is the single most important problem the country faces? (MIPCHOIC)
-
N Mean Std.Deviation TOTAL 1807 134.816 223 - 427) (If R has mentioned any problem) How good a job is the government in Washington doing in dealing with this problem - a good job, only fair, or a poor job? (MIPGVTPR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 944 52.2 1) A good job 84 4.6 3) Only fair 358 19.8 5) A poor job 411 22.7 8) Don't know 9 0.5 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 428) (If R has mentioned any problem) Which political party do you think would be most likely to get the government to do a better job in dealing with this problem - the Republicans, the Democrats, or wouldn't there be much difference between them? (MIPPRTY)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 944 52.2 1) Republicans 201 11.1 3) Democrats 237 13.1 5) There wouldn't be much difference between them 382 21.1 7) Neither party 26 1.4 8) Don't know 17 0.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 429) We hear a lot of talk these days about liberals and conservatives. Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [Interview self placement on liberal conservative scale] (POLVIEW)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much 107 5.9 1) Extremely liberal 9 0.5 2) Liberal 29 1.6 3) Slightly liberal 48 2.7 4) Moderate; middle of the road 125 6.9 5) Slightly conservative 65 3.6 6) Conservative 68 3.8 7) Extremely conservative 11 0.6 8) Don't know 4 0.2 9) Refused, NA, INAP 1341 74.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 430) When it comes to politics, do you usually think of yourself as extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal; moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, extremely conservative, or haven't you thought much about this? (POLVWPH)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much 77 4.3 1) Extremely liberal 8 0.4 2) Liberal 48 2.7 3) Slightly liberal 37 2.0 4) Moderate; middle of the road 90 5.0 5) Slightly conservative 48 2.7 6) Conservative 72 4.0 7) Extremely conservative 15 0.8 8) Don't know 5 0.3 9) Refused, NA, INAP 1407 77.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 431) Liberal/conservative self placement summary [combines both telephone and face to face interview variables] (POLVWTO)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much 184 10.2 1) Extremely liberal 17 0.9 2) Liberal 77 4.3 3) Slightly liberal 85 4.7 4) Moderate; middle of the road 215 11.9 5) Slightly conservative 113 6.3 6) Conservative 140 7.7 7) Extremely conservative 26 1.4 8) Don't know 9 0.5 9) Refused, NA, INAP 941 52.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 432) (If R is moderate, don't know or haven't thought on the liberal-conservative self-placement scale) If you had to choose, would you consider yourself a liberal or a conservative? (POLVWHC)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1399 77.4 1) Liberal 123 6.8 3) Conservative 174 9.6 5) Moderate 51 2.8 7) R refuses to choose 52 2.9 8) Don't know 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 433) Liberal/conservative self placement summary [combines both telephone and face to face interview variables and collapses 7pt lib/con scale into a 3category self-placement scale] (POLVWCO)
-
TOTAL % 1) Liberal 302 16.7 3) Moderate 51 2.8 5) Conservative 453 25.1 7) Refused to choose 52 2.9 8) Don't know 8 0.4 9) NA/Refused 941 52.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 434) Self-placement on liberal-conservative branching [R selected for branching version of lib-con series] (LIBCONBR)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much 314 17.4 1) A Liberal 146 8.1 3) A conservative 229 12.7 5) A moderate 216 12.0 7) Neither 29 1.6 8) Don't know 4 0.2 9) Refused; NA; INAP 869 48.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 435) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series and if self-placement is don't know/neither/moderate/no thought (LIBCOBR2)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1244 68.8 1) Liberal 143 7.9 3) Conservative 241 13.3 5) Moderate 58 3.2 7) Refuses to choose 111 6.1 8) Don't know 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 436) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series and if self-placement is liberal (LIBERAL)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1661 91.9 1) Strong liberal 65 3.6 5) Not very strong liberal 79 4.4 8) Don't know 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 437) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series and if self-placement is conservative (CONSERV)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1578 87.3 1) Strong conservative 119 6.6 5) Not very strong conservative 105 5.8 8) Don't know 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 438) Both 7-point scale and branching liberal-conservative series (SPLIBCN)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 1 0.1 1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal 82 4.5 2) Scale 2 branching: Not strong liberal 158 8.7 3) Scale 3 had to choose liberal/branching: had to choose liberal 351 19.4 4) Scale 4 had to choose moderate/branching: had to choose moderate 109 6.0 5) Scale 5 had to choose conserv/branching: had to choose conservative 528 29.2 6) Scale 6 branching: not strong conservative 250 13.8 7) Scale 7 branching: strong conservative 145 8.0 8) Don't know 18 1.0 9) Refuses to choose 165 9.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 439) If FTF mode: Both 7-point scale and branching liberal-conservative series (LIBCNFTF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 801 44.3 1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal 51 2.8 2) Scale 2 branching: Not strong liberal 77 4.3 3) Scale 3 had to choose liberal/branching: Had to choose liberal 212 11.7 4) Scale 4 had to choose moderate/branching: Had to choose moderate 57 3.2 5) Scale 5 had to choose conservative/branching: Had to choose conservative 314 17.4 6) Scale 6 branching: Not strong conservative 129 7.1 7) Scale 7 branching: Strong conservative 77 4.3 8) Don't know 9 0.5 9) Refuses to choose 80 4.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 440) If in phone mode: Both 7-point scale and branching liberal-conservative series (LIBCONPH)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 1007 55.7 1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal 31 1.7 2) Scale 2 branching: Not strong liberal 81 4.5 3) Scale 3 had to choose liberal/branching: Had to choose liberal 139 7.7 4) Scale 4 had to choose moderate/branching: Had to choose moderate 52 2.9 5) Scale 5 had to choose conserv/branching: Had to choose conservative 214 11.8 6) Scale 6 branching: Not strong conservative 121 6.7 7) Scale 7 branching: Strong conservative 68 3.8 8) Don't know 9 0.5 9) Refuses to choose 85 4.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 441) Both 7-point scale and branching liberal-conservative series (LIBCONSU)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1 0.1 1) Liberal 591 32.7 3) Moderate 109 6.0 5) Conservative 923 51.1 7) Refused to choose 165 9.1 8) Don't know 18 1.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 442) [If R selected for 7-point scale version of liberal-conservative series: FTF interview] WHERE WOULD you Place Bill Clinton on this scale? (CLINSC)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1339 74.1 1) Extremely liberal 78 4.3 2) Liberal 120 6.6 3) Slightly liberal 91 5.0 4) Moderate; middle of the road 85 4.7 5) Slightly conservative 30 1.7 6) Conservative 31 1.7 7) Extremely conservative 4 0.2 8) Don't know 29 1.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 443) [If R selected for 7-point scale version of liberal-conservative series: Telephone interview] What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? (CLINSC2)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1407 77.9 1) Extremely liberal 76 4.2 2) Liberal 106 5.9 3) Slightly liberal 55 3.0 4) Moderate; middle of the road 85 4.7 5) Slightly conservative 10 0.6 6) Conservative 24 1.3 7) Extremely conservative 4 0.2 8) Don't know 38 2.1 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 444) [If R selected for 7-point scale version of liberal-conservative series: Combined FTF/telephone interview] where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? (CLINSC3)
-
TOTAL % 0) 939 52.0 1) 154 8.5 2) 226 12.5 3) 146 8.1 4) 170 9.4 5) 40 2.2 6) 55 3.0 7) 8 0.4 8) 67 3.7 9) 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 445) [If R selected for branching version of liberal-conservative series] IS Bill Clinton a liberal, conservative, or a moderate? (CLINLCBR)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 868 48.0 1) Liberal 434 24.0 2) Conservative 78 4.3 3) Moderate 285 15.8 8) Don't know 139 7.7 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 446) [If R selected for branching version of liberal-conservative series and if R says Clinton is a liberal] would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal or not a very strong liberal? (CLINLIB)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1373 76.0 1) Strong liberal 280 15.5 5) Not very strong liberal 150 8.3 8) Don't know 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 447) [If R selected for branching version of liberal-conservative series and if R says Clinton is a conservative] would you call Bill Clinton a strong conservative or a not VERY strong conservative? (CLINCON)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1729 95.7 1) Strong conservative 45 2.5 5) Not very strong conservative 32 1.8 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 448) [If R is selected for branching version of liberal-conservative series: summary] (CLINSUM5)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 868 48.0 1) Strong liberal 280 15.5 2) Not very strong liberal 154 8.5 3) Moderate 285 15.8 4) Not very strong conservative 33 1.8 5) Strong conservative 45 2.5 8) Don't know 139 7.7 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 449) [Both 7-point scale and branching liberal-conservative series: Summary] 7-point scale FTF: Where would you place Bill Clinton on this scale? 7-Point scale phone: What bout Bill Clinton? Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative? Branching (FTF and phone): What about Bill Clinton? Is Bill Clinton a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate? Would you call Bill Clinton a strong liberal/conservative or a not very strong liberal/conservative? (CLINSUM7)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal 434 24.0 2) Scale 2 branching: Not very strong liberal 380 21.0 3) Scale 3,4,5; Branching: moderate 641 35.5 4) Scale 6; branching: Not very strong conservative 88 4.9 5) Scale 7; branching: Strong conservative 53 2.9 8) Don't know 206 11.4 9) Refused 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 450) IF R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: FTF: Where would you place Al Gore on this scale? (GORESC)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA, INAP 1339 74.1 1) Extremely liberal 40 2.2 2) Liberal 131 7.2 3) Slightly liberal 98 5.4 4) Moderate; middle of the road 94 5.2 5) Slightly conservative 40 2.2 6) Conservative 25 1.4 7) Extremely conservative 8 0.4 8) Don't know 32 1.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 451) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: telephone: What about Al Gore? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (GORESC2)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1407 77.9 1) Extremely liberal 35 1.9 2) Liberal 98 5.4 3) Slightly liberal 68 3.8 4) Moderate; middle of the road 86 4.8 5) Slightly conservative 19 1.1 6) Conservative 32 1.8 7) Extremely conservative 5 0.3 8) Don't know 54 3.0 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 452) Summary: Combined FTF/phone 7pt-scale lib-con Gore placement (GORESC3)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA, INAP 939 52.0 1) Extremely liberal 75 4.2 2) Liberal 229 12.7 3) Slightly liberal 166 9.2 4) Moderate; middle of the road 180 10.0 5) Slightly conservative 59 3.3 6) Conservative 57 3.2 7) Extremely conservative 13 0.7 8) Don't know 86 4.8 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 453) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If Gore placement is not DON'T KNOW: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (GORELCFT)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1371 75.9 1) Very certain 92 5.1 3) Pretty certain 210 11.6 5) Not very certain 134 7.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 454) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If Gore placement is not DON'T KNOW: Telephone: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (GORELCPH)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1464 81.0 1) Very certain 90 5.0 3) Pretty certain 190 10.5 5) Not very certain 63 3.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 455) Combined FTF/telephone 7pt scale certainty-Gore placement (GORELCPL)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA, INAP 1028 56.9 1) Very certain 182 10.1 3) Pretty certain 400 22.1 5) Not very certain 197 10.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 456) If R: What about Al Gore? (Is Al Gore a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) (GOREBRSM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 868 48.0 1) Liberal 386 21.4 2) Conservative 150 8.3 3) Moderate 254 14.1 8) Don't know 149 8.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 457) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Gore placement is liberal: Would you call Al Gore a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? (GORELIB)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1421 78.6 1) Strong liberal 250 13.8 5) Not very strong liberal 130 7.2 8) Don't know 5 0.3 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 458) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Gore placement is conservative: Would you call Al Gore a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? (GORECONS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1657 91.7 1) Strong conservative 89 4.9 5) Not very strong conservative 58 3.2 8) Don't know 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 459) Summary: 5pt lib-con Gore placement from branching series (GORESUM5)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 868 48.0 1) Strong liberal 250 13.8 2) Not very strong liberal 136 7.5 3) Moderate 254 14.1 4) Not very strong conservative 61 3.4 5) Strong conservative 89 4.9 8) Don't know 149 8.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 460) Combined 5-point lib-con Gore placement from 7pt scale/branching (GORESUM7)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal 325 18.0 2) Scale 2 branching: Not very strong liberal 365 20.2 3) Scale 3,4,5; Branching: moderate 659 36.5 4) Scale 6; branching: Not very strong conservative 118 6.5 5) Scale 7; branching: Strong conservative 102 5.6 8) Don't know 235 13.0 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 461) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Gore placement is moderate/If strength of liberal/conservative placement is not DON'T KNOW: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (GORELCBR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1026 56.8 1) Very certain 224 12.4 3) Pretty certain 373 20.6 5) Not very certain 183 10.1 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 462) Combined lib-con certainty - Gore placement from 7pt/branching (GOREBS7)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 247 13.7 1) Very certain 406 22.5 3) Pretty certain 773 42.8 5) Not very certain 380 21.0 9) REFUSED 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 463) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush on this scale? (BUSHSC)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1339 74.1 1) Extremely liberal 8 0.4 2) Liberal 23 1.3 3) Slightly liberal 37 2.0 4) Moderate; middle of the road 58 3.2 5) Slightly conservative 105 5.8 6) Conservative 164 9.1 7) Extremely conservative 36 2.0 8) Don't know 35 1.9 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 464) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: Telephone: What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (BUSHSC2)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1407 77.9 1) Extremely liberal 6 0.3 2) Liberal 32 1.8 3) Slightly liberal 18 1.0 4) Moderate; middle of the road 49 2.7 5) Slightly conservative 61 3.4 6) Conservative 146 8.1 7) Extremely conservative 35 1.9 8) Don't know 51 2.8 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 465) Summary: Combined FTF/phone 7pt-scale lib-con GW Bush placement (BUSHSC3)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 939 52.0 1) Extremely liberal 14 0.8 2) Liberal 55 3.0 3) Slightly liberal 55 3.0 4) Moderate; middle of the road 107 5.9 5) Slightly conservative 166 9.2 6) Conservative 310 17.2 7) Extremely conservative 71 3.9 8) Don't know 86 4.8 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 466) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If GW Bush placement is not DON'T KNOW: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUSHLCFT)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1376 76.1 1) Very certain 93 5.1 3) Pretty certain 208 11.5 5) Not very certain 129 7.1 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 467) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If GW Bush placement is not DON'T KNOW: Telephone: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUSHLCPH)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1460 80.8 1) Very certain 101 5.6 3) Pretty certain 175 9.7 5) Not very certain 71 3.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 468) Combined FTF/phone 7pt scale certainty - GW Bush placement (BUSHLCPL)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1029 56.9 1) Very certain 194 10.7 3) Pretty certain 383 21.2 5) Not very certain 200 11.1 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 469) IF R selected for branching version of lib-con series: What about George W. Bush?(Is George W. Bush a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) (BUSHBRSM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 868 48.0 1) Liberal 113 6.3 2) Conservative 464 25.7 3) Moderate 209 11.6 8) Don't know 151 8.4 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 470) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If GW Bush placement is liberal: Would you call George W. Bush a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? (BUSHLIB)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1694 93.7 1) STRONG LIBERAL 70 3.9 5) NOT VERY STRONG LIBERAL 43 2.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 471) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If GW Bush placement is conservative: Would you call George W. Bush a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? (BUSHCONS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1343 74.3 1) Strong conservative 287 15.9 5) Not very strong conservative 162 9.0 8) Don't know 14 0.8 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 472) Summary: 5pt lib-con GW Bush placement from branching series (BUSHSUM5)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 868 48.0 1) Strong liberal 70 3.9 2) Not very strong liberal 43 2.4 3) Moderate 209 11.6 4) Not very strong conservative 177 9.8 5) Strong conservative 287 15.9 8) Don't know 151 8.4 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 473) Combined 5-point lib-con GW Bush placement from 7pt scale /branch (BUSHSUM7)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal 84 4.6 2) Scale 2 branching: Not very strong liberal 98 5.4 3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Moderate 537 29.7 4) Scale 6; branching: Not very strong conservative 487 27.0 5) Scale 7; branching: Strong conservative 358 19.8 8) Don't know 237 13.1 9) Refused 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 474) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If GW Bush placement is moderate/If strength of liberal/conservative placement is not DON'T KNOW: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUSHLCBR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1036 57.3 1) Very certain 198 11.0 3) Pretty certain 376 20.8 5) Not very certain 196 10.8 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 475) Combined lib-con certainty - GW Bush placement from 7pt/branching (BUSHBS7)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 258 14.3 1) Very certain 392 21.7 3) Pretty certain 759 42.0 5) Not very certain 396 21.9 8) Don't know 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 476) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: FTF: Where would you place Pat Buchanan on this scale? (BUCHSC)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1339 74.1 1) Extremely liberal 14 0.8 2) Liberal 15 0.8 3) Slightly liberal 26 1.4 4) Moderate; middle of the road 57 3.2 5) Slightly conservative 38 2.1 6) Conservative 55 3.0 7) Extremely conservative 115 6.4 8) Don't know 145 8.0 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 477) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: Telephone: What about Pat Buchanan?(Do you think he is extremely liberal, liberal, slightly liberal, moderate or middle of the road, slightly conservative, conservative, or extremely conservative?) (BUCHSC2)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1407 77.9 1) Extremely liberal 3 0.2 2) Liberal 17 0.9 3) Slightly liberal 8 0.4 4) Moderate; middle of the road 35 1.9 5) Slightly conservative 10 0.6 6) Conservative 61 3.4 7) Extremely conservative 108 6.0 8) Don't know 154 8.5 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 478) Summary: Combined FTF/phone 7pt-scale lib-con Buchanan placement (BUCHSC3)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 939 52.0 1) Extremely liberal 17 0.9 2) Liberal 32 1.8 3) Slightly liberal 34 1.9 4) Moderate; middle of the road 92 5.1 5) Slightly conservative 48 2.7 6) Conservative 116 6.4 7) Extremely conservative 223 12.3 8) Don't know 299 16.5 9) Refused 7 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 479) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If Buchanan placement is not DON'T KNOW: FTF: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUCHLCFT)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1487 82.3 1) Very certain 100 5.5 3) Pretty certain 113 6.3 5) Not very certain 107 5.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 480) If R selected for 7-point scale version of lib-con series: If Buchanan placement is not DON'T KNOW: Telephone: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUCHLCPH)
-
TOTAL % 0) INAP 1565 86.6 1) Very certain 93 5.1 3) Pretty certain 89 4.9 5) Not very certain 60 3.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 481) Combined FTF/phone 7pt scale certainty - Buchanan placement (BUCHLCPL)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1245 68.9 1) Very certain 193 10.7 3) Pretty certain 202 11.2 5) Not very certain 167 9.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 482) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: What about Pat Buchanan?(Is Pat Buchanan a liberal, a conservative, or a moderate?) (BUCHBRSM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 868 48.0 1) Liberal 65 3.6 2) Conservative 389 21.5 3) Moderate 107 5.9 8) Don't know 372 20.6 9) Refused 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 483) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Buchanan placement is liberal: would you call Pat Buchanan a strong liberal or a not very strong liberal? (BUCHLIB)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1742 96.4 1) Strong liberal 38 2.1 5) Not very strong liberal 24 1.3 8) Don't know 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 484) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Buchanan placement is conservative: would you call Pat Buchanan a strong conservative or a not very strong conservative? (BUCHCONS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1418 78.5 1) Strong conservative 325 18.0 5) Not very strong conservative 61 3.4 8) Don't know 2 0.1 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 485) Summary: 5pt lib-con Buchanan placement from branching series (BUCHSUM5)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 868 48.0 1) Strong liberal 38 2.1 2) Not very strong liberal 27 1.5 3) Moderate 107 5.9 4) Not very strong conservative 64 3.5 5) Strong conservative 325 18.0 8) Don't know 372 20.6 9) Refused 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 486) Combined 5pt lib-con Buchanan placement from 7pt scale /branch (BUCHSUM7)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Strong liberal 55 3.0 2) Scale 2 branching: Not very strong liberal 59 3.3 3) Scale 3,4,5; Branching: moderate 281 15.6 4) Scale 6 branching: Not very strong conservative 180 10.0 5) Scale 7 branching: Strong conservative 548 30.3 8) Don't know 671 37.1 9) Refused 13 0.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 487) If R selected for branching version of lib-con series: If Buchanan placement is moderate/If strength of liberal/conservative placement is not DON'T KNOW: How certain are you of this? Very certain, pretty certain or not very certain? (BUCHLCBR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1252 69.3 1) Very certain 225 12.5 3) Pretty certain 181 10.0 5) Not very certain 149 8.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 488) Combined lib-con certainty - Buchanan placement from 7pt/branching (BUCHBS7)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 690 38.2 1) Very certain 418 23.1 3) Pretty certain 383 21.2 5) Not very certain 316 17.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 489) Who do you think will be elected President in November? (THNKELEC)
-
TOTAL % 1) Al Gore 848 46.9 2) George W. Bush 783 43.3 3) Pat Buchanan 5 0.3 4) Ralph Nader 3 0.2 7) Other 39 2.2 8) Don't know 126 7.0 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 490) [If R gives name of who they think will win the election] Do you think the Presidential race will be close or will [NAME GIVEN] win by quite a bit? (CLELEC1)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 129 7.1 1) Will be close 1449 80.2 5) Win by quite a bit 213 11.8 8) Don't know 16 0.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 491) If R says he/she doesn't know who will win the Pres. Election: Do you think the Presidential race will be close or will one candidate win by quite a bit? (CLELEC2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1678 92.9 1) Will be close 108 6.0 5) Win by quite a bit 8 0.4 8) Don't know 13 0.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 492) If R selected for standard version: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that over the past year the nation's economy has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? (ECONCND1)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 899 49.8 1) Gotten better 369 20.4 3) Stayed about the same 380 21.0 5) Gotten worse 147 8.1 8) Don't know 11 0.6 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 493) If R selected for experimental version: Now thinking about the economy in the country as a whole, would you say that over the past year the nation's economy has gotten worse, stayed about the same, or gotten better? (ECONCND2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 908 50.2 1) Gotten worse 155 8.6 3) Stayed about the same 405 22.4 5) Gotten better 331 18.3 8) Don't know 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 494) If R thinks economy will be better in the next year: Much better or somewhat better? (ECONCND3)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1107 61.3 1) Much better 251 13.9 5) Somewhat better 448 24.8 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 495) If R thinks economy will be worse in the next year: Much worse or somewhat worse? (ECONCND4)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1505 83.3 1) SOMEWHAT WORSE 232 12.8 5) MUCH WORSE 70 3.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 496) Combined version summary: Economy in next year (ECONCND5)
-
TOTAL % 1) Much better 251 13.9 2) Somewhat better 448 24.8 3) Stayed about the same 785 43.4 4) Somewhat worse 70 3.9 5) Much worse 232 12.8 8) Don't know 20 1.1 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 497) If R selected for standard version: would you say that over the past year, it has gotten harder for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten easier for people to find enough work? (EMPCON1)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 906 50.1 1) Gotten harder 125 6.9 3) Stayed the same 313 17.3 5) Gotten easier 447 24.7 8) Don't know 16 0.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 498) If R selected for experimental version: would you say that over the past year, it has gotten easier for people across the country to find enough work, stayed about the same, or gotten harder for people to find enough work? (EMPCON2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 901 49.9 1) Gotten easier 454 25.1 3) About the same 300 16.6 5) Gotten harder 129 7.1 8) Don't know 23 1.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 499) If R says it has gotten harder to find work in the last year: Much harder or a little harder? (EMPCON3)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1553 85.9 1) Much harder 123 6.8 5) A little harder 131 7.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 500) If R says it has gotten easier to find work in the last year: Much easier or a little easier? (EMPCON4)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 906 50.1 1) Much easier 493 27.3 5) A little easier 404 22.4 8) Don't know 3 0.2 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 501) Combined version summary: Employment opportunities in last year (EMPCON5)
-
TOTAL % 1) Much harder 123 6.8 2) Somewhat harder 131 7.2 3) Stayed about the same 613 33.9 4) Somewhat easier 404 22.4 5) Much easier 493 27.3 8) Don't know 42 2.3 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 502) If R selected for standard version: what about the next 12months? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get better, stay about the same, or get worse? (ECNCOND1)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 896 49.6 1) Get better 181 10.0 3) Stay about the same 535 29.6 5) Get worse 163 9.0 8) Don't know 29 1.6 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 503) If R selected for experimental version: what about the next 12 months? Do you expect the economy, in the country as a whole, to get worse, stay about the same, or get better? (ECNCOND2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 911 50.4 1) Get worse 166 9.2 3) About the same 499 27.6 5) Better 196 10.8 8) Don't know 34 1.9 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 504) If R expects economy to get better in the next 12 months: Much better or somewhat better? (ECNCOND3)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1430 79.1 1) Much better 113 6.3 5) Somewhat better 264 14.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 505) If R expects economy to get worse in the next 12 months: Much worse or somewhat worse? (ECNCOND4)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1478 81.8 1) Much worse 69 3.8 5) Somewhat worse 260 14.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 506) Summary: Economy in next 12 months (ECNCOND5)
-
TOTAL % 1) Much better 113 6.3 2) Somewhat better 264 14.6 3) Stayed about the same 1034 57.2 4) Somewhat worse 260 14.4 5) Much worse 69 3.8 8) Don't know 63 3.5 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 507) Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling the economy? (CLINECON)
-
TOTAL % 1) Approve 1304 72.2 5) Disapprove 387 21.4 8) Don't know 106 5.9 9) Refused 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 508) If R approves of Clinton's handling of economy: Do you approve strongly or not strongly? (CLINECNA)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 503 27.8 1) Strongly 783 43.3 5) Not strongly 516 28.6 8) Don't know 4 0.2 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 509) If R disapproves of Clinton's handling of economy: Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? (CLINECND)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1420 78.6 1) Strongly 237 13.1 5) Not strongly 150 8.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 510) Summary: Approval of Clinton's handling of the economy (CLINECNS)
-
TOTAL % 1) Approve strongly 783 43.3 2) Approve not strongly 516 28.6 4) Disapprove not strongly 150 8.3 5) Disapprove strongly 237 13.1 8) Don't know 110 6.1 9) Refused 11 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 511) Do you personally, or jointly with a spouse, have any money invested in the stock market right now --either in an individual stock or in a mutual fund? (OWNSTOCK)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes 1004 55.6 5) No 780 43.2 8) Don't know 6 0.3 9) Refused 17 0.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 512) Which party do you think would do a better job of handling the nation's economy..., the Democrats, the Republicans, or wouldn't there be much difference between them? (ECONPRTY)
-
TOTAL % 1) Democrats 527 29.2 3) Republicans 406 22.5 5) Wouldn't be much difference between them/no difference 794 43.9 7) Neither party [Vol] 28 1.5 8) Don't know 50 2.8 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 513) Looking ahead, do you think the problem of keeping out of war would be handled better IN THE NEXT FOUR YEARS by the Democrats, the Republicans, or about the same by both? (PEACPRTY)
-
TOTAL % 1) Democrats 373 20.6 3) Republicans 324 17.9 5) About the same by both 1043 57.7 7) Neither party [Vol] 24 1.3 8) Don't know 42 2.3 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 514) Turning to some other types of issues facing the country. During the past year, would you say that the United States' position in the world has grown weaker, stayed about the same, or has it grown stronger? (USGLOBAL)
-
TOTAL % 1) Weaker 500 27.7 3) Stayed about the same 874 48.4 5) Stronger 403 22.3 8) Don't know 28 1.5 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 515) Do you think the number of immigrants from foreign countries who are permitted to come to the United States to live should be increased, decreased, or left the same as it is now? (IMMIGRT)
-
TOTAL % 1) Increased 172 9.5 3) Decreased 785 43.4 5) Left the same as it is now 785 43.4 8) Don't know 60 3.3 9) Refused 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 516) If R Thinks number of immigrants should be increased/If R thinks number of immigrants should be decreased: A little or a lot? (IMMIGRT2)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 850 47.0 1) A little 360 19.9 5) A lot 588 32.5 8) Don't know 9 0.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Immigration, View of Level of ]
- 517) SUmmary: Immigration level (IMMIGRT3)
-
TOTAL % 1) Increased a lot 68 3.8 2) Increased a little 100 5.5 3) Left the same 785 43.4 4) Decreased a little 260 14.4 5) Decreased a lot 520 28.8 8) Don't know 69 3.8 9) Refused 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Immigration, View of Level of ]
- 518) If R selected for standard version: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports, or haven't you thought much about this? (IMPORTSS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 897 49.6 1) Favor 245 13.6 5) Oppose 263 14.6 7) Haven't thought much about this 385 21.3 8) Don't know 17 0.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 519) If R selected for experimental version: Some people have suggested placing new limits on foreign imports in order to protect American jobs. Others say that such limits would raise consumer prices and hurt American exports. Do you favor or oppose placing new limits on imports? (IMPORTSE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 910 50.4 1) Favor 390 21.6 5) Oppose 408 22.6 8) Don't know 95 5.3 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 520) Combined version summary: Import limits (IMPORTSC)
-
TOTAL % 1) Favor 635 35.1 5) Oppose 671 37.1 7) Haven't thought much 385 21.3 8) Don't know 112 6.2 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 521) If R selected for standard version: Do you agree or disagree with this statement: This country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world. (ISOLATS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 916 50.7 1) Agree 235 13.0 5) Disagree 640 35.4 8) Don't know 15 0.8 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 522) If R selected for experimental version: Do you think this country would be better off if we just stayed home and did not concern ourselves with problems in other parts of the world, or do you think that this country would be better off trying to solve some problems in other parts of the world? (ISOLATE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 891 49.3 1) Better off if we just stayed home 267 14.8 5) Better off trying to solve some problems 601 33.3 8) Don't know 44 2.4 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 523) Combined version summary: Isolationism (ISOLATC)
-
TOTAL % 1) Agree/better off to stay home 502 27.8 5) Disagree/better off trying to solve problems 1241 68.7 8) Don't know 59 3.3 9) Refused 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 524) Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling our relations with foreign countries? (CLINTFRN)
-
TOTAL % 1) Approve 1161 64.3 5) Disapprove 534 29.6 8) Don't know 102 5.6 9) Refused 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 525) If R approves Clinton's handling of foreign relations: Do you approve strongly or not strongly? (CLINTFN)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 646 35.7 1) Strongly 605 33.5 5) Not strongly 553 30.6 8) Don't know 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 526) If R disapproves Clinton's handling of foreign relations: Do you disapprove strongly or not strongly? (CLINT_FN)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1273 70.4 1) Strongly 328 18.2 5) Not strongly 202 11.2 8) Don't know 3 0.2 9) REFUSED 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 527) Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bill Clinton is handling our relations with foreign countries? Do you approve/disapprove strongly or not strongly? Summary: Clinton handling of foreign affairs (CLINTFNS)
-
TOTAL % 1) Approve strongly 605 33.5 2) Approve not strongly 553 30.6 4) Disapprove not strongly 202 11.2 5) Disapprove strongly 328 18.2 8) Don't know 108 6.0 9) Refused 11 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 528) Generally speaking, do you think of yourself as a Republican, a Democrat, an Independent, or what? (PARTAFIL)
-
TOTAL % 1) Democrat 620 34.3 2) Republican 451 25.0 3) Independent 496 27.4 4) Party [specify] 27 1.5 5) No preference 204 11.3 8) Don't know 5 0.3 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 529) If R considers self a Democrat: Would you call yourself a strong Democrat or a not very strong Democrat? (STDEMO)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1187 65.7 1) Strong 346 19.1 5) Not very strong 273 15.1 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 530) If R considers self a Republican: Would you call yourself a strong Republican or a not very strong Republican? (STREPUB)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1356 75.0 1) Strong 236 13.1 5) Not very strong 214 11.8 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 531) If R's party preference is Independent, no preference, other, don't know: Do you think of yourself as closer to the Republican Party or to the Democratic Party? (PRTYCLSE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1075 59.5 1) Closer to Republican 230 12.7 3) Neither [Vol] 224 12.4 5) Closer to Democratic 269 14.9 8) Don't know 9 0.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 532) Summary: Party ID (PARTIDSU)
-
TOTAL % 0) Strong Democrat 346 19.1 1) Weak Democrat 274 15.2 2) Independent-Democrat 269 14.9 3) Independent-Independent 206 11.4 4) Independent-Republican 230 12.7 5) Weak Republican 215 11.9 6) Strong Republican 236 13.1 7) Other; minor party; Refuses to say 9 0.5 8) Apolitical 17 0.9 9) NA 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 533) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (moral) (GOREMORL)
-
TOTAL % 1) Extremely well 423 23.4 2) Quite well 820 45.4 3) Not too well 287 15.9 4) Not well at all 133 7.4 8) Don't know 143 7.9 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 534) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (really cares about people like you) (GORECARS)
-
TOTAL % 1) Extremely well 277 15.3 2) Quite well 713 39.5 3) Not too well 464 25.7 4) Not well at all 232 12.8 8) Don't know 119 6.6 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 535) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (knowledgeable) (GOREKNOW)
-
TOTAL % 1) Extremely well 461 25.5 2) Quite well 997 55.2 3) Not too well 212 11.7 4) Not well at all 59 3.3 8) Don't know 77 4.3 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 536) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (strong leader) (GORELEAD)
-
TOTAL % 1) Extremely well 258 14.3 2) Quite well 728 40.3 3) Not too well 522 28.9 4) Not well at all 185 10.2 8) Don't know 113 6.3 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 537) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (dishonest) (GORELIAR)
-
TOTAL % 1) Extremely well 133 7.4 2) Quite well 312 17.3 3) Not too well 629 34.8 4) Not well at all 557 30.8 8) Don't know 173 9.6 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 538) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] ....... 'describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (intelligent) (GORESMRT)
-
TOTAL % 1) Extremely well 494 27.3 2) Quite well 995 55.1 3) Not too well 182 10.1 4) Not well at all 65 3.6 8) Don't know 69 3.8 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 539) Think about Al Gore. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Al Gore extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (out of touch with ordinary people) (GORENOCL)
-
TOTAL % 1) Extremely well 136 7.5 2) Quite well 495 27.4 3) Not too well 641 35.5 4) Not well at all 419 23.2 8) Don't know 113 6.3 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 540) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .....' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (moral) (BUSHMORL)
-
TOTAL % 1) Extremely well 340 18.8 2) Quite well 841 46.5 3) Not too well 330 18.3 4) Not well at all 98 5.4 8) Don't know 196 10.8 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 541) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (really cares about people like you) (BUSHCARS)
-
TOTAL % 1) Extremely well 155 8.6 2) Quite well 625 34.6 3) Not too well 562 31.1 4) Not well at all 342 18.9 8) Don't know 122 6.8 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 542) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (knowledgeable) (BUSHKNOW)
-
TOTAL % 1) Extremely well 274 15.2 2) Quite well 933 51.6 3) Not too well 379 21.0 4) Not well at all 133 7.4 8) Don't know 87 4.8 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 543) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (strong leader) (BUSHLEAD)
-
TOTAL % 1) Extremely well 266 14.7 2) Quite well 842 46.6 3) Not too well 407 22.5 4) Not well at all 166 9.2 8) Don't know 125 6.9 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 544) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (dishonest) (BUSHLIAR)
-
TOTAL % 1) Extremely well 70 3.9 2) Quite well 288 15.9 3) Not too well 653 36.1 4) Not well at all 574 31.8 8) Don't know 220 12.2 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 545) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (intelligent) (BUSHSMRT)
-
TOTAL % 1) Extremely well 329 18.2 2) Quite well 967 53.5 3) Not too well 306 16.9 4) Not well at all 110 6.1 8) Don't know 94 5.2 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 546) Think about George W. Bush. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe George W. Bush extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (out of touch with ordinary people) (BUSHNOCL)
-
TOTAL % 1) Extremely well 207 11.5 2) Quite well 495 27.4 3) Not too well 638 35.3 4) Not well at all 348 19.3 8) Don't know 118 6.5 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 547) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .....' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (moral) (BUCHMORL)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 1037 57.4 1) Extremely well 94 5.2 2) Quite well 240 13.3 3) Not too well 120 6.6 4) Not well at all 47 2.6 8) Don't know 268 14.8 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 548) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (really cares about people like you) (BUCHCARS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 1037 57.4 1) Extremely well 31 1.7 2) Quite well 137 7.6 3) Not too well 197 10.9 4) Not well at all 150 8.3 8) Don't know 254 14.1 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 549) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (knowledgeable) (BUCHKNOW)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 1037 57.4 1) Extremely well 50 2.8 2) Quite well 304 16.8 3) Not too well 139 7.7 4) Not well at all 41 2.3 8) Don't know 235 13.0 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 550) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (strong leader) (BUCHLEAD)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 1037 57.4 1) Extremely well 23 1.3 2) Quite well 136 7.5 3) Not too well 227 12.6 4) Not well at all 138 7.6 8) Don't know 245 13.6 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 551) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (dishonest) (BUCHLIAR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 1037 57.4 1) Extremely well 17 0.9 2) Quite well 65 3.6 3) Not too well 224 12.4 4) Not well at all 175 9.7 8) Don't know 287 15.9 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 552) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (intelligent) (BUCHSMRT)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 1037 57.4 1) Extremely well 82 4.5 2) Quite well 323 17.9 3) Not too well 98 5.4 4) Not well at all 37 2.0 8) Don't know 229 12.7 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 553) Think about Pat Buchanan. In your opinion, does the phrase 'he [is] .......' describe Pat Buchanan extremely well, quite well, not too well, or not well at all? How about (out of touch with ordinary people) (BUCHNOCL)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 1037 57.4 1) Extremely well 85 4.7 2) Quite well 183 10.1 3) Not too well 177 9.8 4) Not well at all 79 4.4 8) Don't know 244 13.5 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 554) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (GOVTSRVF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 142 7.9 1) Gov't should provide many fewer services 46 2.5 2) 60 3.3 3) 102 5.6 4) 251 13.9 5) 184 10.2 6) 115 6.4 7) Gov't should provide many more services 98 5.4 8) Don't know 7 0.4 9) Refused 802 44.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 555) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R Self-placement on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (GOVTSRVP)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 141 7.8 1) Fewer services; reduce spending 179 9.9 5) More services; increase spending 378 20.9 7) Should stay the same as it is now [Vol] 93 5.1 8) Don't know 7 0.4 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1009 55.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 556) If R thinks the government should reduce services and spending: Telephone: Should the government reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (RDUCAMT)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1628 90.1 1) A great deal 74 4.1 5) Only some 105 5.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 557) If R thinks the government should increase services and spending: Telephone: Should the government increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (INCSAMT)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1429 79.1 1) A great deal 141 7.8 5) Only some 233 12.9 8) Don't know 3 0.2 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 558) Telephone: Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Should the government reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? [Summary: 5pt serv/spend self-placement from branching series] (SPSUM5P)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Reduce spending and services a great deal 74 4.1 2) Reduce spending and services only some 105 5.8 3) Stay same as now 93 5.1 4) Increase spending and services only some 233 12.9 5) Increase spending and services a great deal 141 7.8 7) Haven't thought much 141 7.8 8) Don't know 10 0.6 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 559) Should the government reduce/increase services and spending a great deal or (reduce/increase services and spending) only some? [Combined 5pt serv/spend self-placement from 7pt scale /branch] (SPSUM7P)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much 283 15.7 1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal 120 6.6 2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some 165 9.1 3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now 630 34.9 4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some 348 19.3 5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal 239 13.2 8) Don't know 17 0.9 9) Refused; NA; INAP 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 560) Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? [R placement of Clinton on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (CLINTGF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should provide many fewer services 20 1.1 2) 23 1.3 3) 73 4.0 4) 149 8.2 5) 255 14.1 6) 240 13.3 7) Gov't should provide many more services 152 8.4 8) Don't know 92 5.1 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 561) What about Bill Clinton? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? [R placement of Clinton on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (CLINTGP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Fewer services; reduce spending 108 6.0 5) More services; increase spending 522 28.9 7) Should stay the same as it is now 59 3.3 8) Don't know 109 6.0 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 562) If R thinks Clinton would like to reduce services and spending: telephone: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (CLINRGP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1699 94.0 1) A great deal 33 1.8 5) Only some 74 4.1 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 563) If R thinks Clinton would like to increase services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (CLINIGP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1285 71.1 1) A great deal 246 13.6 5) Only some 275 15.2 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 564) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Clinton placement from branching series (CLING5)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Reduce spending and services a great deal 33 1.8 2) Reduce spending and services only some 74 4.1 3) Stay same as now 59 3.3 4) Increase spending and services only some 275 15.2 5) Increase spending and services a great deal 246 13.6 8) Don't know 111 6.1 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 565) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Clinton placement from 7pt scale/branch (CLING7)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal 53 2.9 2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some 97 5.4 3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now 536 29.7 4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some 515 28.5 5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal 398 22.0 8) Don't know 203 11.2 9) Refused 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 566) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? [R placement of Gore on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (GOREGF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should provide many fewer services 9 0.5 2) 27 1.5 3) 62 3.4 4) 154 8.5 5) 262 14.5 6) 251 13.9 7) Gov't should provide many more services 129 7.1 8) Don't know 111 6.1 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 567) What about Al Gore? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? [R placement of Gore on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (GOREGP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Fewer services; reduce spending 91 5.0 5) More services; increase spending 553 30.6 7) Should stay the same as it is now 41 2.3 8) Don't know 114 6.3 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 568) If R thinks Gore would like to reduce services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (GORERGP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1716 95.0 1) A great deal 35 1.9 5) Only some 56 3.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 569) If R thinks Gore would like to increase services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (GOREIGP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1254 69.4 1) A great deal 264 14.6 5) Only some 286 15.8 8) Don't know 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 570) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Gore placement from branching series (GOREG5)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Reduce spending and services a great deal 35 1.9 2) Reduce spending and services only some 56 3.1 3) Stay same as now 41 2.3 4) Increase spending and services only some 286 15.8 5) Increase spending and services a great deal 264 14.6 8) Don't know 117 6.5 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 571) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Gore placement from 7pt scale/branch (GOREG7)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal 44 2.4 2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some 83 4.6 3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now 519 28.7 4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some 537 29.7 5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal 393 21.7 8) Don't know 228 12.6 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 572) Where would you place George W. Bush on this issue? [R placement of Bush on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (BUSHGF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should provide many fewer services 58 3.2 2) 145 8.0 3) 253 14.0 4) 213 11.8 5) 115 6.4 6) 73 4.0 7) Gov't should provide many more services 23 1.3 8) Don't know 124 6.9 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 573) What about George W. Bush? Do you think he would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? [R placement of Bush on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (BUSHGP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Fewer services; reduce spending 410 22.7 5) More services; increase spending 223 12.3 7) Should stay the same as it is now 38 2.1 8) Don't know 128 7.1 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 574) If R thinks Bush would like to reduce services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think he would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (BUSHRGP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1397 77.3 1) A great deal 208 11.5 5) Only some 200 11.1 8) Don't know 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 575) If R thinks Bush would like to increase services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think he would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (BUSHIGP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1584 87.7 1) A great deal 69 3.8 5) Only some 153 8.5 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 576) Summary: 5 pt serv/spend Bush placement from branching series (BUSHG5)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Reduce spending and services a great deal 208 11.5 2) Reduce spending and services only some 200 11.1 3) Stay same as now 38 2.1 4) Increase spending and services only some 153 8.5 5) Increase spending and services a great deal 69 3.8 8) Don't know 131 7.2 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 577) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Bush placement from 7pt scale/branch (BUSHG7)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal 266 14.7 2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some 345 19.1 3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now 619 34.3 4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some 226 12.5 5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal 92 5.1 8) Don't know 255 14.1 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 578) Where would you place the Democratic Party on this issue? [R placement of Democrats on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (DEMSGF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should provide many fewer services 15 0.8 2) 14 0.8 3) 51 2.8 4) 143 7.9 5) 267 14.8 6) 266 14.7 7) Gov't should provide many more services 142 7.9 8) Don't know 106 5.9 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 579) What about the Democratic Party? Do you think THEY would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? [R placement of Democrats on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (DEMSGP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Fewer services; reduce spending 84 4.6 5) More services; increase spending 556 30.8 7) Should stay the same as it is now 46 2.5 8) Don't know 115 6.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 580) If R thinks the Democrats would like to reduce services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think THEY would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (DEMSRGP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1723 95.4 1) A great deal 31 1.7 5) Only some 53 2.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 581) If R thinks the Democrats would like to increase services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think THEY would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (DEMSIGP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1251 69.2 1) A great deal 291 16.1 5) Only some 264 14.6 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 582) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Democrats placement from branching series (DEMSG5)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Reduce spending and services a great deal 31 1.7 2) Reduce spending and services only some 53 2.9 3) Stay same as now 46 2.5 4) Increase spending and services only some 264 14.6 5) Increase spending and services a great deal 291 16.1 8) Don't know 116 6.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 583) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Democrats placement from 7pt scale/branch (DEMSG7)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal 46 2.5 2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some 67 3.7 3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now 507 28.1 4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some 530 29.3 5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal 433 24.0 8) Don't know 222 12.3 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 584) Where would you place the Republicans on this issue? [R placement of Republicans on government services/spending scale: FTF interview] (REPSGF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should provide many fewer services 86 4.8 2) 182 10.1 3) 226 12.5 4) 208 11.5 5) 110 6.1 6) 52 2.9 7) Gov't should provide many more services 20 1.1 8) Don't know 121 6.7 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 585) What about the Republicans? Do you think THEY would like the government to provide fewer services in order to reduce spending or provide more services even if it means an increase in spending? [R placement of Republicans on government services/spending scale: Telephone interview] (REPSGP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Fewer services; reduce spending 451 25.0 5) More services; increase spending 185 10.2 7) Should stay the same as it is now 37 2.0 8) Don't know 128 7.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 586) If R thinks the Republicans would like to reduce services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think THEY would like to) reduce services and spending a great deal or (reduce services and spending) only some? (REPSRGP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1356 75.0 1) A Great deal 229 12.7 5) Only some 221 12.2 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 587) If R thinks the Republicans would like to increase services and spending: Telephone: (Do you think THEY would like to) increase services and spending a great deal or (increase services and spending) only some? (REPSIGP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1622 89.8 1) A great deal 54 3.0 5) Only some 131 7.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 588) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Republicans placement from branching series (REPSG5)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Reduce spending and services a great deal 229 12.7 2) Reduce spending and services only some 221 12.2 3) Stay same as now 37 2.0 4) Increase spending and services only some 131 7.2 5) Increase spending and services a great deal 54 3.0 8) Don't know 129 7.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 589) Summary: 5pt serv/spend Republicans placement from 7pt scale/branch (REPSG7)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Reduce spending and services a great deal 315 17.4 2) Scale 2 branching: Reduce spending and services only some 403 22.3 3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: Stay same as now 581 32.2 4) Scale 6 branching: Increase spending and services only some 183 10.1 5) Scale 7 branching: Increase spending and services a great deal 74 4.1 8) Don't know 250 13.8 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 590) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on defense spending scale: FTF interview] (DFNSFTF)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 161 8.9 1) Gov't should decrease defense spending 35 1.9 2) 33 1.8 3) 72 4.0 4) 238 13.2 5) 229 12.7 6) 144 8.0 7) Gov't should increase defense spending 85 4.7 8) Don't know 8 0.4 9) Refused; NA; INAP 802 44.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 591) Some people believe that we should spend much less money for defense. Others feel that defense spending should be greatly increased. Do you have an opinion on this issue or haven't you thought much about this? (DFNSPH)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Yes, have an opinion 589 32.6 5) No, no opinion (haven't thought much) 207 11.5 8) Don't know 4 0.2 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 592) If R does not say he/she has no opinion about defense spending: Telephone: Do you feel the government should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or is the government spending on defense about the right amount now? (DFNSAMTP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1213 67.1 1) Decrease defense spending 110 6.1 3) Increase defense spending 331 18.3 5) About the right amount 146 8.1 8) Don't know 5 0.3 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 593) If R says does not say he/she has no opinion about defense spending: If R says the government should reduce defense spending: Telephone: Should the government reduce defense spending a lot or a little? (DFNSRP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1697 93.9 1) A lot 54 3.0 5) A little 56 3.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 594) If R says does not say he/she has no opinion about defense spending: If R says the government should increase defense spending: Telephone: Should the government increase defense spending a lot or a little? (DFNSIP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1476 81.7 1) A lot 188 10.4 5) A little 141 7.8 8) Don't know 1 0.1 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 595) Summary: 5pt defense spending self-placement from branching series (DFNS5PS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Decrease defense spending a lot 54 3.0 2) Decrease defense spending a little 56 3.1 3) About the right amount 146 8.1 4) Increase defense spending a little 141 7.8 5) Increase defense spending a lot 188 10.4 7) Haven't thought much 207 11.5 8) Don't know 6 0.3 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 596) Summary: 5pt defense spending self-placement from 7pt scale/branch (DFNS7PS)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much 368 20.4 1) Scale 1 branching: Decrease defense spending a lot 89 4.9 2) Scale 2 branching: Decrease defense spending a little 89 4.9 3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: About the right amount 685 37.9 4) Scale 6 branching: Increase defense spending a little 285 15.8 5) Scale 7 branching: Increase defense spending a lot 273 15.1 8) Don't know 14 0.8 9) Refused; NA; INAP 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 597) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? [R placement of Gore on defense spending scale: FTF interview] (GOREDFI)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should decrease defense spending 29 1.6 2) 72 4.0 3) 169 9.4 4) 239 13.2 5) 186 10.3 6) 83 4.6 7) Gov't should increase defense spending 32 1.8 8) Don't know 195 10.8 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 598) What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? [R placement of Gore on defense spending scale: Telephone interview] (GOREDFP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Decrease defense spending 157 8.7 3) Increase defense spending 167 9.2 5) About the right amount 273 15.1 8) Don't know 203 11.2 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 599) If R says Gore wants to reduce defense spending/if R says Gore wants to increase defense spending: Telephone: A lot or a little? (GOREDFCP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1483 82.1 1) A lot 137 7.6 5) A little 183 10.1 8) Don't know 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 600) Summary: 5pt defense spending Gore placement from branching series (GOREDF5P)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Decrease defense spending a lot 78 4.3 2) Decrease defense spending a little 76 4.2 3) About the right amount 273 15.1 4) Increase defense spending a little 107 5.9 5) Increase defense spending a lot 59 3.3 8) Don't know 207 11.5 9) REFUSED 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 601) Summary: 5pt defense spending Gore placement from 7pt scale/branch (GOREDF7P)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Decrease defense spending a lot 107 5.9 2) Scale 2 branching: Decrease defense spending a little 148 8.2 3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: About the right amount 867 48.0 4) Scale 6 branching: Increase defense spending a little 190 10.5 5) Scale 7 branching: Increase defense spending a lot 91 5.0 8) Don't know 402 22.2 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 602) Where would you place George W. Bush on this issue? [R placement of Bush on defense spending scale: FTF interview] (BUSHDFI)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should decrease defense spending 12 0.7 2) 26 1.4 3) 60 3.3 4) 164 9.1 5) 247 13.7 6) 221 12.2 7) Gov't should increase defense spending 97 5.4 8) Don't know 179 9.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 603) What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? [R placement of Bush on defense spending scale: Telephone interview] (BUSHDFP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Decrease defense spending 48 2.7 3) Increase defense spending 452 25.0 5) About the right amount 111 6.1 8) Don't know 189 10.5 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 604) If R says Bush wants to reduce defense spending/if R says Bush wants to increase defense spending: telephone: A lot or a little? (BUSHDFCP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1307 72.3 1) A lot 304 16.8 5) A little 186 10.3 8) Don't know 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 605) Summary: 5pt defense spending Bush placement from branching series (BUSHDF5P)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Decrease defense spending a lot 29 1.6 2) Decrease defense spending a little 18 1.0 3) About the right amount 111 6.1 4) Increase defense spending a little 168 9.3 5) Increase defense spending a lot 275 15.2 8) Don't know 199 11.0 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 606) Summary: 5pt defense spending Bush placement from 7pt scale/branch (BUSHDF7P)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Decrease defense spending a lot 41 2.3 2) Scale 2 branching: Decrease defense spending a little 44 2.4 3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: About the right amount 582 32.2 4) Scale 6 branching: Increase defense spending a little 389 21.5 5) Scale 7 branching: Increase defense spending a lot 372 20.6 8) Don't know 378 20.9 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 607) Where would you place the Democratic Party on this issue? [R placement of the Democratic Party on defense spending scale: FTF interview] (DEMSDFI)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should decrease defense spending 26 1.4 2) 107 5.9 3) 180 10.0 4) 240 13.3 5) 168 9.3 6) 85 4.7 7) Gov't should increase defense spending 39 2.2 8) Don't know 160 8.9 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 608) What about the Democratic Party? Do you think THEY believe we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? [R placement of the Democratic Party on defense spending scale: Telephone interview] (DEMSDFP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Decrease defense spending 197 10.9 3) Increase defense spending 171 9.5 5) About the right amount 248 13.7 8) Don't know 185 10.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 609) If R says the Democratic Party wants to reduce defense spending/If R says the Democratic Party wants to increase defense spending: Telephone: A lot or a little? (DEMSDFCP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1439 79.6 1) A lot 151 8.4 5) A little 212 11.7 8) Don't know 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 610) Summary: 5pt defense spending the Democratic Party placement from branching series (DEMSDF5P)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Decrease defense spending a lot 90 5.0 2) Decrease defense spending a little 103 5.7 3) About the right amount 248 13.7 4) Increase defense spending a little 109 6.0 5) Increase defense spending a lot 61 3.4 8) Don't know 190 10.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 611) Summary: 5pt defense spending the Democratic Party placement from 7pt scale/branch (DEMSDF7P)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Decrease defense spending a lot 116 6.4 2) Scale 2 branching: Decrease defense spending a little 210 11.6 3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: About the right amount 836 46.3 4) Scale 6 branching: Increase defense spending a little 194 10.7 5) Scale 7 branching: Increase defense spending a lot 100 5.5 8) Don't know 350 19.4 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 612) Where would you place the Republican Party on this issue? [R placement of the Republican Party on defense spending scale: FTF interview] (REPSDFI)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should decrease defense spending 12 0.7 2) 25 1.4 3) 77 4.3 4) 169 9.4 5) 238 13.2 6) 234 12.9 7) Gov't should increase defense spending 86 4.8 8) Don't know 165 9.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 613) What about the Republican Party? Do you think THEY believe we should decrease defense spending, increase defense spending, or that Government spending on defense is about the right amount now? [R placement of the Republican Party on defense spending scale: Telephone interview] (REPSDFP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Decrease defense spending 68 3.8 3) Increase defense spending 441 24.4 5) About the right amount 106 5.9 8) Don't know 186 10.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 614) If R says the Republican Party wants to reduce defense spending/If R says the Republican Party wants to increase defense spending: Telephone: A lot or a little? (REPSDFCP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1298 71.8 1) A lot 288 15.9 5) A little 217 12.0 8) Don't know 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 615) Summary: 5pt defense spending the Republican Party placement from branching series (REPSDF5P)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Decrease defense spending a lot 36 2.0 2) Decrease defense spending a little 32 1.8 3) About the right amount 106 5.9 4) Increase defense spending a little 185 10.2 5) Increase defense spending a lot 252 13.9 8) Don't know 190 10.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 616) Summary: 5pt defense spending the Republican Party placement from 7pt scale/branch (REPSDF7P)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Decrease defense spending a lot 48 2.7 2) Scale 2 branching: Decrease defense spending a little 57 3.2 3) Scale 3,4,5; branching: About the right amount 590 32.7 4) Scale 6 branching: Increase defense spending a little 419 23.2 5) Scale 7 branching: Increase defense spending a lot 338 18.7 8) Don't know 355 19.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 617) Checkpoint: Mode and version for gov't/private medical insurance self-placement (MINSRGXP)
-
TOTAL % 1) FTF standard version 515 28.5 2) FTF experimental version 491 27.2 3) Phone version 1 376 20.8 4) Phone version 2 425 23.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 618) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on private or government insurance scale: If R selected for standard version: FTF] (MINSSP)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much 25 1.4 1) Gov't insurance plan 74 4.1 2) 42 2.3 3) 83 4.6 4) 105 5.8 5) 72 4.0 6) 46 2.5 7) Private insurance plan 59 3.3 8) Don't know 9 0.5 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1292 71.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 619) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on private or government insurance scale: If R selected for experimental version: FTF (MINSSPE)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 35 1.9 1) Private insurance plan 41 2.3 2) 48 2.7 3) 62 3.4 4) 89 4.9 5) 74 4.1 6) 57 3.2 7) Gov't insurance plan 83 4.6 8) Don't know 2 0.1 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1316 72.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 620) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? Combined FTF: Standard/experimental 7pt medical insurance (MINSSPS)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much 60 3.3 1) Gov't insurance plan 157 8.7 2) 99 5.5 3) 157 8.7 4) 194 10.7 5) 134 7.4 6) 94 5.2 7) Private insurance plan 100 5.5 8) Don't know 11 0.6 9) Refused; NA; INAP 801 44.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 621) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on private or government insurance scale: If R selected for version 1: Telephone: (MINSSPPH)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 44 2.4 1) Should be a gov't insurance plan 149 8.2 5) Individuals should pay medical expenses through private insurance 155 8.6 7) Should stay the same as it is now [Vol] 20 1.1 8) Don't know 8 0.4 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1431 79.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 622) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on private or government insurance scale: If R selected for version 2: Telephone: (MINSPEPH)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 47 2.6 1) Should be a gov't insurance plan 146 8.1 5) Individuals should pay medical expenses through private insurance 188 10.4 7) Should stay the same as it is now [Vol] 30 1.7 8) Don't know 14 0.8 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1382 76.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 623) Which is closer to the way you feel or haven't you thought much about this? Combined phone version 1/version 2- medical insurance (MINSCOMB)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 91 5.0 1) Should be a gov't insurance plan 337 18.6 5) INDIVIDUALS SHOULD PAY MEDICAL EXPENSES THROUGH PRIVATE INSU 301 16.7 7) Should stay the same as it is now [Vol] 50 2.8 8) Don't know 22 1.2 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1006 55.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 624) Both telephone versions: If R feels there should be government insurance plan/if R feels individuals should pay through private insurance plan: (MINSFEEL)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1169 64.7 1) Strongly 507 28.1 5) Not strongly 127 7.0 8) Don't know 3 0.2 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 625) Summary: 5pt medical insurance self-placement from branching series (MINSFEE5)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 91 5.0 1) Strongly - government insurance plan 282 15.6 2) Not strongly - government insurance plan 54 3.0 3) Stay the same as it is now 50 2.8 4) Not strongly - individual insurance 73 4.0 5) Strongly - individual insurance 225 12.5 8) Don't know 25 1.4 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1007 55.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 626) Summary: 5pt medical insurance self-placement from 7pt scale/branch (MINSFEE7)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 151 8.4 1) Scale: 1 branching: Strongly - gov't insurance plan 439 24.3 2) Scale: 2 Branching: Not strongly - gov't insurance plan 153 8.5 3) Scale: 3,4,5; branching: Stay the same as it is now 535 29.6 4) Scale: 6 Branching: Not strongly - individual insurance 167 9.2 5) Scale: 7 Branching: Strongly - Individual insurance 325 18.0 8) Don't know 36 2.0 9) Refused; NA 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 627) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: FTF interview (SRELYFTF)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 93 5.1 1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living 74 4.1 2) 48 2.7 3) 93 5.1 4) 173 9.6 5) 189 10.5 6) 195 10.8 7) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own 137 7.6 8) Don't know 4 0.2 9) Refused; NA; INAP 801 44.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 628) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: Telephone interview (SRELYPH)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 108 6.0 1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living 193 10.7 5) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own 439 24.3 7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol] 55 3.0 8) Don't know 3 0.2 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1009 55.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 629) If R thinks government should see to jobs and standard of living: Telephone: Do you feel strongly that the government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or not so strongly? (GOVINTJO)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1614 89.3 1) Strongly 152 8.4 5) Not strongly 40 2.2 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 630) If R thinks government should let each get ahead on their own: Telephone: Do you feel strongly that the government should just let each person get ahead on their own, or not so strongly? (GOVNIJO)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1368 75.7 1) Strongly 346 19.1 5) Not strongly 93 5.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 631) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs self-placement from branching series (GOVGJS5)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 108 6.0 1) Strongly - gov't see to jobs & std living 152 8.4 2) Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & std living 40 2.2 3) Other/depends/neither 55 3.0 4) Not strongly - gov't leave people on own 93 5.1 5) Strongly - gov't leave people on own 346 19.1 8) Don't know 4 0.2 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1009 55.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 632) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs self-placement from 7pt scale/branch (GOVGJS7)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 201 11.1 1) Scale 1 branching: Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living 226 12.5 2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living 88 4.9 3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/depends/neither 510 28.2 4) Scale 6 branching: Not strongly - gov't leave people on own 288 15.9 5) Scale 7 branching: Strongly - gov't leave people on own 483 26.7 8) Don't know 8 0.4 9) Refused; NA 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 633) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? [R placement of Gore on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: FTF interview] (GOREJSF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living 74 4.1 2) 128 7.1 3) 206 11.4 4) 208 11.5 5) 110 6.1 6) 58 3.2 7) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own 38 2.1 8) Don't know 182 10.1 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 634) What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? [R placement of Gore on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: Telephone interview] (GOREJBSP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living 434 24.0 5) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own 180 10.0 7) Other/it depends/neither 20 1.1 8) Don't know 165 9.1 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 635) If R says Gore thinks gov't should see to jobs and standard living/If R says Gore thinks gov't should let each on own: telephone (GOREJSTR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1193 66.0 1) Strongly 444 24.6 5) Not strongly 162 9.0 8) Don't know 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 636) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Gore placement from branching series (GOREJ5PS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living 338 18.7 2) Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living 94 5.2 3) Other/depends/neither 20 1.1 4) Not strongly - gov't leave people on own 68 3.8 5) Strongly - gov't leave people on own 106 5.9 8) Don't know 173 9.6 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 637) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Gore placement from 7pt scale/branch (GOREJ7PS)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living 412 22.8 2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living 222 12.3 3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/depends/neither 544 30.1 4) Scale 6 branching: Not strongly - gov't leave people on own 126 7.0 5) Scale 7 branching: Strongly - gov't leave people on own 144 8.0 8) Don't know 355 19.6 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 638) Where would you place George W. Bush on this issue? [R placement of Bush on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: FTF interview] (BUSHJBSF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living 23 1.3 2) 22 1.2 3) 80 4.4 4) 169 9.4 5) 205 11.3 6) 220 12.2 7) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own 98 5.4 8) Don't know 187 10.3 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 639) What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? [R placement of Bush on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: Telephone interview] (BUSHJOP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living 122 6.8 5) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own 494 27.3 7) Other/it depends/neither 15 0.8 8) Don't know 168 9.3 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 640) If R says Bush thinks gov't should see to jobs and standard living/if R says Bush thinks gov't should let each on own: telephone (BUSHJSTR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1191 65.9 1) Strongly 463 25.6 5) Not strongly 143 7.9 8) Don't know 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 641) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Bush placement from branching series (BUSHJ5PS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living 80 4.4 2) Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living 40 2.2 3) Other/depends/neither 15 0.8 4) Not strongly - gov't leave people on own 103 5.7 5) Strongly - gov't leave people on own 383 21.2 8) Don't know 178 9.9 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 642) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Bush placement from 7pt scale/branch (BUSHJ7PS)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living 103 5.7 2) Scale 2 branching: not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living 62 3.4 3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: other/depends/neither 469 26.0 4) Scale 6 branching: Not strongly - gov't leave people on own 323 17.9 5) Scale 7 branching: strongly - gov't leave people on own 481 26.6 8) Don't know 365 20.2 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 643) Where would you place the Democratic Party on this issue? [R placement of Democratic Party on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: FTF interview] (DEMSJBSF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living 82 4.5 2) 163 9.0 3) 217 12.0 4) 180 10.0 5) 108 6.0 6) 51 2.8 7) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own 43 2.4 8) Don't know 161 8.9 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 644) What about the Democratic Party? Do you think THEY feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? [R placement of Democratic Party on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: Telephone interview] (DEMSJBSP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living 450 24.9 5) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own 161 8.9 7) Other/it depends/neither 22 1.2 8) Don't know 167 9.2 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 645) If R says Democratic Party thinks gov't should see to jobs and standard living/If R says Democratic Party thinks gov't should let each on own: Telephone (DEMSJSTR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1196 66.2 1) Strongly 436 24.1 5) Not strongly 173 9.6 8) Don't know 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 646) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Democratic Party placement from branching series (DEMSJ5PS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard living 347 19.2 2) Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard living 101 5.6 3) Other/depends/neither 22 1.2 4) Not strongly - gov't leave people on own 72 4.0 5) Strongly - gov't leave people on own 89 4.9 8) Don't know 169 9.4 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 647) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Democratic Party placement from 7pt scale/branch (DEMSJ7PS)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living 429 23.7 2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living 264 14.6 3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/depends/neither 527 29.2 4) Scale 6 branching: Not strongly - gov't leave people on own 123 6.8 5) Scale 7 branching: Strongly - gov't leave people on own 132 7.3 8) Don't know 330 18.3 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 648) Where would you place the Republican Party on this issue? [R placement of Republican Party on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: FTF interview] (REPSJBSF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living 13 0.7 2) 24 1.3 3) 65 3.6 4) 167 9.2 5) 204 11.3 6) 228 12.6 7) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own 130 7.2 8) Don't know 174 9.6 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 649) What about the Republican Party? Do you think THEY feel government should see to it that every person has a job and a good standard of living, or that government should just let each person get ahead on their own? [R placement of Republican Party on guaranteed job/standard of living scale: Telephone interview] (REPSJBSP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Gov't should see to jobs and standard of living 96 5.3 5) Gov't should let each person get ahead on own 502 27.8 7) Other/it depends/neither 21 1.2 8) Don't know 181 10.0 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 650) If R says Republican Party thinks gov't should see to jobs and standard living/If R says Republican Party thinks gov't should let each on own: Telephone (REPSJSTR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1209 66.9 1) Strongly 427 23.6 5) Not strongly 167 9.2 8) Don't know 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 651) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Republican Party placement from branching series (REPSJ5PS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living 66 3.7 2) Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living 30 1.7 3) Other/depends/neither 21 1.2 4) Not strongly - gov't leave people on own 137 7.6 5) Strongly - gov't leave people on own 361 20.0 8) Don't know 185 10.2 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 652) Summary: 5pt guaranteed jobs Republican Party placement from 7pt scale/branch (REPSJ7PS)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living 79 4.4 2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - gov't see to jobs & standard of living 54 3.0 3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/depends/neither 457 25.3 4) Scale 6 branching: Not strongly - gov't leave people on own 365 20.2 5) Scale 7 branching: Strongly - gov't leave people on own 491 27.2 8) Don't know 359 19.9 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 653) Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on aid to blacks scale: FTF interview] (BLKADFTF)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 69 3.8 1) Gov't should help blacks 52 2.9 2) 40 2.2 3) 79 4.4 4) 250 13.8 5) 150 8.3 6) 160 8.9 7) Blacks should help themselves 193 10.7 8) Don't know 4 0.2 9) Refused; NA; INAP 810 44.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 654) Some people feel that the government in Washington should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks. Others feel that the government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves. Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? [R self-placement on aid to blacks scale: Telephone interview] (BLKADPH)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 151 8.4 1) Gov't should help blacks 196 10.8 5) Blacks should help themselves 339 18.8 7) It depends, neither 104 5.8 8) Don't know 2 0.1 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1015 56.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 655) If R thinks government should help blacks/If R thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone: (BLKASTS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1272 70.4 1) Great extent 342 18.9 5) Only some 191 10.6 8) Don't know 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 656) Summary: 5pt aid blacks self-placement from branching series (BLKA5DPS)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about it 151 8.4 1) Gov't help blacks to great extent 86 4.8 2) Gov't help blacks to some extent 110 6.1 3) Other/neither/depends 104 5.8 4) Should help themselves to some extent 81 4.5 5) Should help themselves to a great extent 256 14.2 8) Don't know 4 0.2 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1015 56.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 657) Summary: 5pt aid blacks self-placement from 7pt scale/branching (BLKAD7PS)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about it 220 12.2 1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent 138 7.6 2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent 150 8.3 3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends 583 32.3 4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent 241 13.3 5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent 449 24.8 8) Don't know 8 0.4 9) Refused; NA; INAP 18 1.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 658) Where would you place Bill Clinton on this issue? [R placement of Clinton on aid to blacks scale: FTF interview] (CLINBAF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should help blacks 108 6.0 2) 153 8.5 3) 205 11.3 4) 202 11.2 5) 88 4.9 6) 46 2.5 7) Blacks should help themselves 31 1.7 8) Don't know 168 9.3 9) Refused 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 659) What about Bill Clinton? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) [R placement of Clinton on aid to blacks scale: telephone interview] (CLINBAP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Gov't should help blacks 446 24.7 5) Blacks should help themselves 111 6.1 7) Other/it depends/neither 46 2.5 8) Don't know 192 10.6 9) Refused 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 660) If R says Clinton thinks government should help blacks/If R says Clinton thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone (CLINBAS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1250 69.2 1) Great extent 317 17.5 5) Only some 237 13.1 8) Don't know 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 661) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Clinton placement from branching series (CLINBA5P)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Gov't help blacks to great extent 267 14.8 2) Gov't help blacks to some extent 176 9.7 3) Other/neither/depends 46 2.5 4) Should help themselves to some extent 61 3.4 5) Should help themselves to a great extent 50 2.8 8) Don't know 195 10.8 9) Refused 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 662) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Clinton placement from 7pt scale/branching (CLINBA7P)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent 375 20.8 2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent 329 18.2 3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends 541 29.9 4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent 107 5.9 5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent 81 4.5 8) Don't know 363 20.1 9) Refused 11 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 663) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? [R placement of Gore on aid to blacks scale: FTF INTERVIEW] (GOREBAF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should help blacks 96 5.3 2) 135 7.5 3) 189 10.5 4) 224 12.4 5) 68 3.8 6) 58 3.2 7) Blacks should help themselves 27 1.5 8) Don't know 204 11.3 9) REFUSED 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 664) What about Al Gore? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) [R placement of Gore on aid to blacks scale: telephone interview] (GOREBAP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Gov't should help blacks 420 23.2 5) Blacks should help themselves 110 6.1 7) Other/it depends/neither 33 1.8 8) Don't know 232 12.8 9) Refused 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 665) If R says Gore thinks government should help blacks/If R says Gore thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone (GOREBAS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1277 70.7 1) Great extent 284 15.7 5) Only some 245 13.6 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 666) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Gore placement from branching series (GOREBA5P)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Gov't help blacks to great extent 234 12.9 2) Gov't help blacks to some extent 185 10.2 3) Other/neither/depends 33 1.8 4) Should help themselves to some extent 60 3.3 5) Should help themselves to a great extent 50 2.8 8) Don't know 233 12.9 9) Refused 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 667) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Gore placement from 7pt scale/branching (GOREBA7P)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent 330 18.3 2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent 320 17.7 3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends 514 28.4 4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent 118 6.5 5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent 77 4.3 8) Don't know 437 24.2 9) Refused 11 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 668) Where would you place George W. Bush on this issue? [R placement of Bush on aid to blacks scale: FTF interview] (BUSHBAF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should help blacks 19 1.1 2) 22 1.2 3) 69 3.8 4) 209 11.6 5) 226 12.5 6) 143 7.9 7) Blacks should help themselves 102 5.6 8) Don't know 212 11.7 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 669) What about George W. Bush? (Do you think he feels that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) [R placement of Bush on aid to blacks scale: Telephone interview] (BUSHBAP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Gov't should help blacks 151 8.4 5) Blacks should help themselves 351 19.4 7) Other/it depends/neither 44 2.4 8) Don't know 247 13.7 9) Refused 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 670) If R says Bush thinks government should help blacks/If R says Bush thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone (BUSHBAS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1305 72.2 1) Great extent 255 14.1 5) Only some 245 13.6 8) Don't know 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 671) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Bush placement from branching series (BUSHBA5P)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Gov't help blacks to great extent 45 2.5 2) Gov't help blacks to some extent 106 5.9 3) Other/neither/depends 44 2.4 4) Should help themselves to some extent 139 7.7 5) Should help themselves to a great extent 210 11.6 8) Don't know 249 13.8 9) REFUSED 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 672) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Bush placement from 7pt scale/branching (BUSHBA7P)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent 64 3.5 2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent 128 7.1 3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends 548 30.3 4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent 282 15.6 5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent 312 17.3 8) Don't know 461 25.5 9) Refused 12 0.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 673) Where would you place the Democratic Party on this issue? [R placement of Democratic Party on aid to blacks scale: FTF interview] (DEMSBAF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should help blacks 106 5.9 2) 164 9.1 3) 214 11.8 4) 198 11.0 5) 70 3.9 6) 45 2.5 7) Blacks should help themselves 29 1.6 8) Don't know 176 9.7 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 674) What about the Democratic Party? (Do you think THEY feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) [R placement of Democratic Party on aid to blacks scale: Telephone interview] (DEMSBAP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Gov't should help blacks 437 24.2 5) Blacks should help themselves 112 6.2 7) Other/it depends/neither 26 1.4 8) Don't know 220 12.2 9) Refused 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 675) If R says Democratic Party thinks government should help blacks/if R says Democratic Party thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone (DEMSBAS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1258 69.6 1) Great extent 301 16.7 5) Only some 247 13.7 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Minorities, Government Programs ]
- 676) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Democratic Party placement from branching series (DEMSBA5P)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Gov't help blacks to great extent 256 14.2 2) Gov't help blacks to some extent 181 10.0 3) Other/neither/depends 26 1.4 4) Should help themselves to some extent 66 3.7 5) Should help themselves to a great extent 45 2.5 8) Don't know 221 12.2 9) Refused 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 677) Summary: 5pt Aid blacks Democratic Party placement from 7pt scale/branching (DEMSBA7P)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent 362 20.0 2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent 345 19.1 3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends 508 28.1 4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent 111 6.1 5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent 74 4.1 8) Don't know 397 22.0 9) Refused 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 678) Where would you place the Republican Party on this issue? [R placement of Republican Party on aid to blacks scale: FTF interview] (REPSBAF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 801 44.3 1) Gov't should help blacks 15 0.8 2) 19 1.1 3) 66 3.7 4) 186 10.3 5) 218 12.1 6) 196 10.8 7) Blacks should help themselves 116 6.4 8) Don't know 186 10.3 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 679) What about the Republican Party? (Do you think THEY feel that government should make every effort to improve the social and economic position of blacks, or that government should not make any special effort to help blacks because they should help themselves?) [R placement of Republican Party on aid to blacks scale: Telephone interview] (REPSBAP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Gov't should help blacks 151 8.4 5) Blacks should help themselves 369 20.4 7) Other/it depends/neither 43 2.4 8) Don't know 232 12.8 9) Refused 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Minorities, Government Programs ]
- 680) If R says Republican Party thinks government should help blacks/If R says Republican Party thinks blacks should help themselves: Telephone (REPSBAS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1287 71.2 1) Great extent 271 15.0 5) Only some 249 13.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 681) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Republican Party placement from branching series (REPSBA5P)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1006 55.7 1) Gov't help blacks to great extent 44 2.4 2) Gov't help blacks to some extent 107 5.9 3) Other/neither/depends 43 2.4 4) Should help themselves to some extent 142 7.9 5) Should help themselves to a great extent 227 12.6 8) Don't know 232 12.8 9) Refused 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 682) Summary: 5pt aid blacks Republican Party placement from 7pt scale/branching (REPSBA7P)
-
TOTAL % 1) Scale 1 branching: Gov't help blacks to great extent 59 3.3 2) Scale 2 branching: Gov't help blacks to some extent 126 7.0 3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/neither/depends 513 28.4 4) Scale 6 branching: Should help themselves to some extent 338 18.7 5) Scale 7 branching: Should help themselves to a great extent 343 19.0 8) Don't know 418 23.1 9) Refused 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 683) If R selected for standard version: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program? (AFFIRMS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 927 51.3 1) Yes, they should have to have affirmative action 431 23.9 5) No, they should not have to have affirmative action 338 18.7 7) Other (specify) 59 3.3 8) Don't know 42 2.3 9) Refused 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 684) If R selected for experimental version: Some people think that if a company has a history of discriminating against blacks when making hiring decisions, then they should be required to have an affirmative action program that gives blacks preference in hiring. What do you think? Should companies that have discriminated against blacks have to have an affirmative action program or should companies not have to have an affirmative action program? (AFFIRME)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 880 48.7 1) Yes, they should have to have affirmative action 397 22.0 5) No, they should not have to have affirmative action 429 23.7 7) Other (specify) 50 2.8 8) Don't know 43 2.4 9) Refused 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Affirmative Action, Attitude about ]
- 685) If R says companies should have to have affirmative action: Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should have to have affirmative action)? (AFFIRMSP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 979 54.2 1) Strongly 601 33.3 5) Not strongly 221 12.2 8) Don't know 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 686) If R says companies should not have to have affirmative action: Do you feel strongly or not strongly (that they should not have to have affirmative action)? (AFFIRMOP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1040 57.6 1) Strongly 560 31.0 5) Not strongly 204 11.3 8) Don't know 2 0.1 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 687) Combined affirmative action (standard/experimental) (AFFIRMSM)
-
TOTAL % 1) Yes, they should have to have affirmative action 828 45.8 5) No, they should not have to have affirmative action 767 42.4 7) Other 109 6.0 8) Don't know 85 4.7 9) Refused 18 1.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 688) Summary - affirmative action (standard/experimental) (AFFIRMAL)
-
TOTAL % 1) Strongly - should have to have affirmative action 601 33.3 2) Not strongly - should have to have affirmative action 221 12.2 4) Not strongly - shouldn't have to have affirmative action 204 11.3 5) Strongly - shouldn't have to have affirmative action 560 31.0 7) Other 109 6.0 8) Don't know 93 5.1 9) Refused 19 1.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 689) Building and repairing highways (If you had a say in making up the federal budget this year, should federal spending on building and repairing highways be increased decreased or kept about the same?) (HIGHWAY)
-
TOTAL % 1) Increased 677 37.5 3) Decreased 135 7.5 5) Kept about the same 969 53.6 7) Cut out entirely 6 0.3 8) Don't know 20 1.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 690) What about welfare programs? (Should federal spending on welfare programs be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (WELFARE)
-
TOTAL % 1) Increased 302 16.7 3) Decreased 669 37.0 5) Kept about the same 782 43.3 7) Cut out entirely 22 1.2 8) Don't know 30 1.7 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 691) What about spending on aids research? (Should federal spending on spending on aids research be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (AIDS)
-
TOTAL % 1) Increased 911 50.4 3) Decreased 151 8.4 5) Kept about the same 697 38.6 7) Cut out entirely 11 0.6 8) Don't know 37 2.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 692) What about foreign aid? (Should federal spending on foreign aid be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (FOREIGN)
-
TOTAL % 1) Increased 162 9.0 3) Decreased 787 43.6 5) Kept about the same 792 43.8 7) Cut out entirely 22 1.2 8) Don't know 42 2.3 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 693) What about food stamps? (Should federal spending on food stamps be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (FOODSTMP)
-
TOTAL % 1) Increased 285 15.8 3) Decreased 549 30.4 5) Kept about the same 890 49.3 7) Cut out entirely 32 1.8 8) Don't know 49 2.7 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 694) What about aid to poor people? (Should federal spending on aid to poor people be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (AIDPOOR)
-
TOTAL % 1) Increased 916 50.7 3) Decreased 154 8.5 5) Kept about the same 693 38.4 7) Cut out entirely 9 0.5 8) Don't know 29 1.6 9) Refused 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Poverty, Government Response ]
- 695) What about social security? (Should federal spending on social security be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (SOCSEC)
-
TOTAL % 1) Increased 1120 62.0 3) Decreased 66 3.7 5) Kept about the same 572 31.7 7) Cut out entirely 11 0.6 8) Don't know 38 2.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 696) What about environmental protection? (Should federal spending on environmental protection be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (ENVIRON)
-
TOTAL % 1) Increased 913 50.5 3) Decreased 164 9.1 5) Kept about the same 694 38.4 7) Cut out entirely 2 0.1 8) Don't know 33 1.8 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 697) What about public schools? (Should federal spending on public schools be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (SCHOOLS)
-
TOTAL % 1) Increased 1368 75.7 3) Decreased 87 4.8 5) Kept about the same 330 18.3 7) Cut out entirely 13 0.7 8) Don't know 9 0.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 698) What about dealing with crime? (Should federal spending on dealing with crime be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (CRIME)
-
TOTAL % 1) Increased 1180 65.3 3) Decreased 89 4.9 5) Kept about the same 514 28.4 7) Cut out entirely 7 0.4 8) Don't know 17 0.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 699) What about child care? (Should federal spending on child care be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (CHILDCAR)
-
TOTAL % 1) Increased 1108 61.3 3) Decreased 128 7.1 5) Kept about the same 515 28.5 7) Cut out entirely 16 0.9 8) Don't know 39 2.2 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 700) What about tightening border security to prevent illegal immigration? (Should federal spending on tightening border security to prevent illegal immigration be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (IMMIGRAT)
-
TOTAL % 1) Increased 931 51.5 3) Decreased 173 9.6 5) Kept about the same 641 35.5 7) Cut out entirely 11 0.6 8) Don't know 47 2.6 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 701) What about aid to blacks? (Should federal spending on aid to blacks be increased, decreased, or kept about the same?) (BLACKS)
-
TOTAL % 1) Increased 293 16.2 3) Decreased 415 23.0 5) Kept about the same 971 53.7 7) Cut out entirely 39 2.2 8) Don't know 75 4.2 9) Refused 14 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 702) Recently, there has been a lot of talk about how to spend the extra money the federal government is likely to have in the near future. Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should be used to cut taxes. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? (TAXCUTS)
-
TOTAL % 1) Approve 1111 61.5 5) Disapprove 637 35.3 8) Don't know 56 3.1 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 703) If R approves using federal budget surplus to cut taxes/If R disapproves using federal budget surplus to cut taxes: Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly?/Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? (TAXCUTAD)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 59 3.3 1) Strongly 1216 67.3 5) Not strongly 529 29.3 8) Don't know 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 704) Summary: Tax cut from surplus (TAXCUTSP)
-
TOTAL % 1) Approve strongly 811 44.9 2) Approve not strongly 298 16.5 4) Disapprove not strongly 231 12.8 5) Disapprove strongly 405 22.4 8) Don't know 59 3.3 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 705) Some people have proposed that most of the expected federal budget surplus should go to protecting social security and Medicare. Do you approve or disapprove of this proposal? (SOCSECSP)
-
TOTAL % 1) Approve 1453 80.4 5) Disapprove 312 17.3 8) Don't know 39 2.2 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 706) If R approves using surplus for social security & medicare/If R disapproves using surplus for social security & medicare: Do you approve of this proposal strongly or not strongly?/Do you disapprove of this proposal strongly or not strongly? (SOCSCSSP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 42 2.3 1) Strongly 1309 72.4 5) Not strongly 454 25.1 8) Don't know 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 707) Summary: Use surplus to protect social security (SOCSECSM)
-
TOTAL % 1) Approve strongly 1153 63.8 2) Approve not strongly 298 16.5 4) Disapprove not strongly 156 8.6 5) Disapprove strongly 156 8.6 8) Don't know 41 2.3 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 708) There has been some discussion about abortion during recent years. I am going to read you a short list of opinions. Please tell me which one of the opinions best agrees with your view? You can just tell me the number of the opinion you choose. (ABORTION)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) By law, abortion should never be permitted. 215 11.9 2) The law should permit abortion only in case of rape, incest, or when the woman's life is in danger 525 29.1 3) The law should permit abortion for reasons other than rape, incest, or danger to the woman's life, but only after the need for the abortion has been clearly established 265 14.7 4) By law, a woman should always be able to obtain an abortion as a matter of personal choice 753 41.7 7) Other (specify) 28 1.5 8) Don't know 11 0.6 9) Refused 7 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 709) All abortion respondents: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? (ABORTIMP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Not at all important 76 4.2 2) Not too important 193 10.7 3) Somewhat important 499 27.6 4) Very important 640 35.4 5) Extremely important 389 21.5 8) Don't know 3 0.2 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Abortion, Attitude about ]
- 710) Where would you place Al Gore on abortion? (GOREABTN)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) By law, abortion should never be permitted. 84 4.6 2) The law should permit abortion only in case of rape, incest, or when the woman's life is in danger 228 12.6 3) The law should permit abortion for reasons other than rape, incest, or danger to the woman's life, but only after the need for the abortion has been clearly established 253 14.0 4) By law, a woman should always be able to obtain an abortion as a matter of personal choice 762 42.2 7) Other (specify) 21 1.2 8) Don't know 450 24.9 9) Refused 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 711) If Gore's position on abortion is not DON'T KNOW/REF: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (GOREABP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 459 25.4 1) Very certain 426 23.6 3) Pretty certain 540 29.9 5) Not very certain 380 21.0 8) Don't know 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Abortion, Placement of Public Figures ]
- 712) Where would you place George W. Bush (on abortion)? (BUSHABTN)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) By law, abortion should never be permitted. 285 15.8 2) The law should permit abortion only in case of rape, incest, or when the woman's life is in danger 655 36.2 3) The law should permit abortion for reasons other than rape, incest, or danger to the woman's life, but only after the need for the abortion has been clearly established 227 12.6 4) By law, a woman should always be able to obtain an abortion as a matter of personal choice 119 6.6 7) Other (specify) 23 1.3 8) Don't know 488 27.0 9) Refused 7 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 713) If George W. Bush's position on abortion is not DON'T KNOW/REF: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (BUSHABP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 498 27.6 1) Very certain 315 17.4 3) Pretty certain 560 31.0 5) Not very certain 433 24.0 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Abortion, Placement of Public Figures ]
- 714) Would you favor or oppose a law in your state that would require a teenage girl under age 18 to receive her parent's permission before she could obtain an abortion? (ABRTPRNT)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Favor 1395 77.2 5) Oppose 353 19.5 8) Don't know 44 2.4 9) Refused 12 0.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Abortion, Attitude about ]
- 715) If R favors abortion law requiring minors' parental permission/If R opposes abortion law requiring minors' parental permission: Strongly or not strongly? (ABRTSPRN)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 59 3.3 1) Strongly 1461 80.9 5) Not strongly 286 15.8 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Abortion, Decision-Making ]
- 716) Summary: Parental consent for abortions (ABRTSUM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Favor strongly 1233 68.2 2) Favor not strongly 162 9.0 4) Oppose not strongly 124 6.9 5) Oppose strongly 228 12.6 8) Don't know 45 2.5 9) Refused 12 0.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Abortion, Attitude about ]
- 717) There has been discussion recently about a proposed law to ban certain types of late-term abortions, sometimes called partial birth abortions. Do you favor or oppose a law that would make these types of abortions illegal? (PBRTHSUP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Favor 1236 68.4 5) Oppose 444 24.6 8) Don't know 108 6.0 9) Refused 16 0.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 718) If R favors ban on late-term abortions/If R opposes ban on late-term abortions: Do you strongly or not strongly favor/oppose a law that would that would make these types of abortions illegal? (PBRTHSTR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 127 7.0 1) Strongly 1386 76.7 5) Not strongly 289 16.0 8) Don't know 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Abortion, Attitude about ]
- 719) Summary: Ban on late-term abortions (PBRTHSUM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Favor strongly 1097 60.7 2) Favor not strongly 137 7.6 4) Oppose not strongly 152 8.4 5) Oppose strongly 289 16.0 8) Don't know 113 6.3 9) REFUSED 16 0.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Abortion, Attitude about ]
- 720) Checkpoint: Mode and version for environment versus jobs self-placement [FTF: Rs were randomly assigned to the standard 7-point scale or to an experimental version of the 7-point scale (without haven't thought much about it option). Phone: Rs were randomly assigned to 2 versions of the branching format; in the 2nd version, the initial placement question does not include the ‘haven't thought much about it' option.] (CKPTEJSP)
-
TOTAL % 1) FTF standard version 502 27.8 2) FTF experimental version 504 27.9 3) Phone version 1 373 20.6 4) Phone version 2 428 23.7 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 721) [Environment versus jobs scale self placement] If R selected for standard version: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? (JOBENVF)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 66 3.7 1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living 66 3.7 2) 66 3.7 3) 70 3.9 4) 131 7.2 5) 60 3.3 6) 26 1.4 7) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment 16 0.9 8) Don't know 1 0.1 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1305 72.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 722) If R selected for experimental version: FTF: Where would you place yourself on this scale? (JOBENVE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1305 72.2 1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living 44 2.4 2) 62 3.4 3) 92 5.1 4) 160 8.9 5) 70 3.9 6) 41 2.3 7) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment 18 1.0 8) Don't know 13 0.7 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 723) Combined FTF standard/experimental - 7pt jobs vs. environment (JOBNVC)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 66 3.7 1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living 110 6.1 2) 128 7.1 3) 162 9.0 4) 291 16.1 5) 130 7.2 6) 67 3.7 7) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment 34 1.9 8) Don't know 14 0.8 9) Refused; NA; INAP 805 44.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 724) If R selected for version 1: Telephone: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? (JOBENVP)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much 110 6.1 1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living 177 9.8 5) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment 52 2.9 7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol] 29 1.6 8) Don't know 5 0.3 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1434 79.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 725) If R selected for version 2: Telephone: Which is closer to the way you feel? (JOBENVPE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1380 76.4 1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living 245 13.6 5) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment 102 5.6 7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol] 46 2.5 8) Don't know 28 1.5 9) Refused 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 726) Combined telephone versions - environment vs. jobs (JOBENVC)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much 110 6.1 1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living 422 23.4 5) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment 154 8.5 7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol] 75 4.2 8) Don't know 33 1.8 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1013 56.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 727) Both telephone versions: If protecting environment is more important/If maintaining jobs and standard of living are more important: Telephone: Is protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/Are maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? (JOBVSTR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1231 68.1 1) Much more important 336 18.6 5) Only somewhat more important 240 13.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 728) Summary: 5pt env/jobs self-placement from branching series (JOBENV5P)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much 110 6.1 1) Environment much more important 270 14.9 2) Environment somewhat more important 152 8.4 3) Other/depends/neither 75 4.2 4) Jobs somewhat more important 88 4.9 5) Jobs much more important 66 3.7 8) Don't know 33 1.8 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1013 56.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 729) Summary: 5pt env/jobs self-placement from 7pt scale/branching (JOBENV7P)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much 176 9.7 1) Scale 1 branching: Environment much more important 380 21.0 2) Scale 2 branching: Environment somewhat more important 280 15.5 3) Scale 3 branching: Other/depends/neither 658 36.4 4) Scale 4 branching: Jobs somewhat more important 155 8.6 5) Scale 5 branching: Jobs much more important 100 5.5 8) Don't know 47 2.6 9) Refused; NA 11 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 730) Where would you place Al Gore on this issue (jobs/environment scale)? [FTF interview] (GOREJEF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 803 44.4 1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living 132 7.3 2) 161 8.9 3) 171 9.5 4) 178 9.9 5) 79 4.4 6) 45 2.5 7) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment 22 1.2 8) Don't know 213 11.8 9) REFUSED 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 731) What about Al Gore? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? [Telephone interview] (GOREJEP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1007 55.7 1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living 461 25.5 5) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment 101 5.6 7) Other, it depends, neither 21 1.2 8) Don't know 215 11.9 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 732) If R says Gore thinks protecting environment is more important/If R says Gore thinks jobs and standard of living are more important: Telephone: Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/ Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? (GORESJE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1245 68.9 1) Much more important 324 17.9 5) Somewhat more important 234 12.9 8) Don't know 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 733) Summary: 5pt env/jobs Gore placement from branching series (GOREJE5P)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1007 55.7 1) Environment much more important 298 16.5 2) Environment somewhat more important 161 8.9 3) Other/depends/neither 21 1.2 4) Jobs somewhat more important 73 4.0 5) Jobs much more important 26 1.4 8) Don't know 219 12.1 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 734) Summary: 5pt env/jobs Gore placement from 7pt scale/branching (GOREJE7P)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Scale 1 branching: Environment much more important 430 23.8 2) Scale 2 branching: Environment somewhat more important 322 17.8 3) Scale 3 branching: Other/depends/neither 449 24.8 4) Scale 4 branching: Jobs somewhat more important 118 6.5 5) Scale 5 branching: Jobs much more important 48 2.7 8) Don't know 432 23.9 9) Refused 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 735) Where would you place George W. Bush on this issue (jobs/environment scale)? [FTF interview] (BUSHJEF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 803 44.4 1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living 23 1.3 2) 18 1.0 3) 73 4.0 4) 199 11.0 5) 209 11.6 6) 168 9.3 7) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment 63 3.5 8) Don't know 249 13.8 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 736) What about George W. Bush? Do you think he thinks it is important to protect the environment even if it costs some jobs, OR that protecting the environment is not as important as maintaining jobs and our standard of living? [Telephone interview] (BUSHJEP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1007 55.7 1) Protect environment, even if it costs job & standard of living 194 10.7 5) Jobs & standard of living more important than environment 327 18.1 7) Other, it depends, neither 39 2.2 8) Don't know 237 13.1 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 737) If R says Bush thinks protecting environment is more important/If R says Bush thinks jobs and standard of living are more important: Telephone: Does he think protecting the environment much more important (than maintaining jobs and standard of living) or only somewhat more important?/ Does he think maintaining jobs and standard of living much more important (than protecting the environment) or only somewhat more important? (BUSHSJE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1286 71.2 1) Much more important 242 13.4 5) Somewhat more important 273 15.1 8) Don't know 6 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 738) Summary: 5pt env/jobs Bush placement from branching series (BUSHJE5P)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1007 55.7 1) Environment much more important 78 4.3 2) Environment somewhat more important 114 6.3 3) Other/depends/neither 39 2.2 4) Jobs somewhat more important 159 8.8 5) Jobs much more important 164 9.1 8) Don't know 243 13.4 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 739) Summary: 5pt env/jobs Bush placement from 7pt scale/branching (BUSHJE7P)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Scale 1 branching: environment much more important 101 5.6 2) Scale 2 branching: environment somewhat more important 132 7.3 3) Scale 3 branching: Other/depends/neither 520 28.8 4) Scale 4 branching: Jobs somewhat more important 327 18.1 5) Scale 5 branching: Jobs much more important 227 12.6 8) Don't know 492 27.2 9) Refused 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 740) Do you think homosexuals should be allowed to serve in the United States Armed Forces or don't you think so? (GAYMLSUP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Homosexuals should be allowed to serve 1285 71.1 5) Homosexuals should not be allowed to serve 414 22.9 8) Don't know 86 4.8 9) Refused 19 1.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 741) If R says allow homosexuals to serve in armed forces: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should be allowed to serve? (GAYMLFAV)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 522 28.9 1) Strongly 871 48.2 5) Not strongly 410 22.7 8) Don't know 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Homosexuality, Attitude about ]
- 742) If R says do not allow homosexuals to serve in armed forces: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that homosexuals should not be allowed to serve? (GAYMLOPP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1393 77.1 1) Strongly 322 17.8 5) Not strongly 89 4.9 8) Don't know 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Homosexuality, Attitude about ]
- 743) Summary: Homosexuals in armed forces (GAYMLSUM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Strongly - Should be allowed to serve 871 48.2 2) Not strongly - Should be allowed to serve 410 22.7 4) Not strongly - Should not be allowed to serve 89 4.9 5) Strongly - Should not be allowed to serve 322 17.8 8) Don't know 93 5.1 9) Refused 19 1.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Homosexuality, Attitude about ]
- 744) Do you think the federal government should make it more difficult for people to buy a gun than it is now, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? (GUNSSUP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) More difficult 1060 58.7 3) Make it easier 75 4.2 5) Keep these rules about the same 659 36.5 8) Don't know 8 0.4 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 745) If R says gov't should make it more difficult to buy a gun: A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? (GUNSCRTL)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 747 41.3 1) A lot more difficult 861 47.6 5) Somewhat more difficult 199 11.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 746) If R says Gov't should make it easier to buy a gun: A lot easier or somewhat easier? (GUNFREE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1732 95.8 1) A lot easier 39 2.2 5) Somewhat easier 36 2.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 747) Summary: R position on gun restrictions (GUNSSUMM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) A lot more difficult 861 47.6 2) Somewhat more difficult 199 11.0 3) Keep rules about the same 659 36.5 4) Somewhat easier 36 2.0 5) A lot easier 39 2.2 8) Don't know 8 0.4 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 748) All gun restriction respondents: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? (GUNSIMP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Not at all important 37 2.0 2) Not too important 139 7.7 3) Somewhat important 461 25.5 4) Very important 716 39.6 5) Extremely important 448 24.8 8) Don't know 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 749) Where would you place Al Gore? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? (GOREGUNS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) More difficult 1139 63.0 3) Make it easier 19 1.1 5) Keep these rules about the same 350 19.4 8) Don't know 294 16.3 9) REFUSED 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 750) If R thinks Gore would like it easier to buy a gun/If R thinks Gore would like it more difficult to buy a gun: A lot easier or somewhat easier?/A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? (GOREGCT)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 649 35.9 1) A lot 718 39.7 5) Somewhat 437 24.2 8) Don't know 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 751) Summary: Gore position on gun restrictions (GOREGCTL)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) A lot more difficult 709 39.2 2) Somewhat more difficult 427 23.6 3) Keep rules about the same 350 19.4 4) Somewhat easier 10 0.6 5) A lot easier 9 0.5 8) Don't know 297 16.4 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 752) If R says Gore wants more difficult/easier to buy gun: If strength of Gore placement is not DON'T KNOW/REFUSED: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (GOREGCPL)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 652 36.1 1) Very certain 393 21.7 3) Pretty certain 542 30.0 5) Not very certain 219 12.1 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 753) Where would you place George W. Bush? Do you think he would like to make it more difficult for people to buy a gun, make it easier for people to buy a gun, or keep these rules about the same as they are now? (BUSHGUNS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) More difficult 375 20.8 3) Make it easier 315 17.4 5) Keep these rules about the same 806 44.6 8) Don't know 306 16.9 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 754) If R thinks G.W. Bush would like it easier to buy a gun/If R thinks G.W. Bush would like it more difficult to buy a gun: A lot easier or somewhat easier? A lot more difficult or somewhat more difficult? (BUSHGCT)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1117 61.8 1) A lot 318 17.6 5) Somewhat 370 20.5 8) Don't know 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 755) Summary: GW Bush position on gun restrictions (BUSHGCTL)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) A lot more difficult 182 10.1 2) Somewhat more difficult 193 10.7 3) Keep rules about the same 806 44.6 4) Somewhat easier 177 9.8 5) A lot easier 136 7.5 8) Don't know 308 17.0 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 756) If R says GW Bush wants more difficult/easier to buy gun: If strength of GW Bush placement is not DON'T KNOW/REFUSED: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (BUSHGCPL)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1119 61.9 1) Very certain 190 10.5 3) Pretty certain 318 17.6 5) Not very certain 180 10.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 757) If R selected for standard version: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school? (SCHVCHRS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 925 51.2 1) Favor school voucher program 424 23.5 5) Oppose school voucher program 394 21.8 8) Don't know 62 3.4 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 758) If R selected for experimental version: Do you favor or oppose a school voucher program that would allow parents to use tax funds to send their children to the school of their choice, even if it were a private school, or haven't you thought much about this? (SCHVCHRE)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 317 17.5 1) Favor school voucher program 332 18.4 5) Oppose school voucher program 259 14.3 8) Don't know 12 0.7 9) Refused; NA; INAP 887 49.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 759) Combined versions - school vouchers (SCHVCHRC)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 317 17.5 1) Favor school voucher program 756 41.8 5) Oppose school voucher program 653 36.1 8) Don't know 74 4.1 9) Refused; NA; INAP 7 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 760) If R favors school voucher program/If R opposes school voucher program: Do you favor/oppose a school voucher program strongly or not strongly? (SCHVCHRH)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1216 67.3 1) Strongly 439 24.3 5) Not strongly 152 8.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 761) Summary: R position on school vouchers (SCHVCHRU)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 317 17.5 1) Favor strongly 245 13.6 2) Favor not strongly 87 4.8 4) Oppose not strongly 65 3.6 5) Oppose strongly 194 10.7 8) Don't know 12 0.7 9) Refused; NA; INAP 887 49.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 762) Do you favor a law making English the official language of the United States, meaning government business would be conducted in English only, or do you oppose such a law? (ENGLOFFC)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Favor 1202 66.5 3) Neither favor nor oppose [Vol] 130 7.2 5) Oppose 446 24.7 8) Don't know 24 1.3 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 763) Some people say that the government in Washington should see to it that white and black children go to the same schools. Others claim that this is not the government's business. Have you been interested enough in this question to favor one side over the other? (SCHLINTG)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Yes 1195 66.1 5) No 580 32.1 8) Don't know 27 1.5 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 764) If R has opinion whether gov't see to black/white kids in same schools: Do you think the government in Washington should see to it that white and black children go to the same schools or stay out of this area as it is not the government's business? (SCHLINTO)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 612 33.9 1) See to it that white and black children go to the same school 596 33.0 5) Stay out of this area as it is not the government's business 531 29.4 7) Other; depends 56 3.1 8) Don't know 10 0.6 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 765) Do you think gay or lesbian couples, in other words, homosexual couples, should be legally permitted to adopt children? (GAYADOPT)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Yes 747 41.3 5) No 909 50.3 8) Don't know 126 7.0 9) Refused 22 1.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 766) Do you favor or oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder? (DTHPSUP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Favor 1240 68.6 5) Oppose 462 25.6 8) Don't know 87 4.8 9) Refused 15 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 767) If R favors death penalty for persons convicted of murder:(Do you favor the death penalty for persons convicted of murder) strongly or not strongly? (DTHPSTR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 567 31.4 1) Strongly 925 51.2 5) Not strongly 314 17.4 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Death Penalty, Morality of/View of ]
- 768) If R opposes death penalty for persons convicted of murder:(Do you oppose the death penalty for persons convicted of murder) strongly or not strongly? (DTHOPP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1345 74.4 1) Strongly 283 15.7 5) Not strongly 177 9.8 8) Don't know 1 0.1 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Death Penalty, Morality of/View of ]
- 769) Summary: R position on death penalty (DTHPSUM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Favor strongly 925 51.2 2) Favor not strongly 314 17.4 4) Oppose not strongly 177 9.8 5) Oppose strongly 283 15.7 8) Don't know 89 4.9 9) Refused 16 0.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Death Penalty, Morality of/View of ]
- 770) Checkpoint: Mode and version for women's equal role self-placement (CKPTWOM)
-
TOTAL % 1) FTF standard 520 28.8 2) FTF experimental 486 26.9 3) Phone version 1 382 21.1 4) Phone version 2 419 23.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 771) [If R selected for standard version: FTF: R self placement on equal role scale] Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? (FMQLFTF)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 18 1.0 1) Women and men should have equal roles 296 16.4 2) 80 4.4 3) 31 1.7 4) 44 2.4 5) 20 1.1 6) 14 0.8 7) A woman's place is in the home 16 0.9 8) Don't know 1 0.1 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1287 71.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 772) [If R selected for experimental version: FTF: R self placement on equal role scale] Where would you place yourself on this scale? (FMQLFTE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1323 73.2 1) Women and men should have equal roles 276 15.3 2) 62 3.4 3) 39 2.2 4) 60 3.3 5) 18 1.0 6) 9 0.5 7) A woman's place is in the home 13 0.7 8) Don't know 6 0.3 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Women's Roles, Attitudes about]
- 773) Combined FTF standard/experimental versions - women's role (FMQLFTC)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 18 1.0 1) Women and men should have equal roles 572 31.7 2) 142 7.9 3) 70 3.9 4) 104 5.8 5) 38 2.1 6) 23 1.3 7) A woman's place is in the home 29 1.6 8) Don't know 7 0.4 9) Refused; NA; INAP 804 44.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Women's Roles, Attitudes about]
- 774) Recently there has been a lot of talk about women's rights. Some people feel that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry, and government. Others feel that a woman's place is in the home. If R selected for version 1:Telephone: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? (FMQLST)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much 19 1.1 1) Women and men should have equal roles 328 18.2 5) A woman's place is in the home 18 1.0 7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol] 14 0.8 8) Don't know 3 0.2 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1425 78.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Women's Roles, Attitudes about ]
- 775) Recently there has been a lot of talk about women's rights. Some people feel that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry, and government. Others feel that a woman's place is in the home. If R selected for version 2: Telephone: Which is closer to the way you feel? (FMQLBRE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1389 76.9 1) Women and men should have equal roles 367 20.3 5) A woman's place is in the home 23 1.3 7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol] 24 1.3 8) Don't know 3 0.2 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Women's Roles, Attitudes about ]
- 776) Combined telephone versions - women's role (FMQLCPH)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much 19 1.1 1) Women and men should have equal roles 695 38.5 5) A woman's place is in the home 41 2.3 7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol] 38 2.1 8) Don't know 6 0.3 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1008 55.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Women's Roles, Attitudes about ]
- 777) Both telephone versions: If R says men and women should have equal roles/If R says a woman's place is in the home: Telephone: Do you feel strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles?/Do you feel strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? (FMQLSUP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1071 59.3 1) Strongly 680 37.6 5) Not strongly 55 3.0 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Women's Roles, Attitudes about ]
- 778) Summary: 5pt womens role self-placement from branching series (FMQL5PS)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much 19 1.1 1) Strongly - women equal role 652 36.1 2) Not strongly - equal role 42 2.3 3) Other/depends/neither 38 2.1 4) Not strongly - place is in the home 13 0.7 5) Strongly - place is in the home 28 1.5 8) Don't know 7 0.4 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1008 55.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank | View more questions about Women's Roles, Attitudes about ]
- 779) Summary: 5pt womens role self-placement from 7pt scale/branching (FMQL7PS)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much 37 2.0 1) Scale 1 branching: strongly - women equal role 1224 67.7 2) Scale 2 branching: not strongly - equal role 184 10.2 3) Scale 3 branching: other/depends/neither 250 13.8 4) Scale 4 branching: not strongly - place is in the home 36 2.0 5) Scale 5 branching: strongly - place is in the home 57 3.2 8) Don't know 14 0.8 9) Refused; NA; INAP 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 780) Gore-equal role scale FTF Where would you place Al Gore (on this issue)? (GOREFEQF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 803 44.4 1) Women and men should have equal roles 273 15.1 2) 185 10.2 3) 145 8.0 4) 127 7.0 5) 36 2.0 6) 24 1.3 7) A woman's place is in the home 19 1.1 8) Don't know 193 10.7 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 781) Telephone: What about Al Gore? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, or that a woman's place is in the home? (GOREFEQP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1007 55.7 1) Women and men should have equal roles 552 30.5 5) A woman's place is in the home 40 2.2 7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol] 19 1.1 8) Don't know 187 10.3 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 782) If R thinks Gore feels men and women should have equal roles/If R thinks Gore feels that a woman's place is in the home: Telephone: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal role?/Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? (GOREFEQS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1215 67.2 1) Strongly 506 28.0 5) Not strongly 78 4.3 8) Don't know 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 783) Summary: 5pt womens role Gore placement from branching series (GORE5FEQ)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1007 55.7 1) Strongly - women equal role 480 26.6 2) Not strongly - equal role 64 3.5 3) Other/depends/neither 19 1.1 4) Not strongly - place is in the home 14 0.8 5) Strongly - place is in the home 26 1.4 8) Don't know 195 10.8 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 784) Summary: 5pt womens role Gore placement from 7pt scale/branching (GORE7FEQ)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Scale 1 branching: Strongly - women equal role 753 41.7 2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - equal role 249 13.8 3) Scale 3 branching: Other/depends/neither 327 18.1 4) Scale 4 branching: Not strongly - place is in the home 38 2.1 5) Scale 5 branching: strongly - place is in the home 45 2.5 8) Don't know 388 21.5 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 785) Bush-equal role scale FTF Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? (BUSHFEQF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 803 44.4 1) Women and men should have equal roles 154 8.5 2) 99 5.5 3) 153 8.5 4) 172 9.5 5) 114 6.3 6) 60 3.3 7) A woman's place is in the home 30 1.7 8) Don't know 220 12.2 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 786) Telephone: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he feels that women should have an equal role with men in running business, industry and government, OR that a woman's place is in the home? (BUSHFEQP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1007 55.7 1) Women and men should have equal roles 440 24.3 5) A woman's place is in the home 112 6.2 7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol] 30 1.7 8) Don't know 216 12.0 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 787) If R thinks GW Bush feels men and women should have equal roles/If R thinks GW Bush feels that a woman's place is in the home: Telephone: Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that men and women should have equal roles?/Do you think he feels strongly or not strongly that a woman's place is in the home? (BUSHFEQS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1255 69.5 1) Strongly 412 22.8 5) Not strongly 133 7.4 8) Don't know 7 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 788) Summary: 5pt womens role Bush placement from branching series (BUSH5FEQ)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; FTF mode 1007 55.7 1) Strongly - women equal role 344 19.0 2) Not strongly - equal role 90 5.0 3) Other/depends/neither 30 1.7 4) Not strongly - place is in the home 43 2.4 5) Strongly - place is in the home 68 3.8 8) Don't know 223 12.3 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 789) Summary: 5pt womens role Bush placement from 7pt scale/branching (BUSH7FEQ)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Scale 1 branching: strongly - women equal role 498 27.6 2) Scale 2 branching: Not strongly - equal role 189 10.5 3) Scale 3 branching: Other/depends/neither 469 26.0 4) Scale 4 branching: Not strongly - place is in the home 103 5.7 5) Scale 5 branching: Strongly - place is in the home 98 5.4 8) Don't know 443 24.5 9) Refused 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 790) [FTF interview: R self placement on environmental regulation scale] Where would you place yourself on this scale, or haven't you thought much about this? (ENVREGSP)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 192 10.6 1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment 172 9.5 2) 149 8.2 3) 159 8.8 4) 167 9.2 5) 76 4.2 6) 48 2.7 7) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden 36 2.0 8) Don't know 5 0.3 9) Refused; NA; INAP 803 44.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 791) Some people think we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment. Others think that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business. Telephone interview: Which is closer to the way you feel, or haven't you thought much about this? (ENVRGBR)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about this 243 13.4 1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment 337 18.6 5) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden 132 7.3 7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol] 73 4.0 8) Don't know 11 0.6 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1011 55.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 792) If R thinks tougher regulation on business needed: Telephone: Do we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? (ENVRGINC)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1470 81.4 1) A lot 217 12.0 5) Somewhat 120 6.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 793) If R thinks regulations already too much burden: Telephone: Are regulations to protect the environment way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? (ENVRGBRD)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1675 92.7 1) Way too much 58 3.2 5) Somewhat 74 4.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 794) Summary: 5pt environment regulation self-placement from branching series (ENVRG5PS)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about it 243 13.4 1) Toughen regulations a lot 217 12.0 2) Toughen regulations a little 120 6.6 3) Other/depends/neither 73 4.0 4) Regulations somewhat of a burden 74 4.1 5) Regulations way too much burden 58 3.2 8) Don't know 11 0.6 9) Refused; NA; INAP 1011 55.9 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 795) Summary: 5pt environment regulation self-placement from 7pt scale/branching (ENVRG7PS)
-
TOTAL % 0) Haven't thought much about it 435 24.1 1) Scale 1 branching: toughen regulations a lot 389 21.5 2) Scale 2 branching: toughen regulations a little 269 14.9 3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: other/depends/neither 475 26.3 4) Scale 6 branching: regulations somewhat of a burden 122 6.8 5) Scale 7 branching: regulations way too much burden 94 5.2 8) Don't know 16 0.9 9) Refused; NA 7 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 796) All environmental regulation respondents: How important is this issue to you personally? Not at all important, not too important, somewhat important, very important, or extremely important? (ENVRGIMP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Not at all important 129 7.1 2) Not too important 223 12.3 3) Somewhat important 648 35.9 4) Very important 563 31.2 5) Extremely important 219 12.1 8) Don't know 21 1.2 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 797) [Gore placement-environmental regulation scale] Where would you place Al Gore on this issue? (GOREENV)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 803 44.4 1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment 153 8.5 2) 232 12.8 3) 178 9.9 4) 138 7.6 5) 45 2.5 6) 24 1.3 7) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden 10 0.6 8) Don't know 223 12.3 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 798) Telephone: What about Al Gore? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, OR that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? (GOREENVB)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1007 55.7 1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment 483 26.7 5) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden 71 3.9 7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol] 19 1.1 8) Don't know 225 12.5 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 799) If R thinks Gore feels tougher environmental regulation on business needed: Telephone: Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? (GOREERT)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1324 73.3 1) A lot 331 18.3 5) Somewhat 151 8.4 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 800) If R thinks Gore feels environment regulations already too much burden: Telephone: Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? (GOREERB)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1736 96.1 1) Way too much 7 0.4 5) Somewhat 64 3.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 801) Summary: 5pt environment regulation Gore placement from branching series (GOREE5PS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1007 55.7 1) Toughen regulations a lot 331 18.3 2) Toughen regulations a little 151 8.4 3) Other/depends/neither 19 1.1 4) Regulations somewhat of a burden 64 3.5 5) Regulations way too much burden 7 0.4 8) Don't know 226 12.5 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 802) Summary: 5pt environment regulation Gore placement from 7pt scale/branching (GOREE7PS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Scale 1 branching: Toughen regulations a lot 484 26.8 2) Scale 2 branching: Toughen regulations a little 383 21.2 3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: other/depends/neither 380 21.0 4) Scale 6 branching: regulations somewhat of a burden 88 4.9 5) Scale 7 branching: regulations way too much burden 17 0.9 8) Don't know 449 24.8 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 803) If R's placement of Gore is not DON'T KNOW or OTHER/DEPENDS/NEITHER: How certain are you of Al Gore's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (GORECRT)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 473 26.2 1) Very certain 420 23.2 3) Pretty certain 548 30.3 5) Not very certain 364 20.1 8) Don't know 1 0.1 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 804) (Bush placement-environmental regulation scale) FTF: Where would you place George W. Bush (on this issue)? (BUSHENV)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 803 44.4 1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment 26 1.4 2) 40 2.2 3) 93 5.1 4) 203 11.2 5) 182 10.1 6) 148 8.2 7) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden 63 3.5 8) Don't know 248 13.7 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 805) Telephone: What about George W. Bush? Do you think he believes we need much tougher government regulations on business in order to protect the environment, or that current regulations to protect the environment are already too much of a burden on business? (BUSHENVB)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1007 55.7 1) Tougher regulations on business needed to protect environment 159 8.8 5) Regulations to protect environment already too much a burden 355 19.6 7) Other, it depends, neither [Vol] 43 2.4 8) Don't know 241 13.3 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 806) If R thinks GW Bush feels tougher environment regulation on business needed: Telephone: Do you think he believes that we need to toughen regulations to protect the environment a lot, or just somewhat? (BUSHERT)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1648 91.2 1) A lot 68 3.8 5) Somewhat 91 5.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 807) If R thinks GW Bush feels environment regulations already too much burden: Telephone: Do you think he believes regulations to protect the environment are way too much of a burden on business or just somewhat of a burden? (BUSHERB)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1452 80.4 1) Way too much 136 7.5 5) Somewhat 216 12.0 8) Don't know 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 808) Summary: 5pt environment regulation Bush placement from branching series (BUSHE5PS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1007 55.7 1) Toughen regulations a lot 68 3.8 2) Toughen regulations a little 91 5.0 3) Other/depends/neither 43 2.4 4) Regulations somewhat of a burden 216 12.0 5) Regulations way too much burden 136 7.5 8) Don't know 244 13.5 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 809) Summary: 5pt environment regulation Bush placement from 7pt scale/branching (BUSHE7PS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Scale 1 branching: Toughen regulations a lot 94 5.2 2) Scale 2 branching: Toughen regulations a little 131 7.2 3) Scale 3,4,5 branching: Other/depends/neither 521 28.8 4) Scale 6 branching: Regulations somewhat of a burden 364 20.1 5) Scale 7 branching: Regulations way too much burden 199 11.0 8) Don't know 492 27.2 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 810) If R's placement of GW Bush is not DON'T KNOW or OTHER/DEPENDS/NEITHER: How certain are you of George W. Bush's position? Very certain, pretty certain, or not very certain? (BUSHECRT)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 541 29.9 1) Very certain 255 14.1 3) Pretty certain 570 31.5 5) Not very certain 440 24.3 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 811) So far as you know now, do you expect to vote in the national elections this coming November or not? (WILLVOTE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Yes 1547 85.6 5) No 230 12.7 8) Don't know 27 1.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 812) If R expects to vote in November election: Who do you think you will vote for in the election for President? (WHOVOTE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 260 14.4 1) Al Gore 740 41.0 2) George W. Bush 604 33.4 3) Pat Buchanan 5 0.3 4) Ralph Nader 41 2.3 5) None (if voter, will not vote for President) 3 0.2 7) Other 70 3.9 8) Don't know 63 3.5 9) Refused 21 1.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 813) If R expects to vote in November election: If intended presidential vote is not NONE or DON'T KNOW/REFUSED: Would you say that your preference for [Gore/Bush/Buchanan/other] is strong or not strong? (CANDPREF)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 347 19.2 1) Strong 1114 61.6 5) Not strong 339 18.8 8) Don't know 7 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 814) If Turnout intent is will not/don't know if will vote in November/if vote intent is to vote but not for President: If you were going to vote, who do you think you would vote for in the election for President? (WHOVOTEN)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1547 85.6 1) Al Gore 89 4.9 2) George W. Bush 104 5.8 3) Pat Buchanan 2 0.1 4) Ralph Nader 4 0.2 5) None (if voter, will not vote for President) [Vol] 33 1.8 7) Other 6 0.3 8) Don't know 19 1.1 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 815) If turnout intent is WILL NOT/DON'T KNOW if will vote in November/if vote intent is to vote but not for President: If R names presidential candidate he would vote for if voting: Would you say that your preference for [CANDIDATE NAMED] is strong or not strong? (CANDPRFN)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1602 88.7 1) Strong 105 5.8 5) Not strong 97 5.4 8) Don't know 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 816) After the November election, which party do you think will have the most members in the U.S. House of Representatives -- the Republicans or the Democrats? (PARTYHSE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Republicans 815 45.1 5) Democrats 604 33.4 8) Don't know 384 21.3 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 817) Again, after the November election, which party do you think will have the most members in the U.S. Senate, -- the Republicans or the Democrats? (PARTYSEN)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Republicans 814 45.0 5) Democrats 557 30.8 8) Don't know 430 23.8 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 818) Some people feel that if black people are not getting fair treatment in jobs, the government in Washington ought to see to it that they do. Others feel that this is not the federal government's business. Have you had enough interest in this question to favor one side over the other? (JOBINTST)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 3 0.2 1) Yes, have interest in question 1192 66.0 5) No, haven't had interest 585 32.4 8) Don't know 18 1.0 9) Refused 9 0.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 819) If R has had interest in issue of fair treatment in jobs: How do you feel? Should the government in Washington see to it that black people get fair treatment in jobs or is this not the federal government's business? (BLEQUAL)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 615 34.0 1) Government in Washington should see to it that black people 625 34.6 5) This is not the federal government's business 519 28.7 7) Other 46 2.5 8) Don't know 1 0.1 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 820) If R has had interest in issue of fair treatment in jobs: If R's position is to see to fair treatment/if R's position is not the federal government's business: Do you feel strongly or not strongly about that? (BLFEMP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 663 36.7 1) Strongly 951 52.6 5) Not strongly 192 10.6 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 821) Summary: R position on fair treatment in jobs (BLFEMPS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 588 32.5 1) Strongly – Gov't should see to fair treatment 524 29.0 2) Not strongly – Gov't should see to fair treatment 100 5.5 4) Not strongly - Not the government's business 92 5.1 5) Strongly - Not the government's business 427 23.6 7) Other 46 2.5 8) Don't know 20 1.1 9) Refused 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 822) Some people say that because of past discrimination, blacks should be given preference in hiring and promotion. Others say that such preference in hiring and promotion of blacks is wrong because it gives blacks advantages they haven't earned. What about your opinion -- are you for or against preferential hiring and promotion of blacks? (BLAFFIRM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 4 0.2 1) For preferential hiring and promotion of blacks 262 14.5 5) Against preferential hiring and promotion of blacks 1366 75.6 7) Other 94 5.2 8) Don't know 66 3.7 9) Refused 15 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 823) If R favors preference in hiring and promotion of blacks: Do you favor preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly? (BLAFFRMS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1545 85.5 1) Strongly 174 9.6 5) Not strongly 87 4.8 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 824) If R opposes preference in hiring and promotion of blacks: Do you oppose preference in hiring and promotion strongly or not strongly? (BLAFFRMA)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 441 24.4 1) Strongly 1021 56.5 5) Not strongly 342 18.9 8) Don't know 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 825) Summary: R position on affirmative action in jobs (BLAFFRSP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA 4 0.2 1) Favor strongly 174 9.6 2) Favor not strongly 87 4.8 4) Oppose not strongly 342 18.9 5) Oppose strongly 1021 56.5 7) Other 94 5.2 8) Don't know 70 3.9 9) Refused 15 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 826) As you know, Bill Clinton was first elected President in November 1992. He will soon be leaving office after 8 years as President. The next several questions ask whether you think things have changed since Clinton came into office. First, would you say that compared to 1992, the federal budget deficit is now smaller, larger, or about the same? (DEFICT92)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Gotten smaller 496 27.4 3) Gotten larger 126 7.0 5) Stayed about the same 203 11.2 8) Don't know 61 3.4 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 827) If R says the budget deficit is smaller than in 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much smaller or somewhat smaller? (DEFICTSM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1311 72.6 1) Much smaller 240 13.3 5) Somewhat smaller 248 13.7 8) Don't know 8 0.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 828) If R says the budget deficit is larger than in 1992: (Would you say that the budget deficit is) much larger or somewhat larger? (DEFICTLG)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1681 93.0 1) Much larger 44 2.4 5) Somewhat larger 78 4.3 8) Don't know 4 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 829) Summary: Budget deficit since 1992 (DEFICSUM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Much smaller 240 13.3 2) Somewhat smaller 248 13.7 3) About the same 203 11.2 4) Somewhat larger 78 4.3 5) Much larger 44 2.4 8) Don't know 73 4.0 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 830) Has federal spending on assistance to the poor been increased, decreased, or has it stayed about the same as in 1992? (POOR92)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Increased 339 18.8 3) Decreased 158 8.7 5) Stayed about the same 275 15.2 8) Don't know 114 6.3 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 831) If R says spending on poor has decreased since 1992/If R says spending on poor has increased since 1992: A lot or somewhat? (POORSP)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1310 72.5 1) A lot 130 7.2 5) Somewhat 362 20.0 8) Don't know 5 0.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 832) Summary: Federal assistance to the poor (POORSUM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Increases a lot 81 4.5 2) Increased somewhat 256 14.2 3) Stayed about the same 275 15.2 4) Decreased somewhat 106 5.9 5) Decreased a lot 49 2.7 8) Don't know 119 6.6 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 833) Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's economy is better, worse, or about the same? (ECON92)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Better 633 35.0 3) Worse 59 3.3 5) The same 185 10.2 8) Don't know 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 834) If R says nation's economy is better since 1992:(Would you say) much better or somewhat better? (ECONBTTR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1174 65.0 1) Much better 372 20.6 5) Somewhat better 261 14.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 835) If R says nation's economy is worse since 1992:(Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? (ECONWRSE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1748 96.7 1) Much worse 22 1.2 5) Somewhat worse 37 2.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 836) Summary: Economy since 1992 (ECONSUM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Much better 372 20.6 2) Somewhat better 261 14.4 3) About the same 185 10.2 4) Somewhat worse 37 2.0 5) Much worse 22 1.2 8) Don't know 10 0.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 837) Since 1992, would you say President Clinton has made the nation's economy better, made the economy worse, or had no effect on the economy one way or the other? (CLINECN)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Made the economy better 502 27.8 3) Made the economy worse 41 2.3 5) No effect 321 17.8 8) Don't know 23 1.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 838) If R says Clinton has made economy better since 1992: Much better or somewhat better? (CLINECO)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1305 72.2 1) Much better 242 13.4 5) Somewhat better 260 14.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 839) If R says Clinton has made economy worse since 1992: Much worse or somewhat worse? (CLINEC)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1766 97.7 1) Much worse 15 0.8 5) Somewhat worse 26 1.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 840) Summary: Clinton effect on economy (CLINECSM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Much better 242 13.4 2) Somewhat better 260 14.4 3) No effect 321 17.8 4) Somewhat worse 26 1.4 5) Much worse 15 0.8 8) Don't know 23 1.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 841) Have you personally been helped or have you been hurt economically by the Clinton Administration, or hasn't it affected you one way or the other? (CLINPERS)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Helped 189 10.5 3) Hurt 75 4.2 5) Not affected 608 33.6 8) Don't know 15 0.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 842) Would you say that compared to 1992, the United States is more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't this changed very much? (SECURE92)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) More secure 215 11.9 3) Less secure 261 14.4 5) No change 379 21.0 8) Don't know 32 1.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 843) If R says U.S. more secure from enemies since 1992: (Would you say) much more secure or somewhat more secure? (SECURP92)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1592 88.1 1) Much more secure 71 3.9 5) Somewhat more secure 144 8.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 844) If R says U.S. less secure from enemies since 1992: (Would you say) much less secure or somewhat less secure? (SECURN92)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1546 85.6 1) Much less secure 107 5.9 5) Somewhat less secure 153 8.5 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 845) Summary: U.S. security from foreign enemies (SECURSM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Much more secure 71 3.9 2) Somewhat more secure 144 8.0 3) Not changed very much 379 21.0 4) Somewhat less secure 153 8.5 5) Much less secure 107 5.9 8) Don't know 33 1.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 846) Would you say that Clinton Administration has made the United States more secure from its foreign enemies, less secure, or hasn't it made much difference either way? (CLINSEC)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) More secure 192 10.6 3) Less secure 218 12.1 5) No change 449 24.8 8) Don't know 28 1.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 847) If R says Clinton Administration made U.S. more secure: Much more secure or somewhat more secure? (CLINPSEC)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1615 89.4 1) Much more secure 73 4.0 5) Somewhat more secure 119 6.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 848) If R says Clinton Administration made U.S. less secure: Much less secure or somewhat less secure? (CLINNSEC)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1589 87.9 1) Much less secure 99 5.5 5) Somewhat less secure 119 6.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 849) Summary: Clinton Administration effect on U.S. security (CLINSCSU)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Much more secure 73 4.0 2) Somewhat more secure 119 6.6 3) Hasn't made much difference 449 24.8 4) Somewhat less secure 119 6.6 5) Much less secure 99 5.5 8) Don't know 28 1.5 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 850) Would you say that compared to 1992 the nation's crime rate has gotten better, gotten worse, or stayed about the same? (CRIMRATE)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Better 327 18.1 3) Worse 276 15.3 5) The same 260 14.4 8) Don't know 24 1.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 851) If R says U.S. crime rate has gotten better since 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? (CRIMEP92)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1480 81.9 1) Much better 82 4.5 5) Somewhat better 244 13.5 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 852) If R says U.S. crime rate has gotten worse since 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? (CRIMEN92)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1531 84.7 1) Much worse 138 7.6 5) Somewhat worse 138 7.6 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 853) Summary: U.S. crime rate since 1992 (CRIMSUMM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Much better 82 4.5 2) Somewhat better 244 13.5 3) Stayed about the same 260 14.4 4) Somewhat worse 138 7.6 5) Much worse 138 7.6 8) Don't know 25 1.4 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 854) Would you say that Clinton Administration has made the nation's crime rate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? (CLINCRIM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Better 234 12.9 3) Worse 72 4.0 5) No difference 543 30.0 8) Don't know 38 2.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 855) If R says Clinton Administration made U.S. crime rate better: Much better or somewhat better? (CLINPCRM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1573 87.1 1) Much better 72 4.0 5) Somewhat better 161 8.9 8) Don't know 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 856) If R says Clinton Administration made U.S. crime rate worse: Much worse or somewhat worse? (CLINNCRM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1735 96.0 1) Much worse 36 2.0 5) Somewhat worse 36 2.0 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 857) Summary: Effect of Clinton Administration on crime rate (CLINCRSM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Much better 72 4.0 2) Somewhat better 161 8.9 3) Hasn't made much difference 543 30.0 4) Somewhat worse 36 2.0 5) Much worse 36 2.0 8) Don't know 39 2.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 858) Would you say that compared to 1992, the nation's moral climate has gotten better, stayed about the same, or gotten worse? (MORLCLIM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Better 87 4.8 3) Worse 470 26.0 5) The same 314 17.4 8) Don't know 15 0.8 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 859) If R says moral climate is better since 1992: (Would you say) much better or somewhat better? (MORALP92)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1720 95.2 1) Much better 28 1.5 5) Somewhat better 59 3.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 860) If R says moral climate is worse since 1992: (Would you say) much worse or somewhat worse? (MORALN92)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1337 74.0 1) Much worse 260 14.4 5) Somewhat worse 209 11.6 9) Refused 1 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 861) Summary: U.S. moral climate since 1992 (MORALSUM)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Much better 28 1.5 2) Somewhat better 59 3.3 3) Stayed about the same 314 17.4 4) Somewhat worse 209 11.6 5) Much worse 260 14.4 8) Don't know 15 0.8 9) Refused 2 0.1 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 862) Has the Clinton Administration made the nation's moral climate better, worse, or hasn't it made much difference either way? (CLINMORL)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Better 65 3.6 3) Worse 373 20.6 5) No difference 425 23.5 8) Don't know 21 1.2 9) Refused 3 0.2 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 863) If R says Clinton Administration made moral climate better: Much better or somewhat better? (CLINPMOR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1742 96.4 1) Much better 23 1.3 5) Somewhat better 42 2.3 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 864) If R says Clinton Administration made moral climate worse: Much worse or somewhat worse? (CLINNMOR)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 1434 79.4 1) Much worse 214 11.8 5) Somewhat worse 159 8.8 TOTAL 1807 100.0 - [ Analyze results | Add to Question Bank | View Question Bank ]
- 865) Summary: Effect of Clinton Administration on moral climate (CLINMORU)
-
TOTAL % 0) NA; INAP 920 50.9 1) Much better 23 1.3 2) Somewhat better 42 2.3 3) Hasn't made much difference 425 23.5 4) Somewhat worse 159 8.8 5) Much worse 214 11.8 8) Don't know 21 1.2 9) Refused 3 0.2
American National Election Studies, 2000
Data Archive > U.S. Surveys > General Population > National > National Election Studies > Codebook